Cardiorespiratory and sensory responses to exercise in well-controlled asthmatics

Identifying limitations to exercise with incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a scoping review

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a comprehensive and invaluable assessment used to identify the mechanisms that limit exercise capacity. However, its interpretation remains poorly standardised. This scoping review aims to investigate which limitations to exercise are differentiated by the use of incremental CPET in literature and which criteria are used to identify them. We performed a systematic, electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus. All types of publications that reported identification criteria for at least one limitation to exercise based on clinical parameters and CPET variables were eligible for inclusion. 86 publications were included, of which 57 were primary literature and 29 were secondary literature. In general, at the level of the cardiovascular system, a distinction was often made between a normal physiological limitation and a pathological one. Within the respiratory system, ventilatory limitation, commonly identified by a low breathing reserve, and gas exchange limitation, mostly identified by a high minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope and/or oxygen desaturation, were often described. Multiple terms were used to describe a limitation in the peripheral muscle, but all variables used to identify this limitation lacked specificity. Deconditioning was a frequently mentioned exercise limiting factor, but there was no consensus on how to identify it through CPET. There is large heterogeneity in the terminology, the classification and the identification criteria of limitations to exercise that are distinguished using incremental CPET. Standardising the interpretation of CPET is essential to establish an objective and consistent framework.

Does the severity of asthma affect exercise capacity and daily physical activity?

OBJECTIVE

Exercise capacity, daily physical activity, and psychological profile are crucial aspects in the management of asthmatic patients. Whether these features are expressed in a different way in mild-moderate (MMA) and severe asthma (SA) is unknown.

METHODS

In this observational cross-sectional study, patients matching the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) definition for SA underwent incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), full lung function testing, and an evaluation of daily step count and physical activity. Questionnaires on quality of life, general fatigue, and presence of anxiety and depression traits (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - HADS) were administered. Patients were compared with a cohort of age- and gender-matched MMA patients.

RESULTS

We enrolled 16 SA, 17 MMA patients, and 16 healthy subjects. Compared to MMA, SA subjects showed a median (interquartile range) reduced peak oxygen consumption during CPET (20.4 (17.2-23.3) vs. 25.6 (18.5-30.3) ml/min/kg; p = 0.019), a reduced resting lung function (FEV1% of predicted 77 (67-84) vs. 96 (84-100); p < 0.001) and a pronounced anxiety trait at HADS (9.5 (3-11.7) vs. 4.0 (2.0-7.5); p = 0.023). In addition, SA patients showed a significantly higher reduction in inspiratory capacity from rest to peak (310 (160-520) vs. 110 (-65-325) ml; p = 0.031). We found no significant differences in mean daily step count or quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to MMA, SA patients present a reduced exercise capacity and a more pronounced anxiety trait, but not worse daily physical activity or quality of life. These aspects should be considered in the clinical management and research development of SA.

Ventilatory efficiency in athletes, asthma and obesity

During submaximal exercise, minute ventilation (V' _E) increases in proportion to metabolic rate (i.e. carbon dioxide production (V' _CO2 )) to maintain arterial blood gas homeostasis. The ratio V' _E/V' _CO2 , commonly termed ventilatory efficiency, is a useful tool to evaluate exercise responses in healthy individuals and patients with chronic disease. Emerging research has shown abnormal ventilatory responses to exercise (either elevated or blunted V' _E/V' _CO2 ) in some chronic respiratory and cardiovascular conditions. This review will briefly provide an overview of the physiology of ventilatory efficiency, before describing the ventilatory responses to exercise in healthy trained endurance athletes, patients with asthma, and patients with obesity. During submaximal exercise, the V' _E/V' _CO2 response is generally normal in endurance-trained individuals, patients with asthma and patients with obesity. However, in endurance-trained individuals, asthmatics who demonstrate exercise induced-bronchoconstriction, and morbidly obese individuals, the V' _E/V' _CO2 can be blunted at maximal exercise, likely because of mechanical ventilatory constraint.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with asthma: What is its clinical value?

Asthma is one of the most common respiratory disorders, characterized by fully or largely reversible airflow limitation. Asthma symptoms can be triggered or magnified during exertion, while physical activity limitation is often present among asthmatic patients. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a dynamic, non-invasive technique which provides a thorough assessment of exercise physiology, involving the integrative assessment of cardiopulmonary, neuromuscular and metabolic responses during exercise. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the utility of CPET in the diagnostic work-up, functional evaluation and therapeutic intervention among patients with asthma, highlighting its potential role for thorough patient assessment and physician clinical desicion-making.

Exertional dyspnea and operating lung volumes in asthma

Dyspnea has been reported to be a main contributor to exercise avoidance in asthma. While traditional markers of ventilation do not explain the heightened dyspnea during exercise in patients with asthma, this study proposed that exertional dyspnea in asthma was due to high-operating lung volumes, which may be improved with a short-acting β2-agonist. On two separate days, 16 patients with asthma and 16 controls completed a lung function test and incremental exercise tests to exhaustion. On one of the days (order randomized), 400 µg salbutamol was administered before exercise. Inspiratory capacity (IC), inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), and dyspnea (modified Borg scale) were evaluated throughout exercise. Compared with controls, patients with asthma reported greater dyspnea at the same absolute submaximal workloads. Furthermore, patients with asthma demonstrated altered breathing responses to exercise, characterized by reduced IC and IRV throughout exercise compared with controls. The reduced IRV was associated with increased dyspnea in patients with asthma. Salbutamol did not affect dyspnea or operating lung volumes in either group. The increased perception of dyspnea during incremental exercise in patients with asthma appears to be secondary to a reduction in IRV, which is unaffected by an inhaled β2-agonist. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Increased exertional dyspnea in asthma appears to be due to high operating lung volumes and is not affected by salbutamol.

Mechanisms, measurement and management of exertional dyspnoea in asthma: Number 5 in the Series "Exertional dyspnoea" Edited by Pierantonio Laveneziana and Piergiuseppe Agostoni

Asthma is a heterogeneous condition, with dyspnoea during exercise affecting individuals to a variable degree. This narrative review explores the mechanisms and measurement of exertional dyspnoea in asthma and summarises the available evidence for the efficacy of various interventions on exertional dyspnoea. Studies on the mechanisms of dyspnoea in asthma have largely utilised direct bronchoprovocation challenges, rather than exercise, which may invoke different physiological mechanisms. Thus, the description of dyspnoea during methacholine challenge can differ from what is experienced during daily activities, including exercise. Dyspnoea perception during exercise is influenced by many interacting variables, such as asthma severity and phenotype, bronchoconstriction, dynamic hyperinflation, respiratory drive and psychological factors. In addition to the intensity of dyspnoea, the qualitative description of dyspnoea may give important clues as to the underlying mechanism and may be an important endpoint for future interventional studies. There is currently little evidence demonstrating whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions specifically improve exertional dyspnoea, which is an important area for future research.

Combined effects of mild-to-moderate obesity and asthma on physiological and sensory responses to exercise

Despite the close link between asthma and obesity, there are no studies that have evaluated the sensory and physiological responses to exercise in obese asthmatics. We recently demonstrated that normal weight asthmatics with well controlled disease have preserved cardiorespiratory and sensory responses to exercise relative to non-asthmatic controls. However, these similarities may not hold true in patients with combined obesity and asthma. Accordingly, we sought to determine if combined asthma and obesity was associated with deleterious effects on cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise performance, dyspnoea, and physiological responses to exercise. Fourteen well-controlled obese asthmatics and fourteen age-matched normal weight asthmatics performed routine spirometry and underwent an incremental cardiopulmonary cycle test to assess the ventilatory, pulmonary gas exchange, cardiovascular, and sensory responses to exercise. Groups were well matched for age, height, spirometry, and asthma control. Obese asthmatics had a significantly greater body mass index (33 ± 3 vs. 23 ± 1 kg/m(2), p < 0.001) and lower self-reported activity levels by 47 % relative to normal weight asthmatics (p < 0.05). Obese asthmatics had a significantly lower maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)) (82 ± 14 vs. 92 ± 10 %predicted) and work rate (75 ± 8 vs. 89 ± 13 %predicted) relative to normal weight asthmatics (p < 0.05). The anaerobic threshold occurred at a lower VO(2) in obese asthmatics vs. normal weight asthmatics (54 ± 15 vs. 66 ± 16 %predicted, p < 0.05). Ventilatory responses were superimposed throughout exercise with no evidence of a ventilatory limitation in either group. Cardiovascular responses were normal in both groups. Dyspnoea responses were similar but the obese asthmatics experienced greater leg fatigue ratings at submaximal work rates. In conclusion, obese individuals with well controlled asthma have reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and greater leg fatigue ratings relative to normal weight asthmatics. The relatively reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise performance in obese compared to normal weight asthmatics is most likely driven by their more sedentary lifestyle and resultant deconditioning rather than due to respiratory factors.