1
|
Abstract
Medications delivered through oral inhalation represent the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Several options exist as methods of delivering aerosols to the lung, including metered-dose inhalers, metered-dose inhalers attached to spacers or valved holding chambers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers. Delivery of aerosols to the lung is affected by numerous factors including characteristics of aerosol particles, patients’ ventilatory patterns, and physical condition of the lung. It has become increasingly clear that the device used to deliver the medication is an important factor in the extent of deposition and the ultimate therapeutic effect. Further, the same therapeutic agent may exhibit differing effects depending on which delivery device is used. Each inhalation device has specific instructions for use, and the techniques for use vary significantly among the available products. In each case, patients should be instructed and observed to ensure that they have the proper technique of use to achieve an optimal effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Penick Brock
- Beard Hall CB#7360, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Dennis M. Williams
- Division of Pharmacotherapy, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Albuterol (salbutamol outside the USA) is used to acutely relieve symptoms related to airway obstruction and prevent exercise-induced bronchospasm. Albuterol is most commonly administered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI). MDIs had used chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants, but CFCs accumulate in the stratosphere and contribute to ozone catabolism. Loss of the 'ozone layer', which filters UVB rays, has public health concerns. Albuterol has been reformulated in MDIs using hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellants, which do not affect the ozone layer. Albuterol HFA MDIs deliver the same amount of drug per puff with similar particle size distributions as albuterol CFC MDIs, resulting in comparable bronchodilator efficacy of the two products. The highly favorable safety profile of albuterol has not been altered with reformulation. The propellant HFA-134a appears to be devoid of safety concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gene L Colice
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, and Pulmonary, Critical Care and Respiratory Services, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW Washington, DC 20010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dhand R, Guntur VP. How best to deliver aerosol medications to mechanically ventilated patients. Clin Chest Med 2008; 29:277-96, vi. [PMID: 18440437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and nebulizers are employed routinely for aerosol delivery to ventilator-supported patients, but the ventilator circuit and artificial airway previously were thought to be major barriers to effective delivery of aerosols to patients receiving mechanical ventilation. In the past two decades, several investigators have shown that careful attention to many factors, such as the position of the patient, the type of aerosol generator and its configuration in the ventilator circuit, aerosol particle size, artificial airway, conditions in the ventilator circuit, and ventilatory parameters, is necessary to optimize aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation. The best techniques for aerosol delivery during noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation are not well established as yet, and the efficiency of aerosol delivery in this setting is lower than that during invasive mechanical ventilation. The most efficient methods of using the newer hydrofluoroalkane-pMDIs and vibrating mesh nebulizers in ventilator-supported patients also require further evaluation. When optimal techniques of administration are employed, the efficiency of aerosolized drug delivery in mechanically ventilated patients is comparable to that achieved in ambulatory patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Dhand
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Environmental Medicine, University of Missouri, MA-421 Health Sciences Center, 1 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hendeles L, Colice GL, Meyer RJ. Withdrawal of albuterol inhalers containing chlorofluorocarbon propellants. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1344-51. [PMID: 17392304 DOI: 10.1056/nejmra050380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Hendeles
- College of Pharmacy and the Pediatric Pulmonary Division, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The current market for pulmonary drug delivery is at a bottleneck. The therapeutic advantages of inhalation aerosols, and the potential for the lungs as a route for systemically acting drugs, vaccines and gene therapeutic agents, have resulted in a rapid growth of the industry. Alongside this, the environment of inhaler design and formulation has changed markedly in recent years. Environmental concerns over propellants, the commercial success of dry powder inhalers, and the apparent lack of advancement of propellant-driven metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) has led to a less clear future for these devices. This review critically assesses these pressures and also potential opportunities for the pMDI. It is proposed that the future role of pMDIs will be determined by several important forces that can be classified under 'technology development' or 'market climate' categories. Technology development forces will be strengthened by the ability of the industry to have a systematic understanding of mechanisms of spray formation, perform subsequent and continued device and formulation advances, and a focus on all patient groups: particularly paediatric and geriatric populations. The ability to succeed in these areas will be largely determined by the willingness to invest in fundamental research of pMDI technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh D C Smyth
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Pharmacy, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ram FSF. Clinical efficacy of inhaler devices containing beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in the treatment of asthma: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 100 randomized, controlled trials. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004; 2:349-65. [PMID: 14720001 DOI: 10.1007/bf03256663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of different inhaler devices are available to deliver beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist (beta(2)-agonist) bronchodilators in asthma. These include hydrofluoroalkane or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propelled pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), many dry powder inhalers and breath-actuated inhalers. OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical efficacy of all available hand-held inhaler devices compared with the standard CFC-containing pMDI for the delivery of short-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in nonacute asthma in both children and adults. METHODOLOGY A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out of all available randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) using the standard pMDI compared with any other hand-held inhaler device, delivering short-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in patients with stable asthma. RESULTS One hundred and eighteen RCTs were included in this review. No clinical differences were found between the standard CFC-containing pMDI and 12 other hand-held inhaler devices for most outcome measures. We found no evidence of clinical differences between studies using either a 1 : 1 (pMDI: another inhaler) or a 2 : 1 dosing ratio. CONCLUSIONS In patients with stable asthma, short-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilators in standard CFC-pMDIs are as effective as any other hand-held inhaler device; therefore the cheapest available device that the patient is able to use should always be considered. Pharmaceutical companies should in future submit to regulatory authorities clinical outcome data (as opposed to in vitro data) in support of any dosing schedules greater than 1 : 1 when compared with the standard pMDI. Clinical effectiveness studies that use an intention-to-treat analysis and report more patient-centered outcomes are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix S F Ram
- National Collaborating Centre for Women and Children's Health, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gross G, Cohen RM, Guy H. Efficacy response of inhaled HFA-albuterol delivered via the breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device is comparable to dose in patients with asthma. J Asthma 2003; 40:487-95. [PMID: 14529098 DOI: 10.1081/jas-120018777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Handling difficulties, such as poor coordination of actuation and inhalation, are common in patients using press and breathe (P&Bs) metered-dose inhalers to administer asthma medication. Although spacers can help overcome some difficulties, the cumbersome nature of these devices often detracts from their use for the administration of rescue medications, where portability is important. This randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study investigated the efficacy, dose-response and safety of HFA-albuterol delivered via a breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device in comparison with the same medication delivered using a conventional P&B device. In total, 39 patients received six study treatments in a random sequence at clinic visits separated by 2-7 days: 2 puffs from a HFA-placebo Autohaler; 1, 2, or 4 puffs from a HFA-albuterol Autohaler; I or 2 puffs from a HFA-albuterol P&B. Both active inhalers delivered 90 microg albuterol base equivalent/actuation from the actuator. The change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the area under the FEV1 curve (FEV1 AUC) were significantly greater than placebo for all active treatment groups (p < or = 0.01) and were suggestive of a dose response for each inhaler. Examination of the pooled slope of the dose responses for the Autohaler and P&B using Finney's Parallel Line Bioassay Methodology found a highly statistically significant relationship indicating the equivalence of the two inhalers on both parameters (p < or = 0.002). The relative potency of the two inhalers was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.47, 1.46) for the mean change from baseline in FEV1 and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.48) for the change from baseline in FEV1 AUC. There was also a trend toward an increase in the mean percentage change from baseline in FEV1 as the number of puffs increased for both inhalers. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups with regard to time to onset of bronchodilator effect and the duration of effect was significantly greater than placebo (p < or = 0.01) in each of the active groups. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in nature and were of similar incidence (< or = 18% of patients) in each group. This study demonstrates a dose-response for HFA-albuterol on bronchodilation using both the Autohaler and P&B devices and illustrates that, in patients with good coordination of inhalation with actuation, the efficacy and safety of the two inhalers is similar at equivalent doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Gross
- Pharmaceutical Research & Consulting, Dallas, Texas 75231, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wright J, Brocklebank D, Ram F. Inhaler devices for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD). Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11:376-82. [PMID: 12468702 PMCID: PMC1758018 DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The research evidence on the effectiveness of inhaler devices for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease published in a recent issue of Effective Health Care is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Wright
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Infirmary, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ram FS, Brocklebank DM, White J, Wright JP, Jones PW. Pressurised metered dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhaler devices to deliver beta-2 agonist bronchodilators for non-acute asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 2002:CD002158. [PMID: 11869625 PMCID: PMC8437890 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of different inhaler devices are available to deliver beta2-agonist bronchodilators in asthma. These include hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free propelled pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder devices. OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effectiveness of pMDI compared with any other available handheld inhaler device for the delivery of short-acting beta-2 agonist bronchodilators in non-acute asthma in children and adults. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Collaboration Clinical Trials register was searched for studies as well as separate additional searches carried out on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and also on the Current Contents Index as well as the Science Citation Index. In addition, 17 individual online respiratory journals and 12 electronically available clinical trial databases were also searched. The UK pharmaceutical companies who manufacture inhaled asthma medication were contacted in order to obtain details of any published or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA - The full texts of all potentially relevant articles were reviewed independently by two reviewers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Fixed and random effect models were used. Dichotomous outcomes were assessed using Odds Ratios or Relative Risks (RR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI). MAIN RESULTS Eighty-four randomised controlled trials were included in this review, but few could be combined to assess a specific outcome for a given delivery device comparison. Only two studies required demonstration of adequate pMDI technique as an entry requirement. There were no difference between a standard CFC containing pMDI and any other device for most outcomes. Regular use of HFA-pMDI containing salbutamol reduced the requirement for short courses of oral corticosteroids (3 trials, 519 patients: RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49, 0.91); however the total number of exacerbations were unchanged (3 trials, 1271 patients: RR 1.0; 95% CI 0.75, 1.33). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS In patients with stable asthma, short-acting beta-2 bronchodilators in standard CFC-pMDI's are as effective as any other devices. The effect of HFA-pMDI on requirement for oral corticosteroid courses to treat acute exacerbations should be confirmed. Effectiveness studies that use an intention-to-treat analysis are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Ram
- Department of Physiological Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, Level 0, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK, SW17 0RE.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ram FS, Wright J, Brocklebank D, White JE. Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering beta (2 )agonists bronchodilators in asthma. BMJ (CLINICAL RESEARCH ED.) 2001; 323:901-5. [PMID: 11668134 PMCID: PMC58539 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7318.901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers compared with other hand held inhaler devices for delivering short acting beta(2) agonists in stable asthma. DESIGN Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES Cochrane Airways Group specialised trials database (which includes hand searching of 20 relevant journals), Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled clinical trials register, pharmaceutical companies, and bibliographies of included trials. TRIALS All trials in children or adults with stable asthma that compared the pressurised metered dose inhaler (with or without a spacer device) against any other hand held inhaler device containing the same beta(2) agonist. RESULTS 84 randomised controlled trials were included. No differences were found between the pressurised metered dose inhaler and any other hand held inhaler device for lung function, blood pressure, symptoms, bronchial hyperreactivity, systemic bioavailability, inhaled steroid requirement, serum potassium concentration, and use of additional relief bronchodilators. In adults, pulse rate was lower in those using the pressurised metered dose inhaler compared with those using Turbohaler (standardised mean difference 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.84); patients preferred the pressurised metered dose inhaler to the Rotahaler (relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.78); hydrofluoroalkane pressurised metered dose inhalers reduced the requirement for rescue short course oral steroids (relative risk 0.67, 0.49 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS No evidence was found to show that alternative inhaler devices are more effective than standard pressurised metered dose inhalers for delivering acting beta(2 )agonist bronchodilators in asthma. Pressurised metered dose inhalers remain the most cost effective delivery devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Ram
- Bradford Hospitals, NHS Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford BD9 6RJ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global warming is caused by increased carbon dioxide (CO2)resulting in a greenhouse effect with enhanced warming of the earth. Measurements of CO2 show a steady increase over the past 30 years caused by the burning of fossil fuels and from the loss of natural CO2 sinks. A 100-year increase in global temperature by 0.3 to 0.6 degrees C is reflected in atmospheric warming, glacier shrinkage, and rising sea levels. OBJECTIVES Planetary ecosystem dynamics are being altered, challenging public health. It is predicted that morbidity and mortality will increase as a result of heat stress, as seen in recent heat waves in the U.S. Weather disaster effects will increase in number and magnitude, and both noninfectious and infectious diseases may flourish. A significant challenge will be the changes in life cycles of microbial species due to the warmer environs. Specific increases in incidence have been noted for vector-borne diseases, in addition to pulmonary findings, cardiovascular morbidity, neurological diseases, and occupational diseases. CONCLUSIONS Warming can be demonstrated by the observed changes that have already occurred in the environment, particularly the thinning of polar ice caps. The United States Global Research Program has been established to coordinate research activities, which responds to issues deemed important by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Research issues pertain to the scientific uncertainties in the greenhouse effect, temperature measurements at various atmospheric levels and latitudes, and impact on biota redistribution. The Kyoto Protocol has mandated specific solutions, e.g., a 7% reduction in CO2 levels within 10 years. Future recommendations involve supporting new technologies that are available to decrease emissions as well as understanding the role that occupational and environmental specialists have in global warming recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Yoganathan
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Inhaled drugs play an important role in asthma management. The correct use of an appropriate delivery device is necessary to achieve the desired therapeutic effects of the drug. Currently, chlorofluorocarbon-propelled metered-dose inhalers, with or without spacers, are the most popular aerosol delivery devices. With the planned phase out of the chlorofluorocarbon metered-dose inhalers, the use of other delivery devices is being emphasized. To achieve optimal therapeutic effects, the drug and the delivery device should be considered a "couple". Aerosol delivery devices should provide an adequate "drug dose to the lung", be cost effective, simple to operate, minimize oropharyngeal deposition and systemic side effects, and match the patient's requirements. A new generation of aerosol delivery devices, incorporating the latest advances in aerosol technology, is likely to fulfill many of the goals mentioned above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Dhand
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|