Cross-sectional assessment of the roles of comorbidities in resting and activity-related dyspnea in severely obese women

[The impact of obesity on respiratory function]

The respiratory impact of obesity can be both symptomatic (resting and exertional breathlessness) and functional (pulmonary function at rest and on exercise). The prevalence of breathlessness is increased in adult obese individuals, ∼50% at rest and ∼75% on exertion (mMRC score>0). Pulmonary function abnormalities in obese adults include reduced functional residual capacity (FRC) and expiratory residual volume (ERV), and less frequently reduced total lung capacity (a restrictive defect, with TLC below the 5th percentile of predicted is present in around 15% in severe obese adults), with normal residual volume (RV). Airflows are barely affected by obesity, but bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is very prevalent, which may be due to the loss of bronchoprotective effect of deep inspiration in obesity (mechanical pathophysiology of BHR). In children, the modifications of lung volumes seen are quite different: TLC is normal while FRC and RV are reduced, explaining the increase in FVC. FEV1/FVC is therefore reduced by obesity, without true airflow obstruction (dysanaptic growth). Resting oxygen consumption (V'O₂) is increased due to obesity and normally increases with exercise. Maximum V'O₂ is normal or weakly reduced in obese patients; on the other hand, the increase in respiratory load increases the oxygen cost of ventilation, which tends to be rapid, both at rest and during exertion. Finally, it should be noted that there is only limited statistical correlation between exercise dyspnoea and respiratory function abnormalities in obesity.

[Pulmonary function testing of dyspnea complaint by the pulmonologist]

Dyspnea results from an imbalance between ventilatory demand (linked to CO₂ production, PaCO₂ set-point and wasted ventilation-physiological dead space) and ventilatory capacity (linked to passive-compliance, resistance-and active-respiratory muscles-components of the respiratory system). Spirometry and static lung volumes investigate ventilatory capacity only. Ventilatory demand (increased for instance in all pulmonary vascular diseases due to increased physiological dead space) is not evaluated by these routine measurements. DLCO measurement, which evaluates both demand and capacity, depicts the best statistical correlation to dyspnea, for instance in obstructive and interstitial pulmonary diseases. Dyspnea has multiple domains and is inherently complex and weakly explained by resting investigations: explained variance is below 50%. The diagnostic strategy investigating dyspnea has to distinguish complaints related or not to exercise because dyspnea can occur independently from any effort. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (V'O2, V'CO2, V'E and operating lung volumes measurements) allows the assessment of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms leading to functional impairment and can contribute to unmask potential underlying mechanisms of unexplained dyspnea although its "etiological diagnostic value" for dyspnea remains a challenging issue.

Loop gain in severely obese women with obstructive sleep apnoea

Our objective was to assess whether obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients were characterised by a reduced central CO2 controller gain (CG) and an enhanced plant gain (PG). We matched three groups of women (n=10 per group) enrolled in a previous study (Essalhi et al., J. Asthma. 50: 565-572, 2013): obese women with a respiratory disturbance index (RDI)≥15/h and with a RDI<15, and lean women without OSA (RDI<5). Tidal ventilation recordings during wakefulness with end-tidal PCO2 monitoring allowed the assessment of loop gain (LG) and its components (PG and CG). LG were similar for the three groups (p=0.844) while both PG and CG depicted significant differences (p=0.046 and p=0.011, respectively). Obese women with OSA were characterised by an increased PG and a reduced CG as compared to obese women without OSA. A negative relationship between CG and RDI (rho=-0.46, p=0.008) was evidenced. In conclusion, OSA in women is associated with a reduced central CO2 controller gain and an enhanced plant gain.

Mechanisms of obesity in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity and asthma are chronic conditions affecting millions of people worldwide. The two conditions also appear to be linked with an increased risk of asthma in people who are obese. The purpose of this review is to describe mechanism(s) that may explain the association between asthma and obesity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence suggests that the association between asthma and obesity is linked by two major phenotypes and three important pathways of obesity-related asthma: one phenotype with primary (often atopic) asthma that is aggravated by obesity and a second phenotype with late-onset nonatopic asthma, which predominantly affects women and primarily seems to be associated with neutrophilic inflammation. Proposed pathways include the mechanical effects of obesity (fewer deep inspirations leading to increased airway hyperresponsiveness), an inflammatory pathway driven by obesity-related cytokines (adipokines), and finally environment and lifestyle changes that have led to an increasing prevalence of obesity over the past 50 years (including exposures in utero, physical activity, and diet) may also result in asthma in predisposed individuals. How these environmental changes influence the occurrence and expression of asthma may depend on the age of exposure and on interactions with genetic susceptibilities.

SUMMARY

Future research should be directed to shed light on the associations between obesity and asthma phenotypes, modern lifestyles and environmental exposures and genetic susceptibilities.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/COAI/A6.