Time course of neuroprotection induced by normobaric hyperoxia and NCX1 expression

Efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) based on existing evidence.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search through April 15, 2023, of seven major databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjunctive hyperbaric HBOT with non-HBOT (no HBOT or sham HBOT) treatments for AIS. Data extraction and assessment were independently performed by two researchers. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analysis was conducted using Rev Man 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies involving 493 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences between HBOT and the control group in terms of NIHSS score (MD = -1.41, 95%CI = -7.41 to 4.58), Barthel index (MD = 8.85, 95%CI = -5.84 to 23.54), TNF-α (MD = -5.78, 95%CI = -19.93 to 8.36), sICAM (MD = -308.47, 95%CI = -844.13 to 13227.19), sVCAM (MD = -122.84, 95%CI = -728.26 to 482.58), sE-selectin (MD = 0.11, 95%CI = -21.86 to 22.08), CRP (MD = -5.76, 95%CI = -15.02 to 3.51), adverse event incidence within ≤ 6 months of follow-up (OR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.25 to 3.79). However, HBOT showed significant improvement in modified Rankin score (MD = 0.10, 95%CI = 0.03 to 0.17), and adverse event incidence at the end of treatment (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.19 to 0.94) compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

While our findings do not support the routine use of HBOT for improving clinical outcomes in AIS, further research is needed to explore its potential efficacy within specific therapeutic windows and for different cerebral occlusion scenarios. Therefore, the possibility of HBOT offering clinical benefits for AIS cannot be entirely ruled out.

Normobaric hyperoxia therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A literature review

Background

Ischemic stroke is one of the most severe cerebrovascular diseases that leads to disability and death and seriously endangers health and quality of life. Insufficient oxygen supply is a critical factor leading to ischemic brain injury. However, effective therapies for ischemic stroke are lacking. Oxygen therapy has been shown to increase oxygen supply to ischemic tissues and improve prognosis after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. Normobaric hyperoxia (NBHO) has been shown to have neuroprotective effects during ischemic stroke and is considered an appropriate neuroprotective therapy for ischemic stroke. Evidence indicates that NBHO plays a neuroprotective role through different mechanisms in acute ischemic stroke. Recent studies have also reported that combinations with other drug therapies can enhance the efficacy of NBHO in ischemic stroke. Here, we aimed to provide a summary of the potential mechanisms underlying the use of NBHO in ischemic stroke and an overview of the benefits of NBHO in ischemic stroke.

Methods

We screened 83 articles on PubMed and other websites. A quick review was conducted, including clinical trials, animal trials, and reviews of studies in the field of NBHO treatment published before July 1, 2023. The results were described and synthesized, and the bias risk and evidence quality of all included studies were assessed.

Results

The results were divided into four categories: the mechanism of NBHO, animal and clinical trials of NBHO, the clinical application and prospects of NBHO, and adverse reactions of NBHO.

Conclusion

NBHO is a simple, non-invasive therapy that may be delivered early after stroke onset, with promising potential for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains uncertain. Further studies are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.

The effect of normobaric oxygen in patients with acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Normobaric oxygen (NBO) has received considerable attention due to controversial data in brain protection in patients with acute stroke. This study aims to analyze current data of NBO on brain protection as used in the clinic. Methods We searched for and reviewed relevant articles and references from Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Clincialtrials.gov that were published prior to October 2017. Data from prospective studies were processed using RevMan5.0 software, provided by Cochrane collaboration and transformed using relevant formulas. Results A total of 11 prospective RCT studies including 6366 patients with acute stroke (NBO group, 3207; control group, 3159) were enrolled in this analysis. △NIHSS represented the values of NIHSS at 4, 24 h, or 7 days post-stroke minus baseline NIHSS. Compared to controls, there was a minor trend toward NBO benefits in short-term prognostic indices, as indicated by decreased ΔNIHSS at our defined time points. By contrast, NBO decreased Barthel Index scores between 3 and 7 months, and increased death rates at 3, 6 months, and 1 year, whereas, modified Rankin Scale scores between 3 and 6 months were unchanged. Conclusions The existing trends toward benefits revealed in this meta-analysis help us appreciate the promising value of NBO, although current evidence of NBO on improving clinical outcomes of stroke is insufficient. Well-designed multi-center clinical trials are encouraged and urgently needed to further explore the efficacy of NBO on brain protection.