Changes in Corneal Densitometry in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy after Endothelial Keratoplasty

Corneal densitometry measurements comparison between anterior segment OCT and scheimpflug imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the repeatability of corneal densitometry (CD) measurements obtained using both an anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) device and a Scheimpflug camera system, while also assessing the level of agreement. The study also sought to investigate the correlation of CD with age, gender, and central corneal thickness (CCT) in normal eyes.

METHODS

CD measurements were obtained using the Casia 2 and the Pentacam AXL Wave. Data were collected on Total Corneal Densitometry and 4 concentric corneal annular areas, these are referred to as zone 1, denoting the central area, through to zone 4, designating the outermost peripheral region. Repeatability was assessed using intra-session test-retest variability, coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. Correlation analysis was performed between CD, age, gender, and CCT.

RESULTS

The study included 96 healthy volunteers. The Casia 2 demonstrated high repeatability with ICC values exceeding 0.9 in all the corneal zones and lower CoV values compared to the Pentacam AXL Wave (ranging from 1.07% to 2.25% for Casia 2 and from 1.91% to 6.89% for Pentacam).95% LoA were within ± 2 standard deviation from the average mean except from zone 1 (± 2.42).However, the measurements showed a consistent bias among all the corneal zones. CD values were positively correlated with age, except for zone 1 with the Pentacam (p = 0.083).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the Casia 2 can be a reliable tool for assessing corneal transparency in healthy individuals, however its measurements are not interchangeable with those provided by the Pentacam. The AS-OCT device may be more sensitive in detecting subtle age-related changes in CD within the central zone.

Corneal densitometry and associated factors in an elderly population

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Knowing normative corneal optical density (COD) values is important for identifying pathologic corneal changes.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is to determine the distribution and associated factors of COD in the elderly population.

METHODS

This report is a part of a cross-sectional population-based study conducted on the elderly population (≥60 years) of Tehran, Iran from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020. Using a multi-stage stratified random cluster sampling method, a total of 160 clusters were randomly selected from 22 districts of Tehran city. Study participants underwent a complete ocular examination including measurement of visual acuity, refraction, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Corneal densitometry was evaluated using the Pentacam HR. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to investigate associations of COD with study variables.

RESULTS

A total of 3633 eyes from 2068 individuals were analysed. Of these, 1256 (60.7%) were female, and the mean age of the individuals was 66.42 ± 5.28 (60 to 95) years. The mean entire COD was 21.96 ± 4.45 greyscale unit (GSU) (95% CI: 21.57-22.34). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean COD between the anterior, central, and posterior layers (p < 0.001); the highest and lowest average COD was related to the anterior and posterior corneal layers, respectively. The lowest and highest mean COD were observed in the 0-2 mm [17.21GSU (95% CI:16.87-17.55)], and 10-12 mm annular zones [31.4 GSU (95% CI: 30.89-31.91)], respectively (p < 0.001). According to the multiple GEE model, the COD had a statistically significant direct relationship with age, central corneal thickness, and mean keratometry, while it was significantly inversely associated with female sex, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, and corneal volume.

CONCLUSION

These normal values of COD in the present study could be used as reference data in older adults. The associated factors of COD should be taken into account to avoid misinterpretation of physiologic changes as pathologic processes.

Corneal Backscatter, Pachymetric Indices, and Ectasia Indices for the Assessment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To determine whether corneal backscatter, pachymetric indices, and ectasia indices derived from Scheimpflug tomography can identify Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) corneas with abnormal tomography, the relationships between these parameters and tomographic edema in FECD, and if these parameters help predict improvement in central corneal thickness (CCT) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

Tomography maps of 132 eyes of 80 subjects with FECD were analyzed to determine how backscatter, pachymetric, and ectasia parameters compared with the instrument's normative database and if any predicted tomographic edema. Tomography maps from a separate group undergoing DMEK were split into derivation (48 eyes of 39 subjects) and validation (45 eyes of 41 subjects) subgroups to derive a predictive model of improvement in CCT after DMEK. Backscatter, pachymetric, and ectasia parameters were incorporated to determine if the model could be enhanced.

RESULTS

Among all ectasia, pachymetric, and backscatter parameters, at best only 65% of FECD corneas with definite tomographic edema could be identified based on the instrument's normative database. Among all parameters individually, the highest sensitivity for detecting tomographic edema was 77%. Anterior and mid-corneal backscatter featured in a model predicting improvement in CCT after DMEK with high performance in derivation (R2 = 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.87) and validation (R2 = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.83) subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Scheimpflug camera software program could not reliably detect abnormal tomography in FECD from corneal backscatter, pachymetric indices, or ectasia indices. Corneal backscatter contributes to, but does not enhance, a predictive model of improvement in CCT after DMEK.

Investigation of How Corneal Densitometry Artefacts Affect the Imaging of Normal and Keratoconic Corneas

PURPOSE

To investigate corneal densitometry artefacts found in Pentacam Scheimpflug scans and their potential effect on assessing keratoconic (KC) corneas compared to normal (N) corneas.

METHODS

The current study utilises Pentacam data of 458 N eyes, aged 35.6 ± 15.8 (range 10-87), referred to as the "N group", and 314 KC eyes, aged 31.6 ± 10.8 (range 10-72), referred to as the "KC group", where densitometry data were extracted and analysed via a custom-built MATLAB code. Radial summations of the densitometry were calculated at diameters ranging from 0.5 mm to 5.0 mm. The minimum normalised radial summation of densitometry (NRSD) value and angle were determined at each diameter and then linked. KC cone locations and areas of pathology were determined, and a comparison between N and KC groups was carried out both within the averaged area of pathology and over the corneal surface.

RESULTS

Joining minimum NRSD trajectory points marked a clear distortion line pointing to the nasal-superior direction at 65° from the nasal meridian. The findings were found to be independent of eye laterality or ocular condition. Consistency was detected in the right and left eyes among both the N and KC groups. The location of the KC cone centre and the area of pathology were determined, and the densitometry output was compared both within the area of pathology and over the whole cornea. When the average densitometry was compared between N and KC eyes within the KC area of pathology, the N group recorded a 16.37 ± 3.15 normalised grey-scale unit (NGSU), and the KC group recorded 17.74 ± 3.4 NGSU (p = 0.0001). However, when the whole cornea was considered, the N group recorded 16.71 ± 5.5 NGSU, and the KC group recorded 15.72 ± 3.98 NGSU (p = 0.0467). A weak correlation was found between the Bad D index and NGSU when the whole measured cornea was considered (R = -0.01); however, a better correlation was recorded within the KC area of pathology (R = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal-superior artefacts are observed in the densitometry Pentacam maps, and analysis shows no significant differences in their appearance between N or KC corneas. When analysing KC corneas, it was found that the cone positions are mostly on the temporal-inferior side of the cornea, opposite to the densitometry artefact NRSD trajectory. The analysis suggests that the corneal densitometry artefacts do not interfere with the KC area of pathology as it reaches its extreme in the opposite direction; therefore, weighting the densitometry map to increase the contribution of the inferior-temporal cornea and decreasing that of the superior-nasal area would improve the classification or identification of KC if densitometry is to be used as a KC metric.

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Descemet Membrane Reflectivity by Optical Coherence Tomography in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate Descemet membrane reflectivity using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 144 eyes of 88 consecutive participants (41 FECD, 15 pseudophakic bullous keratopathies [BKs], and 32 healthy controls, 63.5 ± 16.5 years). FECD was graded 0 to 3 based on the guttae areas using specular microscopy. The sum of AS-OCT reflectivity of the 3-dimensional volume from 10 μm thickness from the endothelial surface of the cornea and residual stromal area was calculated as D sum (endo) and D sum (stroma) in the central area of 3- and 6-mm diameters, respectively. The D ES ratio was defined as the ratio of D sum (endo) to D sum (stroma). The percentage of the guttae area in the specular images was calculated using MATLAB. D sum (endo) and D ES ratio were compared among FECD, BK, and healthy controls.

RESULTS

D sum (endo) in FECD grade 3 was significantly higher than that in healthy control eyes, FECD patients with mild and moderate guttae, and BK (all P ≤ 0.040). The D ES ratio in FECD patients with mild to severe guttae (grade 1-3) was significantly higher than that in healthy control eyes and BK (all P ≤ 0.035). The percentage of the guttae area was significantly correlated with D sum (endo) (R = 0.488, P < 0.001 for 3 mm, R = 0.512, P < 0.001 for 6 mm) and D ES ratio (R = 0.450, P < 0.001 for 3 mm, R = 0.588, P < 0.001 for 6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Descemet membrane reflectivity in AS-OCT can be objective biomarkers for assessing guttae and FECD severity from early to end-stage FECD.

Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Patterns at the Graft-Host Interface in DMEK and DSAEK: A 12-Month Longitudinal Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

To compare corneal densitometry (CD) patterns at the graft-host interface between Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Corneal densitometry is a quantitative assessment that objectively evaluates corneal clarity and optical quality by measuring the light backscatter from the cornea.

METHODS

Fifty-one eyes that received DMEK or DSAEK surgery for corneal endothelium dysfunction were evaluated. The primary endpoint included CD patterns at the graft-host interface, which were assessed by the Pentacam HR device at the center point of the corneal horizontal meridian (CDcentral), and at six points on the central circumference of the cornea (with a total diameter of 4 mm) (CDI,II,III,IV,V,VI). Secondary endpoints included the best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and graft thickness (GT). All of the evaluations were performed at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure.

RESULTS

DMEK showed a significant overall CD reduction of -7.9 ± 8.5 grayscale unit (GSU) compared to DSAEK (p < 0.001). In addition, the DMEK group showed significantly lower CDCentral,I,II,III,IV,V,VI values at follow-up appointments one, three, six and twelve months after the procedure compared to the DSAEK group (p < 0.001). BCDVA, CCT and GT were in favor of the DMEK group with a mean value of 0.39 ± 0.35 LogMar, 552.2 ± 71.1 µm and 11.03 ± 1.4 µm, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CD patterns at the graft-host interface seem to be different depending on the endothelial keratoplasty procedure. This provides specific insight into CD changes in this critical region of surgery, which may provide a better understanding of the postoperative evolution of these patients.

Long-term changes in corneal densitometry and associated factors following small incision lenticule extraction for moderate and high myopia

Purpose

To investigate long-term trends in corneal densitometry and associated influencing factors following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

A comparative study was performed among 72 eyes of 38 patients undergoing SMILE. Eyes were divided into moderate myopia [mean spherical equivalent (SE),−4.22 ± 0.68D] and high myopia (mean SE,−7.63 ± 1.09 D) groups. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal topography and corneal densitometry (CD) were evaluated preoperatively and 3 years postoperatively.

Results

The efficacy indices at last postoperative follow-up (42.47 ± 0.51 months) were 0.92 ± 0.21 and 0.97 ± 0.22, the safety indices were 1.12 ± 0.17 and 1.14 ± 0.21 for high and moderate myopia, respectively (all P > 0.05). CD values in the 0–6 mm zone of the posterior corneal layer was statistically significantly lower than the preoperative values in both groups. Postoperative CD values (0–2 mm zone) in the posterior layer of the high myopia group were statistically significantly lower than in the moderate myopia group (P = 0.025); CD values (2–6 mm zone) in the anterior layer were higher in the high myopia group (P = 0.026). Correlation analyses showed that CD values in the 0–2 mm middle layer were negatively correlated with lenticule thickness in high myopia (r = −0.411, P = 0.016); there was a negative correlation between the CD values (0–6 mm) and corneal oblique trefoil in this group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Corneal transparency in the 0–6 mm zone of the posterior cornea increased following SMILE in moderate and high myopia. Long-term CD values in high myopia may be correlated with oblique trefoil and lenticule thickness.

Influence of eye tilt on corneal densitometry

PURPOSE

To investigate whether Pentacam densitometry readings are affected by corneal tilt.

METHODS

In a prospective study, the right eyes of 86 healthy participants aged 42.8 ± 20.0 years (range 18-79 years) were imaged using Scheimpflug tomography. Elevation maps were exported to calculate corneal tilt using custom-made software, and densitometry readings were acquired directly from the corneal densitometry analysis add-on to the standard software Oculus Pentacam HR. Simple mediation analysis was applied to study age as a confounding factor in the correlation between corneal tilt and corneal densitometry.

RESULTS

Corneal tilt and corneal densitometry are not independent from one another because age is significantly correlated with both corneal tilt (r = 0.50, p < 0.001) and corneal densitometry (r = 0.91, p < 0.001). Only 3.8% of the correlation between tilt and densitometry operates directly, while the remaining 96.2% depends on age.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal tilt plays a role in corneal densitometry readings, even though the interaction is strongly influenced by age. Age is a well-known factor in densitometry readings that should be taken into consideration when interpreting Scheimpflug densitometry.

Assessment of Corneal Densitometry in Big-Bubble Dissection Versus Manual Dissection Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess corneal densitometry and visual outcomes after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (BB-DALK) and manual dissection deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative observational study included 40 keratoconic patients who underwent DALK surgery: 22 eyes had BB-DALK (group I) and 18 eyes had failed BB technique and DALK was completed by manual dissection (group II). Best -corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal topographic parameters, residual stromal tissue thickness, and endothelial cell count were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Densitometric analysis of different corneal layers and zones was performed using Scheimpflug tomography at each visit; values were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

At 1 and 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was better in group I than in group II, but with no statistically significant difference. At 12 months, the visual acuities became nearly similar in both groups (0.30 ± 0.13 vs. 0.30 ± 0.14 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.888). Regarding corneal densitometric analysis, the recorded values for the posterior corneal layer were significantly higher in group II compared with group I at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively in the 0- to 2-mm zone (P < 0.001) and the 2- to 6-mm zone (P = 0.029, 0.028, 0.001, and <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Manual dissection DALK after failed BB technique may affect the interface stromal reflectivity up to 12 months postoperatively. However, this does not significantly affect the visual acuity in comparison with successful BB-DALK.

Corneal Densitometry After Uneventful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty-5-Year Outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to analyze the course of corneal densitometry (CD), endothelial cell density (ECD), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) 5 years after uneventful Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

Sixty uneventful cases (51 patients) with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. CD of various corneal layers (anterior, central, posterior, and total layer) and zones (0-2 mm, 2-6 mm, and 6-10 mm) were measured with Scheimpflug tomography. ECD, BCVA, and CCT were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Total CD at 0 to 2 mm and 2 to 6 mm zones significantly decreased from 33 ± 10 and 27.8 ± 8 grayscale units (GSU) preoperatively to 21.8 ± 3.1 and 22.2 ± 4.2 GSU at 5 years, respectively (P < 0.001). On the contrary, total CD at the 6 to 10 mm zone significantly increased from 30 ± 8.3 GSU preoperatively to 34.6 ± 7.8 GSU at 5 years (P < 0.001). ECD significantly decreased from 2496 ± 267 cells/mm2 preoperatively to 1063 ± 470 cells/mm2 at 5 years (P < 0.001). Similarly, CCT significantly decreased from 686 ± 109 μm preoperatively to 557 ± 37 μm at 5 years (P < 0.001). Postoperative BCVA was significantly better after DMEK for every examination time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a slight CD increase at all layers of all corneal zones from the second to the fifth postoperative year, the excellent visual outcome was maintained throughout 5-year follow-up. Thus, DMEK seems to effectively treat corneal endothelial disease in the long term.

Comparing corneal outcome between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phaco surgery in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy patients: a randomized pilot study with 6mo follow up

AIM

To compare the corneal outcome in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) patients between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phaco surgery (CPS).

METHODS

This was a randomized controlled study comparing one eye surgery by FLACS and the contralateral eye operated by CPS (stop and chop technique) in FED patients. Central corneal thickness, corneal light backscatter, corneal densitometry, and central corneal endothelial cell count and hexagonality (noncontact endothelial cell microscope), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were assessed preoperatively and at day 1, 40, and 180 postoperatively.

RESULTS

Totally 31 patients (16 women) were included. At day 40 postoperatively, the mean endothelial cell loss (ECL) was 23.67% by FLACS and 17.30% by CPS (P=0.53). At day 180 postoperatively, ECL was 25.58% in FLACS and 21.32% in CPS (P=0.69). Densitometry data in all layers and all annuli from anterior layer to posterior layer in annuli 0-2, 2-6, 6-10 and 10-12, total densitometry with all layers and all annuli was performed. A significant difference was found in 6-10 (posterior layer) at day 1 with -1.42 grayscale units (GSU; 95%CI: -2.66 to -0.19, P=0.02). In 10-12 (anterior layer, central layer and all layers) at day 40 were significant different with 7.7 (95%CI: 1.89 to 13.50, P=0.009), 3.97 (95%CI: 0.23 to 7.71, P=0.03), 4.73 GSU (95%CI: 0.71 to 8.75, P=0.02), respectively. In the remaining parameters we found no difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Three CPS eyes suffered from corneal decompensation.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in corneal outcome between FLACS and CPS. Endothelial cell density and pentacam corneal outcome may be inadequate as outcome parameters in FED patients.

Anterior Chamber Characteristics, Endothelial Parameters, and Corneal Densitometry After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With Fuchs Dystrophy

Purpose

To compare anterior segment parameters in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) who underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in one eye and no corneal surgery in the fellow eye.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted on 28 eyes of 14 patients with FED who underwent DSAEK in one eye at least one year prior (DSAEK group) and no corneal surgery in the fellow eye (control group). Each eye was analyzed with the anterior segment optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Scheimpflug imaging systems. Data were compared between the two groups.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 76.9 ± 7.0 years. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean central corneal thickness (CCT), central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle parameters, cylinder and keratometry values between two groups (all P-values > 0.05). The paracentral corneal thickness, corneal volume, endothelial cell density, and hexagonal cell ratio measurements were statistically significantly higher in the DSAEK group than the control (all P-values < 0.05), and anterior chamber volume in the DSAEK group was significantly less than the control (P = 0.046). While posterior and total corneal densitometry values in the DSAEK group were statistically significantly lower than the control (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively), there were no statistically significant differences in the anterior or middle corneal densities (P = 0.108 and P = 0.134, respectively).

Conclusion

We found that total corneal densitometry value decreased in DSAEK group. Although DSAEK surgery did not affect the anterior chamber angle parameters, it reduced the anterior chamber volume and increased the corneal volume and paracentral corneal thickness due to the addition of the DSAEK graft.

Corneal Light Scatter After Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the degree of corneal light scatter as measured by densitometry in ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in the Descemet endothelial thickness comparison trial.

METHODS

This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the Descemet endothelial thickness comparison trial, which was a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Subjects with isolated endothelial dysfunction were enrolled and were randomized to either UT-DSAEK or DMEK. Corneal opacity was quantitatively measured by Pentacam densitometry (OCULUS) at 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Fifty eyes of 38 patients were enrolled at the Casey Eye Institute at Oregon Health & Science University and the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University. Corneal densitometry for the anterior and posterior layers improved in both UT-DSAEK and DMEK after surgery. The decrease was more pronounced in the posterior layer for both groups. However, there was no difference in the degree of corneal light scatter between UT-DSAEK and DMEK at postoperative month 12, and no difference in change in densitometry was observed between the 2 arms from baseline to month 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Both UT-DSAEK and DMEK experience an improvement in the degree of corneal light scatter after surgery. However, there was no difference in densitometry between the 2 groups at month 12. Therefore, other factors such as higher order aberrations in the posterior cornea rather than stromal-stromal interface haze mediate the superior visual outcomes in DMEK compared with UT-DSAEK.

Corneal Densitometry After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK): 5-Year Prospective Comparative Study

Purpose: To investigate long-term changes in corneal densitometry (CD) following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) vs. femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Methods: Prospective analysis was performed in 66 eyes of 38 patients (13 males) who underwent SMILE and 54 eyes of 29 patients (5 males) who underwent FS-LASIK. In all patients, an ocular examination was performed preoperatively, and at 6–12 months and 5 years postoperatively. CD was obtained with the Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging system at the 0–2-mm, 2–6-mm, and 6–10-mm zones of the cornea at depth of anterior 120 μm, midcornea, and posterior 60 μm. Correlation analysis was performed between postoperative change in CD and other variables such as age, type of surgery, central corneal thickness, spherical equivalent, lenticule thickness/ablation depth, and changes in wavefront aberrations.

Results: At postoperative 6–12 months, a significant reduction at several corneal zones in the FS-LASIK cohort (P < 0.05) was observed. In the SMILE cohort, no significant change in CD relative to baseline was observed. However, at 5 years postoperatively, in both groups, a significant decrease in CD was observed in three zones of three layers (all P < 0.001). The change in CD was similar between groups at postoperative 6–12 months, but at 5 years the magnitude of change was significantly smaller in SMILE than FS-LASIK in the anterior and central layers (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: CD with the Scheimpflug imaging system showed a significant decrease at 5 years after SMILE or FS-LASIK, and the change was significantly less pronounced after SMILE.

Predictors of Vision-Related Quality of Life After Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trials

PURPOSE

To determine which baseline characteristics are associated with vision-related quality of life (QOL) after endothelial keratoplasty.

METHODS

A patient- and outcome-masked randomized clinical trial. Consecutive patients presenting with isolated endothelial disease requiring endothelial keratoplasty at Oregon Health Sciences University and Stanford University. Study eyes randomized to one of the 2 types of endothelial keratoplasty were given the national eye institute vision function questionnaire 25 at baseline and 12 months. In this prespecified secondary outcome, we assessed the role of recipient and donor characteristics as predictors of the 12-month national eye institute vision function questionnaire 25 change score.

RESULTS

The mean vision function questionnaire (VFQ) score was 74 (SD 14) at baseline and increased to 82 (SD 12) at 3 months and 87 (SD 10) at 12 months. We were unable to find a difference in vision-related QOL in study participants who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty compared with ultrathin Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty [coef -0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) -9.27 to 7.31; P = 0.82]. In multivariable analysis, patients who underwent endothelial keratoplasty in 2 eyes had approximately 8 points higher VFQ at 12 months after the second eye than those who had only one eye enrolled (95% CI 0.10-15.72; P = 0.047). Posterior densitometry produced an approximately 1-point increase each in the VFQ change score for each 1 grayscale unit increase at baseline (95% CI 0.26-1.81; P = 0.009). Although the sample size was small, a diagnosis of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy had approximately 19-points more improvement on average compared with Fuchs (95% CI 7.68-30.00; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral endothelial keratoplasty resulted in higher vision-related QOL compared with unilateral. Baseline densitometry, objective measure of corneal haze that predicts vision-related QOL, may play a role in monitoring disease progression.

Visual rehabilitation of patients with corneal diseases

BACKGROUND

Although most patients with visual impairment due to corneal diseases can be treated successfully with surgery, some require visual rehabilitation to restore reading ability. To evaluate the best LVAs especially in terms of reading speed and characterize this specific patient group we performed a prospective, randomized cross-over trial.

METHODS

All 34 patients underwent a detailed examination (slit-lamp, funduscopy, SD-OCT, ETDRS) as screening. Only patients with corneal diseases without other ocular diseases were included. Reading-speed was assessed with International-Reading-Speed-Texts (IReST) consecutively with five different LVAs (low vision aids) during one day in a randomized cross-over design. Corneal haze was quantified with corneal densitometry (Pentacam).

RESULTS

Patients were either visually impaired (n = 28), severely impaired (n = 4) or legally blind (n = 2). Patients read significantly faster with LVAs (p < 0.0001). Fastest reading speed could be achieved with video magnifier (CCTV). Optical magnifier and portable-electronic magnifier enabled significantly lower reading speeds (p < 0.01). In a subgroup of patients (VA < 3/60,n = 6) black background enabled patients to read significantly faster compared to white background (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Patients with low magnification requirement can be treated successfully with optical LVAs and portable-electronic magnifiers. More severely afflicted patients need a CCTV. Black background enables fastest reading-speeds, probably due to less blinding. Visual impairment can be estimated with corneal densitometry. Our trial confirms the capability of LVAs to successfully restore the reading ability in patients with corneal diseases, which is a crucial part of visual rehabilitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register as DRKS00010887 at 09.08.2016.

Using the posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio to minimize the risk of a postoperative hyperopic shift after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate different corneal parameters in identifying patients at risk of a hyperopic shift after (DMEK).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 92 eyes of patients with FECD after DMEK surgery. Pachymetry parameters, various tomographic parameters and densitometry values before and after DMEK were determined using a rotating Scheimpflug system (Pentacam HR, Oculus). For assessing the posterior to anterior corneal curvature relationship, we calculated the R_PA (posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio).

RESULTS

The average keratometry reading of the posterior corneal surface (Km^B) increased and the total corneal refractive power (TCRP) decreased significantly after surgery (P < .001). There was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative R_PA (P < .001) and the posterior Q value (P < .001). The strongest correlation was found between the change in the Km^B and the preoperative R_PA (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.872, P < .001). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the highest AUC values (for ∆Km^B) among the different preoperative parameters tested were obtained for R_PA and posterior Q value (Asph. Q^B) with AUROC (area under the ROC) values of 0.95 and 0.89, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Q value and the R_PA showed the highest correlation with the change in corneal refractive power and the greatest AUC. These parameters could be used as surrogate markers to identify eyes that might be at risk of a greater postoperative hyperopic shift, which would allow more accurate setting of refractive goals.

[Analysis of light scattering ability of the cornea before and after endothelial keratoplasty]

PURPOSE

To evaluate light scattering ability of the cornea before and after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) endothelial keratoplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 70 patients (70 eyes) who had undergone DSAEK and DMEK (35 patients, 35 eyes in each group). In addition to standard ophthalmological examinations before and during the one-year follow-up after surgery, the patients had their central corneal thickness, stromal thickness, thickness of the interface area and the graft measured with optical coherence tomography (Optovue, U.S.A.). Intensity of light scattering by corneal structures was evaluated using Pentacam HR (Oculus, Germany) topographer with proprietary software and algorithms for calculation of corneal transparency.

RESULTS

Comparison of the outcomes revealed that indices of general integral and stromal light-scattering were higher in patients after DSAEK. Integral light scattering in the interface and graft areas in the DMEK group was significantly lower than in the DSAEK group during the whole follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The reason for decrease of visual acuity after endothelial keratoplasty, regardless of the surgery type, may be higher light-scattering ability of patient's corneal stroma due to residual opacifications. Better visual acuity outcomes after DMEK in comparison to DSAEK are associated with higher transparency of the interface and graft areas. The suggested new method of assessing the intensity of light-scattering allows more precise evaluation of the influence of light-scattering ability of the stroma, interface and corneal graft after different modifications of endothelial keratoplasty, considering the respective layer thickness and excluding the influence of light scattering on the air-epithelium interface.

Comparison of corneal densitometry between big-bubble and visco-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Aims

To evaluate deep corneal densitometry and visual outcomes after big-bubble (BB-DALK) and visco-bubble (VB-DALK) deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty performed in patients with keratoconus.

Methods

Prospective comparative study of 50 advanced keratoconic patients who underwent DALK surgery; 25 eyes (group I) were completed with BB-DALK and 25 eyes (group II) with VB-DALK after the failure of pneumatic dissection. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal tomographic parameters and endothelial cell count were recorded 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Densitometric analysis of the deep corneal interface was obtained using Scheimpflug tomography at each visit; values recorded were compared between the two groups and statistically analysed.

Results

BSCVA was significantly better in the BB-DALK group than the VB-DALK group (0.39±0.29 vs 0.65±0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively) for the first 3 months; and in the same time period, densitometry was significantly higher in the VB-DALK group than those recorded in the BB-DALK group (23.97±5.34 vs 17.13±4.44 grayscale units). However, densitometric values and visual acuity did not differ significantly in the two groups at 1 year. No statistically significant difference for the other variables analysed at any time frame was found.

Conclusion

The use of viscoelastic substance in the VB-DALK technique may induce modification of interface stromal reflectivity resulting in reduced visual acuity up to 3 months postoperatively. However, this initial negative effect on the interface quality does not affect the long-term visual outcome, with densitometric values and visual outcomes similar in the two groups from 6 months postoperatively.

Corneal Densitometry as a Predictive Diagnostic Tool for Visual Acuity Results After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate correlations between preoperative corneal backscatter with visual acuity results after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with corneal endothelial disorders.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

The first 551 consecutive patients with DMEK at the Center of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne who had available preoperative corneal densitometry values (corneal light backscatter measured in gray scale units) measured with the Scheimpflug-based Oculus Pentacam corneal densitometry module were screened for eligibility. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) results were retrospectively correlated with densitometry data. Densitometry data were obtained in 4 corneal layers (ie, anterior, central, posterior, and total layers) and 4 annuli. Pre- and postoperative BSCVA results were correlated with densitometry data. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Four hundred twelve eyes were available for the analyses. Visual acuity results improved significantly after DMEK surgery at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up (P < .001). Corneal backscatter correlated moderately with preoperative BSCVA results. Moderate associations to postoperative BSCVA results could predominantly be found between densitometry values of the anterior and central layer more pronounced in the center of the cornea for all postoperative timepoints. The posterior layer correlated worst with postoperative gain in BSCVA. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the best predictive power of densitometry values was for the 2-6 mm annular zone of the cornea.

CONCLUSION

Corneal backscatter in eyes with corneal endothelial disorders correlates with postsurgical BSCVA results after DMEK surgery. Therefore, early DMEK surgery seems to have a positive impact on long-term BSCVA results.

Influence of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery for corneal astigmatism up to 2.5 dioptres on corneal densitometry

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions (PCRI) for astigmatism between 0.75 and 2.5 dioptres during cataract surgery on corneal densitometry (CD).

METHODS

In this prospective, randomised study, 80 eyes (80 patients), received either tIOL or PCRI. Assessment at pre-operative and 1, 3, 6, 12 months post-operative visit included uncorrected (UCDVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), spherical equivalent (SEQ) (only post-operatively), mean anterior and posterior keratometric astigmatism (K_A) and CD with Schiempflug system. CD was analysed in four concentric radial zones from centre to periphery (Zone 1 to 4) and in 3 layers (anterior, mid-stromal and posterior).

RESULTS

Comparing tIOLs vs. PCRIs, there was no significant difference in the UCDVA, BCDVA and SEQ. In PCRI group, anterior K_A decreased at 1 month and remained stable thereafter. For zones 1, 2 and 3, CD significantly reduced after 3 months with tIOLs whereas with PCRIs, it reduced 1 month onwards. For zone 4, CD reduced only at 12 months with tIOLs compared to 3 months onwards with PCRIs. In both groups CD was higher in the zone 4 and anterior layer. Significant reduction in CD was found in all three layers of cornea after 3 months in tIOL and after first month in PCRI groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery alone reduces the CD. Reducing keratometric astigmatism with PCRIs shows significant differences in CD from early post-operative period for central and anterior corneal layer.

Scheimpflug Densitometry After DMEK Versus DSAEK-Two-Year Outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare the course of Scheimpflug corneal densitometry (CD) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

METHODS

Fifty-four DMEK and 25 DSAEK cases without previous corneal surgery, complicated intraoperative or postoperative course, or vision-limiting ocular comorbidities were included. Pseudophakic eyes of age-matched subjects were recruited as controls (n = 20). Scheimpflug CD of the optically relevant zones (0-2 and 2-6 mm), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, and central corneal thickness were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

CD of the optical zone decreased from 34.4 ± 9.4 grayscale units (GSU) before to 19.2 ± 2.7 GSU at 24 months after DMEK. Respectively, CD decreased from 34.0 ± 13.4 GSU before to 21.2 ± 2.5 GSU at 24 months after DSAEK. Mean central CD in group 3 was 18.1 ± 1.3 GSU. Compared with DSAEK, DMEK cases showed lower central CD at 3 and 6 months (P ≤ 0.012) but not at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. DSAEK showed higher CD values throughout the postoperative period compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001). DMEK showed higher CD compared with controls at 3, 6, and 12 but not at 24 months after surgery (P = 0.152). Postoperative BCVA was significantly better after DMEK for every examination time point. No difference in endothelial cell density was found between DMEK and DSAEK at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK showed lower CD and better BCVA compared with DSAEK in the first 6 postoperative months. Notably, although CD reached similar levels in the midterm after both DMEK and DSAEK, BCVA remained significantly better after DMEK.

DMEK versus DSAEK for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: A meta-analysis

Purpose:

To compare the safety and efficacy profiles of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in adult patients with Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy.

Methods:

Electronic database search on MEDLINE and CENTRAL from inception to August 2017. We included all comparative studies of DMEK versus DSAEK in patients with diagnosed Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Studies assessing rescue procedures were excluded to minimize bias. Primary outcome: mean difference in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes: rates of graft primary failure, rejection, and rebubbling; other graft-related issues; mean difference in endothelial cell density; subjective visual outcomes; and patient satisfaction.

Results:

A total of 10 retrospective studies of moderate methodological quality were included (n = 947 eyes, 646 DMEK). BCVA was better with DMEK at all evaluated time points (0.16 logMAR at 12 months) comparing to DSAEK (0.30 logMAR; p < 0.001). DMEK had a 60% lower rate of rejection (risk ratio (RR) 0.4, 95% CI (0.24, 0.67), p = 0.0005), but required more rebubblings (RR = 2.48, 95% CI (1.32, 4.64), p = 0.005). DMEK had more primary graft failures and less endothelial cell density loss, but statistical difference was not reached. More patients were satisfied after DMEK (odds ratio = 10.29, 95% CI (3.55, 29.80), p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

DMEK showed better postoperative results regarding BCVA, patient satisfaction, and graft-related issues. However, the small number of studies with short follow-up times and other methodological issues prompt us to interpret these results carefully.

Efficacy and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Based on current evidence, the efficiency and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) was compared with that of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database and conference abstracts were comprehensively searched for studies that compared the efficacy and safety of DMEK and DSEK. The efficacy outcome was the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The safety outcomes included the postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) and complications such as graft detachment, graft rejection, graft failure, postoperative elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), tissue loss, etc. The outcomes were pooled using random-effects models with Stata 13.0 software. Heterogeneity was qualified with Q statistic and I2/H2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot, Begg rank correlation test, and Egger or Horbard linear regression.

RESULTS

19 articles were eligible, and 1124 eyes and 1254 eyes were included in the DMEK and DSEK groups, respectively. The overall pooled estimates showed a significantly better postoperative BCVA, a comparable ECD and an increased graft detachment rate in the DMEK group compared with the DSEK group (BCVA: mean difference (MD) = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.19 to -0.11, P<0.001; ECD: MD = 14.88, 95% CI = -181.50 to 211.27, P = 0.882; graft detachment rate: OR = 4.56, 95% CI = 2.43 to 8.58, P<0.001). Except for the postoperative ECD, which was changed to be higher in the DSEK group than the DMEK group, the learning curve did not have a marked effect on the comparison outcome of the BCVA and graft detachment rate based on the estimates pooled from studies that collected data during the DMEK learning phase (ECD (learning curve): MD = -361.24, 95% CI = -649.42 to -73.07, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Although DMEK is a more technically difficult and challenging procedure, it may represent a safe and more efficient alternative to DSEK for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases, even during its learning curve.

Corneal Densitometry in Healthy Corneas and Its Correlation With Endothelial Morphometry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the correlations between corneal endothelial cell properties and corneal densitometry values and to investigate whether corneal densitometry may be used as an indicator of the health of corneal endothelium.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-three eyes were analyzed in this prospective cross-sectional study. Corneal densitometry was measured with densitometry software of Pentacam HR-Scheimpflug corneal topography over a 12-mm diameter of the cornea. Furthermore, corneal endothelial cell properties including cell density (CD), average cell area, SD of the cell area, coefficient of variation (CV) of the cell area, maximum cell area, minimum cell area, and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) were measured by a specular microscope. The correlations were calculated using Pearson correlation tests.

RESULTS

The average cell area, SD, maximum cell area, and minimum cell area values were not statistically significantly correlated with the corneal densitometry values in any layer or concentric annulus. CD, CV, and HEX were statistically significantly correlated with the corneal densitometry values in all layers and concentric annuli (P < 0.05 for each one). Moreover, CD and HEX were inversely and moderately correlated with total corneal densitometry (r = -0.403, P < 0.001, and r = -0.327, P < 0.001, respectively), whereas the CV was positively and moderately correlated with total corneal densitometry (r = 0.349, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal densitometry might have potential to be used as an indicator of the health of corneal endothelium in the future.

Changes in Corneal Density After Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-linking With Different Irradiation Intensities and Energy Exposures: 1-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To determine and compare the changes in corneal density after 2 different protocols of accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (A-CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

Two groups of eyes received A-CXL treatment; 20 eyes received A-CXL using continuous UVA light exposure at 9 mW/cm for 10 minutes with a total energy dose of 5.4 J/cm, and 24 eyes received A-CXL using continuous UVA light exposure at 30 mW/cm for 4 minutes with a total energy dose of 7.2 J/cm. Corneal density was measured with Scheimpflug tomography at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Densitometry peaked at 1 month (mean: 16.34 ± 3.80, P = 0.006, 9-mW/cm A-CXL; mean: 20.90 ± 2.81, P < 0.0001, 30-mw/cm A-CXL) in both groups, and it decreased over time in 30-mW/cm A-CXL. However, in 9-mW/cm A-CXL, increased corneal densitometry plateaued until 6 months postoperatively and started to decrease thereafter. Densitometry completely returned to baseline after 12 months in both groups. The mean change in density at 1- and 3-month follow-up was higher in the 30-mW A-CXL group than in the 9-mW A-CXL group (P = 0.003, P = 0.044; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High-energy exposure tends to induce more haze in the early posttreatment period, but it is reversible.

Intraocular lens power calculation using standard formulas and ray tracing after DMEK in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy

BACKGROUND

The study presented here aims to optimize the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in patients after DMEK by evaluation of the impact of the altered anterior/posterior corneal curvature relationship.

METHODS

Scheimpflug-based Oculus Pentacam imaging was performed after DMEK surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. The IOL power was calculated for all patients by ray tracing, aiming for postoperative emmetropia. We also performed the IOL calculation using four third-generation formulas (SRK-T, Hoffer-Q, Holladay-1 and Haigis). The residual refractions for the individual target IOL were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

This retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (age 68.73 ± 10.11 years) after DMEK surgery. The differences between the expected residual refraction based on ray tracing and that predicted with the third-generation formulas were statistically significant (all formulas p < 0.001). The highest mean difference in the residual refraction between the target IOL measured by ray tracing and that calculated with third-generation formulas was found for the Haigis formula (0.90 ± 0.40 D), and the lowest mean difference for the SRK/T formula (0.73 ± 0.49 D).

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK surgery induced a relevant change in the anterior to posterior corneal curvature relationship; this needs to be taken into account in the IOL power calculation to avoid hyperopic refractive surprises.

Corneal densitometry after photorefractive keratectomy, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, and small-incision lenticule extraction

PurposeThe aim of this study was to gain greater insight into the corneal densitometry changes occurring as a result of refractive surgery and to compare these changes across three widely used surgical techniques, namely, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser (LASIK-FS), or ReLEx small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE).Patients and methodsThree hundred and thirty-six patients (184 male and 152 female patients) participated in this study. They were split into three groups according to the refractive surgery technique they had undergone: LASIK-FS (74 patients), PRK (153 patients), and ReLEx SMILE (109 patients). All participants underwent an exhaustive eye examination both before and after surgery. Pre- and postoperative corneal densitometry was measured using an Oculus Pentacam system.ResultsThe mean postoperative total corneal densitometry values were 16.53±1.94 for the LASIK-FS group, 15.53±1.65 for PRK, and 16.10±1.54 for ReLEx SMILE. When corneal densitometry was analyzed for specific corneal areas, the values corresponding to the 0-2, 2-6, and 6-10 mm annuli were similar across the three surgical techniques. The only region in which differences were found was the peripheral area (P<0.05), but these variations across techniques were not statistically significant.ConclusionsCorneal densitometry can be used as an objective metric to assess corneal response to refractive surgery, and to monitor patients over time. Corneal densitometry was not negatively affected by any of the refractive surgical procedures under evaluation.

Corneal Densitometry as a Novel Technique for Monitoring Amiodarone Therapy

PURPOSE

The clinical efficacy and toxicity of amiodarone may be determined more effectively by tissue deposition than by levels of the agent in serum. Therefore, corneal densitometry might be useful for therapeutic monitoring. The aim of the study is to evaluate Scheimpflug corneal densitometry in patients with amiodarone keratopathy (AK).

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-six patients receiving amiodarone therapy and 66 healthy controls were consecutively enrolled in this study.

METHODS

Patients were examined using the Oculus Pentacam (Wetzlar, Germany).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Densitometry data from different corneal layers and different annuli were extracted, analyzed, and compared with densitometry values of healthy controls. Duration of treatment, cumulative dose, Orlando stage (slit-lamp biomicroscopy), and serum concentrations of amiodarone and N-desethylamiodarone also were determined, and the correlation to different densitometry data was evaluated.

RESULTS

The total corneal light backscatter at total corneal thickness and at total diameter was significantly higher in the amiodarone group compared with the control group (AK group: 28.3±5.2; control group: 24.4±4.2; P < 0.001). Upon dividing the corneal surface into different layers at total thickness, the differences were significant in all layers (P < 0.001). The serum concentrations of the metabolite N-desethylamiodarone correlate with densitometry values, especially in the 0- to 2-mm annulus in the anterior layer (r = 0.419; P = 0.001), whereas the cumulative dose and duration of treatment correlate significantly with the densitometry values in the 0- to 2-mm annulus at total thickness (P = 0.014 and P = 0.022, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal densitometry is a useful, objective method for quantifying AK and can help in monitoring amiodarone therapy. The serum concentration of the active metabolite N-desethylamiodarone correlates with the extent of keratopathy in the anterior layer, whereas chronic changes in the stroma correlate with the cumulative dose and duration of treatment.