Effects of denosumab on pain and analgesic use in giant cell tumor of bone: interim results from a phase II study

Denosumab for giant cell tumors of bone from 2010 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are considered moderately malignant bone tumors. Denosumab, as a neoadjuvant therapy, provides new possibilities for treating GCTB. However, even after multiple studies and long-term clinical trials, there are limitations in the treatment process. Research data and Medical Subject Headings terms related to denosumab and GCTB were collected from January 2010 to October 2022 using the Web of Science and MeSH ( https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov ) browsers. These data were imported into CiteSpace and VOSviewer softwares for bibliometric analysis. Overall, 445 publications on denosumab and GCTB were identified. Over the last 12 years, the growth rate of the total number of publications has remained relatively stable. The USA published the highest number of articles (83) and had the highest centrality (0.42). Amgen Inc. and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) First Ortoped Rizzoli were identified as the most influential institutions. Many authors have made outstanding contributions to this field. Lancet Oncology had the highest journal impact factor (54.433). Local recurrence and drug dosage are current research hotspots, and future development trends will mainly focus on prognostic markers of GCTB and the development of new therapies. Further research is required to analyze denosumab's safety and efficacy and understand its local recurrence of GCTB, to identify the optimal dose. Future progress in this field will likely focus on exploring new diagnostic and recurrence markers to monitor disease progression and examine new therapeutic targets and treatment strategies.

Current therapies and future prospective for locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors

Locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of soft tissue and bone tumors with intermediate histology, incompletely understood biology, and highly variable natural history. Despite having a limited to absent ability to metastasize and excellent survival prognosis, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors can be symptomatic, require prolonged and repeat treatments including surgery and chemotherapy, and can severely impact patients' quality of life. The management of locally aggressive tumors has evolved over the years with a focus on minimizing morbid treatments. Extensive oncologic surgeries and radiation are pillars of care for high grade sarcomas, however, play a more limited role in management of locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors, due to propensity for local recurrence despite resection, and the risk of transformation to a higher-grade entity following radiation. Patients should ideally be evaluated in specialized sarcoma centers that can coordinate complex multimodal decision-making, taking into consideration the individual patient's clinical presentation and history, as well as any available prognostic factors into customizing therapy. In this review, we aim to discuss the biology, clinical management, and future treatment frontiers for three representative locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors: desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). These entities challenge clinicians with their unpredictable behavior and responses to treatment, and still lack a well-defined standard of care despite recent progress with newly approved or promising experimental drugs.

Antibody-induced pain-like behavior and bone erosion: links to subclinical inflammation, osteoclast activity, and acid-sensing ion channel 3-dependent sensitization

ABSTRACT

Several bone conditions, eg, bone cancer, osteoporosis, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are associated with a risk of developing persistent pain. Increased osteoclast activity is often the hallmark of these bony pathologies and not only leads to bone remodeling but is also a source of pronociceptive factors that sensitize the bone-innervating nociceptors. Although historically bone loss in RA has been believed to be a consequence of inflammation, both bone erosion and pain can occur years before the symptom onset. Here, we have addressed the disconnection between inflammation, pain, and bone erosion by using a combination of 2 monoclonal antibodies isolated from B cells of patients with RA. We have found that mice injected with B02/B09 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) developed a long-lasting mechanical hypersensitivity that was accompanied by bone erosion in the absence of joint edema or synovitis. Intriguingly, we have noted a lack of analgesic effect of naproxen and a moderate elevation of few inflammatory factors in the ankle joints suggesting that B02/B09-induced pain-like behavior does not depend on inflammatory processes. By contrast, we found that inhibiting osteoclast activity and acid-sensing ion channel 3 signaling prevented the development of B02/B09-mediated mechanical hypersensitivity. Moreover, we have identified secretory phospholipase A2 and lysophosphatidylcholine 16:0 as critical components of B02/B09-induced pain-like behavior and shown that treatment with a secretory phospholipase A2 inhibitor reversed B02/B09-induced mechanical hypersensitivity and bone erosion. Taken together, our study suggests a potential link between bone erosion and pain in a state of subclinical inflammation and offers a step forward in understanding the mechanisms of bone pain in diseases such as RA.

Radiologic and clinical changes after denosumab treatment for giant cell tumors of the mobile spine: a quantitative study

Objectives

To analyze the radiologic and clinical changes after denosumab treatment in patients with giant cell tumors (GCTs) in the mobile spine.

Methods

Clinical data and images by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging at a single center were retrospectively reviewed before and after denosumab treatment.

Results

Pre- and post-treatment data from 24 patients were evaluated. On imaging, marginal ossification and/or bone formation was observed in 22 patients (91.7%). The median maximum diameter of the GCT reduced from 52.5 to 48.2 mm (p < 0.001), and the mean proportion of tumor to spinal canal area decreased from 36.8 to 18.5% (p < 0.001). Out of six patients with compression, three patients (50%) showed no compression after treatment. The signal intensity (SI) ratio between the solid part of the tumor and the normal spinal cord on T2-weighted MR images was 0.77 ± 0.22 and decreased to 0.58 ± 0.22 (p = 0.001). On clinical symptoms, the mean visual analog scale scores were reduced from 5.3 to 2.0 (p < 0.001) and the Karnofsky Performance Scale scores increased from a median of 65 to 80 (p < 0.001). Post-treatment, performance scores improved in eight patients (33.3%) (p = 0.003), and the neurological function of four patients improved according to Frankel grade (p = 0.046).

Conclusions

Bone formation, tumor reduction, regression of epidural lesion and the decrease in SI ratio on T2-weighted image should be considered as the effectiveness of denosumab in the treatment of spinal GCT. In clinical application, denosumab can relieve pain, improve neurological function, and improve the quality of life of spinal GCT patients.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence

Simple Summary

The widely accepted local therapy in extremity giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage; patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Abstract

(1) Despite the benign nature of the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), it shows a local recurrence rate of up to 50% and a chance of malignant transformation. The widely accepted local therapy in extremity GCTB is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the RANKL and associated inhibition of the RANKL pathway, is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. (2) The literature review of patients with GCTB treated with denosumab is performed via PubMed, using suitable keywords from January 2009 to January 2021. (3) Current indications for denosumab use are not definitively clear and unambiguous. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage, and the role of denosumab in preoperative therapy in this patient population remains unclear. (4) However, patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Study of imaging changes following preoperative denosumab for giant cell tumor of bone

•

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply.

•

The decrease of blood supply was the most significant in the initial stage of treatment.

•

It is not recommended to apply denosumab long before surgical treatment.

Background

The changes in the characteristics of the tumor blood supply of giant cell tumor of bone over time after treatment with denosumab remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in the blood supply imaging characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone after preoperative denosumab treatment and to provide evidence for evaluating the reasonable time for preoperative treatment.

Methods

A total of 59 patients with giant cell tumor of bone who were treated in our hospital from 2014 to 2019 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent enhanced CT examination of the tumor site before denosumab treatment and every month after treatment. The plain CT value and enhanced CT value of the tumor were measured, and the CT enhancement rate of the tumor was calculated. The change in the CT enhancement rate of the tumor over time after denosumab treatment was analyzed.

Results

The average tumor enhancement rates were 2.14 (1.22–4.05), 1.60 (1.12–2.53), 1.38 (1.02–2.24), and 1.25 (1–2.11) before denosumab treatment and one month, three months, and six months after treatment, respectively. After denosumab treatment, the average monthly CT enhancement rate decreased as follows: 0.54 (25.2%) in the first month, 0.11 (5.15%) in the second to third months, and 0.04 (1.87%) in the fourth to sixth months. The tumor enhancement rate was no longer significantly reduced three months post-treatment. There was a significant correlation between the reduction in the CT enhancement rate and the initial CT enhancement rate (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply. The decrease in the blood supply is the most significant in the initial stage of treatment. Following treatment, the decrease in the blood supply gradually reduces over time. Therefore, for the purpose of reducing intra-operative bleeding and facilitating surgery, application of denosumab treatment is not recommended more than three months before surgery.

Post-Denosumab-Treated Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Retrospective Histomorphological and Immunohistochemical Study

Introduction Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) are treated with surgery with or without local adjuvants. Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that has recently emerged to be effective in treating unresectable and recurrent GCTBs.

Objective In this study, we analyzed the histomorphological changes in GCTB following treatment with denosumab. The expression of histone mutation H3.3G34W by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using mutant specific antibody was also determined.

Materials and Methods Of the total 109 GCTBs encountered during the study period, 14 cases with neoadjuvant denosumab therapy were analyzed retrospectively. The post-treatment changes on histopathology were examined on routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. IHC was done using antihistone H3.3G34 antibodies. Statistical analysis was limited to descriptive statistics. No hypothesis testing was performed.

Results All these cases except three showed fibrosis with areas of hyalinization, prominent newly formed woven bone along with spindle cells in short fascicles and storiform pattern. There was complete absence and marked reduction in osteoclast-like giant cells in six and five patients, respectively. Only three patients showed a substantial amount of residual osteoclast-like giant cells. IHC with antihistone H3.3G34W antibody showed unequivocal nuclear positivity in the mononuclear cells in nine cases. The mononuclear cells rimming and entrapped within the woven bone were also positive on IHC. The spindle cells in the benign fibrous histiocytoma-like areas and septa of aneurysmal bone cyst-like areas also retained nuclear staining.

Conclusion Awareness of post-denosumab-related histopathological changes are necessary to avoid misdiagnosis as fibroosseous lesion and low-grade central osteosarcoma. Expression of mutant-specific H3.3 G34W antibody suggests that the neoplastic stromal cells are largely retained after denosumab therapy. The positive staining of cells both within and those rimming the newly formed woven bone point toward osteoblastic phenotype of the neoplastic stromal cells.

Rechallenge of denosumab in jaw osteonecrosis of patients with unresectable giant cell tumour of bone: a case series analysis and literature review

Objectives

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a rare tumour, generally managed with surgery. Treatment of the very rare unresectable advanced/metastatic GCTB is challenging and denosumab is the only current available medical option, an anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody inhibiting osteolysis. An uncommon but severe and treatment-limiting adverse event of denosumab is the osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). The clinical management of GCTB patients stopping denosumab for medication-related (MR)-ONJ and the possible reintroduction of denosumab after MR-ONJ resolution is matter of debate. We performed a retrospective study to describe the incidence, clinical features and outcome of MR-ONJ in unresectable GCTB patients treated with denosumab at our Institution.

Design and setting

Retrospective, single-institutional study.

Participants

Adult patients receiving denosumab as antineoplastic therapy for GCTB and experiencing MR-ONJ at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan between January 2008 and July 2019.

Main outcome measures

Incidence, time of onset and clinical features of MR-ONJ.

Results

29 patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic GCTB treated with denosumab were identified. At a median follow-up of 70 months (range 1–125), 4 (13.8%) patients experienced MR-ONJ while on treatment, after 125, 119, 85 and 41 months of denosumab, respectively. All patients showed an ongoing tumour stabilisation with denosumab at the MR-ONJ onset and in all cases denosumab was stopped. All four patients were treated with ozone therapy. Two are waiting for surgery, two were already operated on. Both of them experienced disease progression and were thus rechallenged with denosumab. One is still on therapy after 25 months. The other had an MR-ONJ relapse after 39 months and was treated again with ozone therapy and surgery. She is under surveillance, GCTB being currently stable.

Conclusion

A clinical algorithm of denosumab rechallenge after complete resolution of MR-ONJ in progressing GCTB patients should be prospectively validated.

Denosumab for Effective Tumor Size Reduction in Patients With Giant Cell Tumors of the Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that has been used successfully in the treatment of giant cell tumors of bone. These tumors are rare and, in principle, benign, but they are highly aggressive, locally advanced, osteolytic bone tumors that can metastasize to the lungs. Denosumab is an effective treatment when these tumors cannot be surgically removed or when surgical resection is likely to lead to severe morbidity (eg, loss of limbs or joints). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate patients with giant cell tumors of bone who experienced tumor progression during treatment with denosumab and to compare them with patients who experienced reduction of their giant cell tumors of bone during treatment with denosumab.

METHODS

Embase, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases were searched for trials submitted by January 7, 2020, that reported the efficacy and safety of denosumab in patients with giant cell tumors of bone.

RESULTS

Sixty studies were reviewed, involving a total of 1074 patients who had giant cell tumors of bone and were treated with denosumab. Of the 60 studies, 58% of the patients were from case series studies, 39% from open-label phase II studies, and 3% from case reports. The response rate for denosumab as a treatment for giant cell tumors of bone was 97.5%, with statistical significance (P < .0001). Pain in the limbs was statistically the most common adverse event for denosumab treatment in case series studies (P < .0001). No treatment-related deaths occurred in the reviewed studies.

CONCLUSION

Cumulative evidence supports the addition of surgery to optimal medical therapy with denosumab to reduce tumor size, clinical symptoms, and mortality among patients with giant cell tumors of bone.

The role of Denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of bone

AIMS

Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 33.8 years (18 to 67) with high-risk GCTB received median six cycles of Denosumab before surgery. Tumours occurred most commonly around the knee (17/25, 68%). The median follow-up was 57 months (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 88). The joint was salvaged in 23 patients (92%). Two required knee arthroplasty due to intra-articular fracture and arthritis. Local recurrence developed in 11 patients (44%) at a mean of 32.5 months (3 to 75) following surgery, of whom four underwent repeat curettage and joint salvage. One patient developed secondary osteosarcoma and another benign GCT lung metastases.

CONCLUSION

The use of Denosumab for joint salvage was associated with a higher than expected rate of local recurrence at 44%. Neoadjuvant Denosumab for joint-sparing procedures should be considered with caution in light of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):184-191.

Should Denosumab or Radical Surgery Be Recommended for a Spinal Giant Cell Tumour in a Fertile Female?

Giant cell tumour (GCT) of the spine is a benign aggressive tumour with high recurrence rates. Patients can be asymptomatic due to the slow growth rate and present with localized pain or neurological dysfunction. Current management strategies include intralesional curettage, total en-bloc resection (TER) and denosumab therapy. Treatment strategies can be particularly challenging in women of childbearing age who wish to conceive, as the risks of tumour recurrence need to be balanced against the fetal complications associated with adjuvant denosumab therapy. This case report discusses the management options and controversies for women of childbearing age with GCT of the thoracic spine. Clinicians need to be aware of the complications associated with TER and denosumab treatment when managing GCTs of the spine in young females.

Benign Osseous Tumors and Tumor-Like Conditions

We will provide an imaging-focused discussion of 3 benign bone tumors that do not fit in the categories of cartilaginous tumors or osteoid tumors. We have chosen giant cell tumor of bone, unicameral bone cyst, and fibrous dysplasia. All 3 of these entities are common enough that one does not have to be a musculoskeletal radiologist in a cancer hospital to encounter them occasionally, but none of them should be seen frequently.

Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Spinal Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in Adult Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) constitute 5% of all primary bone tumors with spinal GCTs (SGCTs) accounting for 2%-15% of all GCTs. The standard of care for SGCT has been maximal surgical resection. However, many adjuvant therapies have been used owing to the difficulty in achieving gross total resection combined with the high local recurrence rate. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the incidence, management, and outcomes of SGCT.

METHODS

Patients with diagnosis codes specific for SGCT were queried from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. The outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization.

RESULTS

The search criteria identified 92 patients in the NCDB dataset from 2004 to 2016 with a diagnosis of SGCT. Of the 92 patients, 64.1% had undergone surgical intervention, 24.8% had received radiotherapy, and 15.2% had received immunotherapy. Univariate analysis revealed that age ≥55 years and tumor location in the sacrum/coccyx were associated with worsened overall survival (OS) and that surgical resection was associated with improved OS. On multivariate analysis, age 55-64 years was associated with worsened OS, and radical surgical resection was associated with improved OS. The survival analysis revealed improved OS with surgery but not with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

SGCT is a rare primary bone tumor of the vertebral column. The standard of care has been surgical resection with the goal of gross total resection; however, adjuvant therapies have often been used. Our study found that surgical resection significantly improved OS and that immunotherapy neared significance in improving OS.

Role of (Neo)adjuvant Denosumab for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

OPINION STATEMENT

Denosumab is a RANK ligand inhibitor approved for the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone. While the role of denosumab in the setting of advanced and unresectable disease is well established, its role in surgically resectable disease is currently under discussion. Several prospective and retrospective series on neoadjuvant therapy in potentially resectable tumor with high morbidity surgery reported a relapse rate of 10-20% after resection and 30-40% after curettage. At the same time, less morbid surgery has obvious clinical advantages for the patient, and several studies have shown the efficacy of denosumab in downgrading of the surgical procedure. Currently, the role of neoadjuvant denosumab in operable GCTB is limited to selected cases in which a diffuse reactive bone formation and peripheral ossification can make an easier surgical procedure, for example, in tumors with a large soft tissue component. A planned resection may become less morbid when preoperative denosumab is administered. Whenever a segmental resection is thought to be indicated at diagnosis, denosumab may be considered in the neoadjuvant setting. A preoperative course of 6 months is considered safe and effective. Two case scenarios are presented and critically discussed. Because of the high recurrence rates after denosumab treatment followed by curettage, we discourage the use of denosumab when curettage is considered feasible. In this setting, a short course of preoperative denosumab (2-6 months) may be considered for highly selected cases, for example in pathological fractures. The role of adjuvant denosumab needs further investigation. Long-term disease control has been reported in case of non-surgical lesions, even after treatment interruption, but there is no consensus on ideal treatment duration and dosage for these scenarios. In all cases, multidisciplinary discussion with oncology, pathologist, radiologist, and surgeons is mandatory. Patient's comorbidities, dental conditions, and preferences, including family planning, should always be taken into account.

Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome: A Rare, Mosaic Disease of Gα s Activation

Fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) is a rare disorder of striking complexity. It arises from somatic, gain-of-function mutations in GNAS, leading to mosaic Gα s activation and inappropriate production of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). The clinical phenotype is largely determined by the location and extent of affected tissues, and the pathophysiological effects of Gα s activation within these tissues. In bone, Gα s activation results in impaired differentiation of skeletal stem cells, leading to discrete skeletal lesions prone to fracture, deformity, and pain. Extraskeletal manifestations include a variable combination of hyperpigmented macules and hyperfunctioning endocrinopathies. Distinctive age-related changes in disease development has key effects on histologic, radiographic, and clinical features. FD/MAS thus presents along a uniquely broad clinical spectrum, and the resulting challenges in diagnosis and management can be difficult for clinicians. This review presents FD/MAS in the context of a mosaic disorder of Gα s activation, providing an intellectual framework within which to understand, evaluate, and treat this interesting disease. It includes a comprehensive summary of current understanding of FD/MAS pathogenesis, and a detailed discussion of clinical presentation and management. Critical areas of unmet need are highlighted, including discussion of key challenges and potential solutions to advance research and clinical care in FD/MAS.

Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Giant-cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a rare, locally aggressive osteoclastogenic stromal tumour of the bone. This phase 2 study aimed to assess the safety and activity of denosumab in patients with surgically salvageable or unsalvageable GCTB.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study done at 30 sites in 12 countries we enrolled adults and skeletally mature adolescents (aged ≥12 years) weighing at least 45 kg with histologically confirmed and radiographically measurable GCTB, Karnofsky performance status 50% or higher (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0, 1, or 2), and measurable active disease within 1 year of study enrolment. Patients had surgically unsalvageable GCTB (cohort 1), had surgically salvageable GCTB with planned surgery expected to result in severe morbidity (cohort 2), or were enrolled from a previous study of denosumab for GCTB (cohort 3). Patients received 120 mg subcutaneous denosumab once every 4 weeks during the treatment phase, with loading doses (120 mg subcutaneously) administered on study days 8 and 15 to patients in cohorts 1 and 2 (patients in cohort 3 did not receive loading doses). The primary endpoint was safety in terms of the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events; secondary endpoints included time to disease progression from cohort 1 and the proportion of patients without surgery at month 6 for cohort 2. The safety analysis set included all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of denosumab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00680992, and has been completed.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 9, 2008, and Feb 25, 2016, 532 patients were enrolled: 267 in cohort 1, 253 in cohort 2, and 12 in cohort 3. At data cutoff on Feb 24, 2017, median follow-up was 58·1 months (IQR 34·0-74·4) in the overall patient population, and 65·8 months (40·9-82·4) in cohort 1, 53·4 months (28·2-64·1) in cohort 2, and 76·4 months (61·2-76·5) in cohort 3. During the treatment phase, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypophosphataemia (24 [5%] of 526 patients), osteonecrosis of the jaw (17 [3%], pain in extremity (12 [2%]), and anaemia (11 [2%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 138 (26%) of 526 patients; the most common were osteonecrosis of the jaw (17 [3%]), anaemia (6 [1%]), bone giant cell tumour (6 [1%]), and back pain (5 [1%]). 28 (5%) patients had positively adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw, four (1%) had atypical femur fracture, and four (1%) had hypercalcaemia occurring 30 days after denosumab discontinuation. There were four cases (1%) of sarcomatous transformation, consistent with historical data. Ten (2%) treatment-emergent deaths occurred (two of which were considered treatment-related; bone sarcoma in cohort 2 and sarcoma in cohort 1). Median time to progression or recurrence for patients in cohort 1 during the first treatment phase was not reached (28 [11%] of 262 patients had progression or recurrence). 227 (92%; 95% CI 87-95) of 248 patients who received at least one dose of denosumab in cohort 2 had no surgery in the first 6 months of the study.

INTERPRETATION

The types and frequencies of adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of denosumab, which showed long-term disease control for patients with GCTB with unresectable and resectable tumours. Our results suggest that the overall risk to benefit ratio for denosumab treatment in patients with GCTB remains favourable.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Denosumab treatment for giant-cell tumor of bone: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically inhibits tumor-associated bone lysis through the RANKL pathway and has been used as neoadjuvant therapy for giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in surgical as well as non-surgical cases. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature, therefore, is to investigate: (1) demographic characteristics of patients affected by GCTBs treated with denosumab and the clinical impact, as well as, possible complications associated with its use (2) oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence rate (LRR) and development of lung metastasis, and (3) characteristics of its treatment effect in terms of clinical, radiological, and histological response.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE search including the following terms and Boolean operators: "Denosumab" AND "primary bone tumor", "denosumab" AND "giant cell tumor", "denosumab" AND "treatment", and finally, "denosumab" AND "giant cell tumor" AND "treatment" since 2000. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using STROBE for the assessment of observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1095 patients were included across all 19 studies. Across all the studies included, there were 615 females and 480 males. The mean patient age was 33.7 ± 8.3 years when starting the denosumab treatment. The pooled weighted local recurrence rate was 9% (95% CI 6-12%) and the pooled weighted metastases rate was 3% (95% CI 1-7%). The most common adverse event was fatigue and muscular pain. Radiologic response was estimated to occur in 66-100% of the patients. A significant reduction in pain under denosumab treatment was reported in seven studies and additional improvement in function and mobility was reported by several authors. Only two studies reported musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) scores which were better after denosumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of denosumab as an adjuvant treatment of GCTB has shown a positive but variable histological response with consistent radiological changes and several types of adverse effects. There is a positive clinical response in terms of pain relief with decrease on the morbidity of surgical procedures to be performed. Finally, oncological outcomes are disparate with neither effect on metastatic disease nor local recurrence rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Evaluation of Local Recurrence in Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone Treated by Neoadjuvant Denosumab

Background

Giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive primary benign tumor presenting as an expansile osteolytic lesion affecting the epiphysis of long bones. Denosumab halts the osteolysis by giant cells thereby downstaging the tumor, helping in performing less morbid procedures to remove the tumor. Our aim was to report the incidence of local recurrence (LR) in patients operated following neoadjuvant denosumab, to investigate factors associated with LR following extended curettage for GCTB, and to compare the postoperative functional and oncological outcome of patients operated with and without neoadjuvant denosumab.

Methods

A total of 123 patients with a mean age of 29.6 years undergoing extended curettage for GCTB were retrospectively divided into group 1 receiving neoadjuvant denosumab and group 2 operated without denosumab. The mean follow-up period was 35 months. The perioperative characteristics and outcome were compared between the two groups and the factors for LR of GCTB were analyzed.

Results

The incidence of LR among patients operated after neoadjuvant denosumab therapy was 42.8% and was significantly high compared to that in patients without denosumab (p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of denosumab as a neoadjuvant was the only factor independently associated with LR following surgery (p = 0.002). Patients treated with denosumab had a lower LR-free survival rate (log-rank, p = 0.018).

Conclusions

Denosumab was independently associated with increased LR following surgery for GCTB. Denosumab has to be used cautiously in patients in whom the burden of downstaging the disease outweighs the possible chance of LR.

Denosumab: A potential new treatment option for recurrent Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of the spine

ABCs are expansile osteolytic lesions typically containing blood-filled spaces separated by fibrous septae. Standard treatment includes surgical resection or curettage and packing; however, for some spinal lesions, the standard approach is not optimal. One therapeutic strategy is to treat spinal ABC with an agent that targets a pathway that is dysregulated in a disease with similar pathophysiology. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody to RANKL is effective in the treatment of GCT's. Spinal ABCs are a therapeutic challenge and local recurrence is a concern. We report a case of aggressive recurrent ABC of dorsal spine in a 14-year old female with progressive neurologic deficit who underwent surgical excision and decompression with a recurrence in a short period for which a decompression and fixation was done. She had a recurrence after an asymptomatic period of 6 months and neurologic worsening. Having ruled out use of embolization and radiotherapy, a remission was achieved by treatment with Denosumab using the regimen for GCTs for a duration of 6 months. Follow-up MRI and CT scans at 24 months following inception of Denosumab depicted complete resolution and no recurrence. We conclude that Denosumab can result in symptomatic and radiological improvement in the recurrent locally aggressive ABC and may be useful in selected cases. Long-term results are mandatory to confirm the efficacy of Denosumab and to evaluate local recurrence after stopping Denosumab.

Managements of giant cell tumor within the distal radius: A retrospective study of 58 cases from a single center

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in distal radius is a benign but invasive bone tumor characterized by strong aggressive behavior and frequent recurrence.

Methods

To identify recurrence related risk factors and decide suitable surgical strategy, the potential tumor- and treatment-specific factors, post-operative oncologic and functional outcomes were collected and analyzed from 58 patients with GCTB of the distal radius at our center.

Results

With the numbers available, our analysis strongly indicated soft tissue extension (with vs. without, HR: 5.645, 95% CI: 1.424 to 22.377, p = 0.014) and size of GCTB (diameter ≥ 5 cm vs. 5 cm HR: 3.893, 95% CI: 1.109 to 13.659, p = 0.034) are the two independent risk factors related to local relapse. Neither surgical procedures (curettage vs. en-bloc resection) nor other factors apparently affected the recurrence, including age, tumor nature, dominant hand involvement, pathological fracture conditions or pre-operative denosumab. However, intralesional curettage group achieved much better functional scores ((VAS: 2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 1.2, p = 0.011; MSTS: 20.2 ± 3.4 vs. 16.7 ± 3.8, P = 0.034; DASH 9.1 ± 3.9 vs. 16.4 ± 5.5, p = 0.030) and much less complications (non-unions, dislocations, fractures and infections) compared to resection ones. Furthermore, denosumab provided dramatic pain reduction and strong tumor suppression, facilitating curettage with local adjuvants even in GCTB with advanced status.

Conclusions

Taken together, the radiographic presentations (soft-tissue extension and tumor size) are the strong prognostic predictors of local recurrence of GCTB in distal radius. In most tumors, an initial treatment with curettage remains feasible and first-choice, especially with the adjuvant denosumab.

Mechanisms that drive bone pain across the lifespan

Disorders of the skeleton are frequently accompanied by bone pain and a decline in the functional status of the patient. Bone pain occurs following a variety of injuries and diseases including bone fracture, osteoarthritis, low back pain, orthopedic surgery, fibrous dysplasia, rare bone diseases, sickle cell disease and bone cancer. In the past 2 decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the unique population of sensory and sympathetic nerves that innervate bone and the mechanisms that drive bone pain. Following physical injury of bone, mechanotranducers expressed by sensory nerve fibres that innervate bone are activated and sensitized so that even normally non-noxious loading or movement of bone is now being perceived as noxious. Injury of the bone also causes release of factors that; directly excite and sensitize sensory nerve fibres, upregulate proalgesic neurotransmitters, receptors and ion channels expressed by sensory neurons, induce ectopic sprouting of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibres resulting in a hyper-innervation of bone, and central sensitization in the brain that amplifies pain. Many of these mechanisms appear to be involved in driving both nonmalignant and malignant bone pain. Results from human clinical trials suggest that mechanism-based therapies that attenuate one type of bone pain are often effective in attenuating pain in other seemingly unrelated bone diseases. Understanding the specific mechanisms that drive bone pain in different diseases and developing mechanism-based therapies to control this pain has the potential to fundamentally change the quality of life and functional status of patients suffering from bone pain.

A nonrandomized controlled study of sacral giant cell tumors with preoperative treatment of denosumab

The aim of this nonrandomized controlled study (level 3)was to evaluate whether preoperative denosumab treatment can reduce intraoperative blood loss, facilitate surgical treatment, and improve local control of sacral giant-cell tumor (GCT).Surgical treatment of sacral GCT is very difficult due to extensive bone destruction and complex anatomical structures. The huge intraoperative blood loss may interrupt surgical management and judgment of tumor range. Denosumab can inhibit the differentiation of osteoclast-like giant cells and bone destruction by blocking RANKL-RANK pathway.Study group (preoperative denosumab treatment) and control group (no denosumab treatment) were matched for age, gender, tumor site, staging, and tumor size. In study group, enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed before and after denosumab treatment. The comparison parameters between 2 groups: CT enhancement rate, intraoperative blood loss, and oncologic outcome.The mean preoperative time of denosumab treatment was 5.2 months in study group. The mean CT enhancement rate of study group was 2.60 before treatment and 1.37 after treatment (P = .012). The posttreatment CT enhancement rate of study group was significantly lower than that of control group (P = .007). The mean intraoperative bleeding of study group and control group was 2166.7 and 5240 mL, respectively (P = .040). The mean operative time of study group and control group was 268.3 and 268.5 minutes, respectively (P = .997). The recurrence rate of study group (66.7%) was significantly higher than that of control group (0%) (P = .046).Preoperative denosumab treatment has the tendency to reduce blood supply and intraoperative bleeding of sacral GCT. But the sclerosis and bony separation can increase the difficulty of tumor curettage and lead to high recurrence rate after denosumab treatment. It is necessary to study the best surgical opportunity after denosumab treatment and precise method to judge tumor range.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: definition and best practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment

Skeletal complications caused by osteoporosis or bone metastases are associated with considerable pain, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life. Furthermore, such events place a burden on health care resources. Agents that prevent bone resorption, such as bisphosphonates or denosumab, can reduce the risk of skeletal-related events and are widely used in patients with osteoporosis or bone metastases of cancer. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare, but potentially serious, adverse event associated with high cumulative doses of bisphosphonates or denosumab. However, MRONJ can be treated, and the likelihood of the development of this condition can be reduced through prophylactic dental care and the maintenance of good oral hygiene. Dentists, as part of a multiprofessional team, have a critical role in preventing MRONJ. This review describes the incidence and pathophysiology of MRONJ and provides guidance for dental practitioners with regard to the screening, prophylactic treatment, diagnosis, and management of patients with this condition.

The Changing Sensory and Sympathetic Innervation of the Young, Adult and Aging Mouse Femur

Although bone is continually being remodeled and ultimately declines with aging, little is known whether similar changes occur in the sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers that innervate bone. Here, immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy were used to examine changes in the sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers that innervate the young (10 days post-partum), adult (3 months) and aging (24 months) C57Bl/6 mouse femur. In all three ages examined, the periosteum was the most densely innervated bone compartment. With aging, the total number of sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers clearly declines as the cambium layer of the periosteum dramatically thins. Yet even in the aging femur, there remains a dense sensory and sympathetic innervation of the periosteum. In cortical bone, sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers are largely confined to vascularized Haversian canals and while there is no significant decline in the density of sensory fibers, there was a 75% reduction in sympathetic nerve fibers in the aging vs. adult cortical bone. In contrast, in the bone marrow the overall density/unit area of both sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers appeared to remain largely unchanged across the lifespan. The preferential preservation of sensory nerve fibers suggests that even as bone itself undergoes a marked decline with age, the nociceptors that detect injury and signal skeletal pain remain relatively intact.

Understanding osteoporotic pain and its pharmacological treatment

Osteoporosis, a disorder that affects millions of people worldwide, is characterized by decreased bone mass and microstructural alterations giving rise to an increased risk of fractures. Osteoporotic fractures can cause acute and chronic pain that mainly affects elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and commonly on different drug regimens. The aim of this paper is to summarize the pathogenesis and systemic treatment of osteoporotic pain. This narrative review summarizes the main pathogenetic aspects of osteoporotic pain and the cornerstones of its treatment. Osteoporotic fractures induce both acute and chronic nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Central sensitization seems to play a pivotal role in developing and maintaining chronicity of post-fracture pain in osteoporosis. Antiosteoporosis drugs are able to partially control pain, but additional analgesics are always necessary for pain due to bone fractures. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective COX-2 inhibitors reduce acute pain but with a poor effect on the chronic neuropathic component of pain and with relevant side effects. Opioid drugs can control the whole spectrum of acute and chronic bone pain, but they differ with respect to their efficacy on neuropathic components, their tolerability and safety. Chronic pain after osteoporotic fractures requires a multifaceted approach, which includes a large spectrum of drugs (antiosteoporosis treatment, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, selective COX-2 inhibitors, weak and strong opioids) and non-pharmacological treatment. Based on a better understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporotic and post-fracture pain, a guided stepwise approach to post-fracture osteoporotic pain will also better meet the needs of these patients.

Malignant bone tumors (other than Ewing's): clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up by Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)

Primary malignant bone tumors are uncommon and heterogeneous malignancies. This document is a guideline developed by the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma with the participation of different specialists involved in the diagnosis and treatment of bone sarcomas. The aim is to provide practical recommendations with the intention of helping in the clinical decision-making process. The diagnosis and treatment of bone tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving as a minimum pathologists, radiologists, surgeons, and radiation and medical oncologists. Early referral to a specialist center could improve patients' survival. The multidisciplinary management of osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, chordoma, giant cell tumor of bone and other rare bone tumors is reviewed in this guideline. Ewing's sarcoma will be the focus of a separate guideline because of its specific biological, clinical and therapeutic features. Each statement has been accompanied by the level of evidence and grade of recommendation on the basis of the available data. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment of a localized bone tumor, with various techniques available depending on the histologic type, grade and location of the tumor. Chemotherapy plays an important role in some chemosensitive subtypes (such as high-grade osteosarcoma). In other subtypes, historically considered chemoresistant (such as chordoma or giant cell tumor of bone), new targeted therapies have emerged recently, with a very significant efficacy in the case of denosumab. Radiation therapy is usually necessary in the treatment of chordoma and sometimes of other bone tumors.

Giant cell tumour of the distal radius/ulna: response to pre-operative treatment with short-term denosumab

Background

Treatment of giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) of the distal radius/ulna poses a surgical challenge, as complex reconstructive surgery may be required. This study evaluates the clinical, radiological and pathological findings in five cases of GCTB of the distal forearm where a 3 month course of denosumab was given prior to surgery.

Methods

Patients with biopsy proven distal forearm GCTB, treated for 3 months with denosumab, followed by salvage surgery (curettage and cementation) were included. Wrist pain and function were assessed using the modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Plain radiographs, MRI and PET/CT were performed pre-treatment and 2 months after initiation of denosumab therapy. Histological comparison was made between the original biopsy and surgical curettage specimens.

Results

Five patients with an average age of 25 years were included in the study. Improvement in wrist pain and function was seen in all patients with the average MMWS increasing from 30 pre-treatment to 85 at 3 months. Plain radiographs demonstrated marginal sclerosis in all cases with reconstitution of cortical and subarticular bone by 2 months; internal matrix sclerosis and osseous consolidation was more variable. Increased tumour heterogeneity and low signal were observed on T2-weighted MR images. PET/CT revealed a decrease in average SUV from 14.8 pre-treatment to 4.7 at 2 months. Histology showed disappearance of osteoclasts and increased fibro-osseous tissue. Denosumab treatment has the potential to facilitate salvage surgery, thus avoiding bone resection and graft reconstruction. A good outcome was achieved apart from local recurrence in one case. Follow up ranged from 17 to 54 months.

Conclusion

Distal forearm GCTB responds clinically, radiologically and histologically to a short course of pre-operative denosumab therapy, which has the potential to facilitate salvage surgery.

Denosumab: an Emerging Therapy in Pediatric Bone Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Denosumab is an inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), and has emerged as an important novel therapy for skeletal disorders. This article examines the use of denosumab in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Considerable safety and efficacy data exists for denosumab treatment of adults with osteoporosis, bone metastases, and giant cell tumors. Pediatric data is limited; however, evidence suggests denosumab may be beneficial in decreasing bone turnover, increasing bone density, and preventing growth of certain skeletal neoplasms in children. Denosumab's effect on bone turnover is rapidly reversible after drug discontinuation, representing a key difference from bisphosphonates. Rebound increased bone turnover has led to severe hypercalcemia in several pediatric patients. Denosumab is a promising therapy for pediatric skeletal disorders. At present, safety concerns related to rebounding bone turnover and mineral homeostasis impact use of denosumab in children. Research is needed to determine if and how these effects can be mitigated.

An update on genomic-guided therapies for pediatric solid tumors

Currently, out of the 82 US FDA-approved targeted therapies for adult cancer treatments, only three are approved for use in children irrespective of their genomic status. Apart from leukemia, only a handful of genomic-based trials involving children with solid tumors are ongoing. Emerging genomic data for pediatric solid tumors may facilitate the development of precision medicine in pediatric patients. Here, we provide an up-to-date review of all reported genomic aberrations in the eight most common pediatric solid tumors with whole-exome sequencing or whole-genome sequencing data (from cBioPortal database, Pediatric Cancer Genome Project, Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments) and additional non-whole-exome sequencing studies. Potential druggable events are highlighted and discussed so as to facilitate preclinical and clinical research in this area.

Denosumab Therapy for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Pulmonary Metastasis

Case

A 68-year-old female was diagnosed with giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) metastatic to her lungs. The patient was treated with IV denosumab for the course of 4.5 years for these metastases. The metastatic tumor burden decreased significantly after only 3 months of therapy. The size of the metastases has been stable for over 4 years.

Conclusion

Denosumab therapy has promise in the treatment of GCTB, including pulmonary metastasis. However, the long-term role of denosumab for pulmonary metastases is yet to be determined.

Denosumab in advanced/unresectable giant-cell tumour of bone (GCTB): For how long?

BACKGROUND

Giant-cell tumours of bone (GCTB) are RANK/RANK-ligand (RANKL) positive, aggressive and progressive osteolytic tumours. Denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor, was FDA-approved for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with unresectable GCTB or when surgical resection is likely to result in severe morbidity. Data on long-term toxicity and activity of denosumab monthly 'GCTB-schedule' (120 mg per 12/year, 1440 mg total dose/year) are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with GCTB receiving denosumab, 120 mg on days 1, 8, 15, 29 and every 4 weeks thereafter, from 2006 to 2015 treated in two centres were included. Long-term toxicity was evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were identified. 43 patients underwent resection of the tumour with a median time on denosumab treatment of 12 months (range 6-45 months). Fifty-four patients had unresectable GCTB's (male/female 23/31, median age 35 years [range: 13-76 years], 26% presented with lung metastases, 31% had primary tumor located to the spine, 63% were relapsed after previous surgery) with a median time on denosumab of 54 months (9-115 months). In the unresectable GCTB group, tumour control and clinical benefits were observed in all patients undergoing denosumab, whereas 40% of patients discontinuing denosumab had tumour progression after a median of 8 months (range 7-15 months).

ADVERSE EVENTS

Overall, six (6%) patients developed osteonecrosis of jaw (ONJ): 1/43 (2%) in the resectable group, 5/54 (9%) in the unresectable group, with a 5-year ONJ-free survival of 92% (95% CI 84-100). Only patients with prolonged treatment experienced mild peripheral neuropathy (6/54, 11%), skin rash (5/54, 9%), hypophosphataemia (2/54, 4%) and atypical femoral fracture (2/54, 4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged treatment with denosumab has sustained activity in GCTB, with a mild toxicity profile. The dose-dependent toxicity observed recommends a careful and strict monitoring of patients who need prolonged treatment. Decreased dose-intensity schedules should be further explored in unresectable GCTB.

Prognosis of local recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: what can we do?

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is classified as an intermediate tumour with rare metastasis, but is challenged by local recurrence. This review focuses on the role of radiological evaluation in terms of prognosis of local recurrence in GCTB. We hope to highlight the value of radiological evaluation by integrating studies on the impact of surgical treatments and non-surgical factors on local recurrence of GCTB and the current statuses of genetic and molecular prognostic factors of GCTB. Radiological evaluation can provide diverse information on tumours. As a non-invasive method, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is especially valuable for the diagnosis and evaluation of bone tumours due to its heightened sensitivity to soft tissue disease and multiplanar image acquisition. Imaging findings should be integrated with clinical characteristics, pathology and genetic and molecular prognostic factors to direct clinical approach and reduce the local recurrence of GCTB. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a multi-perspective evaluation system by which prognostic factors can be reliably determined. We further advocate more large-scale prospective studies. With the help of radiological evaluation, the clinic treatment of GCTB can be guided and local recurrence might be reduced; additionally, MR imaging can identify local recurrence of GCTB after surgical treatment in the early stage.

Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone in Norway: results from a nationwide cohort

BACKGROUND

Denosumab is a relatively new treatment option for patients with giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB). The purpose of this study was to report the results for patients treated in Norway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with denosumab for GCTB were identified from the clinical databases at the Norwegian sarcoma reference centers. Data were retrieved from the clinical databases and supplemented by retrospective review of patient records. Denosumab was given as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks with loading doses on day 8 and 15 in cycle 1.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients treated with denosumab for GCTB were identified. Denosumab was given for recurrent disease in seven cases and as first-line treatment in 11 patients, of which 6 received therapy as part of a neoadjuvant/adjuvant strategy and 5 for surgically unsalvageable primary tumor. Ten of 12 patients with unresectable disease are still on denosumab without progression with median treatment duration of 41 months (range 18-60). Two patients discontinued treatment due to osteonecrosis of the jaw and reduced compliance, respectively. In the adjuvant group, four patients experienced disease recurrence after stopping denosumab. In three of six patients, the extent of surgery was reduced due to neoadjuvant therapy. Seventeen of 18 patients underwent response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT at median 4.7 weeks from starting denosumab. Median baseline SUV_max was 11.0 and median SUV_max at evaluation was 4.9 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide GCTB patient cohort, denosumab was an effective agent and durable responses were observed. Our results do not support the use of adjuvant therapy in routine clinical practice. 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a valuable tool for early response evaluation.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Management of Temporal Bone Giant Cell Tumor

Background Giant cell tumors (GCTs) are rare osseous tumors that rarely appear in the skull.

Methods We review the clinical course of a 28-year-old previously healthy woman with a complicated GCT.

Results The reviewed patient presented with a middle cranial fossa tumor acutely complicated by reactive mastoiditis. Left tympanomastoidectomy was performed for drainage of the mastoiditis and for biopsies of the tumor. Due to the challenging tumor location, the patient was treated with denosumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, for 7 months, which resulted in significant preoperative tumor shrinkage. Extensive temporal craniotomy and resection of the tumor followed utilizing a temporomandibular joint total endoprosthesis for reconstruction. A recurrence of the tumor was detected on computed tomography at 19 months after surgery and treated with transtemporal tumor resection, parotidectomy, and mandible re-reconstruction.

Conclusion A multidisciplinary approach resulted in a good functional result and, finally, an eradication of the challengingly located middle cranial fossa tumor.

Thallium-201 Uptake of Giant Cell Tumor: One Step Toward the Differential Diagnosis to Atypically Presenting Osteosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

The radiologic differential diagnosis of giant cell tumors (GCTs) is challenging because there is a risk of misdiagnosis of GCTs as malignant lesions such as atypically presenting osteosarcomas (OSs). This study aims to assess the feasibility of ²⁰¹Tl scintigraphy for the differential diagnosis of GCT and atypical OS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thallium-201 scintigraphy scans obtained between January 2006 and October 2015 of patients with histologically proven GCT (23 patients [male-to-female ratio, 15:8]; median age, 33.0 years; age range, 20-61 years) and patients with atypically presenting OS (20 patients [male-to-female ratio, 11:9]; median age, 30.0 years; age range, 12-69 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Morphologic classification of osseous lesions was performed on radiographs and CT scans. The ²⁰¹Tl scintigraphy-based tumor-to-background contrast (TBC) and washout rate (WR) were calculated on early phase and delayed phase scans. The laboratory parameters lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), and alkaline phosphatase were obtained. Statistical significance was estimated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Cutoff values were calculated for early phase TBC and delayed phase TBC.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 23 GCTs were detected on the initial radiographs, whereas only six of 20 atypical OSs were detected on the initial radiographs. The early phase TBC was increased in GCT (median, 2.59; range, 0.51-12.26) compared with atypical OS (median, 1.68; range, 0.90-6.45) (p = 0.07). The delayed phase TBC was increased in GCT (median, 1.65; range, 0.22-5.26) compared with atypical OS (median, 0.96; range, 0.39-3.76) (p = 0.02). The median WR was not significantly decreased in GCT. The cutoff value for the early phase TBC was 3.90, and the cutoff value for the delayed phase TBC was 1.64; these cutoff values for early and delayed phase TBC yielded a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 47.8% and 52.2% respectively. Serum LDH (mean: atypical OS vs GCT, 215.5 vs 170.5 U/L, respectively; p = 0.01), alkaline phosphatase (median: 355.0 vs 252.0 U/L; p = 0.03), and CRP (median: 0.21 vs 0.09 mg/dL; p = 0.04) values were significantly increased in atypical OS compared with GCT.

CONCLUSION

The intense ²⁰¹Tl uptake of GCT in combination with laboratory OS biomarkers facilitate the differential diagnosis of GCT and atypically presenting OS.

Denosumab for the treatment of giant cell tumor of the bone

Giant cell tumor of bone is typically composed of neoplastic stromal cells and non-neoplastic osteoclastic giant cells. RANK-expressing osteoclastic giant cells are recruited by RANK ligand excreted by the stromal cells, and used by these neoplastic cells to create expansion space. Denosumab specifically binds to and inhibits RANK ligand, thereby eradicating osteoclastic giant cells from the tumor and thus reducing osteolytic activity. Clinical studies reported disease stabilization and clinical benefit in terms of reduced pain and analgesics use, avoided surgeries or surgeries with less morbid procedures. Adverse events observed in patients with giant cell tumor of bone were consistent with the known safety profile of denosumab with a very low incidence of hypocalcemia and osteonecrosis. Overall, denosumab was shown to suppress osteolytic activity and slow disease progression and is thus a treatment option for patients with giant cell tumor of bone.

Management of spinal giant cell tumors

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal giant cell tumors (SGCT) remain challenging tumors to treat. Although advancements in surgical techniques and adjuvant therapies have provided new options for treatment, evidence-based algorithms are lacking.

PURPOSE

This study aims to review the peer-reviewed literature that addresses current treatment options and management of SGCT, to produce an evidence-based treatment algorithm.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A systematic review was performed.

METHODS

Articles published between January 1, 1970 and March 31, 2015 were selected from PubMed and EMBASE searches using keywords "giant cell tumor" AND "spine" AND "treatment." Relevant articles were selected by the authors and reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 515 studies were identified, of which 81 studies were included. Complete surgical resections of SCGT resulted in the lowest recurrence rates. However, morbidity of en bloc resections is high and in some cases, surgery is not possible. Intralesional resection can be coupled with adjuvant therapies, but evidence-based algorithms for use of adjuvants remain elusive. Several recent advancements in adjuvant therapy may hold promise for decreasing SGCT recurrence, specifically stereotactic radiotherapy, selective arterial embolization, and medical therapy using denosumab and interferon.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete surgical resection of SGCT should be the goal when possible, particularly if neurologic impairment is present. Denosumab holds promise as an adjuvant and perhaps stand-alone therapy for SGCT. Spinal giant cell tumors should be approached as a case-by-case problem, as each presents unique challenges. Collaboration of spine surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists is the best practice for treating these difficult tumors.

Response of Aneurysmal Bone Cyst to Denosumab

STUDY DESIGN

Case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a unique case of large sacral aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) treated with denosumab and review the literature on this rare entity.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

ABCs are expansile osteolytic lesions that typically contain blood-filled spaces separated by fibrous septa. Standard treatment includes surgical resection or curettage and packing; however, for some spinal lesions, the standard approach is not optimal. One therapeutic strategy is to treat spinal ABC with an agent that targets a pathway that is dysregulated in a disease with similar pathophysiology. The bone destruction in both giant cell tumors of bone and ABCs is mediated by RANK ligand (RANKL) produced by the tumor cells. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, is effective in the treatment of giant cell tumors of bone.

METHODS

We report a case of a large sacral ABC that responded to denosumab. A 27-year-old male developed increasing back pain. Imaging revealed a lytic lesion in the sacrum with no clear solid component and regions where the cortex was difficult to identify. ABC was diagnosed on biopsy. Surgery or radiation treatment was expected to be associated with serious morbidity; therefore, denosumab was given using the regimen for giant cell tumors of bone (120  mg monthly with a loading dose).

RESULTS

The patient's pain gradually resolved after 2 months of treatment. New bone formation with a more clearly defined cortex was evident on computed tomographic scan at 16 weeks and continued to show evidence of improvement at 7 and 12 months. Biopsy at 12 months revealed a hypocellular fibrous stroma with new bone formation and no giant cells.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that denosumab can result in symptomatic and radiological improvement in ABC and may be useful in select cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Successful Intravascular Correction of Intratumoral Pseudoaneurysm by Erosion of the Aorta in a Patient with Thoracic Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Responding to Denosumab

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm characterized by the presence of giant cells with osteoclast activity. Its biology involves the overexpression of the Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor kB Ligand (RANKL) by osteoclast-like giant cells and tumor stromal cells, which has been shown to be an actionable target in this disease. In cases amenable to surgical resection, very few therapeutic options were available until the recent demonstration of significant activity of the anti-RANK-ligand monoclonal antibody denosumab. Here we present a case of a patient with advanced GCT arising in the spine, recurring after multiple resections and embolization. Following initiation of denosumab, which resulted in unequivocal clinical improvement, computed tomography of the chest done for reassessment purposes revealed an intratumoral pseudoaneurysm by erosion of the aorta, further corrected by endovascular approach and stent placement. Patient had an unremarkable recovery from the procedure and continued benefit from therapy with denosumab and remains on treatment 24 months after the first dose.

Giant-cell tumor of bone: treatment options and role of denosumab

Giant-cell tumor of bone is a rare, locally aggressive tumor that typically occurs in the bones of skeletally mature young adults in their second to fourth decades. Traditionally, surgery has been the mainstay of therapy for this disease, but the disease can recur even with optimal procedures. Furthermore, it may occur in locations where a surgical approach would be morbid. The maturation of the understanding of the role of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) in the pathophysiology of giant-cell tumor of bone has led to the use of denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANKL, in this disease. In 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration approved denosumab for use in patients with recurrent/unresectable/metastatic giant-cell tumor of bone or for patients in whom surgery would be morbid.

Giant cell tumor: rapid recurrence after cessation of long-term denosumab therapy

We report a case of rapid recurrence of a giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal radius in a 24-year-old woman following the cessation of long-term denosumab therapy. GCT of bone is a histologically benign tumor with multinucleated giant cells on a background of mononuclear giant cells usually presenting as a well-defined epi-metaphyseal lytic lesion without sclerotic margins. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), has proven to be an effective neoadjuvant treatment for GCT. The tumor in this case had demonstrated a good response with sustained control for over 2 years while on denosumab therapy. However, within 2 months of cessation of therapy, the tumor demonstrated rapid recurrence and progression with growth, osteolysis, and increased soft tissue component. Despite reinitiating denosumab therapy, there was progressive tumor growth and destruction, ultimately necessitating below-the-elbow amputation. This case illustrates the need for maintenance of denosumab therapy for GCT of bone or definitive surgical treatment prior to its cessation.

Giant cell tumor of bone: current treatment options

OPINION STATEMENT

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) comprises up to 20 % of benign bone tumors in the US. GCTB are typically locally aggressive, but metastasize to the lung in ~5 % of cases. Malignant transformation occurs in a small percentage of cases, usually following radiation therapy. Historically, GCTB have been treated primarily with surgery. When the morbidity of surgery would be excessive, radiation therapy may achieve local control. In most cases the primary driver of the malignant cell appears to be a mutation in H3F3A leading to a substitution of Gly34 to either Trp or Leu in Histone H3.3. This change presumably alters the methylation of the protein, and thus, its effect on gene expression. The malignant stromal cells of GCTB secrete RANKL, which recruits osteoclast precursors to the tumor and stimulates their differentiation to osteoclasts. The elucidation of the biology of GCTB led to trials of the anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab in this disease, with a clear demonstration of beneficial clinical effect. Surgery remains the primary treatment of localized GCTB. When surgery is not possible or would be associated with excessive morbidity, denosumab is a good treatment option. The optimal length of treatment and schedule of denosumab is unknown, but recurrences after apparent complete responses have been observed after stopping denosumab, and long-term follow-up of denosumab treatment may reveal unrecognized effects. The role of denosumab in the preoperative or adjuvant setting will require clinical trials. In some cases local radiation therapy may be useful, although long term effects should be considered.