1
|
Apostolova C, Ferroum A, Alhassan B, Prakash I, Viezel-Mathieu A, Basik M, Boileau JF, Meterissian S, Wong N, Foulkes WD, Wong SM. Surgical Decision Making in Genetically High-Risk Women: Quantifying Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Risks of Supplemental Surgery After Risk-Reducing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:356-364. [PMID: 37838650 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14418-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) helps prevent breast cancer in high-risk women but also carries a risk of unanticipated supplemental surgeries. We sought to determine the likelihood of supplemental surgeries following RRM. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of female patients with a confirmed germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1/2, PALB2 and others) who underwent bilateral or contralateral RRM at our institution between 2006 and 2022. Supplemental surgeries were defined as any operation requiring general or local anesthesia performed outside of the initially planned procedure(s). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-years cumulative incidence of supplemental surgery. RESULTS Of 560 GPV carriers, RRMs were performed in 258 (46.1%) women. The median age of the cohort was 44 years (interquartile range 37-52 years), with 33 (12.8%) patients undergoing RRM without reconstruction and 225 (87.2%) undergoing RRM with reconstruction. Following surgery, 34 patients (13.2%) developed early (< 30 days) postoperative complications, including infection, hematoma, seroma, loss of the nipple areola complex, flap necrosis, implant exposure and/or prosthesis removal. At a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 94 (36.4%) GPV carriers underwent at least one reoperation. Participants who experienced an early postoperative complication had the highest rate of reoperation (85.3% vs. 29.0%; p < 0.001) and a significantly higher likelihood of multiple additional surgical interventions (41.2% vs. 10.7%; p < 0.001). The 5-years rate of supplemental surgery was 39.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.7-46.5] in the overall cohort and 31.5% (95% CI 24.9-39.3) in patients without an early postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS Unanticipated supplemental surgeries occur in 40% of GPV carriers following RRM and in nearly one-third of patients without early postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Apostolova
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amina Ferroum
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Basmah Alhassan
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alex Viezel-Mathieu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Sarkis Meterissian
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nora Wong
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Lorenzi F, Borelli F, Catapano S, Alessandri-Bonetti M, Sala P, Veronesi P. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction for women with hereditary gastric and breast cancer syndrome. Eur J Cancer Prev 2023; 32:139-148. [PMID: 36574282 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Post mastectomy reconstruction is nowadays an integral part of breast cancer treatment, usually performed in the immediate setting. Among women with hereditary gastric and breast cancer syndromes, three different scenarios can be identified. First, healthy women seeking for prophylactic mastectomies. Second, cancer patients requiring mastectomy at the tumor site and simultaneous risk reducing mastectomy of the healthy breast. Third, cancer patients who have been treated for primary cancer requiring risk reducing mastectomies in a further stage. In this paper, we present a schematic guide for reconstruction for each subpopulation of subjects and their peculiarities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Lorenzi
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS
| | - Francesco Borelli
- Department of Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, University of Milan, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Galeazzi
| | - Simone Catapano
- School of Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono
| | - Mario Alessandri-Bonetti
- School of Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono
| | - Pietro Sala
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Milan
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Surgical Outcome Measures in a Cohort of Patients at High Risk of Breast Cancer Treated by Bilateral Risk Reducing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:496e-505e. [PMID: 35749222 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with breast cancer related genetic pathogenic variants (e.g. BRCA1, BRCA2) or with a strong family history carry lifetime risks of developing breast cancer of up to 80-90%. A significant proportion of these women proceed to bilateral risk reducing mastectomy (RRM). We aimed to document the surgical morbidity of RRM and establish whether a diagnosis of breast cancer at the time of surgery impacted on outcomes. METHODS Clinical details of 445 women identified as having >25% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer who underwent RRM and breast reconstruction were interrogated for surgical outcomes such as planned, unplanned and emergency procedures, complication rates, length of stay and longevity of breast reconstruction. These outcome measures were recorded in women diagnosed with breast cancer perioperatively (cancer group, CG) and those without malignancy (benign group, BG). RESULTS Median follow up was similar in both groups (BG, 70months; CG 73 months). Patients were older in the CG than BG (43y v 39y; p<0.001). Women in the CG required more planned procedures to complete reconstruction than those in the BG (4 v 2; p=0.002). Emergency procedures, unplanned surgical interventions (e.g. capsulectomy) and post reconstruction complication rates were similar between groups.One in five women overall required revisional surgery. Patients with autologous reconstructions had a revision rate of 1.24/1000 person years compared with 2.52 in the implant reconstruction group. CONCLUSION Women contemplating RRM can be reassured that this a safe and effective procedure but will likely take multiple interventions. This knowledge should be integral to obtaining informed consent.
Collapse
|
4
|
The Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Surgical and Satisfaction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3910. [PMID: 34765389 PMCID: PMC8575424 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy could be a necessary step in the oncological treatment for breast cancer. However, radiotherapy may have negative effects on implant-based immediate breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on surgical results and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes in women undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A systematic search in PubMed was conducted on September 2019 and updated on April 2021. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Observational Studies. RevMan 5 was used for statistical analysis. We obtained relative risks to determine the complication incidence and mean differences for 2-year BREAST-Q scores. Results Fourteen studies were included. A total of 11,958 implant-based immediate reconstructions were performed, 2311 received postmastectomy radiation therapy, and 9647 were considered as control group. Surgical complications, reoperation rates, and reconstruction failure were significantly higher among irradiated breasts. Significantly lower BREAST-Q scores were reported by irradiated women receiving radiotherapy. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis combines reconstruction complication rates with aesthetic and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes. Adjuvant radiotherapy is consistently associated with greater complication rates and poorer aesthetic and satisfaction outcomes. The magnitude of association is significantly lower when the reconstruction is based on autologous tissues.
Collapse
|
5
|
Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 305:937-943. [PMID: 34554314 PMCID: PMC8967752 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06244-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The demand for prophylactic mastectomy has increased significantly over the last 10 years. This can be explained by a substantial gain of knowledge about the clinical risk and outcome of patients with high risk mutations such as BRCA1 and 2, the improved diagnostic possibilities for detecting the genetic predisposition for the development of breast cancer and the awareness for those mutations by health care professionals as well as patients. In addition to expander-to-implant reconstruction and microsurgical flap surgery, definitive immediate reconstruction with subpectoral insertion of breast implants is often preferred. The prosthesis is covered at its inferior pole by a synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix. In these cases, in addition to the silicone prosthesis, a further foreign body must be implanted. This can be exposed in the event of wound healing disorder or necrosis of the usually thin soft tissue covering after subcutaneous mastectomy, thus calling into question the reconstructive result. In this study, the coverage of the lower pole by a caudal deepithelialized dermis flap, which allows the implant to be completely covered with well vascularized tissue, is compared to coverage by a synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix. Patients and methods From January 2014 to June 2020, 74 patients (106 breasts) underwent breast reconstruction following uni or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Reconstruction was performed with autologous tissue (15 breasts), with tissue expander or implant without implant support (15 breasts), with implant and use of an acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh (39 breasts) and with implant and caudal dermis flap (37 breasts). In this study, we compared the patients with implant and dermal matrix/mesh to the group reconstructed with implant and dermal flap. Results In the group with the caudal dermis flap, 4 patients developed skin necrosis, which all healed conservatively due to the sufficient blood supply through the dermis flap. In the group with the use of a synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix, skin necrosis was found in three cases. In one of these patients the implant was exposed and had to be removed. Discussion For patients with excess skin or macromastia, the caudal dermis flap is a reliable and less expensive option for complete coverage of an implant after prophylactic mastectomy. In particular, the vascularized dermis flap can protect the implant from the consequences of skin necrosis after prophylactic mastectomy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Jeffers L, Reid J, Fitzsimons D, Morrison PJ, Dempster M. Interventions to improve psychosocial well-being in female BRCA-mutation carriers following risk-reducing surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10:CD012894. [PMID: 31595976 PMCID: PMC6784162 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012894.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women who carry a pathogenic mutation in either a BRCA1 DNA repair associated or BRCA2 DNA repair associated (BRCA1 or BRCA2) gene have a high lifetime risk of developing breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. To manage this risk women may choose to undergo risk-reducing surgery to remove breast tissue, ovaries, and fallopian tubes. Surgery should increase survival, but can impact women's lives adversely at the psychological and psychosexual levels. Interventions to facilitate psychological adjustment and improve quality of life post risk-reducing surgery are needed. OBJECTIVES To examine psychosocial interventions in female BRCA carriers who have undergone risk-reducing surgery and to evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions on psychological adjustment and quality of life. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science up to April 2019 and Scopus up to January 2018. We also handsearched abstracts of scientific meetings and other relevant publications. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCT), non-randomised studies (NRS), prospective and retrospective cohort studies and interventional studies using baseline and postintervention analyses in female BRCA carriers who have undergone risk-reducing surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed eligibility studies for inclusion in the review. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We screened 4956 records from the searches, selecting 34 unique studies for full-text scrutiny, of which two met the inclusion criteria: one RCT and one NRS. The included studies assessed 113 female BRCA carriers who had risk-reducing surgery, but there was attrition, and outcome data were not available for all participants at final study assessments. We assessed the RCT as at a high risk of bias whilst the NRS did not have a control group. Our GRADE assessment of the studies was very low-certainty due to the paucity of data and methodological shortcomings of the studies. The primary outcome of quality of life was only measured in the RCT and that was specific to the menopause. Both studies reported on psychological distress and sexual function. Neither study measured body image, perhaps because this is most often associated with risk-reducing mastectomy rather than oophorectomy.The RCT (66 participants recruited with 48 followed to 12 months) assessed the short- and long-term effects of an eight-week mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) training programme on quality of life, sexual functioning, and sexual distress in female BRCA carriers (n = 34) in a specialised family cancer clinic in the Netherlands compared to female BRCA carriers (n = 32) who received usual care. Measurements on the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) showed some improvement at 3 and 12 months compared to the usual care group. At 3 months the mean MENQOL scores were 3.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0 to 3.9) and 3.8 (95% CI 3.3 to 4.2) for the MBSR and usual care groups respectively, whilst at 12 months the corresponding values were 3.6 (95% CI 3.1 to 4.0) and 3.9 (95% CI 3.5 to 4.4) (1 study; 48 participants followed up at 12 months). However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the very low-certainty of the evidence, where a lower score is better. Other outcome measures on the Female Sexual Function Index and the Female Sexual Distress Scale showed no significant differences between the two groups. Our GRADE assessment of the evidence was very low-certainty due to the lack of blinding of participants and personnel, attrition bias and self-selection (as only one-third of eligible women chose to participate in the study) and serious imprecision due to the small sample size and wide 95% CI.The NRS comprised 37 female BRCA carriers selected from three Boston-area hospitals who had undergone a novel sexual health intervention following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) without a history of tubo-ovarian cancer. The intervention consisted of targeted sexual-health education, body awareness and relaxation training, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy strategies, followed by two sessions of tailored telephone counselling. This was a single-arm study without a control group. Our GRADE assessment of the evidence was very low-certainty, and as there was no comparison group in the included study, we could not estimate a relative effect. The study reported change in psychosexual adjustment from baseline to postintervention (median 2.3 months) using measures of Female Sexual Function Index (n = 34), which yielded change with a mean of 3.91, standard deviation (SD) 9.12, P = 0.018 (1 study, 34 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The Brief Symptom Inventory, Global Severity Index yielded a mean change of 3.92, SD 5.94, P < 0.001. The Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale yielded change with a mean of 12.14, SD 20.56, P < 0.001. The Sexual Knowledge Scale reported mean change of 1.08, SD 1.50, P < 0.001 (n = 36). Participant satisfaction was measured by questionnaire, and 100% participants reported that they enjoyed taking part in the psychoeducation group and felt "certain" or "very certain" that they had learned new skills to help them cope with the sexual side effects of RRSO. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effect of psychosocial interventions on quality of life and emotional well-being in female BRCA carriers who undergo risk-reducing surgery is uncertain given the very low methodological quality in the two studies included in the review. The absence of such interventions highlights the need for partnership between researchers and clinicians in this specific area to take forward the patient-reported outcomes and develop interventions to address the psychosocial issues related to risk-reducing surgery in female BRCA carriers, particularly in this new era of genomics, where testing may become more mainstream and many more women are identified as gene carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jeffers
- Regional Medical Genetics CentreMedical GeneticsBelfast Health and Social Care TrustLisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7AB
| | - Joanne Reid
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery10 Malone RoadBelfastUKBT9 5BN
| | - Donna Fitzsimons
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery10 Malone RoadBelfastUKBT9 5BN
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Regional Medical Genetics CentreMedical GeneticsBelfast Health and Social Care TrustLisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7AB
- Queen's University BelfastCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology97 Lisburn RoadBelfastUKBT9 7AE
| | - Martin Dempster
- Queen's University BelfastSchool of PsychologyUniversity RoadBelfastNorthern IrelandUKBT7 1NN
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang L, Jin K, Wang X, Yang Z, Wang J, Ma J, Mei X, Chen X, Wang X, Zhou Z, Luo J, Wu J, Shao Z, Zhang Z, Yu X, Guo X. The Impact of Radiotherapy on Reoperation Rates in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:961-968. [PMID: 30675702 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-07135-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on reoperation rates in women with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. METHODS Between June 2001 and December 2015, 832 breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and breast reconstruction with (n = 159) or without (n = 673) PMRT were analyzed retrospectively. Reoperations following breast reconstruction were categorized into the following three types: anticipated, unanticipated, and others. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the impact of PMRT on overall and unanticipated reoperations according to different breast reconstruction types after adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 58.5 months, a total of 1298 operations were performed in 832 breast cancer patients. The rates of overall and unanticipated reoperations were 46.2% and 7.7%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that PMRT was not associated with overall reoperations in either implant-based reconstruction patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-2.37, p = 0.995) or autologous reconstruction patients (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52-1.40, p = 0.533); however, the impact of PMRT on unanticipated reoperations differed by reconstruction type. In patients who received implant-based reconstructions, PMRT was associated with a 3.05-fold (95% CI 1.20-7.75, p = 0.019) higher odds of unanticipated reoperations, while there was no difference in patients who underwent autologous reconstruction (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.51-2.66, p = 0.713). Delayed reconstruction or delayed-immediate reconstructions were associated with an increased risk of both overall and unanticipated reoperations in both reconstruction cohorts. CONCLUSIONS PMRT appears to be associated with an increased risk of unanticipated reoperations among patients receiving implant-based reconstruction, but not among those receiving autologous reconstruction. The risk of reoperation should be taken into consideration when selecting the appropriate breast reconstruction type when PMRT is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kairui Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuanyi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaozhi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Junqi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinli Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Mei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xingxing Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaofang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhirui Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jurui Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiong Wu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xiaomao Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corso G, Figueiredo J, La Vecchia C, Veronesi P, Pravettoni G, Macis D, Karam R, Lo Gullo R, Provenzano E, Toesca A, Mazzocco K, Carneiro F, Seruca R, Melo S, Schmitt F, Roviello F, De Scalzi AM, Intra M, Feroce I, De Camilli E, Villardita MG, Trentin C, De Lorenzi F, Bonanni B, Galimberti V. Hereditary lobular breast cancer with an emphasis on E-cadherin genetic defect. J Med Genet 2018; 55:431-441. [PMID: 29929997 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have reported germline CDH1 mutations in cases of lobular breast cancer (LBC) not associated with the classical hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. A multidisciplinary workgroup discussed genetic susceptibility, pathophysiology and clinical management of hereditary LBC (HLBC). The team has established the clinical criteria for CDH1 screening and results' interpretation, and created consensus guidelines regarding genetic counselling, breast surveillance and imaging techniques, clinicopathological findings, psychological and decisional support, as well as prophylactic surgery and plastic reconstruction. Based on a review of current evidence for the identification of HLBC cases/families, CDH1 genetic testing is recommended in patients fulfilling the following criteria: (A) bilateral LBC with or without family history of LBC, with age at onset <50 years, and (B) unilateral LBC with family history of LBC, with age at onset <45 years. In CDH1 asymptomatic mutant carriers, breast surveillance with clinical examination, yearly mammography, contrast-enhanced breast MRI and breast ultrasonography (US) with 6-month interval between the US and the MRI should be implemented as a first approach. In selected cases with personal history, family history of LBC and CDH1 mutations, prophylactic mastectomy could be discussed with an integrative group of clinical experts. Psychodecisional support also plays a pivotal role in the management of individuals with or without CDH1 germline alterations. Ultimately, the definition of a specific protocol for CDH1 genetic screening and ongoing coordinated management of patients with HLBC is crucial for the effective surveillance and early detection of LBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corso
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Joana Figueiredo
- EPIC Lab, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy.,Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Debora Macis
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Lo Gullo
- Division of Breast Imaging, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Provenzano
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonio Toesca
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Fátima Carneiro
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Division of Pathology, Hospital São Joao, Porto, Portugal
| | - Raquel Seruca
- EPIC Lab, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Faculty of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Soraia Melo
- EPIC Lab, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Faculty of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fernando Schmitt
- EPIC Lab, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Medical Faculty of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Franco Roviello
- Departments of Surgery and Pathology, Le Scotte Hospital, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Intra
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Irene Feroce
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa De Camilli
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Trentin
- Division of Breast Imaging, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Viviana Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jeffers L, Reid J, Fitzsimons D, Morrison PJ, Dempster M. Interventions to improve psychosocial well-being in female BRCA
-mutation carriers following risk-reducing surgery. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jeffers
- Regional Medical Genetics Centre; Medical Genetics; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust Lisburn Road Belfast UK BT9 7AB
| | - Joanne Reid
- Queen's University Belfast; School of Nursing and Midwifery; 10 Malone Road Belfast UK BT9 5BN
| | - Donna Fitzsimons
- Queen's University Belfast; School of Nursing and Midwifery; 10 Malone Road Belfast UK BT9 5BN
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Regional Medical Genetics Centre; Medical Genetics; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust Lisburn Road Belfast UK BT9 7AB
- The Queen's University Belfast; Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology; 97 Lisburn Road Belfast UK BT9 7AE
| | - Martin Dempster
- Queen's University Belfast; School of Psychology; University Road Belfast Northern Ireland UK BT7 1NN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Unukovych D, Johansson H, Brandberg Y. Preoperative psychosocial characteristics may predict body image and sexuality two years after risk-reducing mastectomy: a prospective study. Gland Surg 2017; 6:64-72. [PMID: 28210554 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.01.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in patients at high risk has become more available and the rates of both bilateral (BRRM) and contralateral (CRRM) procedures are increasing. For women opting for RRM, psychosocial well-being, body image and sexuality are known to be important patient-reported outcomes. The aim of the present study was to investigate baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and emotional distress (anxiety and depression) as predictors of body image and sexuality two years after RRM in women undergoing CRRM and BRRM. METHODS This is a prospective cohort study including consecutive women opting for BRRM and breast cancer patients considering CRRM at Karolinska University Hospital during 1998-2010. The women were given a set of questionnaires to be completed at baseline before RRM (The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and The Sexual Activity Questionnaire) and two years after RRM (all the above-mentioned questionnaires along with The Body Image Scale). Mean scores for all questionnaires were analysed using linear regression models and adjusted for age at RRM as well as calendar year. RESULTS In total, 253 patients consented to participate in the study. Response rate at baseline and 2 years was 88% and 71%, respectively. In the BRRM group (healthy women), preoperative HRQoL and emotional distress were associated with body image and sexual problems two years after the procedure. No similar associations were found for the patients with breast cancer who underwent CRRM. CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that preoperative HRQoL and emotional distress may predict body image and sexual problems two years after RRM in healthy women, but not in breast cancer patients. Baseline psychosocial characteristics may be useful to identify women at risk for long-term body image and sexual problems following BRRM, but not among breast cancer patients opting for CRRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmytro Unukovych
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; ; Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Associations between Reoperations and Psychological Factors after Contralateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study. Int J Breast Cancer 2016; 2016:4604852. [PMID: 27313897 PMCID: PMC4899600 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4604852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 04/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. The aim of the study was to investigate associations between reoperations after contralateral risk-reducing mastectomies (CRRM) and emotional problems, body image, sexuality, and health related quality of life (HRQoL) in women with breast cancer and hereditary high risk. Patients and Methods. Patients scheduled for CRRM with breast reconstruction between 1998 and 2010 completed questionnaires, comprised of SF-36, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Body Image Scale, and the Sexual Activity Questionnaire, preoperatively and two years after CRRM. Data on reoperations was collected from medical charts. Results. A total of 80 women participated, with a response rate of 61 (76%) preoperatively and 57 (71%) at the two-year follow-up. At the two-year assessment, 44 (55%) patients had undergone ≥1 reoperation (reoperation group), whereas 36 (45%) had not (no reoperation group). No statistically significant differences between the groups were found for HRQoL, sexuality, anxiety, or depression. A higher proportion of patients in the “reoperation group” reported being dissatisfied with their bodies (81% versus 48%, p = 0.01). Conclusion. The results suggest associations between reoperation following CRRM with breast reconstruction and body image problems. Special attention should be paid to body image problems among women who are subject to reoperations after CRRM.
Collapse
|
12
|
Freedman RA, Kouri EM, West DW, Rosenberg S, Partridge AH, Lii J, Keating NL. Higher Stage of Disease Is Associated With Bilateral Mastectomy Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Survey. Clin Breast Cancer 2016; 16:105-12. [PMID: 26410475 PMCID: PMC5538374 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Revised: 08/14/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reasons for increasing rates of bilateral mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer are incompletely understood, and associations of disease stage with bilateral surgery have been inconsistent. We examined associations of clinical and sociodemographic factors, including stage, with surgery type and reconstruction receipt among women with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We surveyed a diverse population-based sample of women from Northern California cancer registries with stage 0 to III breast cancer diagnosed during 2010-2011 (participation rate, 68.5%). Using multinomial logistic regression, we examined factors associated with bilateral and unilateral mastectomy (vs. breast-conserving surgery), adjusting for tumor and sociodemographic characteristics. In a second model, we examined factors associated with reconstruction for mastectomy-treated patients. RESULTS Among 487 participants, 58% had breast-conserving surgery, 32% had unilateral mastectomy, and 10% underwent bilateral mastectomy. In adjusted analyses, women with stage III (vs. stage 0) cancers had higher odds of bilateral mastectomy (odds ratio [OR], 8.28; 95% confidence interval, 2.32-29.50); women with stage II and III (vs. stage 0) disease had higher odds of unilateral mastectomy. Higher (vs. lower) income was also associated with bilateral mastectomy, while age ≥ 60 years (vs. < 50 years) was associated with lower odds of bilateral surgery. Among mastectomy-treated patients (n = 206), bilateral mastectomy, unmarried status, and higher education and income were all associated with reconstruction (P < .05). CONCLUSION In this population-based cohort, women with the greatest risk of distant recurrence were most likely to undergo bilateral mastectomy despite a lack of clear medical benefit, raising concern for overtreatment. Our findings highlight the need for interventions to assure women are making informed surgical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| | - Elena M Kouri
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy, Boston, MA
| | - Dee W West
- Cancer Registry of Greater California, Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA
| | - Shoshana Rosenberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Joyce Lii
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy L Keating
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy, Boston, MA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Physical therapy after prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized study. Breast 2014; 23:357-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2013] [Accepted: 01/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|
14
|
Abstract
BRCA mutation carriers have a life-long breast cancer risk between 55 and 85% and a high risk of developing breast cancer at a very young age, depending on the type of mutation. The risk of developing contralateral breast cancer after a first breast cancer is elevated up to 65%, especially in case of BRCA1 mutation and young age at the first breast cancer. Since bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a risk reduction of 90-95% of developing primary or contralateral breast cancer, this option is a key point within the counseling process for patient information and shared decision-making of mutation carriers. Although the local control after breast-conserving therapy in mutation carriers seems to be comparable to that of sporadic breast cancer patients, individual patient information and counseling should include all alternative procedures of oncologically adequate mastectomy techniques and immediate reconstruction. Excellent cosmetic results, high levels of life quality, and good patient acceptance can be achieved with the recent developments in reconstructive surgery of the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Unukovych D, Sandelin K, Liljegren A, Arver B, Wickman M, Johansson H, Brandberg Y. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients with a family history: a prospective 2-years follow-up study of health related quality of life, sexuality and body image. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48:3150-6. [PMID: 22695071 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2011] [Revised: 10/26/2011] [Accepted: 04/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is the most effective option to prevent the occurrence of a second breast cancer in hereditary breast cancer patients. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression, sexuality and body image in breast cancer patients with a family history undergoing CPM with immediate breast reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 60 of 69 eligible patients agreed to participate in the study. Four validated questionnaires were used: the SF-36, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), the Body Image Scale (BIS), and the Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ). Forty-five patients (75%) responded before CPM, 49 (82%) at 6 months, and 45 (75%) at 2 years after CPM. RESULTS Overall, the patients showed a satisfactory HRQoL 2 years after CPM, similar to women in the general population. There were no differences in HRQoL, anxiety, depression or sexuality before and after CPM. However, more than half of the women reported at least one body image problem 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION No adverse effects on HRQoL, anxiety, depression or sexuality were observed. However, some aspects of body image were negatively affected after CPM. These findings could be used in preoperative counselling of breast cancer patients opting for CPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmytro Unukovych
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|