Prednisolone acetate or prednisolone phosphate concurrently administered with ciprofloxacin for the therapy of experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis

Corticosteroids in the Management of Infectious Keratitis: A Concise Review

Microbial keratitis is devastating corneal morbidity with a variable spectrum of clinical manifestations depending on the infective etiology. Irrespective of the varied presentation delayed treatment can lead to severe visual impairment resulting from corneal ulceration, possible perforation, and subsequent scarring. Corticosteroids with a potent anti-inflammatory activity reduce host inflammation, thus minimizing resultant scarring while improving ocular symptoms. These potential effects of corticosteroids have been applied widely to treat various corneal diseases ranging from vernal keratoconjunctivitis to dry eye disease. However, antimicrobial therapy remains the mainstay of treatment in microbial keratitis, whereas the use of adjunctive topical corticosteroid therapy remains a matter of debate. Understandably, the use of topical corticosteroids is a double-edged sword with pros and cons in the treatment of microbial keratitis. Herein we review the rationale for and against the use and safety of topical corticosteroids in the treatment of infective keratitis. Important considerations, including type, dose, efficacy, the timing of initiation of corticosteroids, use of concomitant antimicrobial agents, and duration of corticosteroid therapy while prescribing corticosteroids for microbial keratitis, have been discussed. This review intends to provide new insights into the therapeutic utility of steroids as adjunctive treatment of corneal ulcer.

Effect of Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition in Experimental Pseudomonas keratitis in Rabbits

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NG-nitro-arginine-methyleser (L-NAME) in the treatment of experimental Pseudomonas keratitis.

Methods

Twelve young New Zealand white rabbits were given intrastromal injections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Twenty-four hours later, the rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: group 1 was treated with topical 0.3% ciprofloxacin drops and a single subconjunctival injection of L-NAME (150 mg/kg); group 2 received topical 0.3% ciprofloxacin drops alone; group 3 received a single subconjunctival injection of L-NAME alone; group 4, the control group, was treated with topical balanced salt solution (BSS) drops. One drop of either ciprofloxacin of BSS was applied at each treatment interval. Twenty-six hours after the start of treatment, the eyes were examined by slit lamp to assess inflammation. Aqueous humor specimens were collected from each eye to measure the nitric oxide concentration. Corneas were removed to count bacteria results.

Results

Slit lamp examination cell scores were significantly lower for groups 1 and 3 than groups 2 and 4 eyes (p = 0.002 to p = 0.004). No viable bacteria were detected in the corneas of groups 1 and 2. Group 3 corneas had significantly fewer bacteria (6.33 ± 0.42 × 103) than group 4 (5.94 ± 0.16 × 104) (p < 0.05). Nitric oxide levels in the aqueous humor were significantly lower for group 1 eyes than for groups 2, 3, or 4 (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, and p = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions

We conclude that nitric oxide synthase inhibitors may be a useful adjunct but are not a replacement for traditional antibiotic drop therapy.

The steroids for corneal ulcers trial (SCUT): secondary 12-month clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy for bacterial keratitis improves long-term clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trial.

METHODS

This multicenter trial compared 1.0% prednisolone sodium phosphate to placebo in the treatment of bacterial keratitis among 500 patients with culture-positive ulcers receiving 48 hours of moxifloxacin before randomization. The primary endpoint was 3 months from enrollment, and 399 patients were evaluated at 12 months. The outcomes examined were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and scar size at 12 months. Based on previous results, regression models with adjustments for baseline status and/or causative organism were used for analysis.

RESULTS

No significant differences in clinical outcomes by treatment group were seen with the prespecified regression models (BSCVA: -0.04 logMAR, 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.05, P = .39; scar size: 0.03 mm, 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.18, P = .69). A regression model including a Nocardia-treatment arm interaction found corticosteroid use associated with a mean 1-line improvement in BSCVA at 12 months among patients with non-Nocardia ulcers (-0.10 logMAR, 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.02, P = .02). No significant difference was observed in 12-month BSCVA for Nocardia ulcers (0.18 logMAR, 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.41, P = .16). Corticosteroids were associated with larger mean scar size at 12 months among Nocardia ulcers (0.47 mm, 95% CI, 0.06-0.88, P = .02) and no significant difference was identified by treatment for scar size for non-Nocardia ulcers (-0.06 mm, 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.10, P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive topical corticosteroid therapy may be associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes in bacterial corneal ulcers not caused by Nocardia species.

Infectious keratitis: secreted bacterial proteins that mediate corneal damage

Ocular bacterial infections are universally treated with antibiotics, which can eliminate the organism but cannot reverse the damage caused by bacterial products already present. The three very common causes of bacterial keratitis—Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae—all produce proteins that directly or indirectly cause damage to the cornea that can result in reduced vision despite antibiotic treatment. Most, but not all, of these proteins are secreted toxins and enzymes that mediate host cell death, degradation of stromal collagen, cleavage of host cell surface molecules, or induction of a damaging inflammatory response. Studies of these bacterial pathogens have determined the proteins of interest that could be targets for future therapeutic options for decreasing corneal damage.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis: outcomes and response to corticosteroid treatment

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical course and effect of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with those of all other strains of bacterial keratitis.

METHODS

Subanalyses were performed on data collected in the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT), a large randomized controlled trial in which patients were treated with moxifloxacin and were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 adjunctive treatment arms: corticosteroid or placebo (4 times a day with subsequent reduction). Multivariate analysis was used to determine the effect of predictors, organism, and treatment on outcomes, 3-month best-spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and infiltrate/scar size. The incidence of adverse events over a 3-month follow-up period was compared using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

SCUT enrolled 500 patients. One hundred ten patients had P. aeruginosa ulcers; 99 of 110 (90%) enrolled patients returned for follow-up at 3 months. Patients with P. aeruginosa ulcers had significantly worse visual acuities than patients with other bacterial ulcers (P = 0.001) but showed significantly more improvement in 3-month BSCVA than those with other bacterial ulcers, adjusting for baseline characteristics (-0.14 logMAR; 95% confidence interval, -0.23 to -0.04; P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in adverse events between P. aeruginosa and other bacterial ulcers. There were no significant differences in BSCVA (P = 0.69), infiltrate/scar size (P = 0.17), and incidence of adverse events between patients with P. aeruginosa ulcers treated with adjunctive corticosteroids and patients given placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Although P. aeruginosa corneal ulcers have a more severe presentation, they appear to respond better to treatment than other bacterial ulcers. The authors did not find a significant benefit with corticosteroid treatment, but they also did not find any increase in adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00324168.).

Corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis: the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT)

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a benefit in clinical outcomes with the use of topical corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers.

METHODS

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial comparing prednisolone sodium phosphate, 1.0%, to placebo as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers. Eligible patients had a culture-positive bacterial corneal ulcer and received topical moxifloxacin for at least 48 hours before randomization.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 3 months from enrollment. Secondary outcomes included infiltrate/scar size, reepithelialization, and corneal perforation.

RESULTS

Between September 1, 2006, and February 22, 2010, 1769 patients were screened for the trial and 500 patients were enrolled. No significant difference was observed in the 3-month BSCVA (-0.009 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% CI, -0.085 to 0.068; P = .82), infiltrate/scar size (P = .40), time to reepithelialization (P = .44), or corneal perforation (P > .99). A significant effect of corticosteroids was observed in subgroups of baseline BSCVA (P = .03) and ulcer location (P = .04). At 3 months, patients with vision of counting fingers or worse at baseline had 0.17 logMAR better visual acuity with corticosteroids (95% CI, -0.31 to -0.02; P = .03) compared with placebo, and patients with ulcers that were completely central at baseline had 0.20 logMAR better visual acuity with corticosteroids (-0.37 to -0.04; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no overall difference in 3-month BSCVA and no safety concerns with adjunctive corticosteroid therapy for bacterial corneal ulcers.

APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Adjunctive topical corticosteroid use does not improve 3-month vision in patients with bacterial corneal ulcers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00324168.

Effectiveness of a new tobramycin (0.3%) and dexamethasone (0.05%) formulation in the treatment of experimental Pseudomonas keratitis

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively determine, in a Pseudomonas keratitis model, the anti-inflammatory and bactericidal properties of a new formulation of tobramycin (0.3%) and dexamethasone (0.05%) that utilizes a xanthan gum vehicle.

RESEARCH METHODS

In a randomized and masked fashion, rabbit corneas (n>/=16 eyes per group) were intrastromally injected with 10(3) colony-forming units (CFU) of P. aeruginosa. Eyes were untreated or were administered a single drop every 15 min between 16 and 17 h postinfection (PI) and then a single drop every 30 min between 17 and 22 h PI, a total of 15 drops of either 0.1% dexamethasone and 0.3% tobramycin (TobraDex; Tdex) or a new formulation 0.3% tobramycin and 0.05% dexamethasone with xanthan gum (TobraDex ST; ST). Slit lamp examination scores (SLE+/-SEM) were derived from grading seven parameters at 22 h PI. Rabbits were sacrificed at 23 h PI and the log CFU+/-SEM per cornea was determined.

RESULTS

Untreated eyes had SLE scores of 11.11+/-0.43 and had log CFU of 7.27+/-0.06. Eyes treated with Tdex, as compared to the untreated eyes, had significantly lower SLE scores (7.39+/-0.21, p<0.0001) and significantly fewer bacteria (6.32+/-0.29 log CFU, p=0.0213). Eyes treated with ST had a SLE score (6.56+/-0.19) that was significantly lower than both the untreated eyes (p<0.0001) and the eyes treated with Tdex (p=0.0124). Furthermore, eyes treated with ST had significantly fewer log CFU (5.78+/-0.30) than untreated eyes (p=0.0001) or eyes treated with Tdex (p=0.0434).

CONCLUSIONS

The ST formulation with xanthan gum demonstrated statistically superior anti-inflammatory and bactericidal properties as compared to Tdex.

LIMITATIONS

Variations in inoculation procedures produced limited eye-to-eye differences in the infection.

Acute inflammation and loss of retinal architecture and function during experimental Bacillus endophthalmitis

Rapid vision loss and explosive inflammation are devastating consequences of Bacillus endophthalmitis that have not been well defined. We therefore analyzed the evolution of intraocular inflammation and loss of retinal architecture and function during experimental Bacillus endophthalmitis. Mice were intravitreally injected with 100 CFU of B. cereus, and eyes were analyzed for bacterial growth, retinal function, architectural changes and retinal cellular stress, inflammatory cytokines, and infiltrating cells. Retinal electrophysiologic and structural changes began as early as 4 to 6 hr postinfection. Significant declines in retinal function paralleled the loss of retinal architecture. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was detected in retina, indicating potential stress. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) infiltration into the vitreous began as early as 4 hr postinfection, coinciding with a significant increase in TNF-alpha in the eye. These results indicated that acute inflammation and detrimental architectural and electrophysiologic changes in the retina began earlier than once thought, suggesting that therapeutic intervention should be given at the earliest possible time to avoid vision loss during Bacillus endophthalmitis.

Corneal ulceration in pediatric patients: a brief overview of progress in topical treatment

Pediatric microbial keratitis is a rare but potentially devastating condition. The condition is similar to adult microbial keratitis, but is often characterized by a more severe inflammatory response. The micro-organisms that cause microbial keratitis in children are similar to the causative agents in adults, with herpes simplex and bacteria being the predominant causative agents, and fungi being less frequent. Of the bacterial pathogens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and alpha-hemolytic streptococci are common. The risk factors for pediatric keratitis include colonization of the eyes during birth and trauma to the cornea. Certain microbial factors involved in microbial keratitis are common to all micro-organisms, including adhesion to the cornea, penetration into the cornea, destruction of the corneal stroma (usually by microbial and/or host proteases), and recruitment of white blood cells to help defend the eye. Specific inflammatory responses that occur during pediatric microbial keratitis are not known in detail, but it is likely that cytokines and polymorphonuclear leucocytes are major factors, as they are in adult microbial keratitis. Treatment for pediatric microbial keratitis is usually the same as treatment for adult microbial keratitis; topical application of antimicrobial agents initially, followed by application of anti-inflammatory agents. With pediatric microbial keratitis, extra care must be taken to ensure nontoxicity due to blood adsorption. New microbial keratitis treatments are being developed and these mainly focus on new antimicrobials, antivirulence agents (such as vaccination against microbial toxins) or specific anti-inflammatory agents. There remains a clear need for increased research into the specific responses during microbial keratitis in children which will help progress new therapies as well as the development of new antimicrobials, especially new antifungal therapies.

Locally administered ocular corticosteroids: benefits and risks

Corticosteroids, used prudently, are one of the most potent and effective modalities available in the treatment of ocular inflammation. However, they can produce a plethora of adverse ocular and systemic events. In order to optimise and target drug delivery, whilst minimising systemic adverse effects, a diverse range of local ophthalmic preparations and delivery techniques have been developed. Topical drops and ointments remain the primary methods for administration of ocular corticosteroids. However, ocular penetration of topical corticosteroid drops depends upon drug concentration, chemical formulation of corticosteroid, and composition of the vehicle, therefore, apparently small modifications in preparations can produce a more than 20-fold difference in intraocular drug concentration. Periocular injections of corticosteroids continue to have a useful, but limited, therapeutic role and longer acting, intraocular delayed-release devices are in early clinical studies. Although newer corticosteroids with lesser pressure elevating characteristics have been developed, corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension and glaucoma continue to be significant risks of local and systemic administration. Posterior subcapsular cataract, observed following as little as 4 months topical corticosteroids use, is thought to be due to covalent binding of corticosteroid to lens protein with subsequent oxidation. Inappropriate use of topical corticosteroid in the presence of corneal infections also continues to be a cause of ocular morbidity. Other risks of locally administered ophthalmic corticosteroids include: tear-film instability, epithelial toxicity, crystalline keratopathy, decreased wound strength, orbital fat atrophy, ptosis, limitation of ocular movement, inadvertent intraocular injection, and reduction in endogenous cortisol. This extensive review assesses the therapeutic benefits of locally administered ocular corticosteroids in the context of the risks of adverse effects.

Indecision about corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis: an evidence-based update

PURPOSE

To quantify the effect of topical corticosteroids on bacterial keratitis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Bacterial keratitis is an economically important infection affecting 1 in 10,000 Americans annually. The predisposing factors, prior ocular health, infecting microorganisms, inflammatory severity, and therapeutic choices can affect the course and outcome. Antibacterial treatment is often curative but does not guarantee good vision. Because many treated patients develop a sight-limiting corneal problem, antiinflammatory therapy has sometimes been recommended.

LITERATURE REVIEWED

Publications from 1950 to 2000 that evaluated the effect of corticosteroids on bacterial keratitis in animal experiments, case reports and series, case-comparison and cohort studies, and clinical trials were systematically identified by electronic and manual search strategies.

RESULTS

The use of a topical corticosteroid before the diagnosis of bacterial keratitis significantly predisposed to ulcerative keratitis in eyes with preexisting corneal disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% confidence limits [CL], 1.41, 4.91). Once microbial keratitis occurred, prior corticosteroid use significantly increased the odds of antibiotic treatment failure or other infectious complications (OR, 3.75; 95% CL, 2.52, 5.58). However, the effect of a topical corticosteroid with antibiotics after the onset of bacterial keratitis was unclear. Experimental models suggested likely advantages, but clinical studies did not show a significant effect of topical corticosteroid therapy on the outcome of bacterial keratitis (OR, 0.62; 95% CL, 0.25, 1.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical corticosteroids increase the risk of infectious complications affecting the cornea but may or may not have an effect during antibacterial therapy. The unproven role of corticosteroids in the adjunctive treatment of bacterial keratitis highlights the need to collect prospective information that would guide appropriate management for this common eye disease.

Management of blebitis by members of the American Glaucoma Society: a survey

PURPOSE

To investigate the practice patterns among glaucoma subspecialists in the American Glaucoma Society regarding the management of blebitis.

METHODS

An anonymous survey incorporating 14 questions regarding the management of blebitis was mailed to all current active American Glaucoma Society members, including provisional members, in October 1999.

RESULTS

A total of 319 physicians received the survey, and 204 members (64%) returned surveys. Sixty-nine percent of respondents do not ask their patients with functioning blebs to use topical antibiotics at home for early symptoms of blebitis. Thirty-four percent never or almost never obtain conjunctival cultures at the onset of isolated blebitis, whereas 44% always or usually do. Fifty-one percent prescribe a topical fluoroquinolone alone as the initial empirical treatment of isolated blebitis. Twenty-three percent use a fluoroquinolone in combination with one or two other antibiotics. Twenty-one percent choose a combination of fortified topical agents, usually including a fortified aminoglycoside, vancomycin, or cephalosporin. Thirty-one percent use fortified agents in some combination with or without a fluoroquinolone. Five percent prescribe some other single agent alone. Only 6% routinely use an oral antibiotic in cases of blebitis. Sixty-two percent use topical corticosteroids in conjunction with antibiotic treatment. Of these, 68% start them after initial antibiotic treatment is established or once improvement of blebitis is noted. Fifty-six percent indicated that a moderate or severe anterior chamber reaction, including fibrin, would prompt treatment as a possible endophthalmitis. In a persistently Seidel-positive bleb, 77% generally attempt surgical bleb revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods of the management of blebitis differ among members of the American Glaucoma Society. Treatment recommendations generated from randomized clinical trials are needed.

Effectiveness of specific antibiotic/steroid combinations for therapy of experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis

Ciprofloxacin and prednisolone, but not an aminoglycoside and dexamethasone, were previously found to be effective in killing bacteria and reducing inflammation for the treatment of Pseudomonas keratitis. We investigated the therapeutic effectiveness of tobramycin/prednisolone and ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone in a rabbit model of experimental keratitis to increase our understanding of the effectiveness of antibiotic/steroid combinations. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of the effectiveness of a combination of ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone for experimental keratitis. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, 36 rabbits were divided into six groups: 1) untreated; 2) prednisolone acetate, 1.0%; 3) prednisolone phosphate, 1.0%; 4) tobramycin, 1.36%; 5) tobramycin plus prednisolone acetate; 6) tobramycin plus prednisolone phosphate. In the second experiment, 23 rabbits were divided into four groups: 1) untreated; 2) ciprofloxacin, 0.3%, plus dexamethasone alcohol, 0.1%; 3) ciprofloxacin; 4) dexamethasone alcohol. Topical antibiotic and/or steroid was given for 10 h, from 16 to 26 h postinfection, one drop every 15 min for the first hour and then every 30 min for the remaining 9 h. At 27 h postinfection, eyes were evaluated by slit lamp examination (SLE) and assayed for the presence of bacteria in terms of colony forming units (CFU) per cornea. Both prednisolone acetate and prednisolone phosphate reduced ocular inflammation (as determined by SLE), compared with no treatment (P < or = 0.036); the phosphate was more effective (P = 0.005). Tobramycin alone and in combination with prednisolone also significantly reduced SLE, compared with no treatment (P < or = 0.006). The bactericidal activity of tobramycin was not affected by either steroid formulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of bacterial keratitis

The eye is relatively impermeable to micro-organisms and other environmental elements. However, if corneal integrity is breached by trauma, a sight-threatening bacterial infection can result. Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pneumoniae are the most common bacterial pathogens associated with infection of compromised corneas. Bacterial enzymes and toxins, as well as factors associated with the host immune response, can lead to tissue destruction during corneal infection. For successful therapy, an antibacterial agent must be active against the pathogen and must be able to overcome the permeability barrier of the cornea. Topical application of antibacterial agents adequately delivers drugs to the cornea and aqueous humour. However, drug concentrations at the site of infection are not always sufficient to rapidly kill infective organisms. Infections with antibiotic-resistant strains present an even greater therapeutic challenge. In addition, sterilisation of the cornea by antibacterial agents does not eliminate inflammation and corneal scarring that accompany infection. Steroidal and non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents limit corneal scarring during experimentally induced bacterial keratitis. However, although promising, concomitant use of these drugs with antibacterial agents remains controversial. Two ocular drug delivery systems that provide high and sustained concentrations of drug to ocular tissues are corneal collagen shields and transcorneal iontophoresis. The collagen shield, originally designed as a bandage lens, prolongs drug contact with the cornea. Chemotherapeutic studies of experimental bacterial keratitis demonstrate that shields hydrated with antibacterial agents reduce bacteria in the cornea as well as or better than frequent applications of fortified antibacterial drops. Transcorneal iontophoresis uses an electric current to drive charged drugs into the cornea. In experimentally induced bacterial keratitis, transcorneal iontophoresis of antibacterial agents is superior to topically administered ocular drops for reducing the numbers of bacteria in the cornea. Although both drug delivery systems appear to be well tolerated and nontoxic in animal models, clinical trials in patients are required to determine the usefulness of these drug delivery systems in clinical trials. Based on present experimental results, future therapy of bacterial keratitis will involve efficient drug delivery devices, the use of new antibacterial agents or combinations of presently available antibacterial agents, and careful use of adjuvant anti-inflammatory agents.