Reasons for contact in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study on content of practice

Prevalence, aetiologies and prognosis of the symptom cough in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cough is a relevant reason for encounter in primary care. For evidence-based decision making, general practitioners need setting-specific knowledge about prevalences, pre-test probabilities, and prognosis. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review of symptom-evaluating studies evaluating cough as reason for encounter in primary care.

Methods

We conducted a search in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Eligibility criteria and methodological quality were assessed independently by two reviewers. We extracted data on prevalence, aetiologies and prognosis, and estimated the variation across studies. If justifiable in terms of heterogeneity, we performed a meta-analysis.

Results

We identified 21 eligible studies on prevalence, 12 on aetiology, and four on prognosis. Prevalence/incidence estimates were 3.8–4.2%/12.5% (Western primary care) and 10.3–13.8%/6.3–6.5% in Africa, Asia and South America. In Western countries the underlying diagnoses for acute cough or cough of all durations were respiratory tract infections (73–91.9%), influenza (6–15.2%), asthma (3.2–15%), laryngitis/tracheitis (3.6–9%), pneumonia (4.0–4.2%), COPD (0.5–3.3%), heart failure (0.3%), and suspected malignancy (0.2–1.8%). Median time for recovery was 9 to 11 days. Complete recovery was reported by 40.2- 67% of patients after two weeks, and by 79% after four weeks. About 21.1–35% of patients re-consulted; 0–1.3% of acute cough patients were hospitalized, none died. Evidence is missing concerning subacute and chronic cough.

Conclusion

Prevalences and incidences of cough are high and show regional variation. Acute cough, mainly caused by respiratory tract infections, is usually self-limiting (supporting a “wait-and-see” strategy). We have no setting-specific evidence to support current guideline recommendations concerning subacute or chronic cough in Western primary care. Our study presents epidemiological data under non non-pandemic conditions. It will be interesting to compare these data to future research results of the post-pandemic era.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-021-01501-0.

Coughing children in family practice and primary care: a systematic review of prevalence, aetiology and prognosis

BACKGROUND

For evidence-based decision making, primary care physicians need to have specific and reliable information on the pre-test probabilities of underlying diseases and a symptom's course. We performed a systematic review of symptom-evaluating studies in primary care, following three research questions: (1) What is the prevalence of the symptom cough in children consulting primary care physicians? (2) What are the underlying aetiologies of cough and the respective frequencies? (3) What is the prognosis of children with cough?

METHODS

Following a pre-defined algorithm and independent double reviewer ratings we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE. All quantitative original research articles in English, French or German were included if they focused on unselected study populations of children consulting a primary care physician for cough. We used the random effects model for meta-analysis in subgroups, if justifiable in terms of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We identified 14 eligible studies on prevalence, five on aetiology and one on prognosis. Prevalence estimates varied between 4.7 and 23.3% of all reasons for an encounter, or up to estimates of 60% when related to patients or consultations. Cough in children is more frequent than in adults, with lowest prevalences in adolescents and in summer. Acute cough is mostly caused by upper respiratory tract infections (62.4%) and bronchitis (33.3%); subacute or chronic cough by recurrent respiratory tract infection (27.7%), asthma (up to 50.4% in cough persisting more than 3 weeks), and pertussis (37.2%). Potentially serious diseases like croup, pneumonia or tuberculosis are scarce. In children with subacute and chronic cough the total duration of cough ranged from 24 to 192 days. About 62.3% of children suffering from prolonged cough are still coughing two months after the beginning of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Cough is one of the most frequent reasons for an encounter in primary care. Our findings fit in with current guideline recommendations supporting a thoughtful wait-and-see approach in acute cough and a special awareness in chronic cough of the possibility of asthma and pertussis. Further evidence of aetiological pre-test probabilities is needed to assess the diagnostic gain based on patient history and clinical signs for differential diagnoses of cough in children.

The worried young adult as a primary care patient

BACKGROUND

Being worried about one's complaint is common among primary health care patients. Persistent and intensive worry may, however, have negative consequences.

OBJECTIVES

We explored complaint-related worry and factors associated with it among 18- to 39-year-old primary health care patients.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients evaluated the intensity of their worry and the severity of their complaint before seeing their GP. They were also interviewed about their background and filled in questionnaires about general tendency to illness-related worry and psychiatric symptoms.

RESULTS

The intensity of worry varied greatly. One fourth of the patients reported intense worry. A general tendency to worry about health and hostile reactions were associated with both the intensity of worry and the severity appraisals. The patient's education and the duration and perceived course of the complaint also played a role in worrying and in the perceptions of the severity of the complaint.

CONCLUSIONS

Some psychological characteristics may dispose patients to intensive worrying and pessimistic appraisals of their complaint. This challenges the GP to pay attention to the patients' perspectives and knowledge. Careful elucidation of the patients' experiences of their complaints is especially indicated in the case of complaints of long duration and a stable course.

Health problems in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To establish epidemiological data on the health problems within family practice in Iceland by multicentre analysis of well-defined geographic areas.

DESIGN

Prospective practice audit.

SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS

Thirteen Icelandic health centres (HC) with computerized contact data from 1 January - 31 December 1988.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Health problems during one year in a population, as perceived by health care providers.

RESULTS

A total of 176 384 health problems during one year in a population of 31 248, as perceived by the health care provider, were analysed. Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 9.3% of all health problems (prevalence 210.6/1000 inhabitants), respiratory disorders 9.4% (189.9/1000), accidents 7.4% (203.2/1000), cardiovascular disorders 7.4% (112.0/1000) and mental disorders 6.1% (87.6/1000). The commonest single health problems were: hypertension, upper respiratory tract infections and non-articular rheumatism. The health problems accounting for the most frequent contacts were: mental disorders (4.0 contacts per individual per year), cardiovascular (3.7), and endocrine, nutrition and metabolic (3.2).

CONCLUSION

Problem-oriented medical records from HCs, computerized in a uniform standardized way, can give extensive information about the content and burden of health problems in family practice and presumably public health. Our results are valuable because the population (the denominator) and the geographic study area are well defined. This information is an important part of clinical epidemiology and can be of great value for educators and health care planners.