1
|
Yilmaz MT, Gok A, Gedik ME, Caglayan A, Yedekci FY, Aydin Dilsiz S, Gunaydin G, Akyol A, Hurmuz P. The Impact of Dose Rate on the Tumor Microenvironment Using Flattening-filter-free Beams. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:390-398. [PMID: 38570205 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Recently, dose delivery technology has rapidly evolved with flattening filter-free beams (FFF), and the biological effects of high dose rates are a matter of interest. We hypothesized that FFF beams at different dose rates obtained with modern linear accelerators have different effects on the TME. MATERIALS AND METHODS The B16-F10 melanoma syngeneic tumor model was established, and mice were randomized to 2 different doses (2 Gy and 10 Gy) and 3 different dose rates (1 Gy/min, 6 Gy/min, and 14 Gy/min) along with the control group. Euthanasia was performed on the seventh day after RT, and intracardiac blood was collected for a comet assay. Tumors were harvested and examined histomorphologically and immunohistochemically. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS The daily growth rate was uniform, and no difference was observed between tumor volumes across all three dose rates for each dose. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in blood mononuclear cells was not affected by dose or dose rate. In the TME histomorphological examination, the number of mitosis is less in the 10 Gy arm, whereas the pleomorphism score was greater. Nevertheless, varying dose rates had no effect on the number of mitosis or the pleomorphism score. The severity of the inflammation, cell densities in the TME, and expression of immunohistochemical markers were comparable across all doses and dose rates. CONCLUSION In our study involving the B16-F10 syngeneic tumor model, varying dose rates obtained with FFF beams had no effect on tumor volume, blood mononuclear cell DNA damage, or TME parameters. However, in order to fully understand the biological impacts of novel techniques, our study should be validated with alternative preclinical setups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M T Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - A Gok
- Hacettepe University, Stem Cell Research and Application Center, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - M E Gedik
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Basic Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - A Caglayan
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - F Y Yedekci
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - S Aydin Dilsiz
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - G Gunaydin
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Basic Oncology Department, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - A Akyol
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Pathology Department, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - P Hurmuz
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brekner MC, Imhoff D, Rödel C, Filmann N, Licher J, Ramm U, Köhn J. Stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy and flattening filter-free beams: dosimetric considerations. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:346-357. [PMID: 38092967 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02181-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study comparatively evaluates the impact of energy-matched flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams with different energy levels on the physical-dosimetric quality of lung and liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans. METHODS For this purpose, 54 different lung and liver lesions from 44 patients who had already received SBRT combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included in this retrospective planning study. Planning computed tomography scans already available were used for the renewed planning with 6 MV, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV, and 10 MV-FFF under constant planning objectives. The treatment delivery data, dosimetric distributions, and dose-volume histograms as well as parameters such as the conformity index and gradient indices were the basis for the evaluation and comparison of treatment plans. RESULTS A significant reduction of beam-on time (BOT) was achieved due to the high dose rates of FFF beams. In addition, we showed that for FFF beams compared to flattened beams of the same energy level, smaller planning target volumes (PTV) require fewer monitor units (MU) than larger PTVs. An equal to slightly superior target volume coverage and sparing of healthy tissue as well as organs at risk in both lung and liver lesions were found. Significant differences were seen mainly in the medium to lower dose range. CONCLUSION We found that FFF beams together with VMAT represent an excellent combination for SBRT of lung or liver lesions with shortest BOT for 10 MV-FFF but significant dose savings for 6 MV-FFF in lung lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Christoph Brekner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Natalie Filmann
- Institute for Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, University Hospital, Goethe University, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jörg Licher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ulla Ramm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Janett Köhn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gill A, Hirst AL, Rowshanfarzad P, Gill S, Bucknell N, Dass J, Sabet M. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer: a systematic review on the choice of photon energy and linac flattened/unflattened beams. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:1. [PMID: 38167095 PMCID: PMC10762943 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02392-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
SBRT is an effective local treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This treatment is currently used in patients who have poor lung function or who decline surgery. As SBRT usually has small PTV margins, reducing the beam-on-time (BOT) is beneficial for accurate dose delivery by minimising intrafraction motion as well as improved patient comfort. Removal of the linear accelerator flattening filter can provide a higher dose rate which results in a faster treatment. In addition, the choice of photon energy can also affect the dose distribution to the target and the organs-at-risk (OAR). In this systematic review, studies analysing the choice of various photon beam energies, with a flattening filter or flattening filter free (FFF), were compared for their overall dosimetric benefit in the SBRT treatment for early-stage NSCLC. It was found that FFF treatment delivers a comparatively more conformal dose distribution, as well as a better homogeneity index and conformity index, and typically reduces BOT by between 30 and 50%. The trade-off may be a minor increase in monitor units for FFF treatment found in some studies but not others. Target conformity and OAR sparing, particularly lung doses appear better with 6MV FFF, but 10MV FFF was marginally more advantageous for skin sparing and BOT reduction. The favourable beam modality for clinical use would depend on the individual case, for which tumour size and depth, radiotherapy technique, as well as fractionation scheme need to be taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlesha Gill
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
| | - Andrew L Hirst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Suki Gill
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Nicholas Bucknell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Joshua Dass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Mahsheed Sabet
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hui CB, Pourmoghaddas A, Mutaf YD. The effects of flattening filter-free beams and aperture shape controller on the complexity of conventional large-field treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14108. [PMID: 37528683 PMCID: PMC10647973 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of using flattening filter-free (FFF) beams and the aperture shape controller (ASC) on the complexity of conventional large-field treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 24 head and neck (H&N) and 24 prostate with pelvic nodes treatment plans were used in this study. Each plan was reoptimized using the original clinical objectives with both flattened and FFF beams, as well as six different ASC settings. The dosimetric qualities of each plan cohort were evaluated using commonly used dose-volume histogram values, and plan complexities were assessed through metrics including monitor unit (MU)/Dose, change in gantry speed, multileaf collimator (MLC) speed, the edge area ratio metric (EM), and the equivalent square length. RESULTS No significant differences in dosimetric qualities were found between plans with flattened and FFF beams. The ASC settings did not have significant effects on dosimetric qualities in the H&N plan cohort, but the "very high" ASC setting resulted in poorer dosimetric results for the prostate plans. Plans with FFF beams had significantly higher MU/Dose compared to plans with flattened beams. The use of flattening filter (FF) had significant effects on the change in gantry speed, with flattened beams producing plans that required higher change in gantry speed. However, the FF did not have significant effects on MLC speed, EM, or equivalent square length. In contrast, ASC settings had significant effects on these three metrics; increasing the ASC level resulted in plans with decreasing MLC speed, lower edge area ratio, and higher equivalent square length. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that using FFF beams with various ASC settings, except for the "very high" level, can produce plans with reduced complexities without compromising dosimetric qualities in conventional large-field treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheukkai B. Hui
- Department of Radiation OncologyKaiser PermanenteDublinCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Yildirim D. Mutaf
- Department of Radiation OncologyKaiser PermanenteDublinCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kumar A, Sharma K, Bhatt CP, Garg A. Dosimetric Comparison of Unmatched Flattening Filter-free and Flattened Beams in Volumetric Arc Therapy Plans for Head-and-neck Cancer. J Med Phys 2023; 48:338-344. [PMID: 38223791 PMCID: PMC10783192 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_68_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Conventionally, the fattened beam is being used in radiotherapy for routine clinical cases even after introduction of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with incorporation of multi-leaf collimator system. With the removal of the flattening filter (FF) from the beam's path average energy of the photon gets reduced resulting in reduced scatter, reduction in treatment time, and reduced neutron contamination for high-energy beam and ultimately resulting in treatment plan quality deviations. This study aims to investigate the usefulness of the FF-free (FFF) beam for routine head-and-neck cancer (HNC) cases treated with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and dosimetrically compares the result with the FF beam. Materials and Methods In this study, 20 patients treated on HalcyonTM (unmatched 6 megavoltage [6MV] FFF beam) medical linear accelerator with VMAT of different HNC selected and for comparison with 6MV FF beam, 20 equivalent treatment plans are created for TruebeamTM configuration and the plans have been evaluated for target coverage, doses to the organ at risk (OAR), and other dose quality indices. Results Comparable target coverage, doses to OARs except for rest right parotid (P = 0.02) between 6MV FFF beam and 6MV FF beam is observed. Insignificant differences in conformity index, homogeneity index, and gradient index have been observed. Higher monitor unit (MU) (P ≤ 0.001) and lesser beam on time (BOT) (P = 0.003) have been observed in 6MV FFF. Conclusion 6MV FFF beam provides comparable target coverage and improved dose-sparing effect to most of the OARs. 6MV FFF beam has lesser BOT, but on the other hand number of MUs is higher as compared to 6MV-FF plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind Kumar
- Department of Physics, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Kiran Sharma
- Department of Physics, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, India
| | - Chandi Prasad Bhatt
- S Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Center, Faridabad, Haryana, India
| | - Abhishek Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dosimetric Parameters in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Do Flattening Filter-Free Beams Bring Benefits? A Preliminary Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030678. [PMID: 36765636 PMCID: PMC9913515 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the dosimetric results of flattening filter-free (FFF) vs. flattened (FF) treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), with the goal to highlight potential advantages of FFF beams. METHODS A group of 18 patients with brain metastases treated with fSRT (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions) were included. The dosimetric parameters evaluated were: (1) physical dosimetric parameters (number of monitor units (MUs), conformity index (CI), dose gradient index (DGI), beam on time (BOT)); (2) clinical dosimetric parameters pertaining to target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Two treatment plans were performed for all patients: one used 6 MV FFF beams and the other used 6 MV flattened beams. RESULTS A slight increase in MUs was observed for the FFF mode (+23.3 MUs). The CI showed a difference of -2.7% for the FF plans (p = 0.28), correlated with a poorer coverage of the PTV. DGI values reported in terms of PTV are in line with international recommendations and showed a +1.9% difference for FFF plans. An average BOT of 90.3 s was reported for FFF plans, which was 2.3 times shorter than that required for FF plans delivery (p ≤ 0.001). A slight decrease of PTV coverage (-1.26%, p = 0.036) for FF plans can be considered relevant, but no other significant differences were observed between the two optimizations. No statistically significant benefit of using FFF beams to reduce V20 for normal brain could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION These dosimetric results encourage the implementation of fSRT with standard flattened beams in centers where FFF linacs are not available.
Collapse
|
7
|
Flattening filter free Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases using dynamic conformal arcs: 6 MV or 10 MV? JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIntroduction:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven itself as an effective tool in the treatment of intracranial lesions. Image-guided high dose single fraction treatments have the potential to deliver ablative doses to tumours; however, treatment times can be long. Flattening filter free (FFF) beams are available on most modern linacs and offer a higher dose rate compared to conventional flattened beams which should reduce treatment times. This study aimed to compare 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF to a 6 MV flattened beam for single fraction dynamic conformal arc SRS for a Varian Truebeam linac.Materials and methods:In total, 21 individual clinical treatment plans for 21 brain metastases treated with 6 MV were retrospectively replanned using both 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF. Plan quality and efficiency metrics were evaluated by analysing dose coverage, dose conformity, dose gradients, dose to normal brain, beam-on-time (BOT), treatment time and monitor units.Results:FFF resulted in a significant reduction in median BOT for both 6 MV FFF (57·9%; p < 0·001) and 10 MV FFF (76·3%; p < 0·001) which led to reductions in treatment times of 16·8 and 21·5% respectively. However, 6 MV FFF showed superior normal brain dose sparing (p < 0·001) and dose gradient (p < 0·001) compared to 10 MV FFF. No differences were observed for conformity.Conclusion:6 MV FFF offers a significant reduction in average treatment time compared to 6 MV (3·7 minutes; p = 0·002) while maintaining plan quality.
Collapse
|
8
|
Vassiliev ON, Peterson CB, Chang JY, Mohan R. Monte Carlo evaluation of target dose coverage in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with flattening filter-free beams. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022; 21:81-87. [PMID: 35401050 PMCID: PMC8992779 DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Aim Previous studies showed that replacing conventional flattened beams (FF) with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams improves the therapeutic ratio in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), but these findings could have been impacted by dose calculation uncertainties caused by the heterogeneity of the thoracic anatomy and by respiratory motion, which were particularly high for target coverage. In this study, we minimized such uncertainties by calculating doses using high-spatial-resolution Monte Carlo and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images. We aimed to evaluate more reliably the benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT. Materials and methods For a cohort of 15 patients with early stage lung cancer that we investigated in a previous treatment planning study, we recalculated dose distributions with Monte Carlo using 4DCT images. This included fifteen FF and fifteen FFF treatment plans. Results Compared to Monte Carlo, the treatment planning system (TPS) over-predicted doses in low-dose regions of the planning target volume. For most patients, replacing FF beams with FFF beams improved target coverage, tumor control, and uncomplicated tumor control probabilities. Conclusions Monte Carlo tends to reveal deficiencies in target coverage compared to coverage predicted by the TPS. Our data support previously reported benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg N Vassiliev
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christine B Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boustani J, Lecoester B, Baude J, Latour C, Adotevi O, Mirjolet C, Truc G. Anti-PD-1/Anti-PD-L1 Drugs and Radiation Therapy: Combinations and Optimization Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194893. [PMID: 34638376 PMCID: PMC8508444 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although immune checkpoint blockade has yielded unprecedented and durable responses in cancer patients, the efficacy of this treatment remains limited. Radiation therapy can induce immunogenic cell death that contributes to the local efficacy of irradiation. However, radiation-induced systemic responses are scarce. Studies combining radiation with checkpoint inhibitors suggest a synergistic potential of this strategy. In this review, we focused on parameters that can be optimized to enhance the anti-tumor immune response that results from this association, in order to achieve data on dose, fractionation, target volume, lymph nodes sparing, radiation particles, and other immunomodulatory agents. These factors should be considered in future trials for better clinical outcomes. To this end, we discussed the main preclinical and clinical data available to optimize the efficacy of the treatment combination. Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been associated with long-term complete responses leading to improved overall survival in several cancer types. However, these novel immunotherapies are only effective in a small proportion of patients, and therapeutic resistance represents a major limitation in clinical practice. As with chemotherapy, there is substantial evidence that radiation therapy promotes anti-tumor immune responses that can enhance systemic responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we discuss the main preclinical and clinical evidence on strategies that can lead to an enhanced response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in combination with radiation therapy. We focused on central issues in optimizing radiation therapy, such as the optimal dose and fractionation for improving the therapeutic ratio, as well as the impact on immune and clinical responses of dose rate, target volume, lymph nodes irradiation, and type of radiation particle. We explored the addition of a third immunomodulatory agent to the combination such as other checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and treatment targeting the tumor microenvironment components. The strategies described in this review provide a lead for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (J.B.); (J.B.); (C.L.); (G.T.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT, Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000 Besançon, France; (B.L.); (O.A.)
| | - Benoît Lecoester
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT, Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000 Besançon, France; (B.L.); (O.A.)
| | - Jérémy Baude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (J.B.); (J.B.); (C.L.); (G.T.)
| | - Charlène Latour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (J.B.); (J.B.); (C.L.); (G.T.)
- INSERM UMR 1231, Cadir Team, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Adotevi
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT, Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000 Besançon, France; (B.L.); (O.A.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
| | - Céline Mirjolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (J.B.); (J.B.); (C.L.); (G.T.)
- INSERM UMR 1231, Cadir Team, 21000 Dijon, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Gilles Truc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, UNICANCER, 21079 Dijon, France; (J.B.); (J.B.); (C.L.); (G.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dosimetric impact of FFF over FF beam using VMAT for brain neoplasms treated with radiotherapy. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING 2021. [DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2021-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: This study was conducted to assess the dosimetric impact of FFF beam plans on high-grade brain neoplasms using the VMAT technique when compared with FF beam plans.
Material and Methods: Thirty patients with high-grade brain neoplasms, who had received radiotherapy using VMAT technique retrospectively were selected for this study. All the patients were planned for VMAT using 6MV_FF beam and the same plan was re-optimized using 6MV_FFF beam keeping the same dose constraint. Radiotherapy dose distribution on planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR), target conformity index (CI), Homogeneity Index (HI), Low dose volume in the patient (V5, V10, V20, and V30), and Integral dose to the whole body in both plans were compared.
Results: The PTV coverage and OAR’s showed no significant differences in dose distribution between the FFF and FF beam VMAT planning. There was a reduction of the average maximum dose in the right eye, left eye, right optic nerve, and left optic nerve using FFF beams. The reduction in average low dose volume was observed in V5, V10, V20, V30, and Mean Dose. Also, a significant reduction was observed in the integral dose to the whole body using the FFF beam.
Conclusions: Using FFF beams with VMAT is doable for the treatment of high-grade brain neoplasms, and the delivery mode of the FFF beam in VMAT may yield similar results to FF beam which should be confirmed in a large scale prospective clinical trial.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kodama T, Yasui K, Nishioka S, Miyaura K, Takakura T, Katayose T, Nakamura M. Survey on utilization of flattening filter-free photon beams in Japan. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:726-734. [PMID: 34036361 PMCID: PMC8273795 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
To understand the current state of flattening filter-free (FFF) beam implementation in C-arm linear accelerators (LINAC) in Japan, the quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) 2018-2019 Committee of the Japan Society of Medical Physics (JSMP) conducted a 37-question survey, designed to investigate facility information and specifications regarding FFF beam adoption and usage. The survey comprised six sections: facility information, devices, clinical usage, standard calibration protocols, modeling for treatment planning (TPS) systems and commissioning and QA/QC. A web-based questionnaire was developed. Responses were collected between 18 June and 18 September 2019. Of the 846 institutions implementing external radiotherapy, 323 replied. Of these institutions, 92 had adopted FFF beams and 66 had treated patients using them. FFF beams were used in stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) for almost all disease sites, especially for the lungs using 6 MV and liver using 10 MV in 51 and 32 institutions, respectively. The number of institutions using FFF beams for treatment increased yearly, from eight before 2015 to 60 in 2018. Farmer-type ionization chambers were used as the standard calibration protocol in 66 (72%) institutions. In 73 (80%) institutions, the beam-quality conversion factor for FFF beams was calculated from TPR20,10, via the same protocol used for beams with flattening filter (WFF). Commissioning, periodic QA and patient-specific QA for FFF beams also followed the procedures used for WFF beams. FFF beams were primarily used in high-volume centers for SRT. In most institutions, measurement and QA was conducted via the procedures used for WFF beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takumi Kodama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780 Ooazakomuro, Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama 362-0806, Japan
| | - Keisuke Yasui
- Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Science, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470–1192, Japan
| | - Shie Nishioka
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104–0045, Japan
| | - Kazunori Miyaura
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142–8666, Japan
| | - Toru Takakura
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Uji-Tokushukai Medical Center, 145 Ishibashi, Makichima-cho, Uji-shi, Kyoto 611–0041, Japan
| | - Tetsurou Katayose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260–8717, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Information Technology and Medical engineering, Human Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
In-vivo and in-vitro impact of high-dose rate radiotherapy using flattening-filter-free beams on the anti-tumor immune response. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 24:116-122. [PMID: 32793819 PMCID: PMC7415635 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Effect of RT dose rate modulation on immune response has never been evaluated. Preclinical study using FFF RT technique in vivo and in vitro. RT dose rate did not influence radio-immune response parameters. We may modulate RT dose rate in association with immunotherapy without efficacy modification.
Introduction Modern accelerators have the “flattening filter-free” (FFF) technique to deliver RT with a moderate high-dose rate, currently used in limited clinical indications. No scientifically established data are currently available on the possible effects of this high dose rate on the anti-tumor immune response. We therefore propose here to study these effects in a preclinical CT26 murine colorectal tumor model. Material and methods In-vitro, CT26 cells were irradiated on a Varian TrueBeam® linac at 3 different dose rates (4; 12 or 24 Gy/min) using the FFF mode. Activation of the anti-tumor immune response was evaluated by the analysis of induction of genes of the type I interferon pathway by RT-qPCR, and by the study of the induction of immunogenic death biomarkers. In-vivo, an efficacy study of RT delivering 16.5 Gy at 2 different dose rates was performed in immunocompetent Balb/c mice carrying CT26 syngeneic tumors, as well as an immunomonitoring analysed by flow cytometry and a transcriptomic analysis using RNA sequencing. Statistical analyzes were performed using non-parametric tests. Results In-vitro, no significant influence of an increase in FFF dose rate was shown for the induction of genes of the type I interferon pathway as well as for the studied immunogenic death markers (HMGB1 secretion). In-vivo, no difference in terms of tumor growth retardation between the 2 dose rates used was demonstrated, as well as for the composition of immune cell infiltrates within tumor microenvironment and the expression of immune checkpoints in immunomonitoring and RNAseq. Conclusion In this study involving the CT26 model, no influence of a moderate high dose rate in FFF technique on the anti-tumor immune response was demonstrated, which would make studies of associations between RT and checkpoint inhibitors fit with this technique of RT. However, further explorations using other cellular models seem to be of interest.
Collapse
|
13
|
Using FFF beams to improve the therapeutic ratio of lung SBRT. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020; 20:419-425. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAim:The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans can be improved by replacing conventional flattening filter (FF) beams with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams.Materials and methods:We selected 15 patients who had received SBRT with conventional 6-MV photon beams for early-stage lung cancer. We imported the patients’ treatment plans into the Eclipse 13·6 treatment planning system, in which we configured the AAA dose calculation model using representative beam data for a TrueBeam accelerator operated in 6-MV FFF mode. We then created new treatment plans by replacing the conventional FF beams in the original plans with FFF beams.Results:The FFF plans had better target coverage than the original FF plans did. For the planning target volume, FFF plans significantly improved the D98, D95, D90, homogeneity index and uncomplicated tumour control probability. In most cases, the doses to organs at risk were lower in FFF plans. FFF plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose, V10, V20, V30, and normal tissue complication probability for the total lung and improved the dosimetric indices for the ipsilateral lung. For most patients, FFF beams achieved lower maximum doses to the oesophagus, heart and the spinal cord, and a lower chest wall V30.Conclusions:Compared with FF beams, FFF beams achieved lower doses to organs at risk, especially the lung, without compromising tumour coverage; in fact, FFF beams improved coverage in most cases. Thus, replacing FF beams with FFF beams can achieve a better therapeutic ratio.
Collapse
|
14
|
Isobe I, Mori Y, Kaneda N, Hashizume C, Ishiguchi T, Suzuki K. Dosimetric Comparison of Hypofractionated Multi-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy With Flattened Beam and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam for Skull Base Meningioma Adjacent to Optic Pathways. Cureus 2020; 12:e8690. [PMID: 32699688 PMCID: PMC7370696 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since the optic pathways are the most vulnerable to radiation, the treatment of skull base tumors involving them is challenging. In this study simulation plans by multi-beam (MB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), both with the flattened beam (FB) and flattening-filter-free beam (FFF), were compared in terms of covering of the target and sparing of the optic pathways. Materials and methods Treatment planning was simulated by MB-IMRT with FB and FFF and by 2-rotational VMAT with FB and FFF in three cases of skull base meningioma [volume of the planned target volume (PTV; PTV margin=2 mm except for overlapping area with optic pathways or brainstem): 8.6 ml, 34.6 ml, and 55.3 ml respectively], which were treated previously by multi-fractionated MB-IMRT [45 Gy/18 fx. (fraction) with 7-, 6-, and 5-beam] using a conventional Novalis (BrainLAB, Tokyo, Japan) planned by iPlan (BrainLAB, Tokyo, Japan). In all three cases, the optic pathways were adjacent to the lesion. The reference CT with contouring data set of target volumes [gross tumor volume (GTV) and PTV] and OARs (organs at risk) was transferred from iPlan to Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). In this study, hypofractionated radiation therapy by 30 Gy/5 fx. was designed; 95% dose (28.5 Gy/5 fx.) was prescribed to D95 (dose to 95% volume of PTV). Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI, D5/D95), D[0.1 ml] (dose to 0.1 ml) for optic pathways, and D[1 ml] for brainstem and eyes, and V[20 Gy] (volume delivered with 20 Gy or more/5 fx.) of the whole brain were evaluated. Results The indices did not differ between FB and FFF, in either MB-IMRT or VMAT. Between MB-IMRT and VMAT, the indices were similar. The mean dose of PTV and HI was a little larger with MB-IMRT than with VMAT. D[0.1 ml] of the optic pathways and D[1 ml] of the ipsilateral eye were smaller with VMAT in all three cases. D[1 ml] of the brainstem was smaller with VMAT in two cases, though it was similar in one case. Conclusion Based on our findings, VMAT with FFF might be the optimal method to treat cases of skull base meningioma involving optic pathways. However, further studies involving more cases are required to arrive at a conclusive verdict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikue Isobe
- Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
| | - Yoshimasa Mori
- Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, JPN
- Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
- Neurological Surgery, Ookuma Hospital, Nagoya, JPN
- Neurological Surgery, Aoyama General Hospital, Toyokawa, JPN
| | - Naoki Kaneda
- Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
| | | | - Tsuneo Ishiguchi
- Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mhatre VR, Chadha P, Kumar AP, Talapatra K. Dosimetric Comparison of 6 MV Flattening Filter Free and 6 MV Stereotactic Radiosurgery Beam Using 4 mm Conical Collimator for Trigeminal Neuralgia Radiosurgery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.14407/jrpr.2018.43.3.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
16
|
Tsubouchi T, Yagi M, Sumida I, Tamari K, Seo Y, Ogawa K. The effect of beam shape on physical parameters of head and neck simultaneous-integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018; 23:425-432. [PMID: 30197578 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the influence of the beam shape created by X-rays with "flat beams" and without "flattening-filter-free [FFF] beams" a flattening filter, and the isocenter locations for FFF beams on the treatment of a large irradiated volume for tumours. Background The increase of dose rate and the decrease of out-of-field dose can be expected for FFF beams and lead to effective and safety radiotherapy. On the other hand, the bell-shaped dose profile is thought to be a factor of negating these advantages. Materials and methods Treatment plans for 15 patients with head and neck cancer were created using XiO (Elekta, Stockholm AB, Sweden) in fixed-gantry step-and-shoot delivery under the same dose constraints. Seven fields of FFF beams with 7 MV and flat beams with 6 MV were used with the technique of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We compared the dose homogeneity and conformity of targets and dose constraints for organs as the plan quality and evaluated physical parameters: monitor unit (MU) values, number of segments and their locations from the isocenter in beam's-eye-view. Results No significant differences were found in the plan quality. The isocenter locations do not affect the physical parameters for FFF beams. It has been confirmed that the number of segments and MU values were 40% higher with FFF beams than with flat beams (p < 0.05). Conclusion This study demonstrates flat dose distribution is more suitable for IMRT with large and complex targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiro Tsubouchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Masashi Yagi
- Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Iori Sumida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Keisuke Tamari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuji Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1, Yamadaoka, Suita-city, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Benedek H, Lerner M, Nilsson P, Knöös T, Gunnlaugsson A, Ceberg C. The effect of prostate motion during hypofractionated radiotherapy can be reduced by using flattening filter free beams. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 6:66-70. [PMID: 33458391 PMCID: PMC7807632 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer reduces the overall treatment time but increases the per-fraction beam-on time due to the higher fraction doses. This increased fraction treatment time results in a larger uncertainty of the prostate position. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prostate motion during flattening filter free (FFF) Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in ultrahypofractionation of prostate cancer radiotherapy with preserved plan quality compared to conventional flattened beams. Materials and methods Nine prostate patients from the Scandinavian HYPO-RT-PC trial were re-planned using VMAT technique with both conventional and flattening filter free beams. Two fractionation schedules were used, one hypofractionated (42.7 Gy in 7 fractions), and one conventional (78.0 Gy in 39 fractions). Pre-treatment verification measurements were performed on all plans and the treatment time was recorded. Measurements with simulated prostate motion were performed for the plans with the longest treatment times. Results All the 10FFF plans fulfilled the clinical gamma pass rate, 90% (3%, 2 mm), during all simulated prostate motion trajectories. The 10MV plans only fulfilled the clinical pass rate for three of the trajectories. The mean beam-on-time for the hypofractionated plans were reduced from 2.3 min to 1.0 min when using 10FFF compared to 10MV. No clinically relevant differences in dose distribution were identified when comparing the plans with different beam qualities. Conclusion Flattening-filter free VMAT reduces treatment times, limiting the dosimetric effect of organ motion for ultrahypofractionated prostate cancer with preserved plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunor Benedek
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Minna Lerner
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Tommy Knöös
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Volumetric modulated arc therapy of head-and-neck cancer on a fast-rotating O-ring linac: Plan quality and delivery time comparison with a C-arm linac. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:479-484. [PMID: 29739713 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Linac improvements in gantry speed, leaf speed and dose rate may increase the time-efficiency of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery. The plan quality achievable with faster VMAT however remains to be investigated. In this study, a fast-rotating O-ring linac with fast-moving leaves is compared with a C-arm linac in terms of plan quality and delivery time for VMAT of head-and-neck cancer (HNC). MATERIAL AND METHODS For 30 patients with HNC, treatment planning was performed using dual-arc (HA2) and triple-arc (HA3) VMAT on a Halcyon fast-rotating O-ring linac and using dual-arc VMAT on a TrueBeam C-arm linac (TB2). Target coverage metrics and complication probabilities were compared. Plan delivery was verified using 3%/3 mm gamma-index analysis of helical diode array measurements. Volumetric image acquisition and plan delivery times were compared. RESULTS All studied VMAT-techniques fulfilled the target coverage objectives. D2% to the boost volume was higher for HA2 (median 103.7%, 1st-3rd quartile [103.5%;104.0%]) and HA3 (103.2% [103.0%;103.7%)] than for TB2 (102.6% [102.3%;103.0%)], resulting in an increased boost target dose heterogeneity for HA2 and HA3. Complication probabilities were comparable between HA2 and TB2, while HA3 showed a xerostomia probability reduction (0.8% [0.2%;1.8%]) and dysphagia probability reduction (1.0% [0.2%;1.8%]) compared with TB2. Gamma-index agreement scores were never below 93.0% for HA2, HA3 and TB2. Volumetric imaging and plan delivery time was shorter for HA2 (1 m 24 s ± 1 s) and HA3 (1 m 54 s ± 1 s) than for TB2 (2 m 47 s ± 1 s). CONCLUSION For VMAT of HNC, the fast-rotating O-ring linac at least maintains the plan quality of two arcs on a C-arm linac while reducing the image acquisition and plan delivery time.
Collapse
|
19
|
Dosimetric Analysis of Unflattened (FFFB) and Flattened (FB) Photon Beam Energy for Gastric Cancers Using IMRT and VMAT-a Comparative Study. J Gastrointest Cancer 2018. [PMID: 29520733 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-018-0080-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of flattening filter free beam (FFFB) for the treatment of gastric tumors and to review their benefits over 6MV flatten beam (6MV_FFB). METHODS Fifteen patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma were selected. CT scans with slice thickness of 0.3 cm were acquired and planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR) were delineated. Plans were made retrospectively for each patient for the prescription dose of 45 Gy/25 fractions to the PTV. Four isocentric plans were compared in the present study on Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). RESULTS PTV D98% was 44.41 ± 0.12, 44.38 ± 0.13, 44.59 ± 0.14, and 44.49 ± 0.19 Gy for IMRT 6MV_FFB, IMRT 6MV_FFFB, VMAT 6MV_FFB, and VMAT 6MV_FFFB respectively. 6MV_FFFB beam minimizes the mean heart dose Dmean (P = 0.001). VMAT dominates over IMRT when it came to kidney doses V12Gy (P = 0.02), V23Gy (P = 0.015), V28Gy (P = 0.011), and Dmax (P < 0.01). VMAT has significantly reduced the doses to kidneys. It was analyzed that 6MV_FFFB significantly reduces the dose to normal tissues (P = 0.006 and P = 0.018). VMAT significantly reduces the TMU, which is required to deliver the similar dose by IMRT (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Unflattened beam spares the organs at risk significantly to avoid the chances of secondary malignancies and reduces the intra-fraction motion during treatment due to provision of higher dose rate. Hence, we conclude that 6MV unflattened beam can be used to treat gastric carcinoma.
Collapse
|
20
|
Dosimetric superiority of flattening filter free beams for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in single brain metastasis. Oncotarget 2018; 8:35272-35279. [PMID: 27823985 PMCID: PMC5471053 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
For single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using linac in brain metastases, more accurate treatment delivery with higher tumor absorbed doses and lower absorbed doses to normal tissues remains an enormous challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric superiority in flattening filter free beams (FFF) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in single brain metastasis. 68 patients with single brain metastasis were included in this study. Every patient was subjected to VMAT treatment plans using 6 MV standard flattened (FF) beams (VMAT_FF) and 6 MV FFF beams (VMAT_FFF) with single fraction doses of 20 Gy. Dosimetric evaluation was performed by analysis of target coverage, dose gradients, beam-on time (BOT), gantry speed and number of monitor units (MU). There were no differences between VMAT_FF and VMAT_FFF plans in conformity and MU. VMAT_FFF plans showed obvious superiority in homogeneity, dose gradients and efficiency. For the mean BOT, VMAT_FFF plans provided a significant decrease by 42.8% compared with VMAT_FF. By the use of FFF beams, brain irradiation was minimized with about 2% reductions in low-dose regions (about 5-10 Gy). FFF beams not only resulted in more efficiency by reducing treatment time, but also provided further brain sparing compared to traditional techniques for SRS in single brain metastasis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Preclinical studies for implementing flattening filter-free beams in hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2017. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396917000176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundVolumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has emerged as one of the most favourable techniques for radiotherapy treatment in recent years because of its conformal dose distribution to the planning target volume (PTV), lower doses to adjacent normal organs at risk (OARs) and faster and easier dose delivery. A typical conventional VMAT protocol for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer uses a flattened 6 MV photon beam to deliver 78 Gy in 39 fractions, however, a recent Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study investigated prostate cancer radiotherapy with a hypofractionated dose scheme of 36·25 Gy in 5 fractions. One advantage of flattening filter-free (FFF) beams in radiotherapy is the higher doses in the central region on the dose profile and much higher dose delivery rates.Methods and materialsThis paper reports the investigation of preclinical studies for implementing FFF beams in hypofractionated VMAT for prostate cancer radiotherapy. All treatment planning were accomplished using Varian EclipseTM treatment planning system version 11 and delivered on Varian Truebeam linear accelerators. The studies compared the biological-effective dose–volume histograms and dose–volume histograms of PTV and OARs for 20 patients using conventional and hypofractionated dose schemes. The study also evaluated the 6 and 10 MV FFF by comparing 6 and 10 MV VMAT plans with the FFF beams. The treatment time was investigated using plans with 6 MV beams and doses of 2, 4, 5, 6, 7·25 Gy/fraction and plans with 10 MV FFF with a dose of 7·25 Gy/fraction. We also investigated an angular monitor unit (MU) quantity (MU/deg) and its threshold value for RapidArcTM plans, beyond which FFF beams can be considered superior to flattened beams in terms of treatment time increased caused by higher dose per fraction.ResultsThe results show that the hypofractionated plans resulted in greater biological equivalent doses to PTV and lower doses to OARs. The 10 MV FFF plans have statistically lower mean doses to all the OARs, whereas PTV homogeneity index remains the same compared with other beam energies. The mean body integral dose for the 20 patients is 8·7% lower using 10 MV FFF compared with 6 MV FFF mainly because of the higher energy and less required MUs with the 10 MV FFF beam. The hypofractionated scheme with 10 MV FFF plan has the same treatment time as that of the 6 MV plan at 2 Gy/fraction, as the higher dose delivery rates at 10 MV FFF can compensate for the higher prescribed dose per fraction without the need of extra treatment time.ConclusionIn this study, we observed that the 10 MV FFF beam is better for hypofractionated prostate cancer VMAT plan delivery. The threshold value of MU/deg is found to be 2·083 MU/deg based on our machine configurations.
Collapse
|
22
|
Tambe NS, Fryer A, Marsden JE, Moore C, Beavis AW. Determination of clinically appropriate flattening filter free (FFF) energy for treating lung SABR using treatment plans and delivery measurements. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2016. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/2/6/065016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
23
|
Budgell G, Brown K, Cashmore J, Duane S, Frame J, Hardy M, Paynter D, Thomas R. IPEM topical report 1: guidance on implementing flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:8360-8394. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/23/8360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
24
|
Ahunbay EE, Ates O, Li XA. An online replanning method using warm start optimization and aperture morphing for flattening-filter-free beams. Med Phys 2016; 43:4575. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4955439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
25
|
Radiosurgery with flattening-filter-free techniques in the treatment of brain metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:789-796. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-1012-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
26
|
Rieber J, Tonndorf-Martini E, Schramm O, Rhein B, König L, Adeberg S, Meyerhof E, Mohr A, Kappes J, Hoffmann H, Debus J, Rieken S. Establishing stereotactic body radiotherapy with flattening filter free techniques in the treatment of pulmonary lesions - initial experiences from a single institution. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:80. [PMID: 27411832 PMCID: PMC4943033 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using flattening filter free (FFF)-techniques has been increasingly applied during the last years. However, clinical studies investigating this emerging technique are still rare. Hence, we analyzed toxicity and clinical outcome of pulmonary SBRT with FFF-techniques and performed dosimetric comparison to conventional techniques using flattening filters (FF). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 05/2014 and 06/2015, 56 consecutive patients with 61 pulmonary lesions were treated with SBRT in FFF-mode. Central lesions received 8 × 7.5 Gy delivered to the conformally enclosing 80 %-isodose, while peripheral lesions were treated with 3 × 15 Gy, prescribed to the 65 %-isodose. Early and late toxicity (after 6 months) as well as initial clinical outcomes were evaluated. Furthermore, [deleted] plan quality and efficiency were evaluated by analyzing conformity, beam- on and total treatment delivery times in comparison to plans with FF-dose application. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 9.3 months (range 1.5-18.0 months). Early toxicity was low with only 5 patients (8.9 %) reporting CTCAE 2° or higher side-effects. Only one patient (1.8 %) was diagnosed with radiation-induced pneumonitis CTCAE 3°, while 2 (3.6 %) patients suffered from pneumonitis CTCAE 2°. After 6 months, no toxicity greater than CTCAE 2° was reported. 1-year local progression-free survival, distant progression-free survival and overall survival were 92.8 %, 78.0 %, and 94.4 %, respectively. While plan quality was similar for FFF- and FF-plans in respect to conformity (p = 0.275), median beam-on time as well as total treatment time were significantly reduced for SBRT in FFF-mode compared to FF-mode (p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patient treatment with SBRT using FFF-techniques is safe and provides promising clinical results with only modest toxicity at significantly increased dose delivery speed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Tonndorf-Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Schramm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Rhein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meyerhof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Mohr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jutta Kappes
- Translational Research Unit, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Germany Translational Lung Research Centre Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pneumology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Hoffmann
- Department of Pneumology, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Role of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy with Flattening Filter Free Delivery in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2016; 47:155-159. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
28
|
Lu JY, Zheng J, Zhang WZ, Huang BT. Flattening Filter-Free Beams in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Sinonasal Cancer. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146604. [PMID: 26734731 PMCID: PMC4703390 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the dosimetric impacts of flattening filter-free (FFF) beams in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for sinonasal cancer. METHODS For fourteen cases, IMRT and VMAT planning was performed using 6-MV photon beams with both conventional flattened and FFF modes. The four types of plans were compared in terms of target dose homogeneity and conformity, organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing, number of monitor units (MUs) per fraction, treatment time and pure beam-on time. RESULTS FFF beams led to comparable target dose homogeneity, conformity, increased number of MUs and lower doses to the spinal cord, brainstem and normal tissue, compared with flattened beams in both IMRT and VMAT. FFF beams in IMRT resulted in improvements by up to 5.4% for sparing of the contralateral optic structures, with shortened treatment time by 9.5%. However, FFF beams provided comparable overall OAR sparing and treatment time in VMAT. With FFF mode, VMAT yielded inferior homogeneity and superior conformity compared with IMRT, with comparable overall OAR sparing and significantly shorter treatment time. CONCLUSIONS Using FFF beams in IMRT and VMAT is feasible for the treatment of sinonasal cancer. Our results suggest that the delivery mode of FFF beams may play an encouraging role with better sparing of contralateral optic OARs and treatment efficiency in IMRT, but yield comparable results in VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Yang Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jing Zheng
- Department of Laboratory, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wu-Zhe Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Bao-Tian Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Teke T, Duzenli C, Bergman A, Viel F, Atwal P, Gete E. Monte Carlo validation of the TrueBeam 10XFFF phase-space files for applications in lung SABR. Med Phys 2015; 42:6863-74. [PMID: 26632043 DOI: 10.1118/1.4935144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish the clinical acceptability of universal Monte Carlo phase-space data for the 10XFFF (flattening filter free) photon beam on the Varian TrueBeam Linac, including previously unreported data for small fields, output factors, and inhomogeneous media. The study was particularly aimed at confirming the suitability for use in simulations of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatment plans. METHODS Monte Carlo calculated percent depth doses (PDDs), transverse profiles, and output factors for the TrueBeam 10 MV FFF beam using generic phase-space data that have been released by the Varian MC research team were compared with in-house measurements and published data from multiple institutions (ten Linacs from eight different institutions). BEAMnrc was used to create field size specific phase-spaces located underneath the jaws. Doses were calculated with DOSXYZnrc in a water phantom for fields ranging from 1 × 1 to 40 × 40 cm(2). Particular attention was paid to small fields (down to 1 × 1 cm(2)) and dose per pulse effects on dosimeter response for high dose rate 10XFFF beams. Ion chamber measurements were corrected for changes in ion collection efficiency (P(ion)) with increasing dose per pulse. MC and ECLIPSE ANISOTROPIC ANALYTICAL ALGORITHM (AAA) calculated PDDs were compared to Gafchromic film measurement in inhomogeneous media (water, bone, lung). RESULTS Measured data from all machines agreed with Monte Carlo simulations within 1.0% and 1.5% for PDDs and in-field transverse profiles, respectively, for field sizes >1 × 1 cm(2) in a homogeneous water phantom. Agreements in the 80%-20% penumbra widths were better than 2 mm for all the fields that were compared. For all the field sizes considered, the agreement between their measured and calculated output factors was within 1.1%. Monte Carlo results for dose to water at water/bone, bone/lung, and lung/water interfaces as well as within lung agree with film measurements to within 2.8% for 10 × 10 and 3 × 3 cm(2) field sizes. This represents a significant improvement over the performance of the ECLIPSE AAA. CONCLUSIONS The 10XFFF phase-space data offered by the Varian Monte Carlo research team have been validated for clinical use using measured, interinstitutional beam data in water and with film dosimetry in inhomogeneous media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Teke
- Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Centre for the Southern Interior, Kelowna, British Columbia V1Y 5L3, Canada
| | - Cheryl Duzenli
- Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Alanah Bergman
- Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Francis Viel
- Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Parmveer Atwal
- Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Ermias Gete
- Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fortin D, Mestrovic A, Alexander A. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy in flattening filter-free mode for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer patients: Are 2 arcs better than 1? Pract Radiat Oncol 2015; 5:e489-e497. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Revised: 03/02/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
31
|
Xiao Y, Kry SF, Popple R, Yorke E, Papanikolaou N, Stathakis S, Xia P, Huq S, Bayouth J, Galvin J, Yin FF. Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16:5219. [PMID: 26103482 PMCID: PMC5690108 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2014] [Revised: 02/06/2015] [Accepted: 01/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This report describes the current state of flattening filter‐free (FFF) radiotherapy beams implemented on conventional linear accelerators, and is aimed primarily at practicing medical physicists. The Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed a writing group to assess FFF technology. The published literature on FFF technology was reviewed, along with technical specifications provided by vendors. Based on this information, supplemented by the clinical experience of the group members, consensus guidelines and recommendations for implementation of FFF technology were developed. Areas in need of further investigation were identified. Removing the flattening filter increases beam intensity, especially near the central axis. Increased intensity reduces treatment time, especially for high‐dose stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery (SRT/SRS). Furthermore, removing the flattening filter reduces out‐of‐field dose and improves beam modeling accuracy. FFF beams are advantageous for small field (e.g., SRS) treatments and are appropriate for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). For conventional 3D radiotherapy of large targets, FFF beams may be disadvantageous compared to flattened beams because of the heterogeneity of FFF beam across the target (unless modulation is employed). For any application, the nonflat beam characteristics and substantially higher dose rates require consideration during the commissioning and quality assurance processes relative to flattened beams, and the appropriate clinical use of the technology needs to be identified. Consideration also needs to be given to these unique characteristics when undertaking facility planning. Several areas still warrant further research and development. Recommendations pertinent to FFF technology, including acceptance testing, commissioning, quality assurance, radiation safety, and facility planning, are presented. Examples of clinical applications are provided. Several of the areas in which future research and development are needed are also indicated. PACS number: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.55.N‐, 87.56.bc
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Xiao
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dzierma Y, Bell K, Palm J, Nuesken F, Licht N, Rübe C. mARC vs. IMRT radiotherapy of the prostate with flat and flattening-filter-free beam energies. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:250. [PMID: 25424536 PMCID: PMC4272773 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-014-0250-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/04/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There as yet exists no systematic planning study investigating the novel mARC rotational radiotherapy technique, which is conceptually different from VMAT. We therefore present a planning study for prostate cancer, comparing mARC with IMRT treatment at the same linear accelerator equipped with flat and flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon energies. METHODS We retrospectively re-contoured and re-planned treatment plans for 10 consecutive prostate cancer patients. Plans were created for a Siemens Artiste linear accelerator with flat 6 MV and FFF 7 MV photons, using the Prowess Panther treatment planning system. mARC and IMRT plans were compared with each other considering indices for plan quality and dose to organs at risk. All plans were exported to the machine and irradiated while measuring scattered dose by thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on an anthropomorphic phantom. Treatment times were also measured and compared. RESULTS All plans were found acceptable for treatment. There was no marked preference for either technique or energy from the point of view of target coverage and dose to organs at risk. Scattered dose was significantly decreased by the use of FFF energies. While mARC and IMRT plans were of very similar overall quality, treatment time could be markedly decreased both by the use of mARC and FFF energy. CONCLUSIONS Highly conformal treatment plans could be created both by the use of flat 6 MV and FFF 7 MV energy, using IMRT or mARC. For all practical purposes, the FFF 7 MV energy and mARC plans are acceptable for treatment, a combination of both allowing a drastic reduction in treatment time from over 5 minutes to about half this value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Dzierma
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. Geb. 6.5, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
| | - Katharina Bell
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. Geb. 6.5, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
| | - Jan Palm
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. Geb. 6.5, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
| | - Frank Nuesken
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. Geb. 6.5, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
| | - Norbert Licht
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. Geb. 6.5, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
| | - Christian Rübe
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Str. Geb. 6.5, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Muren LP, Teräs M, Knuuti J. NACP 2014 and the Turku PET symposium: the interaction between therapy and imaging. Acta Oncol 2014; 53:993-6. [PMID: 25141819 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.941073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ludvig P Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|