Is the MVP regimen less active than previously described? Results of a phase II study in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Neuron-specific enolase is an effective tumour marker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is a well known marker of small cell lung cancer. The present study was designed to assess the clinical value of NSE in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as compared to that of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA).

METHODS

The study comprised 448 new consecutive NSCLC patients seen from 1996 to 2001. A set of 30 anthropometric, clinical, physical, laboratory, radiological, and pathological variables was prospectively recorded for all patients. Patients were carefully followed-up, and their subsequent clinical course recorded.

RESULTS

Increased values of NSE were present in 32% of the patients. Bivariate analyses showed that NSE, TPA and CEA were significantly correlated with each other, lactate dehydrogenase, tumour diameter, and disease extent. Univariate analyses showed that patients with elevated concentration of both NSE and TPA had significantly shorter survivals than patients with low values (30 [95% CI: 25-35] vs. 61 weeks [46-76], and 30 [CI: 24-36] vs. 59 weeks [40-79], respectively, P=0.0000). The Cox proportional hazards model including all the 22 variables significant in univariate analysis selected, in decreasing order of significance, the following variables: (1) N factor; (2) main treatment; (3) ECOG PS; (4) CNS metastasis; (5) age; (6) tumour cavitation; (7) NSE; (8) T factor; and (9) adrenal gland metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

This data indicates that serum assay of NSE is a useful marker also in NSCLC and a significant predictor of survival, independently of the other prognostic factors.

Prognostic significance of blood coagulation tests in lung cancer

Previous studies have shown that activation of coagulation has an impact on the clinical course of lung cancer. This study was carried out to assess the potential prognostic significance of platelet count (P), prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), anti-thrombin III (AT-III), fibrinogen (F), D-dimer (DD), factor II (F-II), factor VII (F-VII), factor X (F-X), protein C clotting (PCC), plasminogen (PL), and antiplasmin (AP) in 343 consecutive new lung cancer patients. A set of 32 anthropometric, clinical, physical, laboratory, radiological, and pathological variables was recorded prospectively for all patients. Patients were carefully followed-up, and their subsequent clinical course recorded. The most frequent abnormalities were of DD, F, and AT-III followed by F-VII, F-X, and F-II. Among the 12 clotting variables, the strongest relationships were those of F-II and F-X (Spearman rank (rs)=0.565), PT and F-VII (rs=0.562), F-VII and F-X (rs=0.514), PL and AP (rs=0.515), F and P (rs=0.490), AT-III and PCC (rs=0.476). Univariate analyses of survival showed that prolonged PT (p<0.043), and abnormally elevated DD (p<0.003), F (p<0.031), and P (p<0.047) were all associated with a poor prognosis. The multivariate model, however, did not confirm the prognostic significance of the coagulation factors. The results show subclinical activation of blood coagulation in lung cancer patients with early disease. In addition, clotting activation is confirmed as a predictor of survival, although not independently of other prognostic factors.

Prognostic value of stage grouping and TNM descriptors in lung cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The International Staging System for Lung Cancer (ISSLC) was revised in 1997. Validation studies are numerous but include only selected surgical patients. This study aims to verify the following: (1) the reliability of the ISSLC in an unselected lung cancer population; (2) the likely improvement in prognostic capability of the new classification; and (3) the possibilities for further improvements.

DESIGN

Analysis of a single institution database over a 16-year period from 1983 to 1998.

SETTING

Community-based hospital and second referral level institution for a province of 500,000 people.

PATIENTS

The study included 1,296 consecutive patients (1,117 men), with pathologically documented lung cancer (46% with squamous cell cancer), staged both clinically (77%) and pathologically (23%), and treated, for the most part, with chemotherapy (52%).

INTERVENTIONS

Anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded prospectively. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariate regression analysis.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

The 1997 revised ISSLC classification fit well with the cohort studied. Each stage and substage significantly differed from each other, except for stage IIA. In this stratum, there were only 13 patients. Comparing the 1986 and the 1997 classifications, no substantial differences were observed (log-rank statistics, 295 vs 293, respectively; p < 0.0001). Independent of the classification used, the Cox models were always highly predictive of the outcome. The only way to increase their efficiency was to replace the variable stage with the original TNM descriptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Since grouping different TNM subsets into one stage is not really helpful, we might choose to use TNM descriptors in clinical practice and in research.

Efficacy of platinum-based regimens in non-small cell lung cancer. A negative report from the Cuneo Lung Cancer Study Group

Combination chemotherapy with cytotoxic agents is the regular treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), good performance status, and no major clinical contraindications. Since the early 1980s, platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of this treatment, while combinations containing long-acting alkylating agents have been nearly abandoned, and represent a sort of historical treatment. Nevertheless, the real survival benefits of cisplatin are uncertain and still debated. To attempt an answer, the Cuneo Lung Cancer Study Group (CuLCaSG) carried out a clinical trial comparing a platinum (MVP) versus a non-platinum-based combination chemotherapy (MACC). The study comprised 156 patients with advanced NSCLC randomly assigned to the two treatment arms. MACC and MVP chemotherapies were given as originally described and continued until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or refusal by the patient. For a medium of four cycles of MVP and three cycles of MACC, the median dose intensity (DI) reached was, respectively, 95% and 100% of the intended (P = 0.0132). In all, 27 objective responses (1 complete and 16 partial responses in patients allocated to MVP versus 10 partial responses of the MACC group) were observed. Median progression-free and global survivals were, respectively, 21 and 34 weeks for MVP and 20 and 31 weeks for MACC (non-significant differences). The treatment plan was found non-significant also multivariate analysis of survival. Toxicity was rather similar in the two arms, except for more severe neurological toxicity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting in patients on MVP. Alopecia was more common after MACC. Subjective tolerance to treatment, and perception of physical and psychological well-being were rated similarly by patients of both groups. In conclusion, MVP was moderately more active than MACC, and showed a foreseeable and reversible toxicity, of a low-medium grade. However, this CuLCaSG study failed to substantiate any survival benefit from the use of platinum in combination with other cytotoxic agents.