1
|
Gao Y, Wu A. Organ Preservation in MSS Rectal Cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36:430-440. [PMID: 37795468 PMCID: PMC10547535 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Rectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with complex genetic and molecular subtypes. Emerging progress of neoadjuvant therapy has led to increased pathological and clinical complete response (cCR) rates for microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer, which responds poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitor alone. As a result, organ preservation of MSS rectal cancer as an alternative to radical surgery has gradually become a feasible option. For patients with cCR or near-cCR after neoadjuvant treatment, organ preservation can be implemented safely with less morbidity. Patient selection can be done either before the neoadjuvant treatment for higher probability or after with careful assessment for a favorable outcome. Those patients who achieved a good clinical response are managed with nonoperative management, organ preservation surgery, or radiation therapy alone followed by strict surveillance. The oncological outcomes of patients with careful selection and organ preservation seem to be noninferior compared with those of radical surgery, with lower postoperative morbidity. However, more studies should be done to seek better regression of tumor and maximize the possibility of organ preservation in MSS rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuye Gao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Aiwen Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steinke J, Jordan C, Rossides S, Minnaar H, Yu J, Franklin A, Rockall T, Dhadda AS, Andrew Hunter I, Mills J, Chadwick E, Silverman R, Folkesson J, Radu C, Myint AS, Stewart AJ. Planned organ preservation for elderly patients with rectal cancer using short course radiotherapy and a contact brachytherapy boost-an International multi-institution analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100580. [PMID: 36686563 PMCID: PMC9852541 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and contact X-Ray brachytherapy (CXB) is emerging as an effective alternative in patients with early stage rectal cancer with the intent of organ preservation (OP). Short course radiotherapy (SCRT) is an alternative EBRT schedule for patients not fit for chemotherapy or for longer courses of EBRT. There are no multicentre studies that have reported on the outcomes of SCRT with a CXB boost, therefore we present these from patients from centres from the UK and Sweden. Materials and methods From the Guildford Colorectal Database or local databases, 258 patients who underwent SCRT and CXB with the intent of OP from five centres treated between 2007 and 2019 were identified. Response and survival data was analysed and presented. Results With a median age of 81, 226 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone (RTA) and 32 immediately after local excision (ILE). Median follow-up was 24 months. 70% and 97% of patients in the RTA and ILE groups respectively had a complete clinical response (cCR) after SCRT with CXB. Of those, local relapse was seen in 16% of the RTA and 3% of the ILE group. Median survival was 40 months after CXB in the RTA and 52 months in the ILE group. 94% of patients remained stoma-free to the point of latest follow-up. Conclusion This data suggests that CXB when combined with SCRT, in a mainly elderly and comorbid population, provides good palliation with stoma-avoidance. Oncological outcomes compare with previously published work. A greater focus is required on quality of life outcomes after OP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Steinke
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom,University of Surrey, Guildford, England, United Kingdom,Corresponding author at: Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, The Leggett Building, Daphne Jackson Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7WG, United Kingdom.
| | - Chloe Jordan
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Savvas Rossides
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Minnaar
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Jimmy Yu
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Franklin
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Rockall
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom,University of Surrey, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Amandeep Singh Dhadda
- Queens Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, England, United Kingdom
| | - Iain Andrew Hunter
- Queens Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, England, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie Mills
- Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
| | - Eliot Chadwick
- Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
| | | | - Joakim Folkesson
- Uppsala University Hospital, Akademiska sjukhuset S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Calin Radu
- Uppsala University Hospital, Akademiska sjukhuset S-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Arthur Sun Myint
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom,University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra J. Stewart
- St Luke’s Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, United Kingdom,University of Surrey, Guildford, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roeder F, Jensen AD, Lindel K, Mattke M, Wolf F, Gerum S. Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:689-711. [PMID: 37168037 PMCID: PMC10166100 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s365495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
- Correspondence: Falk Roeder, Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria, Tel +43 57255 55569, Email
| | - Alexandra D Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg-Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frank Wolf
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Limbergen EJ, Hazelaar C, Vaassen F, Bellezzo M, Verrijssen AS, Willems Y, Stewart AJ, Vanneste B, Buijsen J, Paiva Fonseca G, Leijtens J, Appelt AL, Verhaegen F, Berbee M. Endorectal contact radiation boosting: Making the case for dose AND volume reporting. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:887-895. [PMID: 36130857 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The various rectal endoluminal radiation techniques all have steep, but different, dose gradients. In rectal contact brachytherapy (CXB) doses are typically prescribed and reported to the applicator surface and not to the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV) or organs at risk (OAR), which is crucial to understand tumor response and toxicity rates. To quantify the above-described problem, we performed a dose modeling study using a fixed prescription dose at the surface of the applicator and varied tumor response scenarios. METHODS Endorectal ultrasound-based 3D-volume-models of rectal tumors and the rectal wall were used to simulate the delivered dose to GTV, CTV and the rectal wall layers, assuming treatment with Maastro HDR contact applicator for rectal cancer with a fixed prescription dose to the applicator surface (equivalent to 3 × 30 Gy CXB) and various response scenarios. RESULTS An identical prescribed dose to the surface of the applicator resulted in a broad range of doses delivered to the GTV, CTV and the uninvolved intestinal wall. For example, the equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2) D90% of the GTV varied between 63 and 231 Gy, whereas the EQD2 D2cc of the rectal wall varied between 97 and 165 Gy. CONCLUSION Doses prescribed at the surface are not representative of the dose received by the tumor and the bowel wall. This stresses the relevance of dose reporting and prescription to GTV and CTV volumes and OAR in order to gain insight between delivered dose, local control and toxicity and to optimize treatment protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evert J Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Colien Hazelaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Vaassen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Murillo Bellezzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - An-Sofie Verrijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Yves Willems
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra J Stewart
- St Luke's Cancer Centre, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England; University of Surrey, Guildford, England
| | - Ben Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Buijsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabriel Paiva Fonseca
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Leijtens
- Department of Surgery, Laurentiusziekenhuis Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Frank Verhaegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Larrouy A, Giraud N, Huguet F, Vendrely V. [Organ preservation for rectal cancer: What are the arguments in favor of radiotherapy?]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:766-770. [PMID: 35995720 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Standard care for rectal cancers relies on both tumor (location relative to the sphincter, T and N stage, sphincter involvement) and patients characteristics. Radical surgery (total mesorectal excision) following short-course radiotherapy (RT) or standard chemo-radiotherapy, associated with induction or consolidation chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant treatment), remains the cornerstone of locally advanced rectal cancer (T3cd, T4 and/or N+) treatment. Nevertheless, for early stages, this radical resection could be avoided in favor of conservative approaches combining RT (external, contact, brachytherapy) with or without chemotherapy (concurrent, induction or consolidative), or even be limited, for good responders, to a local excision with view of organ-preservation strategies. This conservative approach could also be offered selectively to patients with complete clinical response after the induction sequence, irrespective of initial tumor characteristics. The Watch and Wait strategy relies on clinical, endoscopic and radiological evaluations, as well as sustained surveillance. Ongoing studies aim to improve response rates, either with chemotherapy intensification, or RT boost dose escalation with brachytherapy or contact-therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Larrouy
- Institut cancérologie Paris Nord, service d'oncologie radiothérapie, avenue Charles-Péguy, 95200 Sarcelles, France.
| | - N Giraud
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Huguet
- Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Paris, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; U1312-BRIC, eq BioGO, Inserm, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
GEC ESTRO ACROP consensus recommendations for contact brachytherapy for rectal cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 33:15-22. [PMID: 35243017 PMCID: PMC8885383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
CXB appears to be an efficacious technique for rectal cancer treatment and may allow rectal preservation in selected patients. These GEC ESTRO ACROP recommendations recommend dose schemes in for rectal CXB. These recommendations advise reporting of tumour depth to enable future refinement of dose prescription and target definition. The routine collection and publication of outcome data including patient reported outcomes (PROs) is recommended.
Purpose To issue consensus recommendations for contact X-Ray brachytherapy (CXB) for rectal cancer covering pre-treatment evaluation, treatment, dosimetric issues and follow-up. These recommendations cover CXB in the definitive and palliative setting. Methods Members of GEC ESTRO with expertise in rectal CXB issued consensus-based recommendations for CXB based on literature review and clinical experience. Levels of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence based medicine guidance are presented where possible. Results The GEC ESTRO ACROP consensus recommendations support the use of CXB to increase the chances of clinical complete remission and cure for patients who are elderly with high surgical risk, surgically unfit or refusing surgery. For palliative treatment, the use of CXB is recommended for symptomatic relief and disease control. The use of CXB in an organ-preservation setting in surgically fit patients is recommended within the setting of a clinical trial or registry. Conclusions The GEC ESTRO ACROP recommendations for CXB are provided. Recommendations towards standardisation of reporting and prescription are given. Practitioners are encouraged to follow these recommendations and to develop further clinical trials to examine this treatment modality and increase the evidence base for its use. The routine collection of outcomes both clinical and patient-reported is also encouraged.
Collapse
|
7
|
Vendrely V, Rivin Del Campo E, Modesto A, Jolnerowski M, Meillan N, Chiavassa S, Serre AA, Gérard JP, Créhanges G, Huguet F, Lemanski C, Peiffert D. Rectal cancer radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:272-278. [PMID: 34953708 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
We present the updated recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists in chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal resection and adjuvant chemotherapy according to nodal status. Although this strategy efficiently reduced local recurrences rates below 5% in expert centres, functional sequelae could not be avoided resulting in 20 to 30% morbidity rates. The early introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven beneficial in recent trials, in terms of recurrence free and metastasis free survivals. Complete pathological responses were obtained in 15% of tumours treated by chemoradiation, even reaching up to 30% of tumours when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated to chemoradiotherapy. These good results question the relevance of systematic radical surgery in good responders. Personalized therapeutic strategies are now possible by improved imaging modalities with circumferential margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, by intensity modulated radiotherapy and by refining surgical techniques, and contribute to morbidity reduction. Keeping the same objectives, ongoing trials are now evaluating therapeutic de-escalation strategies, in particular rectal preservation for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment, or radiotherapy omission in selected cases (Greccar 12, Opera, Norad).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue de Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France; Inserm U1035, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - A Modesto
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Claudius-Regaud, université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - M Jolnerowski
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - N Meillan
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP, Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - S Chiavassa
- Service de physique médicale, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) centre René-Gauducheau, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - A-A Serre
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - J-P Gérard
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - G Créhanges
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, Institut du cancer de Montpellier, université de Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - D Peiffert
- Service universitaire de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 54000 Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Costanzo A, Ghidini A, Petrelli F, Turati L, Rampulla V, Varricchio A, Trizzino A, Russo AA, Sgroi G. Time interval between neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: is the long interval correct for all patients? Minerva Surg 2021; 77:245-251. [PMID: 34047530 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.08770-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal time between neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy period and surgery remains controversial in patients with rectal cancer: an increasing number of studies show results in favour of a long interval. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the cases of low-middle rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant RT-CT and surgery: the primary endpoint was the complete pathological response rate and the secondary endpoint the rate of complications. We analysed cases from 1/01/2003 to 31/12/2018 divided in two periods: from 2003 to 2010 (23 pts) and from 2011 to 2018 (23 pts). The two periods were characterised by two different surgical teams which use different time intervals (≤vs>8 weeks). RESULTS The pCR rate is 21.7% in both groups; as regards the complications, the difference between the two groups is in grade IIIb: 8.7% in the first group and 17.4% in the second group (p 0.66). CONCLUSIONS Although our study is based on a small number of patients, it shows the same rate of pCR with respect to two different time intervals; this suggests the need for studies based on the division of patients into subgroups and the evaluation of different time intervals in order to reach the best oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Costanzo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Fausto Petrelli
- Oncology Unit, Medical Sciences Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luca Turati
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Arianna Trizzino
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alfio A Russo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Sgroi
- Surgical Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clinical audit of rectal cancer patient referrals for Papillon contact brachytherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground and purpose:Papillon treatment is a form of contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) which is used as an alternative to surgery for rectal cancer. This study aimed to audit patients who were referred for and treated with CXB over a 6-year period against guidelines derived from a critical review of the evidence base.Materials and methods:Patient demographics, tumour characteristics and outcome data were gathered for 31 patients referred for CXB. A critical review of the evidence identified consensus referral criteria and outcome data against which to audit patients.Results:Referral criteria were derived from six published studies. These applied to patients unfit for surgery or stoma-averse. All referred patients had a visible tumour or scar with a tumour size under 3 cm and sited less than 12 cm from the anal verge. Nodal status varied from N0 to N2, but there was no metastatic disease present. The audited cohort demonstrated demographic equivalence, while the initial clinical complete response and recurrence rates were also comparable.Conclusion:This audit confirmed the validity of referral and treatment protocols and should guide future referrals until evidence from ongoing studies becomes available. These findings should contribute to the development of robust national guidelines.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bellezzo M, Fonseca GP, Voncken R, Verrijssen AS, Van Beveren C, Roelofs E, Yoriyaz H, Reniers B, Van Limbergen EJ, Berbée M, Verhaegen F. Advanced design, simulation, and dosimetry of a novel rectal applicator for contact brachytherapy with a conventional HDR 192Ir source. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:544-553. [PMID: 32386884 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dose escalation yields higher complete response to rectal tumors, which may enable the omission of surgery. Dose escalation using 50 kVp contact x-ray brachytherapy (CXB) allow the treatment of a selective volume, resulting in low toxicity and organs-at-risk preservation. However, the use of CXB devices is limited because of its high cost and lack of treatment planning tools. Hence, the MAASTRO applicator (for HDR 192Ir sources) was developed and characterized by measurements and Monte Carlo simulations to be a cost-effective alternative to CXB devices. METHODS AND MATERIALS A cylindrical applicator with lateral shielding was designed to be used with a rectoscope using its tip as treatment surface. Both the applicator and the rectoscope have a slanted edge to potentially allow easier placement against tumors. The applicator design was achieved by Monte Carlo modeling and validated experimentally with film dosimetry, using the Papillon 50 (P50) device as reference. RESULTS The applicator delivers CXB doses in less than 9 min using a 20375 U source for a treatment area of approximately 20 × 20 mm2 at 2 mm depth. Normalized at 2 mm, the dose falloff for depths of 0 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm are 130%, 70%, and 43% for the P50 and 140%, 67%, and 38% for the MAASTRO applicator, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MAASTRO applicator was designed to use HDR 192Ir sources to deliver a dose distribution similar to those of CXB devices. The applicator may provide a cost-effective solution for endoluminal boosting with clinical treatment planning system integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murillo Bellezzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Centro de Engenharia Nuclear, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gabriel P Fonseca
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - An-Sofie Verrijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Celine Van Beveren
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Roelofs
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hélio Yoriyaz
- Centro de Engenharia Nuclear, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Brigitte Reniers
- Research group NuTeC, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Evert J Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Berbée
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Verhaegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Myint AS, Gérard JP. Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer in older patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:349-357. [PMID: 31926607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Striking a balance between cancer treatment and patient-centred care is becoming ever more important in older patients with rectal cancer as the population is ageing. The treatment decision made by the modern multidisciplinary colorectal team will recommend pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery for advance rectal cancer and surgery alone for early rectal cancer, as the "standard of care" is surgery. However, an alternative non-surgical treatment option should be consider for older patients with rectal cancer as the surgical harm can far outweigh the potential benefits. There is published evidence that mortality is higher with increasing age. An alternative treatment option to surgery when patients are not suitable or refusing surgery is to offer them external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or chemo radiotherapy (EBCRT). A proportion of these patients can achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) which enable adoption of 'watch and wait' strategy to avoid surgery. However, a third of patients who achieved initial cCR can develop local regrowth within the first two years. This require salvage surgery which reduces their chance of organ preservation. Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or High Dose Rate Endo Brachy Therapy (HDREBT) boost following external beam radiotherapy can improve the initial cCR rate and reduce the risk of local regrowth. Those patients with persistent residual cancer or regrowth after brachytherapy boost following EBCRT or EBRT can have salvage surgery later without compromising their chance of cure. Therefore, patients should be fully aware of their treatment options and have 'a choice' when deciding and consenting their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Sun Myint
- Papillon Suite, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK; Translation Department, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rijkmans EC, Marijnen CAM, van Triest B, Ketelaars M, Cats A, Inderson A, van den Ende RPJ, Laman MS, Kerkhof EM, Nout RA. Predictive factors for response and toxicity after brachytherapy for rectal cancer; results from the HERBERT study. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:176-182. [PMID: 30935576 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The HERBERT study was a dose-finding feasibility study of a high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) boost after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in elderly patients with rectal cancer who were unfit for surgery. This analysis evaluates the association of patient, tumor and dosimetric parameters with tumor response and toxicity after HDREBT in definitive radiotherapy for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS The HERBERT study included 38 inoperable patients with T2-3N0-1 rectal cancer. Thirteen fractions of 3 Gy EBRT were followed by three weekly HDREBT applications of 5-8 Gy per fraction. Clinical and dosimetric parameters were tested for correlation with clinical complete response (cCR), sustained partial/complete response (SR), patient reported bowel symptoms, physician reported acute and late proctitis (CTCAE v3) and endoscopically scored toxicity. RESULTS Thirty-five patients completed treatment and were included in the current analyses. Twenty of 33 evaluable patients achieved a cCR, the median duration of a sustained response was 32 months. Tumor volume at diagnosis showed a strong association with clinical complete response (OR 1.15; p = 0.005). No dose-response correlation was observed in this cohort. Prescribed dose to the brachytherapy CTV (D90) correlated with acute and late physician reported proctitis while CTV volume, CTV width and high dose regions in the CTV (D1cc/D2cc) were associated with endoscopic toxicity at the tumor site. CONCLUSION Tumor volume is the most important predictive factor for tumor response and a higher dose to the brachytherapy CTV increases the risk of severe clinically and endoscopically observed proctitis after definitive radiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva C Rijkmans
- Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands.
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Ketelaars
- Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Cats
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Leiden University Medical Center LUMC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Roy P J van den Ende
- Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam S Laman
- Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M Kerkhof
- Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Leiden University Medical Center LUM, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Socha J, Pietrzak L, Zawadzka A, Paciorkiewicz A, Krupa A, Bujko K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pT2 rectal cancer spread and recurrence pattern: Implications for target design in radiation therapy for organ preservation. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:20-27. [PMID: 30935577 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no guidelines on clinical target volume (CTV) delineation for cT2 rectal cancer treated with organ preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the extent of distal mesorectal (DMS) and distal intramural spread (DIS), the risk of lateral lymph node (LLN) metastases in pT2 tumours, and regional recurrence pattern after organ preservation. RESULTS The rate of DMS > 1 cm was 1.9% (95% CI: 0.4-5.4%), maximum extent: 1.3 cm. The rate of DIS > 0.5 cm was 4.7% (95% CI: 1.3-11.5%), maximum extent: 0.8 cm. The rate of LLN metastases was 8.2% (95% CI: 6.7-9.9%) for tumours below or at peritoneal reflexion and 0% for higher tumours. Regional nodal recurrences alone were recorded in 1.0% (95% CI: 0.5-1.7%) of patients after watch-and-wait and in 2.1% (95% CI: 1.2-3.4%) after preoperative radiotherapy and local excision. Thus, the following rules for CTV delineation are proposed: caudal border 1.5 cm from the tumour to account for DMS or 1 cm to account for DIS, whichever is more caudal; cranial border at S2/S3 interspace; inclusion of LLN for tumours at or below peritoneal reflexion. A planning study was performed in eight patients to compare dose-volume parameters obtained using these rules to that obtained using current guidelines for advanced cancers. The proposed rules led to a mean 18% relative reduction of planning target volume, which resulted in better sparing of organs-at-risk. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests a smaller CTV for cT2 tumours than the current guidelines designed for advanced cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Socha
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Oncology Center, Czestochowa, Poland.
| | - Lucyna Pietrzak
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Zawadzka
- Medical Physics Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Paciorkiewicz
- Medical Physics Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Krupa
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Bujko
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Verrijssen AS, Opbroek T, Bellezzo M, Fonseca GP, Verhaegen F, Gerard JP, Sun Myint A, Van Limbergen EJ, Berbee M. A systematic review comparing radiation toxicity after various endorectal techniques. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:71-86.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
15
|
Bellezzo M, Fonseca GP, Verrijssen AS, Voncken R, Van den Bosch MR, Yoriyaz H, Reniers B, Berbée M, Van Limbergen EJ, Verhaegen F. A novel rectal applicator for contact radiotherapy with HDR 192Ir sources. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:1037-1044. [PMID: 30122346 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dose escalation to rectal tumors leads to higher complete response rates and may thereby enable omission of surgery. Important advantages of endoluminal boosting techniques include the possibility to apply a more selective/localized boost than using external beam radiotherapy. A novel brachytherapy (BT) rectal applicator with lateral shielding was designed to be used with a rectoscope for eye-guided positioning to deliver a dose distribution similar to the one of contact x-ray radiotherapy devices, using commonly available high-dose-rate 192Ir BT sources. METHODS AND MATERIALS A cylindrical multichannel BT applicator with lateral shielding was designed by Monte Carlo modeling, validated experimentally with film dosimetry and compared with results found in the literature for the Papillon 50 (P50) contact x-ray radiotherapy device regarding rectoscope dimensions, radiation beam shape, dose fall-off, and treatment time. RESULTS The multichannel applicator designed is able to deliver 30 Gy under 13 min with a 20350 U (5 Ci) source. The use of multiple channels and lateral shielding provide a uniform circular treatment surface with 22 mm in diameter. The resulting dose fall-off is slightly steeper (maximum difference of 5%) than the one generated by the P50 device with the 22 mm applicator. CONCLUSIONS A novel multichannel rectal applicator for contact radiotherapy with high-dose-rate 192Ir sources that can be integrated with commercially available treatment planning systems was designed to produce a dose distribution similar to the one obtained by the P50 device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murillo Bellezzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Centro de Engenharia Nuclear, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gabriel P Fonseca
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - An-Sofie Verrijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel R Van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hélio Yoriyaz
- Centro de Engenharia Nuclear, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Brigitte Reniers
- Research group NuTeC, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Maaike Berbée
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Evert J Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Verhaegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Balyasnikova S, Vuong T, Wale A, Chong I, Rutten H, Brown G. Session 3: Boosting primary and recurrent rectal cancer: how far can we push the radiotherapy envelope? Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 Suppl 1:88-91. [PMID: 29878674 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant pelvic radiotherapy is widely used for patients with advanced rectal cancer. The trade-off between dose and response is well-established, yet little consensus remains on the precise methods of delivery and doses given in different scenarios. Professor Vuong reviews the evidence base and trial evidence on the escalation of radiotherapy dose and the methods of achieving this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - T Vuong
- Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - A Wale
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Chong
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Rutten
- Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G Brown
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang SJ, Hathout L, Malhotra U, Maloney-Patel N, Kilic S, Poplin E, Jabbour SK. Decision-Making Strategy for Rectal Cancer Management Using Radiation Therapy for Elderly or Comorbid Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:926-944. [PMID: 29485072 PMCID: PMC11131033 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Rectal cancer predominantly affects patients older than 70 years, with peak incidence at age 80 to 85 years. However, the standard treatment paradigm for rectal cancer oftentimes cannot be feasibly applied to these patients owing to frailty or comorbid conditions. There are currently little information and no treatment guidelines to help direct therapy for patients who are elderly and/or have significant comorbidities, because most are not included or specifically studied in clinical trials. More recently various alternative treatment options have been brought to light that may potentially be utilized in this group of patients. This critical review examines the available literature on alternative therapies for rectal cancer and proposes a treatment algorithm to help guide clinicians in treatment decision making for elderly and comorbid patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shang-Jui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Lara Hathout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Usha Malhotra
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Nell Maloney-Patel
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Sarah Kilic
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Elizabeth Poplin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rijkmans E, van Triest B, Nout R, Kerkhof E, Buijsen J, Rozema T, Franssen J, Velema L, Laman M, Cats A, Marijnen C. Evaluation of clinical and endoscopic toxicity after external beam radiotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer treated in the HERBERT study. Radiother Oncol 2018; 126:417-423. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
19
|
Lancellotta V, Kovács G, Tagliaferri L, Perrucci E, Colloca G, Valentini V, Aristei C. Age Is Not a Limiting Factor in Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) for Patients with Localized Cancer. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:2178469. [PMID: 29581964 PMCID: PMC5822774 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2178469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
This review examines the role of interventional radiotherapy (IRT otherwise known as brachytherapy) in cancer treatment for elderly patients. Despite their advanced age and associated comorbidities, elderly patients should receive definitive cancer therapies, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT). In fact, RT becomes first-line option for patients who are not eligible for surgery (due to comorbidities, anticoagulant drugs, and risk of disfigurement) or those who refuse it. It emerged from this review of the literature as effective, simple, safe, and comfortable and was associated with good local control, low toxicity rates, and excellent cosmesis and provided a cost benefit. IRT may be used as sole treatment for small cancers or as a useful adjunct to surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in more advanced (or lymph node positive) cases, especially when the aim is local control with adequate preservation of normal tissue function. As palliative treatment, IRT preserves quality of life and/or improves survival. It is to be hoped that this review will serve as a helpful guide for members of multidisciplinary teams that are involved in treating elderly patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Lancellotta
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - György Kovács
- Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University of Lübeck/UKSH-CL, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Polo Scienze Oncologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Colloca
- Polo Scienze Oncologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Gruppo Italiano di Oncologia Geriatrica (GIOGER), Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Polo Scienze Oncologiche ed Ematologiche, Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Vailati BB, Castro I, Raffaele D. Management of the Complete Clinical Response. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 30:387-394. [PMID: 29184475 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Organ preservation is considered in the management of selected patients with rectal cancer. Complete clinical response observed after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer is one of these cases. Patients who present complete clinical response are candidates to the watch-and-wait approach, when radical surgery is not immediately performed and is offered only to patients in the event of a local relapse. These patients are included in a strict follow-up, and up of 70% of them will never be operated during the follow-up. This strategy is associated with similar oncological outcomes as patients operated on, and the advantage of avoiding the morbidity associated to the radical operation. In this article we will discuss in detail the best candidates for this approach, the protocol itself, and the long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelita Habr-Gama
- Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.,University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Ivana Castro
- Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sun Myint A, Smith FM, Gollins SW, Wong H, Rao C, Whitmarsh K, Sripadam R, Rooney P, Hershman MJ, Fekete Z, Perkins K, Pritchard DM. Dose escalation using contact X-ray brachytherapy (Papillon) for rectal cancer: does it improve the chance of organ preservation? Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170175. [PMID: 28937269 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A watch and wait policy for patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after external beam chemoradiotherapy (EBCRT) for rectal cancer is an attractive option. However, approximately one-third of tumours will regrow, which requires surgical salvage for cure. We assessed whether contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) can improve organ preservation by avoiding surgery for local regrowth. METHODS From our institutional database, we identified 200 of 573 patients treated by CXB from 2003 to 2012. Median age was 74 years (range 32-94), and 134 (67%) patients were males. Histology was confirmed in all patients and was staged using CT scan, MRI or endorectal ultrasound. All patients received combined CXB and EBCRT, except 17 (8.5%) who had CXB alone. RESULTS Initial cCR was achieved in 144/200 (72%) patients. 38/56 (68%) patients who had residual tumour received immediate salvage surgery. 16/144 (11%) patients developed local relapse after cCR, and 124/144 (86%) maintained cCR. At median follow up of 2.7 years, 161 (80.5%) patients were free of cancer. The main late toxicity was bleeding (28%). Organ preservation was achieved in 124/200 (62%) patients. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that CXB can reduce local regrowth to 11% compared with around 30% after EBCRT alone. Organ preservation of 62% achieved was higher than reported in most published watch and wait studies. Advances in knowledge: CXB is a promising treatment option to avoid salvage surgery for local regrowth, which can improve the chance of organ preservation in patients who are not suitable for or refuse surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Sun Myint
- 1 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre , Liverpool , UK.,2 Institute of Translational Medicine , University of Liverpool , UK
| | - Fraser McLean Smith
- 3 The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust , Liverpool , UK
| | | | - Helen Wong
- 1 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre , Liverpool , UK
| | - Christopher Rao
- 5 Department of Surgery , University Hospital, Lewisham, London , UK
| | | | - Raj Sripadam
- 1 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre , Liverpool , UK
| | - Paul Rooney
- 3 The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust , Liverpool , UK
| | | | - Zsolt Fekete
- 7 Prof Dr Ion Chiricuţă Institute of Oncology , Cluj , Romania
| | - Kate Perkins
- 1 The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre , Liverpool , UK
| | - D Mark Pritchard
- 2 Institute of Translational Medicine , University of Liverpool , UK.,3 The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust , Liverpool , UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sun Myint A, Smith FM, Gollins S, Wong H, Rao C, Whitmarsh K, Sripadam R, Rooney P, Hershman M, Pritchard DM. Dose Escalation Using Contact X-ray Brachytherapy After External Beam Radiotherapy as Nonsurgical Treatment Option for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:565-573. [PMID: 29229327 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with a nonsurgical approach using contact x-ray brachytherapy (CXB) when suspicious residual disease (≤3 cm) was present after external beam chemoradiation therapy/radiation therapy (EBCRT/EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Outcome data for rectal cancer patients referred to our institution from 2003 to 2012 were retrieved from an institutional database. These patients were referred after initial local multidisciplinary team discussion because they were not suitable for, or had refused, surgery. All selected patients received a CXB boost after EBCRT/EBRT. Most patients received a total of 90 Gy of CXB delivered in 3 fractions over 4 weeks. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 2.5 years (range 1.2-8.3). Of 345 consecutive patients with rectal cancer referred to us, 83 with suspicious residual disease (≤3 cm) after EBCRT/EBRT were identified for a CXB boost. Their median age was 72 years (range 36-87), and 58 (69.9%) were men. The initial tumor stages were cT2 (n = 28) and cT3 (n = 55), and 54.2% were node positive. A clinical complete response (cCR) was achieved in 53 patients (63.8%) after the CXB boost that followed EBCRT/EBRT. Of these 53 patients, 7 (13.2%) developed a relapse after achieving a cCR, and the 6 patients (11.6%) with nonmetastatic regrowth underwent salvage surgery (100%). At the end of the study period, 69 of 83 patients (83.1%) were cancer free. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that a CXB boost for selected patients with suspicious residual disease (≤3 cm) after EBCRT/EBRT can be offered as an alternative to radical surgery. In our series, patients with a sustained cCR had a low rate of local regrowth, and those with nonmetastatic regrowth could be salvaged successfully. This approach could provide an alternative treatment option for elderly or comorbid patients who are not suitable for surgery and those with rectal cancer who wish to avoid surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Sun Myint
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | - Fraser McLean Smith
- The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Gollins
- North Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Rhyl, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Wong
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Rao
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Raj Sripadam
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Rooney
- The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - D Mark Pritchard
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom; The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Inflatable multichannel rectal applicator for adaptive image-guided endoluminal high-dose-rate rectal brachytherapy: design, dosimetric characteristics, and first clinical experiences. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:359-363. [PMID: 28951756 PMCID: PMC5611456 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.69335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the dosimetric results and first clinical experiences with a new designed balloon applicator with adjustable catheters for endoluminal brachytherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer not undergoing surgery. Material and methods The applicator consists of an inflatable rectal balloon with six attached Foley catheters used as guidance for the inserted brachytherapy plastic needles. The construction of the applicator and the dosimetric profile in terms of representative dose points in 0, 2, 5, 10 mm ipsilaterally and in 0 mm contralaterally are described. The first clinical outcomes in three patients are reported. Results For all three patients, a reproducible dose gradient was achieved. The surface dose on the target side was 204 ± 19% of the normalized dose in 5 mm (100%) tissue depth, and 143 ± 8% in 2 mm and 64 ± 3% in 10 mm tissue depth, while the surface dose on the contra-lateral side was 20 ± 8%. After radiochemotherapy with 50 Gy external beam radiotherapy and concomitant administration of capecitabine, a HDR brachytherapy boost in 2-3 fractions of 7-10 Gy each was delivered. All patients achieved a clinical complete response 3 month after the treatment, and no major toxicity was observed. Conclusion The use of the applicator was clinically feasible, and resulted in a stable and reproducible dose distribution. First clinical results are promising.
Collapse
|
24
|
Gérard JP, André T, Bibeau F, Conroy T, Legoux JL, Portier G, Bosset JF, Cadiot G, Bouché O, Bedenne L. Rectal cancer: French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO). Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49:359-367. [PMID: 28179091 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2016] [Revised: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of rectal adenocarcinoma published in February 2016. METHOD This collaborative work, under the auspices of most of the French medical societies involved in the management of rectal cancer, is based on the previous guidelines published in 2013. Recommendations are graded into 3 categories according to the level of evidence of data found in the literature. RESULTS In agreement with the ESMO guidelines (2013), non-metastatic rectal cancers have been stratified in 4 risk groups according to endoscopy, MRI or endorectal-ultrasonography. Locally-advanced tumors are limited to groups 3 and 4 (T3≥4cm or T3c-d or N1-2 or T4). These tumors are usually treated using neoadjuvant treatment and total proctectomy (TME). Adjuvant treatment depends on the pathological findings. Very early (group 1) or early (group 2) tumors are managed mainly by surgery, and organ preservation may be an option in selected cases. For metastatic tumors, the recommendations are based on less robust evidence and chemotherapy plays a major role. CONCLUSION Such recommendations are constantly being optimized and each individual case must be discussed within a Multi-Disciplinary Team.
Collapse
|
25
|
Glimelius B. On a prolonged interval between rectal cancer (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery. Ups J Med Sci 2017; 122:1-10. [PMID: 28256956 PMCID: PMC5361426 DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2016.1274806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Revised: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is often required before rectal cancer surgery to obtain low local recurrence rates or, in locally advanced tumours, to radically remove the tumour. RT/CRT in tumours responding completely can allow an organ-preserving strategy. The time from the end of the RT/CRT to surgery or to the decision not to operate has been prolonged during recent years. After a brief review of the literature, the relevance of the time interval to surgery is discussed depending upon the indication for RT/CRT. In intermediate rectal cancers, where the aim is to decrease local recurrence rates without any need for down-sizing/-staging, short-course RT with immediate surgery is appropriate. In elderly patients at risk for surgical complications, surgery could be delayed 5-8 weeks. If CRT is used, surgery should be performed when the acute radiation reaction has subsided or after 5-6 weeks. In locally advanced tumours, where CRT is indicated, the optimal delay is 6-8 weeks. In patients not tolerating CRT, short-course RT with a 6-8-week delay is an alternative. If organ preservation is a goal, a first evaluation should preferably be carried out after about 6 weeks, with planned surgery for week 8 if the response is inadequate. In case the response is good, a new evaluation should be carried out after about 12 weeks, with a decision to start a 'watch-and-wait' programme or operate. Chemotherapy in the waiting period is an interesting option, and has been the subject of recent trials with promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rijkmans EC, Cats A, Nout RA, van den Bongard DHJG, Ketelaars M, Buijsen J, Rozema T, Franssen JH, Velema LA, van Triest B, Marijnen CAM. Endorectal Brachytherapy Boost After External Beam Radiation Therapy in Elderly or Medically Inoperable Patients With Rectal Cancer: Primary Outcomes of the Phase 1 HERBERT Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:908-917. [PMID: 28366579 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) boost in elderly and medically inoperable patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS A phase 1 dose-escalation study was performed. Treatment consisted of EBRT (13 × 3 Gy) followed by 3 weekly brachytherapy applications 6 weeks later. The HDREBT dose started at 5 Gy per fraction, increasing with 1 Gy per fraction if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, defined as grade ≥3 proctitis <6 weeks after HDREBT) occurred in ≤2 patients per dose level. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose, defined as 1 dose level below the dose at which 3 patients experienced DLT. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, clinical tumor response, freedom from local progression, and local progression-free and overall survival (L-PFS and OS). RESULTS Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 83 years were included in the study. Thirty-two were evaluable for DLT and late toxicity and 33 for response evaluation. Maximum delivered dose was 8 Gy per fraction, resulting in a recommended dose of 7 Gy per fraction. Response occurred in 29 of 33 patients (87.9%), with 60.6% complete response (CR). The L-PFS and OS rates were 42% and 63%, respectively, at 2 years. Patients with CR showed a significantly improved L-PFS (60% at 2 years, P=.006) and a trend in improved OS (80% at 2 years, P=.11). Severe late toxicity occurred in 10 of 32 patients. CONCLUSION We found that HDREBT after EBRT results in a high overall response rate, with improved L-PFS for patients with a CR. The high observed rate of severe late toxicity requires further evaluation of the risks and benefits of an HDREBT boost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva C Rijkmans
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn Ketelaars
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Buijsen
- Department of Radiotherapy, MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Rozema
- Department of Radiotherapy, Verbeeten Institute, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Huib Franssen
- Department of Radiotherapy, HAGA Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Laura A Velema
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Omidvari S, Zohourinia S, Ansari M, Ghahramani L, Zare-Bandamiri M, Mosalaei A, Ahmadloo N, Pourahmad S, Nasrolahi H, Hamedi SH, Mohammadianpanah M. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy as a Boost to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer: A Phase-II Clinical Trial. Ann Coloproctol 2015; 31:123-30. [PMID: 26361613 PMCID: PMC4564663 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite advances in rectal cancer treatment over the last decade, local control and risk of late side effects due to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) remain as concerns. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and the safety of low-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (LDRBT) as a boost to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for use in treating locally advanced distal rectal adenocarcinomas. METHODS This phase-II clinical trial included 34 patients (as the study arm) with newly diagnosed, locally advanced (clinical T3-T4 and/or N1/N2, M0) lower rectal cancer. For comparative analysis, 102 matched patients (as the historical control arm) with rectal cancer were also selected. All the patients were treated with LDRBT (15 Gy in 3 fractions) and concurrent chemoradiation (45-50.4 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily during LDRBT and EBRT. RESULTS The study results revealed a significant differences between the study arm and the control arm in terms in the pathologic tumor size (2.1 cm vs. 3.6 cm, P = 0.001), the pathologic tumor stage (35% T3-4 vs. 65% T3-4, P = 0.003), and the pathologic complete response (29.4% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.028). Moreover, a significantly higher dose of EBRT (P = 0.041) was found in the control arm, and a longer time to surgery was observed in the study arm (P < 0.001). The higher rate of treatment-related toxicities, such as mild proctitis and anemia, in the study arm was tolerable and easily manageable. CONCLUSION A boost of LDRBT can optimize the pathologic complete response, with acceptable toxicities, in patients with distal rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shapour Omidvari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Shadi Zohourinia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mansour Ansari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Leila Ghahramani
- Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | - Ahmad Mosalaei
- Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Niloofar Ahmadloo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Saeedeh Pourahmad
- Department of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hamid Nasrolahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sayed Hasan Hamedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
[Organ preserving strategies for rectal cancer treatment]. Cancer Radiother 2015; 19:404-9. [PMID: 26278990 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
For rectal cancers, the current standard of care consists of chemoradiation followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal excision. Oncologic results are good, especially regarding local recurrence rates, but at the cost of high morbidity rates and poor anorectal, urinary and sexual function results. Since chemoradiation yields 15 to 25% pathological complete response, the role of radical surgery is questioned for patients presenting with good response after chemoradiation and two organ preservation strategies have been offered: watch and wait strategy and local excision strategy. The aim of this review is to give the results of organ preservation after chemoradiotherapy series and to highlight different questions regarding initial patient's selection, complete clinical response definition, risk of mesorectal nodal involvement, follow-up modalities as well as oncologic and functional results.
Collapse
|
29
|
Radiation Techniques for Increasing Local Control in the Non-Surgical Management of Rectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-015-0284-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|