1
|
Souto-Ribeiro I, Woods L, Maund E, Alexander Scott D, Lord J, Picot J, Shepherd J. Transperineal biopsy devices in people with suspected prostate cancer - a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-213. [PMID: 39364806 DOI: 10.3310/zktw8214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background People with suspected prostate cancer are usually offered either a local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy or a general anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy. Transperineal prostate biopsy is often carried out under general anaesthetic due to pain caused by the procedure. However, recent studies suggest that performing local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy may better identify cancer in particular regions of the prostate and reduce infection rates, while being carried out in an outpatient setting. Devices to assist with freehand methods of local anaesthetic transperineal prostate may also help practitioners performing prostate biopsies. Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of local anaesthetic transperineal prostate compared to local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate and general anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy for people with suspected prostate cancer, and local anaesthetic transperineal prostate with specific freehand devices in comparison with local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate and transperineal prostate biopsy conducted with a grid and stepping device conducted under local or general anaesthetic. Data sources and methods We conducted a systematic review of studies comparing the diagnostic yield and clinical effectiveness of different methods for performing prostate biopsies. We used pairwise and network meta-analyses to pool evidence on cancer detection rates and structured narrative synthesis for other outcomes. For the economic evaluation, we reviewed published and submitted evidence and developed a model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the different biopsy methods. Results We included 19 comparative studies (6 randomised controlled trials and 13 observational comparative studies) and 4 single-arm studies of freehand devices. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer detection rates for local anaesthetic transperineal prostate (any method) compared to local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.18) (n = 5 randomised controlled trials), as was the case for local anaesthetic transperineal prostate with a freehand device compared to local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (relative risk 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 2.04) (n = 1 randomised controlled trial). Results of meta-analyses of observational studies were similar. The economic analysis indicated that local anaesthetic transperineal prostate is likely to be cost-effective compared with local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate (incremental cost below £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained) and less costly and no less effective than general anaesthetic transperineal prostate. local anaesthetic transperineal prostate with a freehand device is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy: incremental cost versus local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate of £743 per quality-adjusted life-year for people with magnetic resonance imaging Likert score of 3 or more at first biopsy. Limitations There is limited evidence for efficacy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. There is comparative evidence for the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (BXTAccelyon Ltd, Burnham, UK) but limited or no evidence for the other freehand devices. Evidence for other outcomes is sparse. The cost-effectiveness results are sensitive to uncertainty over cancer detection rates, complication rates and the numbers of core samples taken with the different biopsy methods and the costs of processing them. Conclusions Transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthetic is equally efficient at detecting prostate cancer as transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy under local anaesthetic but it may be better with a freehand device. local anaesthetic transperineal prostate is associated with urinary retention type complications, whereas local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate has a higher infection rate. local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy with a freehand device appears to meet conventional levels of costeffectiveness compared with local anaesthetic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021266443. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR134220) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment Vol. 28, No. 60. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bancroft EK, Page EC, Brook MN, Pope J, Thomas S, Myhill K, Helfand BT, Talaty P, Ong KR, Douglas E, Cook J, Rosario DJ, Salinas M, Buys SS, Anson J, Davidson R, Longmuir M, Side L, Eccles DM, Tischkowitz M, Taylor A, Cruellas M, Ballestero EP, Cleaver R, Varughese M, Barwell J, LeButt M, Greenhalgh L, Hart R, Azzabi A, Jobson I, Cogley L, Evans DG, Rothwell J, Taylor N, Hogben M, Saya S, Eeles RA, Aaronson NK. The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. BJU Int 2024; 134:484-500. [PMID: 38839570 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the long-term outcomes from a longitudinal psychosocial study that forms part of the 'Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted Screening in men at higher genetic risk and controls' (IMPACT) study. The IMPACT study is a multi-national study of targeted prostate cancer (PrCa) screening in individuals with a known germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in either the BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1) or the BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2). SUBJECTS AND METHODS Participants enrolled in the IMPACT study were invited to complete a psychosocial questionnaire prior to each annual screening visit for a minimum of 5 years. The questionnaire included questions on sociodemographics and the following measures: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, Memorial Anxiety Scale for PrCa, Cancer Worry Scale, risk perception and knowledge. RESULTS A total of 760 participants completed questionnaires: 207 participants with GPV in BRCA1, 265 with GPV in BRCA2 and 288 controls (non-carriers from families with a known GPV). We found no evidence of clinically concerning levels of general or cancer-specific distress or poor health-related quality of life in the cohort as a whole. Individuals in the control group had significantly less worry about PrCa compared with the carriers; however, all mean scores were low and within reported general population norms, where available. BRCA2 carriers with previously high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels experience a small but significant increase in PrCa anxiety (P = 0.01) and PSA-specific anxiety (P < 0.001). Cancer risk perceptions reflected information provided during genetic counselling and participants had good levels of knowledge, although this declined over time. CONCLUSION This is the first study to report the longitudinal psychosocial impact of a targeted PrCa screening programme for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. The results reassure that an annual PSA-based screening programme does not have an adverse impact on psychosocial health or health-related quality of life in these higher-risk individuals. These results are important as more PrCa screening is targeted to higher-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Bancroft
- Oncogenetics Team, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Mark N Brook
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Pope
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Oncogenetics Team, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Myhill
- Oncogenetics Team, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Brian T Helfand
- Division of Urology, John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Pooja Talaty
- Division of Urology, John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Kai-Ren Ong
- West Midlands Regional Clinical Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emma Douglas
- West Midlands Regional Clinical Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Monica Salinas
- Hereditary Cancer Program, ICO (Catalan Institute of Oncology), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jo Anson
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- West of Scotland Genetic Service, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Mark Longmuir
- West of Scotland Genetic Service, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lucy Side
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
- The University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amy Taylor
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mara Cruellas
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Perez Ballestero
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ruth Cleaver
- Peninsula Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Mohini Varughese
- Peninsula Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Julian Barwell
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Lynn Greenhalgh
- Liverpool Centre for Genomic Medicine, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rachel Hart
- Liverpool Centre for Genomic Medicine, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ashraf Azzabi
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Irene Jobson
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Lynn Cogley
- Peninsular Genetics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jeanette Rothwell
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Oncogenetics Team, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Hogben
- Oncogenetics Team, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sibel Saya
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bancroft EK. Response to BJU-2024-0780: RE: The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 39059002 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Bancroft
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rögnvaldsson S, Thorsteinsdóttir S, Kristinsson SY. Screening in Multiple Myeloma and Its Precursors: Are We There Yet? Clin Chem 2024; 70:128-139. [PMID: 38175579 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy that develops over years from the asymptomatic precursors, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and smoldering multiple myeloma. Recent evidence shows that by initiating treatment at an asymptomatic stage, outcomes in MM can be significantly improved. However, a vast majority of MM patients are diagnosed after the development of symptomatic end-organ damage and cannot reap the benefits of early treatment. The precursors of MM are easily detected by serum protein electrophoresis and free light chain assay of the serum, raising the question of whether population-based screening could detect MM at an asymptomatic stage and significantly expand the availability of early treatment in MM. Screening is a hallmark of care in many malignancies, and there are accepted criteria for when screening is appropriate. CONTENT Here we review the available relevant evidence for the introduction of screening and discuss whether screening for MM and its precursors fulfills these criteria. We also highlight gaps in our current knowledge, most notably a lack of data on the benefits and harms of screening and the lack of a defined target population. There are ongoing studies that may fill these critical gaps in the literature, but their results are still pending. SUMMARY Screening could lead to a paradigm shift in the care of patients with MM, but critical scientific questions need to be answered before screening of healthy individuals can be recommended. In short, we should not screen for MM and its precursors-yet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Sigrún Thorsteinsdóttir
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
- Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: prostate cancer - Diagnosis and management of localised disease. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1275-1372. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
6
|
Kim A, Chung KC, Keir C, Patrick DL. Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:223. [PMID: 35232405 PMCID: PMC8886782 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09261-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multi-cancer early detection tests have been developed to enable earlier detection of multiple cancer types through screening. As reflected by patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the psychosocial impact of cancer screening is not yet clear. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of cancer screening through PRO assessment. Methods A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists of articles from January 2000 to August 2020 for relevant publications assessing the psychosocial impact of cancer screening before and within 1 year after screening in the general asymptomatic population, including following receipt of results. Studies focused on diagnostic evaluation or involving patients previously diagnosed with cancer were excluded. Results In total, 31 studies (12 randomized controlled trials; 19 observational studies) were included, reflecting PRO assessments associated with lung, breast, colorectal, anal, ovarian, cervical, and prostate cancer screening procedures. The most commonly assessed construct was symptoms of anxiety, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Cancer-specific distress and worry were also assessed using a broad range of measures. Overall, individuals tolerated screening procedures well with no major psychosocial effects. Of note, increases in symptoms of anxiety and levels of distress and worry were generally found prior to communication of screening results and following communication of indeterminate or positive results that required further testing. These negative psychosocial effects were, however, not long-lasting and returned to baseline relatively soon after screening. Furthermore, individuals with higher cancer risk, such as current smokers and those with a family history of cancer, tended to have higher levels of anxiety and distress throughout the screening process, including following negative or indeterminate results. Conclusions The psychosocial impact of cancer screening is relatively low overall and short-lived, even following false-positive test results. Individuals with a higher risk of cancer tend to experience more symptoms of anxiety and distress during the screening process; thus, more attention to this group is recommended. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09261-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Kim
- GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA.
| | - Karen C Chung
- GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l’AFU – actualisation 2020–2022 : cancer de la prostate. Prog Urol 2020; 30:S136-S251. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30752-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
8
|
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Among Chinese Men. Value Health Reg Issues 2020; 21:272-279. [PMID: 32402819 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening among Chinese men. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a societal perspective using a Markov model to compare 2 strategies: the population-based screening strategy and the current clinical diagnostic strategy. Relevant parameters were retrieved from published literature data and surveys, and univariate sensitivity analysis was used to assess the robustness of the model. We simulated the health outcomes for the next 25 years for 100 000 men and calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS This study found that the population-based screening strategy, compared with the clinical diagnostic strategy, could save 756.61 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for the hypothetical population. The ICER for the population-based screening strategy was ¥14 747.11/QALY, and this value was less than the willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥64 520. With life-year gains (LYGs) as the model output, the population-based screening strategy yielded an ICER of ¥16 470.45/LYG. The univariate sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER was sensitive to the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test fee, the proportion diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancer (PC) in the population-based strategy, and the proportion diagnosed with intermediate-grade PC in the population-based strategy. CONCLUSIONS Prostate cancer screening based on PSA test results appears to be cost-effective for Chinese men who are in good health and have a life expectancy of more than 10 years. Nevertheless, this finding needs to be further studied with more treatment cost parameters (treatment costs related to impotence and urinary incontinence) and using local utility value information.
Collapse
|
9
|
Li L, Severens JL(H, Mandrik O. Disutility associated with cancer screening programs: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220148. [PMID: 31339958 PMCID: PMC6655768 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Disutility allows to identify how much population values intervention-related harms contributing to knowledge on the benefits/harms ratio of cancer screening programs. This systematic review evaluates disutility related to cancer screening applying a utility theory framework. METHODS Using a predefined protocol, Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane, Google scholar and supplementary sources were systematically searched. The framework grouped disutilities associated with breast, cervical, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening programs into the screening, diagnostic work up, and treatment phases. We assessed the quality of included studies according to the relevance to target population, risk of bias, appropriateness of measure and the time frame. RESULTS Out of 2840 hits, we included 38 studies, of which 27 measured (and others estimated) disutilities. Around 70% of studies had medium to high-level quality. Measured disutilities and Quality Adjusted Life Years loss were 0-0.03 and 0-0.0013 respectively in screening phases. Both disutilities and Quality Adjusted Life Years loss had similar ranges in diagnostic work up (0-0.26), and treatment (0.09-0.27) phases. We found no measured disutilities available for lung cancer screening and-little evidence for disutilities in treatment phase. Almost 40% of the estimated disutility values were above the range of measured ones. CONCLUSIONS Cancer screening programs led to low disutities related to screening phase, and low to moderate disutilities related to diagnostic work up and treatment phases. These disutility values varied by the measurement instrument applied, and were higher in studies with lower quality. The estimated disutility values comparing to the measured ones tended to overestimate the harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Li
- School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. L. (Hans) Severens
- School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olena Mandrik
- School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Health Economic and Decision Science (HEDS), Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bancroft EK, Saya S, Page EC, Myhill K, Thomas S, Pope J, Chamberlain A, Hart R, Glover W, Cook J, Rosario DJ, Helfand BT, Hutten Selkirk C, Davidson R, Longmuir M, Eccles DM, Gadea N, Brewer C, Barwell J, Salinas M, Greenhalgh L, Tischkowitz M, Henderson A, Evans DG, Buys SS, Eeles RA, Aaronson NK. Psychosocial impact of undergoing prostate cancer screening for men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. BJU Int 2019; 123:284-292. [PMID: 29802810 PMCID: PMC6378691 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the baseline results of a longitudinal psychosocial study that forms part of the IMPACT study, a multi-national investigation of targeted prostate cancer (PCa) screening among men with a known pathogenic germline mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. PARTICPANTS AND METHODS Men enrolled in the IMPACT study were invited to complete a questionnaire at collaborating sites prior to each annual screening visit. The questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics and the following measures: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Impact of Event Scale (IES), 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer, Cancer Worry Scale-Revised, risk perception and knowledge. The results of the baseline questionnaire are presented. RESULTS A total of 432 men completed questionnaires: 98 and 160 had mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, respectively, and 174 were controls (familial mutation negative). Participants' perception of PCa risk was influenced by genetic status. Knowledge levels were high and unrelated to genetic status. Mean scores for the HADS and SF-36 were within reported general population norms and mean IES scores were within normal range. IES mean intrusion and avoidance scores were significantly higher in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers than in controls and were higher in men with increased PCa risk perception. At the multivariate level, risk perception contributed more significantly to variance in IES scores than genetic status. CONCLUSION This is the first study to report the psychosocial profile of men with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations undergoing PCa screening. No clinically concerning levels of general or cancer-specific distress or poor quality of life were detected in the cohort as a whole. A small subset of participants reported higher levels of distress, suggesting the need for healthcare professionals offering PCa screening to identify these risk factors and offer additional information and support to men seeking PCa screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K. Bancroft
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Sibel Saya
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Elizabeth C. Page
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Kathryn Myhill
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Jennifer Pope
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Anthony Chamberlain
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Rachel Hart
- Clinical Genetics UnitBirmingham Women's HospitalBirminghamUK
| | - Wayne Glover
- Clinical Genetics UnitBirmingham Women's HospitalBirminghamUK
| | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics ServiceSheffield Children's HospitalSheffieldUK
| | | | - Brian T. Helfand
- John and Carol Walter Center for Urological HealthNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonILUSA
| | - Christina Hutten Selkirk
- John and Carol Walter Center for Urological HealthNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonILUSA
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- Clinical Genetics DepartmentQueen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
| | - Mark Longmuir
- Clinical Genetics DepartmentQueen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics ServicePrincess Anne HospitalSouthamptonUK
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | - Neus Gadea
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention ClinicVall d'Hebron University HospitalBarcelonaSpain
| | - Carole Brewer
- Clinical Genetics DepartmentRoyal Devon and Exeter HospitalExeterUK
| | - Julian Barwell
- Department of GeneticsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
- Clinical GeneticsUniversity Hospitals LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Monica Salinas
- Hereditary Cancer ProgrammeCatalan Institute of Oncology (ICO‐IDIBELL, CIBERONC)L'Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelonaSpain
| | - Lynn Greenhalgh
- Cheshire and Mersey Clinical Genetics ServiceLiverpool Women's HospitalLiverpoolUK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Academic Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Alex Henderson
- Northern Genetics ServiceNewcastle upon Tyne HospitalsNewcastleUK
| | - David Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic MedicineCentral Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Saundra S. Buys
- Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | | | | | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- Oncogenetics TeamRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamInstitute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Neil K. Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harju E, Rantanen A, Helminen M, Kaunonen M, Isotalo T, Åstedt-Kurki P. Health-related quality of life in patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: Results from a longitudinal study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2018; 37:51-55. [PMID: 30473051 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 08/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to explore changes in HRQoL (health-related quality of life) and identify the associated factors in patients with prostate cancer and their spouses during the year following their diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS The longitudinal study design consisted of 179 patients and 166 spouses, using discretionary sampling, at five Finnish central hospitals. Participants completed a self-reported RAND-36-Item Health Survey at three time-points: time of diagnosis and 6 and 12 months later. Changes in HRQoL were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests. Linear mixed-effects models were used to identify the factors associated with the changes in HRQoL in the patients and their spouses. RESULTS On average, the HRQoL of patients with prostate cancer changed in physical functioning (p = 0.015), emotional well-being (p = 0.029) and general health (p = 0.038) were statistically significant over the 12-month study period. In spouses, statistically significant changes in HRQoL were not observed. Interaction between the age of participants and changes in HRQoL were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Findings in this study suggest that interventions aimed at improving the HRQoL of patients should support a few different dimensions of HRQoL for the patients themselves than for their spouses. Nurses should pay more attention to elderly couples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eeva Harju
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science, University of Tampere, Arvo, FI-33014, Finland.
| | - Anja Rantanen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science, University of Tampere, Arvo, FI-33014, Finland.
| | - Mika Helminen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Arvo, FI-33014, Finland; Science Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, PO Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
| | - Marja Kaunonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science, University of Tampere, Arvo, FI-33014, Finland; Department of General Administration, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, PO Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
| | - Taina Isotalo
- Department of Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7, FI-15850, Lahti, Finland.
| | - Päivi Åstedt-Kurki
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science, University of Tampere, Arvo, FI-33014, Finland; Department of General Administration, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, PO Box 2000, FI-33521, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
During the prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer (PCa) screening era there has been a 53% decrease in the US PCa mortality rate. Concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment combined with misinterpretation of clinical trial data led to a recommendation against PCa screening, resulting in a subsequent reversion to more high-risk disease at diagnosis. Re-evaluation of trial data and increasing acceptance of active surveillance led to a new draft recommendation for shared decision making for men aged 55 to 69 years old. Further consideration is needed for more intensive screening in men with high-risk factors. PCa screening significantly reduces PCa morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Catalona
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 675 North Saint Clair Street, Suite 20-150, Chicago, IL 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Harju E, Rantanen A, Kaunonen M, Helminen M, Isotalo T, Åstedt-Kurki P. Changes in the health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eeva Harju
- Doctoral Researcher, Doctoral Researcher Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Tampere Finland
| | - Anja Rantanen
- Docent, University Teacher Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Tampere Finland
| | - Marja Kaunonen
- Professor, Doctoral Researcher Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Tampere Finland
- Department of General Administration; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; Tampere Finland
| | - Mika Helminen
- Biostatistician, Faculty of Social Sciences; University of Tampere; Tampere Finland
- Science Centre; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; Tampere Finland
| | - Taina Isotalo
- Chief Urologist, Department of Surgery; Päijät-Häme Central Hospital; Lahti Finland
| | - Päivi Åstedt-Kurki
- Professor, Department of General Administration; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; Tampere Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Harju E, Rantanen A, Kaunonen M, Helminen M, Isotalo T, Åstedt-Kurki P. The health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses before treatment compared with the general population. Int J Nurs Pract 2017; 23. [DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eeva Harju
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Finland
| | - Anja Rantanen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Finland
| | - Marja Kaunonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Finland
- Department of General Administration; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; Finland
| | - Mika Helminen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Finland
- Science Centre; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; Finland
| | - Taina Isotalo
- Department of Surgery; Päijät-Häme Central Hospital; Lahti Finland
| | - Päivi Åstedt-Kurki
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Finland
- Department of General Administration; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; Finland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Keller A, Gericke C, Whitty JA, Yaxley J, Kua B, Coughlin G, Gianduzzo T. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2017; 15:95-111. [PMID: 27757918 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0278-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial demonstrated that prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening reduces prostate cancer deaths compared with an age-matched control group. Utilising the prostate cancer detection rates from this study, we investigated the clinical and cost effectiveness of a similar PSA-based screening strategy for an Australian population of men aged 50-69 years. METHODS A decision model that incorporated Markov processes was developed from a health system perspective. The base-case scenario compared a population-based screening programme with current opportunistic screening practices. Costs, utility values, treatment patterns and background mortality rates were derived from Australian data. All costs were adjusted to reflect July 2015 Australian dollars (A$). An alternative scenario compared systematic with opportunistic screening but with optimisation of active surveillance (AS) uptake in both groups. A discount rate of 5 % for costs and benefits was utilised. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of variable uncertainty on model outcomes. RESULTS Our model very closely replicated the number of deaths from both prostate cancer and background mortality in the Göteborg study. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for PSA screening was A$147,528. However, for years of life gained (LYGs), PSA-based screening (A$45,890/LYG) appeared more favourable. Our alternative scenario with optimised AS improved cost utility to A$45,881/QALY, with screening becoming cost effective at a 92 % AS uptake rate. Both modelled scenarios were most sensitive to the utility of patients before and after intervention, and the discount rate used. CONCLUSION PSA-based screening is not cost effective compared with Australia's assumed willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000/QALY. It appears more cost effective if LYGs are used as the relevant outcome, and is more cost effective than the established Australian breast cancer screening programme on this basis. Optimised utilisation of AS increases the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening dramatically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Keller
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Wesley Research Institute, The Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Christian Gericke
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Wesley Research Institute, The Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - John Yaxley
- The Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Boon Kua
- The Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Troy Gianduzzo
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- The Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Harju E, Rantanen A, Kaunonen M, Helminen M, Isotalo T, Åstedt-Kurki P. Marital relationship and health-related quality of life after prostate cancer diagnosis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eeva Harju
- School of Health Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Arvo FI-33014 University of Tampere Finland
| | - Anja Rantanen
- University Teacher, School of Health Sciences, Nursing Science, University of Tampere; Arvo FI-33014 University of Tampere Finland
| | - Marja Kaunonen
- School of Health Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Arvo FI-33014 University of Tampere Finland
- Department of General Administration; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; FI-33521 Tampere University Hospital Finland
| | - Mika Helminen
- School of Health Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Arvo FI-33014 University of Tampere Finland
- Science Centre; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; FI-33521 Tampere University Hospital Finland
| | - Taina Isotalo
- Department of Surgery; Päijät-Häme Central Hospital; Keskussairaalankatu 7 FI-15850 Lahti Finland
| | - Päivi Åstedt-Kurki
- School of Health Sciences, Nursing Science; University of Tampere; Arvo FI-33014 University of Tampere Finland
- Department of General Administration; Pirkanmaa Hospital District; FI-33521 Tampere University Hospital Finland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jalón Monzón A, Escaf Barmadah S, Viña Alonso LM, Jalón Monzón M. [Current aspects of prostate cancer screening]. Semergen 2016; 43:387-393. [PMID: 27562331 DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2016.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Revised: 07/02/2016] [Accepted: 07/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Screening programs for prostate cancer based on the determination of serum prostate specific antigen has led to overdiagnosis, and consequently overtreatment. A percentage of men diagnosed with prostate cancer have a tumour that will not progress, or do so slowly (overdiagnosis or pseudo-disease). This overdiagnosis rate ranges from 17-50%. Mass screening is defined as the systematic examination of asymptomatic men. Early detection or opportunistic screening involves the pursuit of individual cases being initiated by the doctor or the patient. In the case of a patient who requests a prostate specific antigen from their general practitioner, a number of issues on overdiagnosis, over-treatment and possible damage from the biopsy, should be explained to him. With data from randomised studies on prostate specific antigen and prostate cancer screening, population screening is not recommended by any urological society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Jalón Monzón
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España.
| | - S Escaf Barmadah
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lane A, Metcalfe C, Young GJ, Peters TJ, Blazeby J, Avery KNL, Dedman D, Down L, Mason MD, Neal DE, Hamdy FC, Donovan JL. Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life. BJU Int 2016; 118:869-879. [PMID: 27415448 PMCID: PMC5113698 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To present the baseline patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) randomized trial comparing active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and external‐beam conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare results with other populations. Materials and Methods A total of 1643 randomized men, aged 50–69 years and diagnosed with clinically localized disease identified by prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing, in nine UK cities in the period 1999–2009 were included. Validated PROMs for disease‐specific (urinary, bowel and sexual function) and condition‐specific impact on quality of life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite [EPIC], 2005 onwards; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Urinary Incontinence [ICIQ‐UI], 2001 onwards; the International Continence Society short‐form male survey [ICSmaleSF]; anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), generic mental and physical health (12‐item short‐form health survey [SF‐12]; EuroQol quality‐of‐life survey, the EQ‐5D‐3L) were assessed at prostate biopsy clinics before randomization. Descriptive statistics are presented by treatment allocation and by men's age at biopsy and PSA testing time points for selected measures. Results A total of 1438 participants completed biopsy questionnaires (88%) and 77–88% of these were analysed for individual PROMs. Fewer than 1% of participants were using pads daily (5/754). Storage lower urinary tract symptoms were frequent (e.g. nocturia 22%, 312/1423). Bowel symptoms were rare, except for loose stools (16%, 118/754). One third of participants reported erectile dysfunction (241/735) and for 16% (118/731) this was a moderate or large problem. Depression was infrequent (80/1399, 6%) but 20% of participants (278/1403) reported anxiety. Sexual function and bother were markedly worse in older men (65–70 years), whilst urinary bother and physical health were somewhat worse than in younger men (49–54 years, all P < 0.001). Bowel health, urinary function and depression were unaltered by age, whilst mental health and anxiety were better in older men (P < 0.001). Only minor differences existed in mental or physical health, anxiety and depression between PSA testing and biopsy assessments. Conclusion The ProtecT trial baseline PROMs response rates were high. Symptom frequencies and generic quality of life were similar to those observed in populations screened for prostate cancer and control subjects without cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athene Lane
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Grace J Young
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, United Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kerry N L Avery
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Daniel Dedman
- Clinical Practice Research Datalink Group, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Liz Down
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - David E Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, United Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Krstanoski Z, Vokac NK, Zagorac A, Pospihalj B, Munda M, Dzeroski S, Golouh R. TMPRSS2:ERG gene aberrations may provide insight into pT stage in prostate cancer. BMC Urol 2016; 16:35. [PMID: 27377958 PMCID: PMC4932765 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-016-0160-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background TMPRSS2:ERG gene aberration may be a novel marker that improves risk stratification of prostate cancer before definitive cancer therapy, but studies have been inconclusive. Methods The study cohort consisted of 202 operable prostate cancer Slovenian patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We retrospectively constructed tissue microarrays of their prostatic specimens for fluorescence in situ hybridization, with appropriate signals obtained in 148 patients for subsequent statistical analyses. Results The following genetic aberrations were found: TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, TMPRSS2 split (a non-ERG translocation) and ERG split (an ERG translocation without involvement of TMPRSS2). TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion happened in 63 patients (42 %), TMPRSS2 split in 12 patients and ERG split in 8 patients. Association was tested between TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion and several clinicopathological variables, i.e., pT stage, extended lymph node dissection status, and Gleason score, correcting for multiple comparisons. Only the association with pT stage was significant at p = 0.05: Of 62 patients with pT3 stage, 34 (55 %) had TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion. In pT3 stage patients, stronger (but not significant) association between eLND status and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion was detected. We detected TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion in 64 % of the pT3 stage patients where we did not perform an extended lymph node dissection. Conclusions Our results indicate that it is possible to predict pT3 stage at final histology from TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at initial core needle biopsy. FISH determination of TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion may be particularly useful for patients scheduled to undergo a radical prostatectomy in order to improve oncological and functional results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoran Krstanoski
- Department of Urology, General Hospital Slovenj Gradec, Gosposvetska 1, 2380, Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia.
| | - Nadja Kokalj Vokac
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Andreja Zagorac
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Boris Pospihalj
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Gynecological Pathology and Cytology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Miha Munda
- Institute for Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Rastko Golouh
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
D'Amelio P, Roato I, Oderda M, Soria F, Zitella A, Ferracini R, Mengozzi G, Gontero P, Isaia GC. DKK-1 in prostate cancer diagnosis and follow up. BMC Clin Pathol 2014; 14:11. [PMID: 24655661 PMCID: PMC3976154 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-14-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2013] [Accepted: 03/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dickoppf-1 (DKK-1) is a negative regulator of bone formation with tumorigenic potential. The up-regulation of DKK-1 is an early event in prostate cancer (PCa) development, thus we investigated its role as a marker in the diagnosis and prognosis of PCa. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 159 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, either for elevated PSA or suspect digital rectal examination, between 2003 and 2010. During the biopsy, one serum sample was collected from all patients; PSA and DKK-1 were measured by ELISA technique. Amongst the biopsy of 159 patients 75 were affected by PCa and 84 were not the mean period of follow-up for these patients was 5 years; a new biopsy was performed in case of PCa suspicion. RESULTS PSA performed better than DKK-1 in detecting PCa (0.63 vs 0.51 respectively). Differently from PSA DKK-1 was significantly higher in patients who developed PCa during follow-up than in cancer-free ones, thus DKK-1 performed better than PSA in detecting these patients (0.67 vs 0.55). DKK-1 was significantly lower in patients with bone metastases, whereas PSA was not significantly different in patients with different outcomes. CONCLUSIONS DKK-1 might be predictive for patients negative at first biopsy who will develop PCa and in the prognosis of bone metastases. It performed worse than PSA in the early diagnosis of Pca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia D'Amelio
- Gerontology Section, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Ilaria Roato
- Center for Research in Experimental Medicine (CeRMS), Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Urology Section, Department of Surgical Science, Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Urology Section, Department of Surgical Science, Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Zitella
- Urology Section, Department of Surgical Science, Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ferracini
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giulio Mengozzi
- Baldi & Riberi Lab, Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Section, Department of Surgical Science, Hospital City of Health and Science of Turin, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanni Carlo Isaia
- Gerontology Section, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|