Review of radiation therapy services for neurofibromatosis (NF2) patients in England

Reliability and toxicity of bevacizumab for neurofibromatosis type 2-related vestibular schwannomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab is currently the only drug used clinically for neurofibromatosis type 2-related vestibular schwannomas (NF2-VS). Though benefits have been demonstrated in several cases, the standardized dosage remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Our meta-analysis was performed to systematically and comprehensively investigate the reliability and toxicity of bevacizumab in the treatment of NF2-VS, with particular emphasis on the impact of dosage.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted for studies providing data on patients treated with bevacizumab for NF2-VS across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until December 31, 2020. Two reviewers extracted the incidence rate of results independently. Then we calculated and pooled unadjusted incidence rate with 95% CIs for each study. The subgroups analyzed were conducted.

RESULTS

Fourteen citations (prospective or retrospective observational cohort studies) were eligible based on data from a total of 247 patients with NF2 and 332 related VSs. The pooled results showed that the radiographic response rate (RRR) was 30% [95% CI (20%-42%)], the hearing response rate (HRR) was 32% [95% CI (21%-45%)]. The incidence of major complications was: hypertension 29% [95% CI (23%-35%)], proteinuria 30% [95% CI (18%-44%)], menstrual disorders 44% [95% CI (16%-73%)], hemorrhage 14% [95% CI (4%-26%)], grade3/4 events 12% [95% CI (4%-22%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-third of NF2-VS patients may benefit significantly from bevacizumab due to hearing improvement and tumor reduction. Menstrual disorders were the most common adverse events. The high-dose regimen didn't show better efficacy, but results varied considerably according to age.

Surgical Outcome of Trigeminal Schwannomas

Simple Summary

Trigeminal schwannomas are the most common among non-vestibular schwannomas. Treatment of trigeminal schwannomas may be challenging due to critical anatomical relations and involvement of different aspects of the skull base. Advances in microsurgery have led to improved outcomes over the last decades, whereas in contrast, some advocate stereotactic radiotherapy as an effective therapy, controlling the tumor volume with few complications. In this manuscript, we present outcome and adverse events in a contemporary cohort of trigeminal schwannomas and discuss surgical advantages and disadvantages of different performed classic skull-base approaches.

Abstract

(1) Background: As resection of trigeminal schwannomas is challenging, due to anatomical involvement of the anterior, middle and posterior fossa, the appropriate approach is important. We report our experience with surgical resection of trigeminal schwannomas by simple and classic skull-base approaches. (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study including patients who underwent surgery for trigeminal schwannoma tumors between June 2007 and May 2020, concentrating on surgical technique, extent of resection, postoperative outcome and complications. (3) Results: We included 13 patients (median age 57.5 with range of 36-83 years, 53.8% (7/13) female. The most common preoperative clinical presentations were facial pain in six (46.2%), hypoacusis in four (30.8%), trigeminal nerve hypesthesia in 11 (V1 46.2% (6/13), V2 (61.5% (8/13), V3 46.2% (6/13)) and headache in three (23.1%) patients. In three cases, the tumor was resected in a two-stage technique. The intradural subtemporal approach was performed in six cases, the extradural technique in two cases, the retrosigmoid approach in five cases, a Kawase approach in two cases and the transnasal endoscopic approach in one case. The gross total resection rate was 76.9% (10/13) and the median follow-up time 24.0 (0–136) months. Three (23.1%) patients developed postoperative anesthesia in at least one branch of the trigeminal nerve. Trigeminal motor function was preserved in 11 (84.6%) patients. Ten of the 11 patients (76.9%) who reported decreased gustation, cerebellar ataxia, visual impairment, or headache improved postoperatively. Two (15.4%) patients exhibited minimal facial palsy (House and Brackmann II–III), which resolved during the follow-up. The total adverse event rate requiring surgical intervention during follow-up was 7.7%. Surgery-related mortality was 0%. (4) Conclusions: Trigeminal schwannomas are rare benign lesions with intra- and extracranial extension. Considering the low operative morbidity and satisfying functional outcome, gross total resection of trigeminal schwannomas is achievable by classic, but also individually tailored approaches. More invasive or combined techniques were not needed with meticulous surgical planning.

A Review of Drug Therapy in Vestibular Schwannoma

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs, also known as acoustic neuromas) are benign intracranial tumors commonly managed with observation, surgery, and radiotherapy. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for VS patients, which is why we conducted a detailed search of relevant literature from PubMed and Web of Science to explore recent advances and experiences in drug therapy. VSs feature a long course of disease that requires treatment to have minimal long-term side effects. Conventional chemotherapeutic agents are characterized by neurotoxicity or ototoxicity, poor effect on slow-growing tumors, and may induce new mutations in patients who have lost tumor suppressor function, and therefore are unsuitable for treating VSs. Along with the well-investigated molecular pathophysiology of VS and the increasingly accessible technology such as drug repositioning platform, many molecular targeted inhibitors have been identified and shown certain therapeutic effects in preclinical experiments or clinical trials.

Therapy of Sporadic and NF2-Related Vestibular Schwannoma

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a benign primary brain tumor that occurs sporadic or as part of a genetic syndrome. The most common cause is the mutation of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene that is involved in the production of the protein merlin. Merlin plays a role in cell growth and cell adhesion. In patients with NF2, the VSs arise bilaterally and coincide with other brain tumors. In sporadic VS, the tumor is typically unilateral and does not coincide in combination with other tumors. MRI is the standard imaging technique and can be used to assess the size and aspect of the tumor as well as the progression of disease. The preferred management of large VS in both VS types is surgery with or without adjuvant radiation. The management for the medium- or small-sized VS includes wait and scan, radiotherapy and/or surgery. This choice depends on the preference of the patient and institutional protocols. The outcomes of surgical and radiotherapy treatments are improving due to progress in surgical equipment/approaches, advances in radiation delivery techniques and dose optimizations protocols. The main purpose of the management of VS is preserving function as long as possible in combination with tumor control.

Intra-Orbital Meningioma Causing Loss of Vision in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Case Series and Management Considerations

Objectives: Little evidence exists regarding the management of orbital meningioma causing vision loss in the setting of neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2). We review here our experience with patients at risk for blindness due to intra-orbital meningioma. Design/Setting/Participants/Main Outcome Measures: The charts of patients with NF2 presenting for evaluation of intra-orbital meningioma and vision impairment between 2008 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed in accordance with institutional IRB policies. Patients with primarily extra-orbital tumors and minimal intra-orbital extension were excluded. Charts were analyzed for the presence and/or imaging progression of intra-orbital tumor, presence of other optic apparatus pathology, presence and/ or progression of vision impairment, and intervention performed (if any). Results: Seven patients with intra-orbital meningioma on MRI and bilateral vision loss and/or unilateral visual impairment due to tumor and contralateral blindness of any etiology were identified. Patients without salvageable vision in either eye were excluded (n = 3). Diagnosis of meningioma was obtained either by biopsy or based on imaging assessment. Conclusion: Conservative management of orbital tumors in NF2 may be preferred in asymptomatic patients but may not be acceptable in patients with progressive visual decline. Radiation is a reasonable option for meningiomas of the orbit and optic nerve sheath. Finally, although the benefit of cranial nerve decompression in NF2 for preservation of facial nerve and hearing has previously been established, the role of optic nerve decompression for preservation of vision in NF2 remains poorly defined.

The Solid Component of Radiographically Non-Growing, Post-Radiated Vestibular Schwannoma Retains Proliferative Capacity: Implications for Patient Counseling

OBJECTIVE

Nearly all radiated vestibular schwannomas (VS) have solid tissue remaining at the radiation bed. The viability and proliferation capacity of this tissue has never been objectively assessed. The goals of our study were to (1) determine whether this tissue retains the morphological and immunohistochemical features of VS and (2) evaluate whether the tissue is capable of proliferation in cell culture.

METHODS

Case history, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cell culture, histology, and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We report the first case of a post-radiated, sporadic VS patient whose non-growing, residual MR-enhancing solid tissue was examined histologically and in cell culture. These cells were architecturally identical to non-radiated VS, had a Ki67 proliferative index similar to non-radiated sporadic and NF2-associated VS, were S100 positive, and grew in culture with kinetics comparable to non-radiated VS.

CONCLUSION

The long-term risk for delayed tumor growth and/or secondary malignancy in radiated VS patients is unknown. Because the average life span in the United States is nearly 80 years, patients should be informed that (1) residual VS cells are viable even when tumors appear to be non-growing on MRI, (2) post-radiation surveillance imaging is required indefinitely, and (3) radiation may incur more risk in those patients with life expectancy>20-25 years.