Comparison of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide with Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Meta-analysis

Saudi Arabia Guidelines for diabetic macular edema: A consensus of the Saudi Retina Group

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications are major public health burdens in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is 19.7% and the prevalence of diabetic macular edema (DME) is 5.7% in Saudi Arabia. Diabetic macular edema is a vision-threatening complication of DR and a major cause of vision loss worldwide. Ocular treatments include retinal laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, intravitreal corticosteroids, and vitreoretinal surgery when necessary. The present consensus was developed as a part of the Saudi Retina Group's efforts to generate Saudi guidelines and consensus for the management of DME, including recommendations for its diagnosis, treatment, and best practice. The experts' panel stipulates that the treatment algorithm should be categorized according to the presence of central macula involvement. In patients with no central macular involvement, laser photocoagulation is recommended as the first-line option. Patients with central macular involvement and no recent history of cardiovascular (CVS) or cerebrovascular disorders can be offered anti-VEGF agents as the first-line option. In the case of non-responders (defined as an improvement of <20% in optical coherence tomography or a gain of fewer than 5 letters in vision), switching to another anti-VEGF agent or steroids should be considered after 3 injections. Within the class of steroids, dexamethasone implants are recommended as the first choice. In patients with a recent history of CVS events, the use of anti-VEGF agents is not recommended, regardless of their lens status. The experts' panel recommends that a future study be conducted to provide a cut-off point for early switching to steroid implants in pseudo-phakic eyes.

Treatment of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery

The purpose of this review was to determine the optimum pharmacologic treatment for cystoid macular edema (CME) after cataract surgery in nondiabetic and diabetic patients. The Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase databases were searched, and all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared at least 2 pharmacologic strategies for CME after cataract surgery were included. Studies were excluded if preoperative CME or other risk factors for developing CME postoperatively were present. Ten RCTs were included in the systematic review. Five trials included at least 30 participants. Three RCTs showed a greater visual acuity improvement in patients treated with topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) than with a placebo. Other studies comparing the efficacy of topical NSAIDs, topical corticosteroids, sub-Tenon corticosteroids, oral NSAIDs, and oral acetazolamide did not report significant differences between treatment groups. Therefore, large RCTs are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the optimum treatment of CME after cataract surgery.

Reduction in the frequency of intravitreal bevacizumab administrations achieved by posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) during treatment with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) in eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME).

METHODS

Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral DDME with foveal thickness (FT) greater than 400 μm were studied. Initially, both eyes of each patient received 1.25 mg/0.05 ml of IVB. One eye then received 20 mg/0.5 ml of STTA at the onset and at 16, 32, and 48 weeks. For the control, the other eye was not treated with STTA. Patients were treated with additional IVB when DDME recurred during the study to maintain the FT at <350 μm. The FT, logMAR visual acuity (VA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were monitored monthly for 56 weeks. The total number of IVB injections during the 1-year follow-up was also calculated.

RESULTS

STTA-treated eyes had significantly more regression of FT and improvement of VA at several time points during the study than did the controls. The mean (SD) required number of IVB injections in the STTA-treated eyes during the study was 5.00 ± 1.75, which was significantly less than the 7.95 ± 1.57 in the control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive STTA therapy to IVB for the treatment of DDME not only improved the morphological and functional regressions but also reduced the frequency of IVB treatments.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME), one the most prevalent causes of visual loss in industrialized countries, may be diagnosed at any stage of diabetic retinopathy. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow up of DME have become straightforward with recent developments in fundus imaging, such as optical coherence tomography. Laser photocoagulation, intravitreal injections, and pars plana vitrectomy surgery are the current treatment modalities; however, the positive effects of currently available intravitreally injected agents are temporary. At this point, further treatment choices are needed for a permanent effect.

A 12-MONTH, SINGLE-MASKED, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY OF EYES WITH PERSISTENT DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA AFTER MULTIPLE ANTI-VEGF INJECTIONS TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY OF THE DEXAMETHASONE-DELAYED DELIVERY SYSTEM AS AN ADJUNCT TO BEVACIZUMAB COMPARED WITH CONTINUED BEVACIZUMAB MONOTHERAPY

PURPOSE

To determine whether a dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (dexamethasone delivery system [DDS], Ozurdex) combined with bevacizumab 1.25 mg (Avastin) provides greater benefit than bevacizumab monotherapy in eyes with diabetic macular edema with incomplete response to multiple antivascular endothelial growth factor injections.

METHODS

Eyes with diabetic macular edema were randomly assigned to receive combination therapy (bevacizumab plus DDS) or bevacizumab monotherapy. Combination therapy eyes received intravitreal bevacizumab at baseline, DDS at Month 1, and subsequent DDS (at Months 5 and 9), whereas monotherapy eyes received bevacizumab (monthly) if indicated. Eyes were eligible for retreatment if the central subfield thickness measured >250 μm, and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity was <80 letters (20/25).

RESULTS

Forty eyes of 30 patients were enrolled. The mean visual acuity changes from baseline to 12 months were similar in the 2 groups (combined: +5.4 letters; bevacizumab: +4.9 letters; difference = 0.2 letters, 95% confidence interval = -5.9 to 6.3; P = 0.75). The mean reduction in central subfield thickness was greater in the combination group (-45 μm vs. -30 μm, difference = 69 μm, 95% confidence interval = 9-129; P = 0.03) and more patients in the combination group had central subfield thickness <250 μm. The combined treatment group received three fewer supplemental injections of bevacizumab, but this was counterbalanced by the need for an average of 2.1 DDS injections.

CONCLUSIONS

The dexamethasone implant combined with bevacizumab significantly improves visual acuity and significantly improves macular morphology in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema, although visual acuity changes are not superior to continued bevacizumab monotherapy.

Intraocular pressure trends after intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To study intraocular pressure (IOP) trends and risk factors of IOP elevation after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 760 eyes treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for diabetic macular edema was performed. The rate and risk factors of IOP elevation were assessed. Intraocular pressure elevation was defined as an increase above baseline IOP by ≥ 6 mmHg, increase above baseline by > 20%, or IOP elevation to > 24 mmHg on 2 or more consecutive visits after treatment. When more than one pretreatment IOP reading was available, baseline IOP was calculated as the mean of the available pretreatment IOP readings (up to a maximum of three last IOP readings). Intraocular pressure elevation was considered transient unless it was maintained throughout the follow-up or required treatment (persistent elevation).

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 18 months, persistent and transient IOP elevation occurred in 44 (5.8%) and 53 (7%) eyes, respectively. The majority of eyes with persistent IOP elevation (70.4%) showed IOP elevation of > 20% from baseline. Only 13 eyes (1.71%) met the more strict criteria (> 6 mmHg from baseline or an IOP elevation > 24 mmHg). Final IOP was higher in the persistent IOP elevation group than the rest of the eyes (P < 0.001). Only the number of injections was associated with IOP elevation (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Persistent IOP elevation after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for diabetic macular edema is uncommon but may be associated with a higher number of injections.

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Bevacizumab With or Without Triamcinolone Acetonide for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Background: Bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) are both common choices for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), but the comparative efficacy of combined or separate applications is still not determined. Objectives: To compare the treatment efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and the combination of IVB and intravitreal triamcinolone (IVT) for DME patients. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were systematically reviewed for randomized controlled trials comparing IVB with IVB/IVT. Data on visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes at 3 and 6 months were extracted and data on adverse events were collected. A meta-analysis was performed using the software RevMan 5.3. The methodological quality and bias risks were also evaluated. Results: VA improved more significantly in the IVB/IVT group compared with the IVB group at 3 months (mean difference [MD] = 0.07; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.13), whereas there was no significant difference at 6 months (MD = −0.01; 95%CI = −0.11 to 0.09). The CMT reduction in the IVB/IVT group was significantly greater than that in the IVB group at 3 months (MD = 48.40; 95%CI = 30.23 to 66.57), but no statistically significant difference was found at 6 months (MD = 0.47; 95%CI = −24.11 to 25.04). Ocular hypertension was detected in 9/243 eyes in the IVB/IVT group but none of the IVB eyes. Conclusion: IVB/IVT is more effective for improving VA and decreasing CMT at 3 months in DME. A single injection of TA along with the first IVB could improve outcome within 3 months, but this is not sustained at 6 months. Continuous IVT/IVB treatment should be performed in further trials to clarify its long-term potential efficacy.

Advances in diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a complication of long-term diabetes mellitus (DM). Over the last 2 decades lot of work has been on early diagnosis of DR and screening programs have been designed to help the masses. Large numbers of clinical studies have been done for patients of diabetes and DR wherein the role of blood sugar control, metabolic control, role of oral medicines for DR, role of imaging, fluorescein angiography, and retinal photocoagulation has been studied. Newer treatment modalities are being devised and studied for better patient care. We discuss these issues in our review highlight and newer advances over the last few years.

Severe intraocular pressure rise following intravitreal triamcinolone: a national survey to estimate incidence and describe case profiles

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to estimate the incidence of steroid-induced severe intraocular pressure (IOP) rise following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection and to describe case profiles of the patients affected within the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A national survey was carried out to identify cases that had developed severe IOP rise requiring laser or surgery following IVTA through the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit. Respondents were mailed a questionnaire and with a follow-up questionnaire 1 year later, to ascertain characteristics of the patients identified. We also carried out a midpoint survey to ascertain national practice of IVTA at the time.

RESULTS

There were 29 confirmed reports of severe IOP rise after IVTA in the 13-month period of surveillance. All the cases were unilateral and the mean time between the IVTA and the maximum recorded IOP was 16 weeks. Six of these patients had pre-existing glaucoma or ocular hypertension, and a further two were known to be 'steroid responders'. Using the adjusted denominators, obtained from our national survey, the estimated annual incidence would be between 3.6 and 9.5 per 1000 injections.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that severe IOP rise after IVTA is an uncommon but serious complication. Data obtained from this national study should aid clinicians in choosing the treatment best suited to their patients.

Meta-analysis of the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To further evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) by meta-analysis.

METHODS

Pertinent publications were identified through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to January 30, 2013. Changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were extracted at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment, and a meta-analysis was carried out to compare results between groups receiving IVB and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA).

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial and 4 comparative studies were identified and included. All of the funnel plots, the Egger's method and Begg method did not show publication bias. Our meta-analysis revealed that BCVA and CMT at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment did not vary significantly between the IVB groups and IVTA groups (BCVA: at 4 weeks, P=0.27; at 12 weeks, P=0.51; at 24 weeks, P=0.64; CMT at 4 weeks, P=0.88; at 12 weeks, P=0.57; at 24 weeks, P=0.64). However, the rate of intraocular pressure rise after intravitreal injection varied significantly between the IVB groups and IVTA groups (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed a similar improvement in BCVA and CMT among CRVO patients was obtained after intravitreal injections of both IVB, or IVTA, while the rate of IOP rise was significantly higher in the latter.

Effect of Bevacizumab Injection before Vitrectomy on Intravitreal Hemorrhage in Pseudophakic Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

We evaluated the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection before pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) on intravitreal hemorrhage (VH) during and after vitrectomy for postoperative the first day and the first month in pseudophakic patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). This retrospective study was performed on 44 eyes of 44 patients who underwent vitrectomy for PDR. Patients were divided into PPV (n = 22 eyes) and PPV + IVB (n = 22 eyes) groups. Injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was performed 3 days before vitrectomy. Outcomes of visual acuity as well as intraoperative and postoperative VH were compared between the two groups. One month after surgery, visual acuity improved in PPV and PPV + IVB groups (P = 0.005, P = 0.006), respectively. There was no difference between the two groups in best corrected visual acuity at baseline and after vitrectomy (P = 0.71). Intraoperative bleeding into the vitreous was recorded in 14 (63.6%) cases in the PPV group and in 7 (31.8%) cases in the PPV + IVB group. The first month, intravitreal hemorrhage was recorded in six patients in the PPV group and in two patients in the PPV + IVB group (P = 0.03). The mean pre-postoperative central macular thickness was similar in both groups. Intravitreal injection of IVB before vitrectomy decreased the rate of VH at the time of surgery and at the first postoperative month in patients with PDR.