Ventriculostomy for acute hydrocephalus in critically ill patients on the ICU--outcome analysis of two different procedures

The Technique for Transorbital Ventricular Puncture: An Anatomic Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Transorbital ventricular puncture is a minimally invasive described procedure with poor landmarks and anatomic references. This approach can be easily performed to save patients with intracranial hypertension, especially when it is secondary to an acute decompensated hydrocephalus. This study aims to describe anatomic structures and landmarks to facilitate the execution of transorbital puncture in emergency cases.

METHODS

We analyzed 120 head computed tomographies to show the best area to perform the procedure in the orbital roof. Two adult cadavers (4 sides) were punctured in the predetermined area. Angles, distances, landmarks, and anatomic structures were registered. This approach to the ventricular system may be performed at bedside to relieve intracranial hypertension only in specific cases.

RESULTS

The perforation point is 2.5 cm (female) or 3.0 cm (male) lateral to the midline and immediately inferior to the superciliary arch. A vertical line, parallel to midline, was drawn on the outer edge of the patient's forehead, the needle was 45° inferiorly and 20° medially and then progressed 2.0 cm backwards to reach the bone perforation point. After that, it was advanced another 4.5cm approximately until it reached the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle.

CONCLUSION

Based on statistical and experimental evidences, we were able to establish reliable anatomic reference points to access the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle through transorbital puncture.

Accuracy of bolt external ventricular drain insertion by neurosurgeons of different experience

OBJECTIVE

The accuracy of tunneled external ventricular drain (EVD) placement has been shown to be similar among practitioners of varying experience, but this has not yet been investigated for bolt EVDs. Tunneled and bolt EVDs are distinct techniques, and it is unclear if conclusions regarding accuracy can be inferred from one method to the other. The goal of this study was to determine whether neurosurgical experience influences the accuracy of bolt EVD placement.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of accuracy of bolt EVD placement between 1st December 2018 and 31st May 2020, comparing the accuracy outcomes between three levels of training (junior trainees (JT); mid-grade trainees (MT); senior trainees/fellows (ST)). Accuracy was determined radiologically by two methods: Kakarla grade and by measuring the distance of the catheter tip to its optimal position (DTOP) at the foramen of Monro.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients underwent insertion of bolt EVDs, of which n = 19 by JT, n = 40 by MT and n = 28 by ST, with a significant difference found between training grades in the median Kakarla grade (p = 0.0055) and in the accuracy of placement as per DTOP (p = 0.0168).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to previous published results on tunneled EVDs, we demonstrate that the accuracy of bolt EVD placement is dependent on neurosurgical experience. Our results draw awareness to the fact that the bolt EVD technique can represent a challenge for less experienced practitioners and underline the importance of dedicated training to support the safe insertion of bolt ventricular catheters.

Neuronavigation-assisted bedside placement of bolt external ventricular drains in the intensive care setting: a technical note

BACKGROUND

The insertion of bolt external ventricular drains (EVD) on the intensive care unit (ICU) has enabled rapid cranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. However, bolt EVDs tend to be perceived as a more challenging technique, particularly when dealing with small ventricles or when there is midline shift distorting the ventricular morphology. Furthermore, if neuronavigation guidance is felt to be necessary, this usually assumes a transfer to an operating theatre. In this technical note, we describe the use of electromagnetic neuronavigation for bolt EVD insertion on the ICU and assess the protocol's feasibility and accuracy.

METHODS

Case series of neuronavigation-assisted bolt EVD insertion in ICU setting, using Medtronic Flat Emitter for StealthStation EM.

RESULTS

Neuronavigation-guided bolt EVDs were placed at the bedside in n = 5 patients on ICU. Their widest frontal ventricular horn diameter in the coronal plane ranged from 11 to 20 mm. No procedural complications were encountered. Post-procedural CT confirmed the optimal placement of the EVDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Electromagnetic neuronavigation is feasible at the ICU bedside and can assist the insertion of bolt EVDs in this setting. The preference for a bolt EVD to be inserted in ICU-as is standard practice at this unit-should not prohibit patients from benefitting from image guidance if required.

Craniometrics and Ventricular Access: A Review of Kocher's, Kaufman's, Paine's, Menovksy's, Tubbs’, Keen's, Frazier's, Dandy's, and Sanchez's Points

Intraventricular access is frequently required during neurosurgery, and when neuronavigation is unavailable, the neurosurgeon must rely upon craniometrics to achieve successful ventricular cannulation. In this historical review, we summarize the most well-described ventricular access points: Kocher's, Kaufman's, Paine's, Menovksy's, Tubbs’, Keen's, Frazier's, Dandy's, and Sanchez's. Additionally, we provide multiview, 3-dimensional illustrations that provide the reader with a novel understanding of the craniometrics associated with each point.

Safety, Accuracy, and Cost Effectiveness of Bedside Bolt External Ventricular Drains (EVDs) in Comparison with Tunneled EVDs Inserted in Theaters

OBJECTIVES

External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is required frequently in neurosurgical patients to divert cerebrospinal fluid and monitor intracranial pressure. The usual practice is the tunneled EVD technique performed in operating theaters. EVD insertion through a bolt in intensive care also is described. We employ both practices in our institute. Herein, we compare the indications, accuracy, safety, and costs of the 2 techniques.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained EVD database of all patients undergoing first frontal EVD placement between January 2010 and December 2015. Those patients with preceding cerebrospinal fluid infection were excluded. We compared bolt EVD with tunneled EVD techniques in terms of accuracy of EVD tip location by analyzing computed tomography scans to grade catheter tip location as optimal (ipsilateral frontal horn) or otherwise suboptimal, and complications that include infection and revision rates.

RESULTS

In total, 579 eligible patients aged 3 months to 84 years were identified; 430 had tunneled EVDs and 149 bolt EVDs. The most frequent diagnosis was intracranial hemorrhage (73% bolt vs. 50.4% tunneled group; P < 0.001). Other diagnoses included tumor (4.7% bolt vs. 19.1% tunneled; P < 0.001) and traumatic brain injury (17.5% bolt vs. 17.4% tunneled). In the bolt EVD group 66.4% of EVD tips were optimal, compared with 61.0% in the tunneled group (P = 0.33). Infection was confirmed in 15 (10.0%) bolt EVDs compared with 61 (14.2%) tunneled EVDs (P = 0.2). Each bolt EVD kit costs £260, whereas placing a tunneled one in the theater costs £1316.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside bolt EVD placement is safe, accurate, and cost effective in selective patients with hemorrhage-related hydrocephalus.

The Aalborg Bolt-Connected Drain (ABCD) study: a prospective comparison of tunnelled and bolt-connected external ventricular drains

BACKGROUND

Acutely increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is frequently managed by external ventricular drainage (EVD). This procedure is life-saving but marred by a high incidence of complications. It has recently been indicated that bolt-connected external ventricular drainage (BC-EVD) compared to the standard technique of tunnelled EVD (T-EVD) may result in less complications.

AIM

To prospectively sample and compare two cohorts by consecutive allocation to either BC-EVD or T-EVD from the introduction of the BC-EVD technique in our department and 12 months onward.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ventriculostomy between the 1st of March 2017 and the 28th of February 2018 were considered for inclusion. The neurosurgeon on-call sovereignly set the indication and decided on EVD type (BC-EVD or T-EVD), consequently resulting in two cohorts as 3/7 senior neurosurgeons on call were open to the use of BC-EVD, while 4/7 were reluctant to use this technique. Data was continuously collected using patient records, including results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culturing and available CT/MRI-scans. Recorded complications included CSF leakage, accidental discontinuation, placement-related intracranial haemorrhage, malfunction, migration, infection and revision.

RESULTS

Forty-nine EVDs (32 T-EVDs/17 BC-EVDs) were included; 19/32 (59.4%) T-EVDs and 3/17 (17.6%) BC-EVDs were found to have complications (p = 0.007). The relative risk of complications when using T-EVD was 3.4 times that of BC-EVD.

CONCLUSION

Ventriculostomy by BC-EVD compared to T-EVD reduces incidence and risk of complications and should be the first choice in EVD placement. That said, T-EVD has a role in paediatric patients and for intraoperatively and occipitally placed EVDs.

Current practice of external ventricular drainage: a survey among neurosurgical departments in Germany

BACKGROUND

There are various recommendations, but no generally accepted guidelines, to reduce the risk of external ventricular drainage (EVD)-associated infections. The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate the current practice of EVD in a European country and to set the results in perspective to published data.

METHOD

A standardised questionnaire prepared by the Commission of Technical Standards and Norms of the German Society of Neurosurgery was sent to 127 neurosurgical units in Germany.

RESULTS

Data were analysed from 99 out of 127 neurosurgical units which had been contacted. Overall, more than 10,000 EVD procedures appear to be performed in Germany annually. There is disagreement about the location where the EVD is inserted, and most EVDs are still inserted in the operation theatre. Most units apply subcutaneous tunnelling. Impregnated EVD catheters are used regularly in only about 20 % of units. Single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis is given in more than half of the units, while continued antibiotic prophylaxis is installed in only 15/99 units at a regular basis. There are discrepancies in the management of prolonged EVD use with regard to replacement policies. Regular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling is still performed widely. There were no statistical differences in policies with regard to academic versus non-academic units.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey clearly shows that some newer recommendations drawn from published studies penetrate much slower into clinical routine, such as the use of impregnated catheters, for example. It remains unclear how different policies actually impact quality and outcome in daily routine.

A meta-analysis of ventriculostomy-associated cerebrospinal fluid infections

BACKGROUND

Ventriculostomy insertion is a common neurosurgical intervention and can be complicated by ventriculostomy-associated cerebrospinal fluid infection (VAI) which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis was aimed at determining the pooled incidence rate (number per 1000 catheter-days) of VAI.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE and from reference searching of included studies and recent review articles on relevant topics. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess quality and risk of bias. A random effects model was used to pool individual study estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the exact Poisson method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the heterogeneity χ2 and I-squared tests. Subgroup analyses were performed and a funnel plot constructed to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

There were a total of 35 studies which yielded 752 infections from 66,706 catheter-days of observation. The overall pooled incidence rate of VAI was 11.4 per 1000 catheter days (95% CI 9.3 to 13.5), for high quality studies the rate was 10.6 (95% CI 8.3 to 13) and 13.5 (95% CI 8.9 to 18.1) for low quality studies. Studies which had mean duration of EVD treatment of less than 7 days had a pooled VAI rate of 19.6 per 1000 catheter-days, those with mean duration of 7-10 days had VAI rate of 12.8 per 1000 catheter-days and those with mean duration greater than 10 days had VAI rate of 8 per 1000 catheter-days. There was significant heterogeneity for the primary outcome (p = 0.004, I-squared = 44%) and most subgroups. The funnel plot did not show evidence for publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of VAI is 11.4 per 1000 catheter-days. Further research should focus on analysis of risk factors for VAI and techniques for reducing the rate of VAI.