Herpetic keratitis therapy to reduce recurrence

Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Eye disease due to herpes simplex virus (HSV) commonly presents as epithelial keratitis which, though usually self-limiting, may persist or progress without treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative effectiveness of antiviral agents, interferon, and corneal debridement in the treatment of HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2014, Issue 12), PubMed (January 1946 to 31 December 2014), EMBASE (January 1980 to 31 December 2014), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to 31 December 2014), System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (OpenGrey) (January 1995 to 31 December 2014), BIOSIS (January 1926 to 5 May 2014), Scopus (January 1966 to 31 December 2014), Japan Science and Technology Institute (J-Global) (January 1975 to 31 December 2014), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (January 1979 to 31 December 2014), British Library's Electronic Table of Contents (Zetoc) (January 1993 to 7 May 2014). We looked for trials listed on the the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en), Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (www.fda.gov/), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (www.

EVIDENCE

nhs.uk) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (www.ema.europa.eu/ema/) as of 31 December 2014. There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. We also culled literature digests and conference proceedings as of 15 April 2014. There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of HSV dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis were included that reported the proportion of eyes healed at one week, two weeks, or both after enrolment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We tabulated data on study characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes and used direct comparisons to estimate a risk ratio (RR) and, when feasible, a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by an inconsistency index. A multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis consolidated direct and indirect comparisons of relative healing at 14 days.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven studies involving 8333 eyes met the inclusion criteria. Placebo-controlled studies were heterogeneous in comparison with idoxuridine (RR 1.74; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.91) and few in number for vidarabine (RR 1.81; 95% CI 1.09 to 3.01), interferon (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.64), and debridement. Vidarabine (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25), trifluridine (RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.43), acyclovir (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.34), and brivudine (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.51) were more effective than idoxuridine. Trifluridine (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.32) and acyclovir (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19) were more effective than vidarabine. No significant differences in healing emerged among trifluridine, acyclovir, brivudine, and foscarnet although few studies compared brivudine or foscarnet with other antivirals. Any potential advantage of ganciclovir compared to acyclovir was mitigated by study heterogeneity and possible publication bias. Only one study evaluated the joint use of two topical antivirals. In a limited number of studies, oral acyclovir (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.07) or the combination of oral acyclovir with a topical antiviral (RR 1.36; 95% CI 0.68 to 2.74) appeared as effective as a single topical antiviral agent. Compared to topical antiviral monotherapy, the combination of an antiviral with either interferon or debridement had inconsistent effects on expediting healing and improving outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Placebo-controlled studies of HSV epithelial keratitis are limited to superseded interventions. Trifluridine and acyclovir are more effective than idoxuridine or vidarabine and similar in therapeutic effectiveness. Brivudine and foscarnet do not substantially differ in effectiveness from trifluridine or acyclovir. Ganciclovir is at least as effective as acyclovir. The addition of interferon to a nucleoside antiviral agent and the combination of debridement with antiviral treatment need to be further assessed to substantiate any possible advantage in healing.

Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Eye disease due to herpes simplex virus (HSV) commonly presents as epithelial keratitis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative effectiveness of antiviral agents, interferon, and corneal débridement in the treatment of acute HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 4), MEDLINE (January 1950 to October 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2010), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to October 2010), Zetoc (British Library's Electronic Table of Contents), System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (openSIGLE), Biosciences Information Service (BIOSIS), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), Japan Information Center of Science and Technology (JICST-EPlus), and China Academic Journals database (CAJ) via China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) with citations confirmed using China/Asia On Demand (COAD). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. All databases except CNKI and COAD were last searched on 27 October 2010, CNKI and COAD were searched on 1 April 2010. We also searched literature digests, conference proceedings and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Of 152 eligible studies,106 comparative treatment trials involving 5872 eyes with dendritic or geographic epithelial keratitis were analysed for corneal healing over two weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Interventions were compared at 14 days after trial enrolment by calculating a risk ratio (RR) that was adjusted with indirect RR, assessed by an inconsistency index (I(2) ) and supplemented by a seven-day RR and a hazard ratio (HR).

MAIN RESULTS

Idoxuridine, though uncertainly better in healing outcome than control because of few trials with 14-day follow up, allowed earlier corneal re-epithelialisation. Vidarabine resulted in a significantly better outcome than placebo in one trial (RR 1.96; 95% CI 1.10 to 3.49). Compared to idoxuridine, in combined direct and indirect analyses, vidarabine (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19), trifluridine (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.42), acyclovir (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.31), brivudine (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.61), and ganciclovir (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.57) were significantly more effective. Trifluridine (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.21) and acyclovir (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19) appeared more effective than vidarabine. No significant differences were found in comparisons between acyclovir, trifluridine and brivudine. The comparison of ganciclovir to acyclovir was limited by heterogeneity and possible publication bias. The joint use of two topical antivirals (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.12) and the use of oral acyclovir alone (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.07) or combined with a topical antiviral (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.17) appeared as effective as topical antiviral therapy. Compared to antiviral monotherapy, the combination of an antiviral with interferon (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.07) or with débridement (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.14) did not yield significantly better outcomes but may have accelerated healing. The corneal epithelial healing outcome was improved when antiviral therapy was added to débridement (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Trifluridine and acyclovir are more effective than idoxuridine or vidarabine, and similar in therapeutic effectiveness. Brivudine and ganciclovir are at least as effective as acyclovir. While not improving outcome, the combination of interferon and an antiviral agent may speed healing. The effectiveness of corneal epithelial débridement is improved by an antiviral agent.

Therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Many clinical trials have been performed on the acute treatment of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Surveys of ocular antiviral pharmacology and of herpes simplex virus (HSV) eye disease have evaluated different interventions, but a systematic review of all comparative clinical studies has not previously been undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the effects of various therapeutic interventions for dendritic or geographic HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2007), EMBASE (1980 to September 2007), LILACS (up to September 2007), SIGLE (1980 to September 2007), ZETOC (21 September 2007), BIOSIS (up to 2005), JICT-EPlus (up to 2005), Index Medicus (1960 to 1965), Excerpta Medica Ophthalmology (1960 to 1973), reference lists of primary reports and review articles, and conference proceedings pertaining to ocular virology.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review included comparative clinical trials that assessed one-week or two-week healing rates of topical ophthalmic or oral antiviral agents and or physical or chemical debridement in people with active epithelial keratitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review author extracted data and assessed trial quality. Interventions were compared by the proportions of participants healed at seven days and at fourteen days after trial enrolment.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included data from 99 trials that randomised a total of 5363 participants. The topical application of vidarabine, trifluridine, acyclovir or ganciclovir resulted in a high proportion of participants healing within one week of treatment. Among these antiviral agents, no treatment emerged as significantly better for the therapy of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Insufficient placebo-controlled studies were available to assess debridement and other physical or physicochemical methods of treatment. Interferon monotherapy had a slight beneficial effect on dendritic epithelial keratitis but was not better than other antiviral agents. Interferon was very effective when combined with another antiviral agent such as trifluridine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available antiviral agents are effective and nearly equivalent. The combination of a nucleoside antiviral with either debridement or with interferon seems to speed healing. Future trials of the acute treatment of HSV epithelial keratitis must aim to achieve adequate statistical power for assessing the primary outcome of epithelial healing and should consider the effect of lesion size and other characteristics on treatment response.

Evidence-based treatment of herpes simplex virus keratitis: a systematic review

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) keratitis is a common cause of ocular and visual morbidity. In this article, we systematically review published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for HSV epithelial and stromal keratitis in order to establish a rational evidence-based foundation for treatment of these disorders. Articles for review were identified in the MEDLINE database from January 1, 1966, to May 30, 2006. Our review criteria stipulated that each study be performed in prospective, randomized, and double-blinded fashion, that it be controlled, and that it rely on specific clinical criteria for diagnosis and outcome. Of articles thus identified in the English language press, 38 articles met our review criteria, 30 for HSV epithelial keratitis and 8 (comprising 7 RCTs) for HSV stromal keratitis. From these studies, we concluded that the best evidence from treatment trials on HSV epithelial keratitis supports the use of topical trifluridine and topical or oral acyclovir, and suggests a possible additional benefit for topical interferon. The best evidence from RCTs for HSV stromal keratitis supports the use of topical corticosteroids given together with a prophylactic antiviral to shorten the duration of active HSV stromal keratitis, and the use of long-term suppressive oral acyclovir therapy to reduce the incidence of recurrent HSV keratitis.

Therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis

BACKGROUND

Many clinical trials have been performed on the acute treatment of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Surveys of ocular antiviral pharmacology and of herpes simplex virus (HSV) eye disease have evaluated different interventions, but a systematic review of all comparative clinical studies has not previously been undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the effects of various therapeutic interventions for dendritic or geographic HSV epithelial keratitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2006, week 3), EMBASE (1980 to 2006, week 30), LILACS (up to August 2006), SIGLE (1980 to March 2005), ZETOC (1 August 2006), BIOSIS (up to 2005), JICT-EPlus (up to 2005), Index Medicus (1960 to 1965), Excerpta Medica Ophthalmology (1960 to 1973), reference lists of primary reports and review articles, and conference proceedings pertaining to ocular virology.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review included comparative clinical trials that assessed one-week or two-week healing rates of topical ophthalmic or oral antiviral agents and or physical or chemical debridement in people with active epithelial keratitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review author extracted data and assessed trial quality. Interventions were compared by the proportions of participants healed at seven days and at fourteen days after trial enrolment.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included data from 98 trials that randomised a total of 5211 participants. Compared to idoxuridine, the topical application of vidarabine, trifluridine, or acyclovir resulted in a significantly greater proportion of participants healing within one week of treatment. Among these latter three antiviral agents, no treatment emerged as significantly better for the therapy of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Insufficient placebo-controlled studies were available to assess debridement and other physical or physicochemical methods of treatment. Interferon monotherapy had a slight beneficial effect on dendritic epithelial keratitis but was not better than other antiviral agents. Interferon was very effective when combined with another antiviral agent such as trifluridine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available antiviral agents are effective and nearly equivalent. The combination of a nucleoside antiviral with either debridement or with interferon seems to speed healing. Future trials of the acute treatment of HSV epithelial keratitis must aim to achieve adequate statistical power for assessing the primary outcome of epithelial healing and should consider the effect of lesion size and other characteristics on treatment response.

Herpes simplex virus epidemiology and ocular importance

PURPOSE

To review the changing epidemiology of herpes simplex disease and correlate it with the epidemiology of ocular herpes simplex disease.

METHOD

A review of pertinent reports in the world literature about the epidemiology of herpes simplex and specifically about ocular herpes simplex.

RESULTS

In developed countries, many individuals are reaching adolescence and adulthood without prior herpesvirus infection. Herpes simplex genital infection is increasing at a rapid rate in sexually active adolescents and adults, with about one in six adults now infected in the United States. Similar statistics are confirmatory worldwide in developed countries. Active herpes simplex infection is a risk factor for acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus. The Herpetic Eye Disease Study, as well as prior studies from Moorfields Eye Hospital and the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, provides us with the epidemiology of ocular herpes simplex. Recent studies suggest an older age of onset and perhaps overall more severe ocular disease as compared with the older literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Herpes simplex is a significant health concern at present with genital infections increasing in epidemic proportions. This is also reflected in a rise in the incidence of neonatal herpes. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection is being acquired for the first time in an older age group. A significant and increasing proportion of genital herpes is caused by HSV-1. Serologic studies are no longer as useful in distinguishing orofacial herpes from genital herpes. More acute retinal necrosis syndrome cases are associated with HSV-2. Speculation about the future of ocular herpes is made based on this changing epidemiology.

Herpetic Eye Disease Study. A controlled trial of topical corticosteroids for herpes simplex stromal keratitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of topical corticosteroids in treating herpes simplex stromal keratitis.

METHODS

The authors performed a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial of 106 patients with active herpes simplex stromal keratitis who had not received any corticosteroids for at least 10 days before study enrollment. Patients were assigned to the placebo group (n = 49) or the steroid group (topical prednisolone phosphate; n = 57); both regimens were tapered over 10 weeks. Both groups received topical trifluridine. Visual acuity assessment and slit-lamp biomicroscopy were performed weekly for 10 weeks, every other week for an additional 6 weeks or until removal from the trial, and at 6 months after randomization.

RESULTS

The time to treatment failure (defined by specific criteria as persistent or progressive stromal keratouveitis or an adverse event) was significantly longer in the steroid group compared with the placebo group. Compared with placebo, corticosteroid therapy reduced the risk of persistent or progressive stromal keratouveitis by 68%. The time from randomization to resolution of stromal keratitis and uveitis was significantly shorter in the steroid group compared with the placebo group even though both groups included patients who were removed from the study and treated with topical corticosteroids according to best medical judgment. Nineteen (33%) of the steroid-treated patients and 11 (22%) of the placebo-treated patients completed the 10 weeks of protocol therapy and had stable, noninflamed corneas after 16 weeks. At 6 months after randomization, no clinically or statistically significant differences in visual outcome or recurrent herpetic eye disease were identified between the steroid and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The topical corticosteroid regimen used in this study was significantly better than placebo in reducing persistence or progression of stromal inflammation and in shortening the duration of herpes simplex stromal keratitis. Postponing steroids during careful observation for a few weeks delayed resolution of stromal keratitis but had no detrimental effect as assessed by visual outcome at 6 months.