Dosimetric impact of a frame-based strategy in stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumors

Estimation of delivered dose to lung tumours considering setup uncertainties and breathing motion in a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

Dose-response relationships for local control of lung tumours treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have proved ambiguous, however, these have been based on the prescribed or planned dose. Delivered dose to the target may be a better predictor for local control. In this study, the probability of the delivered minimum dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) in relation to the prescribed dose was estimated for a cohort of patients, considering geometrical uncertainties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Delivered doses were retrospectively simulated for 50 patients treated with SBRT for lung tumours, comparing two image-guidance techniques: pre-treatment verification computed tomography (IG1) and online cone-beam computed tomography (IG2). The prescribed dose was typically to the 67% isodose line of the treatment plan. Simulations used in-house software that shifted the static planned dose according to a breathing motion and sampled setup/matching errors. Each treatment was repeatedly simulated, generating a multiplicity of dose-volume histograms (DVH). From these, tumour-specific and population-averaged statistics were derived.

RESULTS

For IG1, the probability that the minimum CTV dose (D_98%) exceeded 100% of the prescribed dose was 90%. With IG2, this probability increased to 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses below the prescribed dose were delivered to a considerably larger part of the population prior to the introduction of online soft-tissue image-guidance. However, there is no clear evidence that this impacts local control, when compared to previous published data.

Investigating strategies to reduce toxicity in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for central lung tumors

BACKGROUND

[corrected] Stereotactic radiotherapy for central lung tumors has a narrower therapeutic index than that for peripheral tumors. Tumor tracking strategies have been proposed to reduce treatment volumes and toxicity, however they need to consider uncertainties in tumor size and shape change throughout respiration to ensure optimal local control. We quantified these uncertainties and explored strategies to account for them.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten patients with central tumors, PTV > 100 cm(3), motion > 5 mm and a 10-phase 4DCT without significant artifact in the tumor region were evaluated. Uncertainties were quantified using GTV size in different phases, and the Hausdorff distance (HD) between the phase 50% GTV and other phases after soft-tissue rigid registration. An individualized internal target volume for tracking (ITV(T)) was generated from the union of the GTVs in all phases after rigid registration. This was compared to ITVs generated for tracking based on the phase 50% GTV alone or with isotropic margins of 3 or 5 mm for size and volume overlap.

RESULTS

Median free-breathing PTV size and motion were 162.1 cm(3) (110-210) and 8.9 mm (6.1-14.1). Overall, median GTV size variation and HD were 4.7% (0.2-22.3) and 6.3 mm (3.9-17.6). Tracking using GTV 50% alone resulted in median volume overlap with ITV(T) of 71.7% (range 56.8-85.1). Isotropic margins of 3 or 5mm always resulted in a volume overlap less than 95% or a volume larger than the ITV(T).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in size and shape of central lung tumors are substantial during respiration. These limit the ability to reduce treatment volumes with tracking, especially if isotropic margins are used. An individualized ITV for tracking, such as the ITV(T) is preferred.

Inter-tester reproducibility of tumour change in small cell lung cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Tumour volume change during delivery of chemoradiotherapy is observed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. In this study, we have compared tumour volume and anatomical changes, e.g. atelectasis or pleural effusions determined by three different methods.

METHOD

A total of 37 SCLC patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy during 2010-2011 were included. The patients were treated based on a daily three-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) bony anatomy registration. The CBCT scans were retrospectively reviewed visually by a radiation therapist (Visual-RTT) in order to register tumour volume changes. Furthermore, the tumour volume changes were obtained by either deformable image registration (DIR) or delineation by a radiation oncologist (RO). Kappa (κ) statistics and paired t-tests were used for evaluation of the inter-tester agreement.

RESULTS

The tumour volume change between the Visual-RTT, the DIR and the RO assessments obtained 84-97% agreement (κ = 0.68-0.95). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the tumour change assessment of the RO (mean 13.6 ml) and the DIR (mean 14.5 ml), p = 0.59. Tumour shrinkage was observed in 15 (41%) patients and anatomical changes in seven (19%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The inter-tester reproducibility of tumour volume change between the three methods is excellent. Visual-RTT on-line inspection may be used to determine tumour shrinkage and anatomical changes as atelectasis or pleural effusions during the radiotherapy course by use of daily CBCT scans.

Dosimetric impact of respiratory motion, interfraction baseline shifts, and anatomical changes in radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The survival rates for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be improved by dose escalation; however, margin reduction may be required in order to keep the toxicity at an acceptable level. In this study we have investigated the dosimetric impact of tumor motion and anatomical changes during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of patients with NSCLC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixteen NSCLC patients received IMRT with concomitant chemotherapy. The tumor and lymph node targets were delineated in the mid-ventilation phase of a planning 4DCT scan (CT1). Typically 66 Gy was delivered in 33 fractions using daily CBCT with bony anatomy match for patient setup. The daily baseline shifts of the mean tumor position relative to the spine were extracted from the CBCT scans. A second 4DCT scan (CT2) was acquired halfway through the treatment course and the respiratory tumor motion was extracted. The plan was recalculated on CT2 with and without inclusion of the respiratory tumor motion and baseline shifts in order to investigate the impact of tumor motion and anatomical changes on the tumor dose.

RESULTS

Respiratory tumor motion was largest in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction (range 0-13.1 mm). Tumor baseline shifts up to 18 mm (CC direction) and 24 mm (left-right and anterior-posterior) were observed. The average absolute difference in CTV mean dose to the primary tumor (CTV-t) between CT1 and CT2 was 1.28% (range 0.1-4.0%) without motion. Respiratory motion and baseline shifts lead to average absolute CTV-t mean dose changes of 0.46% (0-1.9%) and 0.65% (0.0-2.1%), respectively. For most patients, the changes in the CTV-t dose were caused by anatomical changes rather than internal target motion.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical changes had larger impact on the target dose distribution than internal target motion. Adaptive radiotherapy could be used to achieve better target coverage throughout the treatment course.