The objective response of brain metastases on radiotherapy. A prospective study using computer tomography

The Impact of an Intensive Care Diary on the Psychological Well-Being of Patients and Their Family Members: Longitudinal Study Protocol

BACKGROUND

Thanks to medical and technological advancements, an increasing number of individuals survive admission to intensive care units. However, survivors often experience negative outcomes, including physical impairments and alterations in mental health. Anxiety, depression, cognitive impairments, post-traumatic stress disorders, and functional disorders are known collectively as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Among the key triggering factors of this syndrome, memory impairment appears to play a significant role.

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the impact of an intensive care diary on the psychological well-being of patients and their relatives after discharge from the ICU.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

EXPECTED RESULTS

The results of this study evaluate the impact of an ICU diary on the quality of life of ICU survivors and their family members.

Local recurrence and cerebral progression-free survival after multiple sessions of stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases: a retrospective study of 184 patients : Statistical analysis

PURPOSE

Forty to sixty percent of patients treated with focal therapy for brain metastasis (BM) will have distant brain recurrence (C-LR), while 10-25% of patients will have local recurrence (LR) within 1 year after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). The purpose of this study was to analyze cerebral progression-free survival (C-PFS) and LR of BM among patients treated with repeated courses of radiotherapy in stereotactic conditions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 184 patients treated for 915 BMs with at least two courses of SRT without previous WBRT. Initial patient characteristics, patient characteristics at each SRT, brain metastasis velocity (BMV), delay between SRT, MRI response, LR and C‑LR were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all, 123 (66.9%), 39 (21.2%), and 22 (12%) patients received 2, 3, or 4 or more SRT sessions, respectively. Ninety percent of BMs were irradiated without prior surgery, and 10% were irradiated after neurosurgery. The MRI response at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after SRT was stable regardless of the SRT session. At 6, 12 and 24 months, the rates of local control were 96.3, 90.1, and 85.8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, P‑LR was statistically associated with kidney (HR = 0.08) and lung cancer (HR = 0.3), ECOG 1 (HR = 0.5), and high BMV grade (HR = 5.6). The median C‑PFS after SRT1, SRT2, SRT3 and SRT4 and more were 6.6, 5.1, 6.7, and 7.7 months, respectively. C‑PFS after SRT2 was significantly longer among patients in good general condition (HR = 0.39), patients with high KPS (HR = 0.91), patients with no extracerebral progression (HR = 1.8), and patients with a low BMV grade (low vs. high: HR = 3.8).

CONCLUSION

Objective MRI response rate after repeated SRT is stable from session to session. Patients who survive longer, such as patients with breast cancer or with low BMV grade, are at risk of local reirradiation. C‑PFS after SRT2 is better in patients in good general condition, without extracerebral progression and with low BMV grade.

Hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy without memantine in preserving neurocognitive function for brain metastases: a phase II blinded randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) shows potential for neurocognitive preservation. This study aimed to evaluate whether HA-WBRT or conformal WBRT (C-WBRT) is better for preserving neurocognitive function.

METHODS

This single-blinded randomized phase II trial enrolled patients with brain metastases and randomly assigned them to receive HA-WBRT or C-WBRT. Primary endpoint is decline of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) delayed recall at 4 months after treatment. Neurocognitive function tests were analyzed with a mixed effect model. Brain progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

From March 2015 to December 2018, seventy patients were randomized to yield a total cohort of 65 evaluable patients (33 in the HA-WBRT arm and 32 in the C-WBRT arm) with a median follow-up of 12.4 months. No differences in baseline neurocognitive function existed between the 2 arms. The mean change of HVLT-R delayed recall at 4 months was -8.8% in the HA-WBRT arm and +3.8% in the C-WBRT arm (P = 0.31). At 6 months, patients receiving HA-WBRT showed favorable perpetuation of HVLT-R total recall (mean difference = 2.60, P = 0.079) and significantly better preservation of the HVLT-R recognition-discrimination index (mean difference = 1.78, P = 0.019) and memory score (mean difference = 4.38, P = 0.020) compared with patients undergoing C-WBRT. There were no differences in Trail Making Test Part A or Part B or the Controlled Oral Word Association test between the 2 arms at any time point. There were no differences in brain PFS or OS between arms as well.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving HA-WBRT without memantine showed better preservation in memory at 6-month follow-up, but not in verbal fluency or executive function.

Phase II study of temozolomide and concomitant whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and possible toxicity of the combination of temozolomide (TMZ) with whole-brain irradiation (WBI) in the treatment of brain metastases from solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

33 patients with brain metastases were included in the study and treated with TMZ 60 mg/m2/day (days 1-16) concomitantly with WBI (36 Gy/12 fractions given in 16 days). One month after the end of radiotherapy, 6 cycles of TMZ were administered as adjuvant treatment (200 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days every 28 days).

RESULTS

Responses were assessed using computed tomography at the end of the 3rd and 6th cycle of chemotherapy. The objective response rate was 54.5% and 57.6% after the 3rd and the 6th cycle, respectively. The median overall survival was 12 months. In patients with metastases from lung cancer the objective response rate was 11/14 (78.6%) after both the 3rd and the 6th cycle of treatment. The most common side effects were anemia (24.2%), thrombocytopenia (18.2%), as well as nausea and vomiting (18.2%). The high incidence of hepatotoxicity (45.5%) might be related to concomitantly administered antiepileptic drugs and not to TMZ.

CONCLUSION

WBI combined with TMZ as concomitant and adjuvant treatment is effective in treating brain metastases, with acceptable mild side effects.

Temozolomide and concomitant whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: A phase II randomized trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) concomitantly with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with brain metastases (BM).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with BM were randomly assigned to 30 Gy of WBRT with or without concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m(2)/d) plus two cycles of TMZ (200 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days). The primary outcome was analysis of neurologic toxicity. The primary efficacy measures were 90-day progression-free survival of BM and the radiologic response at Days 30 and 90.

RESULTS

We enrolled 82 patients. No neurologic acute toxicity was observed. Grade 3 or worse hematologic toxicity was seen in 3 patients and Grade 3 or worse vomiting in 1 patient of the WBRT plus TMZ arm. The objective response rate at 30 and 90 days and overall survival were similar in both arms. The percentage of patients with progression-free survival of BM at 90 days was 54% for WBRT vs. 72% for WBRT and TMZ (p = 0.03). Death from BM was greater in the WBRT arm (69% vs. 41%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The concomitant use of RT with TMZ was well tolerated and resulted in significantly better progression-free survival of BM at 90 days. Although caution should be used, these results suggest TMZ could improve local control of BM.

Prognostic factors in brain metastases: can we determine patients who do not benefit from whole-brain radiotherapy?

AIMS

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is a standard treatment recommendation for patients with brain metastases. The goal of treatment is symptom control, which in the short run can be often achieved by steroids. Patients with a short life expectancy may not derive benefit from the addition of radiation. The ability to identify this group would aid the decision of whether to recommend WBRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on all patients referred for WBRT to palliative radiotherapy teams at two comprehensive cancer centres were prospectively collected over a 2-year period. The most frequent radiation dose and fractionation was 2000 cGy in 5 fractions over 1 week. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using forward stepwise selection process was used to develop a prediction model for early death (before 8 weeks). The variables considered were sex, performance status, primary disease, weight loss, age, time from primary diagnosis to brain metastases diagnosis, number of metastatic sites and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) status.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-five patients with brain metastases were assessed. The median follow-up was 19 weeks, and estimated median overall survival was 5.3 months. Multivariate regression revealed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and number of metastatic sites to be significant predictors of early death. The odds ratios were 2.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-3.19) and 1.39 (95% CI 1.07-1.81), respectively. Sixty-eight per cent of patients could be correctly classified; however, 55% would have been incorrectly predicted to die early.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor performance status and number of metastatic sites are useful predictors of early death. A regression model was highly predictive overall, but this was primarily due to a high negative predictive value of 86%. The ability to predict patients who would die early (positive predictive value) was only 45%. Thus, despite the understanding that we are over-treating a subset of patients, further research is required to identify patients who do not require radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy for brain metastases: defining palliative response

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Most patients with brain metastases are treated with palliative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). There is no established definition of palliative response. The aim of this study was to develop and test clinically useful criteria for response following palliative WBRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted of patients with symptomatic brain metastases treated with WBRT (20 Gy/5 fractions) and standardised steroid tapering. Assessments included observer rating of neurological symptoms, patient-completed symptom checklist and performance status (PS). Response criteria were operationally defined based on a combination of neurological symptoms, PS and steroid dose.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were accrued. At 1 month, presenting neurological symptoms were improved in 14 patients, stable in 17, and worse in 21; 23 patients were not assessed, mainly due to death or frailty. Using response criteria defined a priori, 15% (95% CI 7-23%) of patients were classified as having a response to RT, 25% no response, and 29% progression; 27% were deceased at or soon after 1 month. A revised set of criteria was tested, with less emphasis on complete tapering of steroids: they increased the proportion of patients responding to 39% (95% CI 27-50%) but didn't change the large proportion who did not benefit (44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical response to RT of patients with brain metastases is multifactorial, comprising symptoms, PS and other factors. Assessment of degree of palliation depend on the exact definition used. More research is needed in this important area, to help validate criteria for assessing palliation after WBRT.

Fractionated radiosurgery for brain metastases in 43 patients with breast carcinoma

About 15% of metastatic breast carcinoma patients are diagnosed with brain metastases. Historically, the majority are treated with palliative external whole-brain radiation with a median survival of 4 months. We examined stereotactic radiosurgery's effect on treatment outcome in such patients. Four hundred and fifty four consecutive patients with brain metastases were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery at Staten Island University Hospital, NY, between 1991 and 1999. The medical records of 60 women with histologically confirmed breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-three patients (71%) received fractionated radiosurgery (4 x 600 cGy) and form the core of this report. Sixty five percentage had been previously unsuccessfully treated by whole-brain radiation or had recurrence after craniotomy. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age at diagnosis of brain metastases was 52 years, with median interval of 49 months following the diagnosis of tumor primary. Median survival from brain diagnosis reached 13.6 months. Overall median survival from radiosurgery treatment was 7.5 months. Fifteen patients with one or two brain lesions survived a median of 11.5 months. For the fractionated cohort of patients 1- and 2-year actuarial survival was 28.2% and 12.8%, respectively. Three patients are alive at 32, 34 and 64 months, respectively. We conclude that fractionated radiosurgery improves survival of patients with brain metastases from breast cancer, especially those with small lesions, good functional status and no other metastatic disease. These patients should be encouraged to consider radiosurgery, possibly before WBRT. Considering our 7.5 months overall survival including patients with multiple metastases, and patients with progressive brain metastases despite extensive standard therapy and often systemic disease, these results suggest that radiosurgery could benefit breast cancer patients with brain metastases and extend life.

External radiation of brain metastases from renal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 119 patients from the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

PURPOSE

Approximately 10% of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma are diagnosed with brain metastases. Most of these patients receive palliative radiotherapy and die of progressive brain metastatic disease. This retrospective study examines the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with such patients who received only whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records of 200 patients with brain metastases from renal carcinoma who were treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1976 and 1993 were reviewed. Of these patients, 119 received WBRT only and constitute the basis of this study. Different prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall median survival time from diagnosis of the brain metastases was 4.4 months. Multiple brain tumors were treated in 70 patients (58.8%) who had a survival of 3.0 months compared with 4.4 months for patients having a single brain metastasis (p = 0.043). Among 117 patients the causes of death were neurologic in 90 (76%), systemic cancer in 19 (16%), and unknown in 9 (8%). Survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, were 33.6, 16.8, and 5.9%, respectively. Patients in whom brain metastases were diagnosed synchronously with a renal primary (n = 24) had a median survival time of 3.4 months compared with 3.2 months for those 95 who were diagnosed metachronously (p < 0.79, NS). In the Cox multivariate analysis of 13 possible prognostic factors, only a single brain metastasis (p = 0.0329), lack of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.0056), and tumor diameter < or = 2 cm (p < 0.0016) were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

These unsatisfactory results with WBRT suggest that more aggressive approaches, such as surgery or radiosurgery should be applied whenever possible.

Quantitative computer-assisted analysis vs. visual estimation of MR imaging response of brain metastases to radiotherapy

Using both quantitative computer-assisted analysis and visual estimation the MR imaging response of brain metastases to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was prospectively studied in 49 patients. Compared to the computer-assisted analysis, the precision of the visual estimation (by two readers in conference) of tumor response was determined. Also the radiological response was related to the clinical response. Six weeks after WBRT follow-up MR was performed in 27 of 49 patients. Of the remaining 22 patients without follow-up MR, 9 had died or deteriorated due to neurologic decline. In four patients (15%) tumor increase was demonstrated by computer-assisted analysis; in the other 23 patients tumor remained stable (15%) or decreased (70%). In 11 of the 27 patients, a second follow-up MR was obtained 26 wk after WBRT demonstrating tumor increase in seven patients (64%). Complete discordance between both assessment methods was noticed in only 4 of 38 MR scans (27 scans 6 wk after WBRT and 11 scans 26 wk after WBRT) with small quantitative changes in tumor volume. In 26 of 38 (68%) observations 6 and 26 wk after WBRT, there was a positive correlation between change in tumor volume and change in the Neurologic Status. Visual estimation analysis seems an appropriate method of routine therapy monitoring in individual patients with brain metastases. The computer-assisted analysis should be considered if precise response monitoring becomes critical.

Survival after surgical treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer: a follow-up study of 231 patients treated between 1976 and 1991

The authors reviewed the records of 231 patients who underwent resection of brain metastases from nonsmall-cell lung cancer between 1976 and 1991. Data regarding the primary disease and the characteristics of brain metastasis were retrospectively collected. Median survival in the group from the time of first craniotomy was 11 months; post-operative mortality was 3%. Survival rates of 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 46.3%, 24.2%, 14.7%, and 12.5%, respectively. One hundred twelve women survived significantly longer than 119 men (13.8 vs. 9.5 months, p < 0.02). Patients with single metastatic lesions (200 patients) survived longer than those (31 patients) with multiple metastases (11.1 vs. 8.5 months, p < 0.02). Patients with supratentorial tumors survived longer than patients with cerebellar lesions. A high Karnofsky performance scale score before surgery also indicated increased survival. In multivariate analyses, incomplete resection or no resection of primary lung tumor, male gender, infratentorial location, presence of systemic metastases, and age older than 60 years were significantly correlated with shorter survival. Approximately one-third of the patients died of neurological causes, one-third of systemic disease, and one-third of a combination of both. The results of this series confirm that the overall prognosis for patients with even a single resectable brain metastasis is poor, but that aggressive therapy can prolong life with quality of life preserved and can occasionally permit long-term survival.

Relation between local result and total dose of radiotherapy for brain metastases

PURPOSE

Some studies published recently focused on the improvement of the treatment results of patients with brain metastases who underwent radiation therapy. They evaluated survival as a measure for the expected improvement, but failed to demonstrate a significant benefit from an increased total dose of radiotherapy. This study was targeted to investigate the effect of dose escalation with a different endpoint, the local response.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

As a first step, a retrospective analysis of 164 patients treated with a standard regimen of 10 x 3 Gy was performed to find factors correlating with the local result. All patients were systematically followed and underwent regular computed tomography (CT) examinations of the brain after irradiation. The second step was to compare, with respect to local control and survival, 39 patients treated with a total dose of 40-60 Gy with 39 patients treated with the standard regimen selected by means of a matched cohort pairs method.

RESULTS

The retrospective analysis showed a dependence of the local result after irradiation on three parameters: diameter of brain metastases, primary tumor, and tumor histology. Small-cell and adenocarcinoma were found to be more radiosensitive than squamous-cell carcinoma. The highest radiosensitivity was found in breast cancer metastases. The matching procedure was performed with respect to those parameters and also the number of brain metastases and total cerebral tumor volume. The resulting groups were absolutely equivalent and differed only with regard to the total dose applied. The local response (complete or partial remission) was 48-52% after 30 Gy vs. 77% after 40-60 Gy (p < or = 0.05). Survival was not significantly different. A further analysis of the dose-response relationships showed the tendency of control probability to increase with total dose.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that there is a rationale for dose escalation in the treatment of brain metastases with radiotherapy, when local control is the aim. However, it seems questionable whether an improvement in survival results.

Radiotherapy response of cerebral metastases quantified by serial MR imaging

A patient with cerebral metastases, treated with radiotherapy, underwent serial gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. The MR images were quantified using home developed software to evaluate the changes in volumes of tumor mass and edema after radiotherapy (mean precision of the quantification technique less than 5%). The decrease in tumor volume and edema observed after radiotherapy preceded clinical improvement. The presented technique can be used to accurately assess, more directly than using clinical scales, the effect of putative therapies.