1
|
Malouff TD, Newpower M, Bush A, Seneviratne D, Ebner DK. A Practical Primer on Particle Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00137-1. [PMID: 38844118 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Particle therapy is a promising treatment technique that is becoming more commonly used. Although proton beam therapy remains the most commonly used particle therapy, multiple other heavier ions have been used in the preclinical and clinical settings, each with its own unique properties. This practical review aims to summarize the differences between the studied particles, discussing their radiobiological and physical properties with additional review of the available clinical data. METHODS AND MATERIALS A search was carried out on the PubMed databases with search terms related to each particle. Relevant radiobiology, physics, and clinical studies were included. The articles were summarized to provide a practical resource for practicing clinicians. RESULTS A total of 113 articles and texts were included in our narrative review. Currently, proton beam therapy has the most data and is the most widely used, followed by carbon, helium, and neutrons. Although oxygen, neon, silicon, and argon have been used clinically, their future use will likely remain limited as monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This review summarizes the properties of each of the clinically relevant particles. Protons, helium, and carbon will likely remain the most commonly used, although multi-ion therapy is an emerging technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Mark Newpower
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Aaron Bush
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Danushka Seneviratne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Daniel K Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gordon K, Gulidov I, Fatkhudinov T, Koryakin S, Kaprin A. Fast and Furious: Fast Neutron Therapy in Cancer Treatment. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:59-69. [PMID: 36060415 PMCID: PMC9415749 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Fast neutron therapy has been used for decades. In conjunction with recent advances in photonic techniques, fast neutrons are no longer of much oncologic interest, which is not unequivocally positive, given their undoubted therapeutic value. This mini-review recalls the history of medical research on fast neutrons, considers their physical and radiobiological properties alongside their benefits for cancer treatment, and discusses their place in modern radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Gordon
- 1 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “People's Friendship University of Russia,” Medical Institution, Moscow, Russia
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| | - Igor Gulidov
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| | - Timur Fatkhudinov
- 1 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “People's Friendship University of Russia,” Medical Institution, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Koryakin
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| | - Andrey Kaprin
- 1 Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “People's Friendship University of Russia,” Medical Institution, Moscow, Russia
- 2 A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center—branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schaub L, Harrabi SB, Debus J. Particle therapy in the future of precision therapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200183. [PMID: 32795176 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The first hospital-based treatment facilities for particle therapy started operation about thirty years ago. Since then, the clinical experience with protons and carbon ions has grown continuously and more than 200,000 patients have been treated to date. The promising clinical results led to a rapidly increasing number of treatment facilities and many new facilities are planned or under construction all over the world. An inverted depth-dose profile combined with potential radiobiological advantages make charged particles a precious tool for the treatment of tumours that are particularly radioresistant or located nearby sensitive structures. A rising number of trials have already confirmed the benefits of particle therapy in selected clinical situations and further improvements in beam delivery, image guidance and treatment planning are expected. This review summarises some physical and biological characteristics of accelerated charged particles and gives some examples of their clinical application. Furthermore, challenges and future perspectives of particle therapy will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moffitt GB, Stewart RD, Sandison GA, Goorley JT, Argento DC, Jevremovic T, Emery R, Wootton LS, Parvathaneni U, Laramore GE. Dosimetric characteristics of the University of Washington Clinical Neutron Therapy System. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:105008. [PMID: 29637903 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabd52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The University of Washington (UW) Clinical Neutron Therapy System (CNTS), which generates high linear energy transfer fast neutrons through interactions of 50.5 MeV protons incident on a Be target, has depth-dose characteristics similar to 6 MV x-rays. In contrast to the fixed beam angles and primitive blocking used in early clinical trials of neutron therapy, the CNTS has a gantry with a full 360° of rotation, internal wedges, and a multi-leaf collimator (MLC). Since October of 1984, over 3178 patients have received conformal neutron therapy treatments using the UW CNTS. In this work, the physical and dosimetric characteristics of the CNTS are documented through comparisons of measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. A high resolution computed tomography scan of the model 17 ionization chamber (IC-17) has also been used to improve the accuracy of simulations of the absolute calibration geometry. The response of the IC-17 approximates well the kinetic energy released per unit mass (KERMA) in water for neutrons and photons for energies from a few tens of keV up to about 20 MeV. Above 20 MeV, the simulated model 17 ion chamber response is 20%-30% higher than the neutron KERMA in water. For CNTS neutrons, simulated on- and off-axis output factors in water match measured values within ~2% ± 2% for rectangular and irregularly shaped field with equivalent square areas ranging in a side dimension from 2.8 cm to 30.7 cm. Wedge factors vary by less than 1.9% of the measured dose in water for clinically relevant field sizes. Simulated tissue maximum ratios in water match measured values within 3.3% at depths up to 20 cm. Although the absorbed dose for water and adipose tissue are within 2% at a depth of 1.7 cm, the absorbed dose in muscle and bone can be as much as 12 to 40% lower than the absorbed dose in water. The reported studies are significant from a historical perspective and as additional validation of a new tool for patient quality assurance and as an aid in ongoing efforts to clinically implement advanced treatment techniques, such as intensity modulated neutron therapy, at the UW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory B Moffitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America. Nuclear Engineering Program, University of Utah, 50 South Central Drive, 1206 MEB, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Glenny A, Furness S, Worthington HV, Conway DI, Oliver R, Clarkson JE, Macluskey M, Pavitt S, Chan KKW, Brocklehurst P, The CSROC Expert Panel. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 2010:CD006387. [PMID: 21154367 PMCID: PMC10749265 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006387.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of advanced oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers is problematic and has traditionally relied on surgery and radiotherapy, both of which are associated with substantial adverse effects. Radiotherapy has been in use since the 1950s and has traditionally been given as single daily doses. This method of dividing up the total dose, or fractionation, has been modified over the years and a variety of approaches have been developed with the aim of improving survival whilst maintaining acceptable toxicity. OBJECTIVES To determine which radiotherapy regimens for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers result in increased overall survival, disease free survival, progression free survival and locoregional control. SEARCH STRATEGY The following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 28 July 2010), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 28 July 2010) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 28 July 2010). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours of the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared two or more radiotherapy regimens, radiotherapy versus other treatment modality, or the addition of radiotherapy to other treatment modalities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias was undertaken independently by two or more authors. Study authors were contacted for additional information as required. Adverse events data were collected from published trials. MAIN RESULTS 30 trials involving 6535 participants were included. Seventeen trials compared some form of altered fractionation (hyperfractionation/accelerated) radiotherapy with conventional radiotherapy; three trials compared different altered fractionation regimens; one trial compared timing of radiotherapy, five trials evaluated neutron therapy and four trials evaluated the addition of pre-operative radiotherapy. Pooling trials of any altered fractionation radiotherapy compared to a conventional schedule showed a statistically significant reduction in total mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.98). In addition, a statistically significant difference in favour of the altered fractionation was shown for the outcome of locoregional control (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89). No statistically significant difference was shown for disease free survival.No statistically significant difference was shown for any other comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Altered fractionation radiotherapy is associated with an improvement in overall survival and locoregional control in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. More accurate methods of reporting adverse events are needed in order to truly assess the clinical performance of different radiotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne‐Marie Glenny
- School of Dentistry, The University of ManchesterCochrane Oral Health GroupCoupland III Building, Oxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Susan Furness
- The University of ManchesterCochrane Oral Health Group, School of DentistryCoupland III Bldg, Oxford RdManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Helen V Worthington
- School of Dentistry, The University of ManchesterCochrane Oral Health GroupCoupland III Building, Oxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - David I Conway
- University of GlasgowGlasgow Dental School378 Sauchiehall StreetGlasgowUKG2 3JZ
| | - Richard Oliver
- RED (Research and Education in Dentistry)10 Longbow Close, Harlescott LaneShrewsburyUKSY1 3GZ
| | - Jan E Clarkson
- Cochrane Oral Health Group, The University of ManchesterDental Health Services & Research Unit, University of Dundee, DundeeManchesterUK
| | - Michaelina Macluskey
- University of DundeeUnit of Oral Surgery and MedicineUniversity of Dundee Dental Hospital and SchoolPark PlaceDundeeScotlandUKDD1 4NR
| | - Sue Pavitt
- University of LeedsClinical Trials Research UnitClinical Trials Research House71‐75 Clarendon RoadLeedsUKLS2 9NP
| | - Kelvin KW Chan
- Princess Margaret Hospital610 University AvenueTorontoOntarioCanadaM5G 2M9
| | - Paul Brocklehurst
- School of Dentistry, The University of ManchesterCoupland III BuildingOxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - The CSROC Expert Panel
- School of Dentistry, The University of ManchesterCochrane Oral Health GroupCoupland III Building, Oxford RoadManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Tumour hypoxia is one of the limiting factors in obtaining tumour control in radiotherapy. The high-LET region of a beam of heavy charged particles such as carbon ions is located in the distal part of the Bragg peak. A modulated or spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) is a weighted function of several Bragg peaks at various energies, which however results in a dilution of the dose-average LET in the target volume. Here, we investigate the possibility to redistribute the LET by dedicated treatment plan optimisation, in order to maximise LET in the target volume. This may be a strategy to potentially overcome hypoxia along with dose escalation or dose painting. The high-LET region can be shaped in very different ways, while maintaining the distribution of the absorbed dose or biological effective dose. Treatment plans involving only carbon ion beams, show very different LET distributions depending on how the fields are arranged. Alternatively, a LET boost can be applied in multi-modal treatment planning, such as combining carbon ions with protons and/or photons. For such mixed radiation modalities, significant "LET boosts" can be achieved at nearly arbitrary positions within the target volume. Following the general understanding of the relationship between hypoxia, LET and the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER), we conclude, that an additional therapeutic advantage can be achieved by confining the high-LET part of the radiation in hypoxic compartments of the tumour, and applying low-LET radiation to the normoxic tissue. We also anticipate that additional advantages may be achieved by deliberate sparing of normal tissue from high LET regions. Consequently, treatment planning based on simultaneous dose and LET optimisation has a potential to achieve higher tumour control and/or reduced normal tissue control probability (NTCP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Bassler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Daşu A, Toma-Daşu I. What is the Clinically Relevant Relative Biologic Effectiveness? A Warning for Fractionated Treatments With High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70:867-74. [PMID: 17889448 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2007] [Revised: 07/04/2007] [Accepted: 07/06/2007] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the clinically relevant relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) of fractionated treatments with high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation and to identify the important factors that might influence the transfer of tolerance and curative levels from low LET radiation. These are important questions in the light of the growing interest for the therapeutic use of radiation with higher LET than electrons or photons. METHODS AND MATERIALS The RBE of various fractionated schedules was analyzed with theoretical models for radiation effect, and the resulting predictions were compared with the published clinical and experimental data regarding fractionated irradiation with high LET radiation. RESULTS The clinically relevant RBE increased for greater doses per fraction, in contrast to the predictions from single-dose experiments. Furthermore, the RBE for late-reacting tissues appeared to modify more quickly than that for early-reacting tissues. These aspects have quite important clinical implications, because the increased biologic effectiveness reported for this type of radiation would otherwise support the use of hypofractionation. Thus, the differential between acute and late-reacting tissues could put the late-reacting normal tissues at more risk from high LET irradiation; however, at the same time, it could increase the therapeutic window for slow-growing tumors. CONCLUSIONS The modification of the RBE with the dose per fraction must be carefully taken into consideration when devising fractionated treatments with high LET radiation. Neglecting to do so might result in an avalanche of complications that could obscure the potential advantages of the therapeutic use of this type of radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandru Daşu
- Department of Radiation Physics, Norrland University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mizoe JE, Tsujii H, Kamada T, Matsuoka Y, Tsuji H, Osaka Y, Hasegawa A, Yamamoto N, Ebihara S, Konno A. Dose escalation study of carbon ion radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60:358-64. [PMID: 15380567 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2003] [Revised: 02/20/2004] [Accepted: 02/26/2004] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of carbon ion radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer in a Phase I/II dose escalation clinical trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between June 1994 and January 1997, 36 patients with locally advanced, histologically proven, and new or recurrent cancer of the head and neck were treated with carbon ions. A dose escalation study was conducted, delivering 18 fractions through 6 weeks for 17 patients (Group A) and 16 fractions through 4 weeks for 19 patients (Group B). Eligibility and ineligibility criteria were the same in both groups. The dosages were escalated in increments of 10% after careful observation of at least 3 patients treated with the same dosages. The endpoints of the study were a Grade 3 reaction of the skin and the mucous membrane or local control of the tumors. RESULTS Follow-up time ranged from 77 to 108 months with a median of 90 months. Grade 3 acute reaction of the skin was detected in 1 of the 2 patients in Group A who were treated with 70.2 GyE/18 fractions/6 weeks. In Group B, Grade 3 acute skin reaction was detected in 20% (1/5), 27% (2/11), and 67% (2/3) patients treated with 52.8 GyE, 57.6 GyE, and 64.0 GyE through 16 fractions for 4 weeks, respectively. There was only 1 patient with a Grade 3 acute reaction of the mucous membrane. Only 1 patient developed a Grade 2 late reaction of the mucous membrane (superficial ulcer), which was located close to the tumor. No other Grade 2 or greater late reaction was noted until the time of analysis. Acute tumor reactions in 34 patients consisted of 10 patients of complete response 19 of partial response, 4 of no change, and 1 of progressive disease. Local control of 34 patients calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 75% at 5 years. Five years' local control of five malignant melanomas showed 100%, and that of 9 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma was 90%. Also, local control of 8 patients of salivary glands and 4 patients of ears was 100% at 56 months and 5 years. CONCLUSIONS The dose fractionation methods of 70.2 GyE through 18 fractions for 6 weeks and 64.0 GyE through 16 fractions for 4 weeks showed equal clinical outcome in terms of morbidity and local control. The outcome of carbon ion radiotherapy showed a specific effectiveness in local control of non-squamous cell carcinoma such as adenoid cystic carcinomas and malignant melanomas. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that carbon ion radiotherapy will deliver a high local control rate without unacceptable injuries to the surrounding normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Etsu Mizoe
- Hospital, Research Center of Charged Particle, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Noël G, Feuvret L, Ferrand R, Mazeron JJ. Le traitement par neutrons : hadronthérapie partie II : bases physiques et expérience clinique. Cancer Radiother 2003; 7:340-52. [PMID: 14522355 DOI: 10.1016/s1278-3218(03)00113-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Neutrons have radiobiological characteristics, which differ from those of conventional radiotherapy beams (photons) and which offer a theoretical advantage over photons to fight radioresistance by the differential relative biological effect of them between normal and tumour tissues. Neutron therapy beneficed of great interest between 1975 and 1985. Many of phase III trials were conducted and indications have been definitively deducted of them. After briefly describing the properties of neutron beams, this review discusses the indication of neutron therapy on the basis of the clinical results. Salivary, prostate tumours and sarcomas are the main indications of neutron therapy. In concern to the prostate cancers, other alternative treatments reduce the neutron therapy field. For sarcomas, the lack of randomised trials limits the impact of the interest of neutrons. For other tumours, the ratio benefice/risk of neutron therapy is inferior to these obtained with photons and they could not be considered like classical indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Noël
- Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO), BP 65, 91402 cedex, Orsay, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The development and evaluation of a new approach to neutron brachytherapy is described. This approach, accelerator-based fast neutron brachytherapy, involves the interstitial or intracavity insertion of a narrow, evacuated accelerator beam tube such that its tip, containing the neutron-producing target, is placed in or near the tumor. Tumor irradiation via brachytherapy should result in a reduction in the healthy tissue complication rate observed when poorly collimated and/or low energy external neutron beam are used for treatment. Use of a variable energy accelerator provides an advantage over isotope sources for neutron brachytherapy in that the neutron beam can be turned on and off and the neutron energy spectrum varied for different treatment applications. A prototype accelerator-based fast neutron brachytherapy device, 10 cm long and 6 mm outer diameter, has been constructed and evaluated in terms of its dosimetric output, treatment time, and practical feasibility. The prototype device is a tube-in-tube design with cooling water running between the inner and outer tubes to cool a beryllium target located at the tip of the inner tube. Cooling experiments were performed and coupled with Monte Carlo simulations to determine treatment times as a function of heat load for various neutron-producing reactions. Using the 9Be(d,n) 10B reaction at Ed= 1.5 MeV, 66 RBE-Gy (12 Gy physical dose) can be delivered to the boundary of a 4.5-cm-diam treatment volume in 8 min at a heat load of 130 W. Other reactions offer similar treatment times at somewhat higher bombarding energies and also show higher potential for dose enhancement with the boron-10 neutron capture reaction due to their softer neutron spectra. Dose distributions in a water phantom were measured with the prototype brachytherapy tube using the dual-ion chamber technique for the 9Be(d,n) 10B reaction at Ed = 1.5 MeV. The measurements and simulations agree within uncertainties and demonstrate that fast neutrons contribute more than 90% of the dose to the target volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijun Song
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pignol J, Slabbert J, Binns P. Monte Carlo simulation of fast neutron spectra: mean lineal energy estimation with an effectiveness function and correlation to RBE. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 49:251-60. [PMID: 11163522 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01406-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intercomparisons of radiotherapy trials conducted at different fast neutron facilities are complicated by the dependence of the relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) of the different beams on the fast neutrons spectra. To obtain a better understanding of the influence of neutron energy on radiation quality, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate fast neutron (FN) spectra at different irradiation positions. To allow for comparisons with experimental data, the positions were chosen to be the same as that used by other investigators to obtain microdosimetry readings and radiobiological data. METHODS AND MATERIALS The primary neutron yield for beryllium targets bombarded with protons at the National Accelerator Center, Louvain, Nice, and Orleans facilities were calculated using the FLUKA code. Neutron transport simulations were performed with MCNP-4A, giving FN spectra for various phantom depths, hardening filter thickness, and field sizes. Using an effectiveness function, FN energy groups were correlated with mean lineal energies (y*-values) obtained experimentally by other workers. RESULTS Calculations confirm earlier measurements that a decrease in beam quality by a hardening filter is the result of a reduction in the low-energy neutron component, i.e., neutrons below 3 MeV. Variations in RBE due to changes in field size and different phantom depths could also be explained by variations of neutrons with energies between 3-15 MeV. The effectiveness function allows one to calculate changes in y* observed for the NAC beam with great accuracy (R(2) = 0.99, p < 0.0001). Also, when this function is applied to beams with different neutron energies, y* calculated values show a very significant correlation with measured RBE values (R(2) = 0.98, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION The effectiveness function appears to be suitable to predict changes in y*-values and variations in RBE, using FN spectra simulated for various neutron therapy facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Pignol
- Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Soulen RL, Romero JA, Chuba PJ, Evelhoch JL, Simpson RE, Forman JD. Musculoskeletal complications of neutron therapy for prostate cancer. RADIATION ONCOLOGY INVESTIGATIONS 1997; 5:81-91. [PMID: 9303061 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6823(1997)5:2<81::aid-roi6>3.0.co;2-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the cause of hip complaints following conformal neutron therapy delivered by opposed lateral and oblique anterior ports to treat prostate cancer. Twenty-seven patients with hip complaints following neutron or mixed neutron and photon therapy for prostate cancer had 34 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies 3-39 (mean 15.3) months following treatment; for comparison, 13 similarly treated patients without hip complaints were imaged 1-32 (mean 13.8) months post-treatment; 25/40 imaged patients received concurrent nonsteroidal hormone therapy. Coronal and axial images of the hips/pelvis were obtained utilizing T1 weighted spin echo and fat suppressed inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Signal amplitude (SA) of involved muscles was measured on the STIR images and normalized to that of the psoas outside the treatment field. Hip complaints ranged from mild soreness or motion limitation to severe pain and limitation of ambulation; presence and severity of symptoms (sx) were significantly related to neutron dose (P = 0.020 and 0.0001) but not to hormone therapy (each P > 0.17). Normalized SA of the obturator muscles differed significantly with neutron dose (P = 0.013), the presence, and the severity, of sx (P = 0.0002 and 0.0007); estimated extent of abnormal muscle also differed significantly with neutron dose (P = 0.039), presence, and severity, of sx (P = 0.00004 and 0.0007); [hormone treatment had a profound effect on SA (P = 0.0001) and extent (P = 0.005) which was independent of sx (P = 0.10 and 0.14, respectively) and neutron dose (P = 0.33 and 0.32, respectively)]. Subcutaneous changes localized lateral to the greater trochanter were seen in all, and edema of the subjacent gluteus muscles in many, symptomatic hips; only 4/13 asymptomatic hips showed subcutaneous changes, 6 had mild gluteus edema. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head was seen in 5 symptomatic hips, with marked acetabular necrosis in 3 of these; small joint effusions were seen in 8 symptomatic hips; asymptomatic hips had no significant bone or joint abnormalities. Neutron therapy for prostate cancer designed to spare the rectum results in significant dose-dependent, musculoskeletal complications which are well demonstrated by MRI. SA abnormalities of irradiated muscle correlate significantly with neutron dose and both presence and severity of hip sx. Protocol modifications have been implemented to reduce these complications. MRI provides an objective means to assess both complications and the success of new protocols in ameliorating them. Concurrent hormone therapy has a profound effect on muscle changes on MRI which is independent of neutron dose and sx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Soulen
- Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Twenty-five randomised clinical trials have been completed which have investigated the value of fast neutron therapy. The results of these trials are reviewed in terms of the reported rates of local tumour control and late morbidity. The trials have included patients with cancers of the head and neck region, brain, lung, pancreas, cervix, bladder and rectum. None has demonstrated neutrons to be advantageous compared with photons. Two trials of locally advanced prostate cancer have given conflicting results. A trial of mixed schedule therapy has demonstrated improved local tumour control and survival. A trial of neutrons alone for similar stage disease has not shown any therapeutic advantages. It is still claimed that salivary gland tumours may be more effectively treated by neutrons but the clinical trial results are not definitive. Late morbidity after neutron therapy is a persistent cause for concern and often has been unacceptably high. There is no convincing evidence that fast neutrons are either as safe or as effective in cancer control as photon therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Duncan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|