1
|
Juan-Cruz C, Stam B, Rossi M, Belderbos J, Sonke JJ. Baseline shift corrections towards the heart: External validation of the impact on survival in early-stage NSCLC patients. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110214. [PMID: 38458257 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To externally validate Johnson-Hart et al. findings: the association of tumor baseline shifts towards the heart with overall survival (OS) in SBRT for NSCLC. Further analysis included investigating the presence of interfractional heart baseline shifts and the association of OS with heart dose change during treatment. METHODS Data from 416 SBRT early-stage NSCLC patients was collected. Pearson's correlations (PCCs) between clinical variables and treatment-averaged tumor shifts towards/away from the heart were explored. Validation of published multivariable Cox model was performed. PCCs between heart and tumor baseline shifts were analyzed. Dose accumulation was performed following daily CBCT-to-pCT deformable registration. Maximum heart dose (D0) was computed for planned and accumulated doses. Differences in OS according to shifts towards/away from the heart or D0 increase/decrease were analyzed. Significant D0 differences between patients with D0 increase/decrease and different tumor locations were explored. RESULTS Tumor shifts towards/away from the heart showed no significant association with OS (p = 0.91). Distance between PTV and heart correlated significantly (PCC = 0.18) with shifts to the heart. Cox model did not validate in our cohort. Heart presented baseline shifts positively correlated with tumor baseline shifts in all three directions (PCC ≥ 0.38; p < 0.001). Counterintuitively, patients experiencing increased D0 during treatment showed significantly better OS (p = 0.0077). Upper-lobe tumor patients with increased D0 had lower D0 than those with decreased D0 (right-upper-lobe p ≤ 0.018). CONCLUSIONS In our SBRT cohort, the shifts towards the heart were not associated with worse OS. Moderate correlations were found between tumor and heart baseline shifts in each direction. Moreover, the distance between the PTV and the heart showed a significant correlation with shifts to the heart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Juan-Cruz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Barbara Stam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maddalena Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Katsuta T, Murakami Y, Kawahara D, Miyoshi S, Imano N, Hirokawa J, Nishibuchi I, Nagata Y. Novel simulation for dosimetry impact of diaphragm respiratory motion in four-dimensional volumetric modulated arc therapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 187:109849. [PMID: 37562552 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The diaphragm respiratory motion (RM) could impact the target dose robustness in the lower esophageal cancer (EC). We aimed to develop a framework evaluating the impact of different RM patterns quantitatively in one patient, by creating virtual four-dimensional computed-tomography (v4DCT) images, which could lead to tailored treatment for the breathing pattern. We validated virtual 4D radiotherapy (v4DRT) along with exploring the acceptability of free-breathing volumetric modulated arc therapy (FB-VMAT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We assessed 10 patients with superficial EC through their real 4DCT (r4DCT) scans. v4DCT images were derived from the end-inhalation computed tomography (CT) image (reference CT) and the v4DRT dose was accumulated dose over all phases. r4DRT diaphragm shifts were applied with magnitudes derived from r4DCT scans; clinical target volume (CTV) dose of v4DRT was compared with that of r4DRT to validate v4DRT. CTV dosage modifications and planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins of the spinal cord were examined with the diaphragm movement. The percentage dose differences (ΔDx) were determined between the v4DRT and the dose calculated on the reference CT image. RESULTS The CTV ΔDx between the r4DRT and v4DRT were within 1% in cases with RM ≦ 15 mm. The average ΔD100% and ΔDmean of the CTV ranging from 5 to 15 mm of diaphragm motion was 0.3% to 1.7% and 0.1% to 0.4%, respectively. All CTV index changes were within 3% and ΔD1cc and ΔD2cc of Cord PRV were within 1%. CONCLUSION We postulate a novel method for evaluating the CTV robustness, comparable to the conventional r4DCT method under the diaphragm RM ≦ 15 mm permitting an impact of within 3% in FB-VMAT for EC on the CTV dose distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Katsuta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yuji Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Kawahara
- Section of Radiation Therapy, Department of Clinical Practice and Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Shota Miyoshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Nobuki Imano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Junichi Hirokawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Ikuno Nishibuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nagata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shamshad M, Møller DS, Mortensen HR, Ehmsen ML, Jensen MF, Hoffmann L. Bone versus soft-tissue setup in proton therapy for patients with oesophageal cancer. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:994-1003. [PMID: 35775236 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2091949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patient positioning based on either bone or soft-tissue matching for PT in oesophageal cancer and its impact on plan adaptation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two retrospective patient cohorts treated with radiotherapy were included in the study. Cohort A consisted of 26 consecutive patients with a planning 4DCT scan (CT1) and a surveillance 4DCT scan (CT2) at fraction ten. Cohort B consisted of 17 patients selected based on large anatomical changes identified during treatment resulting in a rescan (CT2). Mean dose to the iCTV (sum of the CTVs in all respiratory phases) was 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 28 fractions or 41.4 Gy (RBE) in 23 fractions. A nominal pencil beam scanning plan was created using two posterior beams and robust optimization (5 mm setup, 3.5% range). For each patient, two rigid registrations were made between average (avg) CT1 and CT2: a match on the vertebral column (bone match) and a match on the iCTV (soft-tissue match). Robustness towards setup (5 mm) and range (3.5%) errors was evaluated at CT2. Robustness towards respiration was evaluated by recalculation of the plan on all phases of the CT2 scan. Dose coverage <96% would trigger adaptation. The statistical significance (p-value <0.05) between dose coverage for the two registration methods was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS All plans fulfilled V95%iCTV>99% for the nominal plan and V95%iCTV>97% for all respiratory phases and robustness scenarios at CT1. In two (8%) and three (18%) patients, V95%iCTV<96% on CT2 for Cohort A and B, respectively when bone match was used. For soft-tissue match, V95%iCTV >96% for all patients. V95%iCTV was significantly higher (p-value = 0.0001) for soft-tissue match than bone match. CONCLUSION Anatomical changes during the treatment course led to target dose deterioration and a need for plan adaptation when using a bone match.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Shamshad
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ditte Sloth Møller
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoffmann L, Mortensen H, Shamshad M, Berbee M, Bizzocchi N, Bütof R, Canters R, Defraene G, Lykkegaard Ehmsen M, Fiorini F, Haustermans K, Hulley R, Korevaar EW, Clarke M, Makocki S, Muijs CT, Murray L, Nicholas O, Nordsmark M, Radhakrishna G, Thomas M, Troost EGC, Vilches-Freixas G, Visser S, Weber DC, Sloth Møller D. Treatment planning comparison in the PROTECT-trial randomising proton versus photon beam therapy in oesophageal cancer: results from eight european centres. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:32-41. [PMID: 35513132 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare dose distributions and robustness in treatment plans from eight European centres in preparation for the European randomized phase-III PROTECT-trial investigating the effect of proton therapy (PT) versus photon therapy (XT) for oesophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS All centres optimized one PT and one XT nominal plan using delineated 4DCT scans for four patients receiving 50.4Gy(RBE) in 28 fractions. Target volume receiving 95% of prescribed dose (V95%iCTVtotal) should be >99%. Robustness towards setup, range, and respiration was evaluated. The plans were recalculated on a surveillance 4DCT (sCT) acquired at fraction ten and robustness evaluation was performed to evaluate the effect of respiration and inter-fractional anatomical changes. RESULTS All PT and XT plans complied with V95%iCTVtotal>99% for the nominal plan and V95%iCTVtotal>97% for all respiratory and robustness scenarios. Lung and heart dose varied considerably between centres for both modalities. The difference in mean lung dose and mean heart dose between each pair of XT and PT plans was in median [range] 4.8Gy [1.1;7.6] and 8.4Gy [1.9;24.5], respectively. Patients B and C showed large inter-fractional anatomical changes on sCT. For patient B, the minimum V95%iCTVtotal in the worst-case robustness scenario was 45% and 94% for XT and PT, respectively. For patient C, the minimum V95%iCTVtotal was 57% and 72% for XT and PT, respectively. Patient A and D showed minor inter-fractional changes and the minimum V95%iCTVtotal was >85%. CONCLUSION Large variability in dose to the lungs and heart was observed for both modalities. Inter-fractional anatomical changes led to larger target dose deterioration for XT than PT plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Hanna Mortensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Muhammad Shamshad
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Maaike Berbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands
| | - Nicola Bizzocchi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Richard Canters
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands
| | - Gilles Defraene
- KU Leuven - University of Leuven - Department of Oncology - Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Karin Haustermans
- KU Leuven - University of Leuven - Department of Oncology - Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ryan Hulley
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea University Board, UL AND Swansea University Medical School, United Kingdom
| | - Erik W Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew Clarke
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Makocki
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina T Muijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Luke Murray
- Rutherford Cancer Centre, Shinfield, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Nicholas
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea University Board, UL AND Swansea University Medical School, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Melissa Thomas
- KU Leuven - University of Leuven - Department of Oncology - Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Rossendorf, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Gloria Vilches-Freixas
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ditte Sloth Møller
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Astrup Søndergaard MM, Nordsmark M, Sloth Møller D, Melgaard Nielsen K, Poulsen SH. Reduction in myocardial function and oxygen consumption after chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:566-574. [PMID: 35289694 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2048068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may induce myocardial dysfunction, congestive heart failure, and impaired physical performance in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). We aimed to investigate left ventricular (LV) function at rest and during stress, using echocardiography (echo) and a cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) test both before and immediately after completing CRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS Consecutive EC patients referred for curative treatment were enrolled. Patients attended either definitive CRT or neoadjuvant CRT with subsequent surgery. The evaluation included cardiac biomarkers, electrocardiogram, echo, and CPX test. The primary endpoint was changes in left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) at rest. Secondary endpoints were LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV diastolic function, LVEF and GLS at peak exercise, and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max). The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03619317). RESULTS Among 47 patients enrolled (94% male; median age 67 years, range 50-86 years), cardiac examinations were performed a median of three days [Interquartile range (IQR (1-5))] before CRT and one day [IQR (0-6)] after CRT. At rest, GLS and LVEF decreased, 17.6 vs. 16.4% and 56.4 vs. 55.1%, respectively (p = 0.004; p = 0.030). Furthermore, an absolute decrease of at least 5% in LVEF and 2.5% in GLS was noted in 21% of the patients. Signs of LV diastolic dysfunction increased from 13 to 21% (p = ns). VO2max significantly decreased; 21.2 ml/kg/min vs. 18.8 ml/kg/min (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION LV function and physical performance decreased in EC patients after CRT, and the LV systolic reserve capacity declined. This study highlighted that EC treatment was associated with early cardiac side effects, which may have clinical and prognostic implications.
Collapse
|
6
|
Visser S, den Otter LA, Ribeiro CO, Korevaar EW, Both S, Langendijk JA, Muijs CT, Sijtsema NM, Knopf A. Diaphragm-Based Position Verification to Improve Daily Target Dose Coverage in Proton and Photon Radiation Therapy Treatment of Distal Esophageal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:463-474. [PMID: 34530091 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In modern conformal radiation therapy of distal esophageal cancer, target coverage can be affected by variations in the diaphragm position. We investigated if daily position verification (PV) extended by a diaphragm position correction would optimize target dose coverage for esophageal cancer treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS For 15 esophageal cancer patients, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were computed. Displacements of the target volume were correlated with diaphragm displacements using repeated 4-dimensional computed tomography images to determine the correction needed to account for diaphragm variations. Afterwards, target coverage was evaluated for 3 PV approaches based on: (1) bony anatomy (PV_B), (2) bony anatomy corrected for the diaphragm position (PV_BD) and (3) target volume (PV_T). RESULTS The cranial-caudal mean target displacement was congruent with almost half of the diaphragm displacement (y = 0.459x), which was used for the diaphragm correction in PV_BD. Target dose coverage using PV_B was adequate for most patients with diaphragm displacements up till 10 mm (≥94% of the dose in 98% of the volume [D98%]). For larger displacements, the target coverage was better maintained by PV_T and PV_BD. Overall, PV_BD accounted best for target displacements, especially in combination with tissue density variations (D98%: IMPT 94% ± 5%, VMAT 96% ± 5%). Diaphragm displacements of more than 10 mm were observed in 22% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS PV_B was sufficient to achieve adequate target dose coverage in case of small deviations in diaphragm position. However, large deviations of the diaphragm were best mitigated by PV_BD. To detect the cases where target dose coverage could be compromised due to diaphragm position variations, we recommend monitoring of the diaphragm position before treatment through online imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lydia A den Otter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cássia O Ribeiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik W Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christina T Muijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nanna M Sijtsema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boekhoff M, Defize I, Borggreve A, van Hillegersberg R, Kotte A, Lagendijk J, van Lier A, Ruurda J, Takahashi N, Mook S, Meijer G. An in-silico assessment of the dosimetric benefits of MR-guided radiotherapy for esophageal cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:76-84. [PMID: 34237345 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the dosimetric benefits of online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for esophageal cancer patients and to assess how these benefits could be translated into a local boosting strategy to improve future outcomes. METHODS Twenty-nine patients were in-silico treated with both a MRgRT regimen and a conventional image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) regimen using dose warping techniques. Here, the inter and intrafractional changes that occur over the course of treatment (as derived from 5 MRI scans that were acquired weekly during treatment) were incorporated to assess the total accumulated dose for each regimen. RESULTS A significant reduction in dose to the organs-at-risk (OARs) was observed for all dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters for the MRgRT regimen without concessions to target coverage compared to the IGRT regimen. The mean lung dose was reduced by 28%, from 7.9 to 5.7 Gy respectively and V20Gy of the lungs was reduced by 55% (6.3-2.8%). A reduction of 24% was seen in mean heart dose (14.8-11.2 Gy), while the V25Gy of the heart was decreased by 53% (14.3-6.7%) and the V40Gy of the heart was decreased by 69% (3.9-1.2%). In addition, MRgRT dose escalation regimens with a boost up to 66% of the prescription dose to the primary tumor yielded approximately the same dose levels to the OARs as from the conventional IGRT regimen. CONCLUSION This study revealed that MRgRT for esophageal cancer has the potential to significantly reduce the dose to heart and lungs. In addition, online high precision targeting of the primary tumor opens new perspectives for local boosting strategies to improve outcome of the local management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mick Boekhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
| | - Ingmar Defize
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Alicia Borggreve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexis Kotte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Lagendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Lier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Gert Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boekhoff MR, Defize IL, Borggreve AS, van Hillegersberg R, Kotte ANTJ, Lagendijk JJW, van Lier ALHMW, Ruurda JP, Takahashi N, Mook S, Meijer GJ. CTV-to-PTV margin assessment for esophageal cancer radiotherapy based on an accumulated dose analysis. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:16-22. [PMID: 33992628 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the smallest clinical target volume (CTV) to planned target volume (PTV) margins for esophageal cancer radiotherapy using daily online registration to the bony anatomy that yield full dosimetric coverage over the course of treatment. METHODS 29 esophageal cancer patients underwent six T2-weighted MRI scans at weekly intervals. An online bone-match image-guided radiotherapy treatment of five fractions was simulated for each patient. Multiple conformal treatment plans with increasing margins around the CTV were created for each patient. Then, the dose was warped to obtain an accumulated dose per simulated fraction. Full target coverage by 95% of the prescribed dose was assessed as a function of margin expansion in six directions. If target coverage in a single direction was accomplished, then the respective margin remained fixed for the subsequent dose plans. Margins in uncovered directions were increased in a new dose plan until full target coverage was achieved. RESULTS The smallest set of CTV-to-PTV margins that yielded full dosimetric CTV coverage was 8 mm in posterior and right direction, 9 mm in anterior and cranial direction and 10 mm in left and caudal direction for 27 out of 29 patients. In two patients the curvature of the esophagus considerably changed between fractions, which required a 17 and 23 mm margin in right direction. CONCLUSION Accumulated dose analysis revealed that CTV-to-PTV treatment margins of 8, 9 and 10 mm in posterior & right, anterior & cranial and left & caudal direction, respectively, are sufficient to account for interfraction tumor variations over the course of treatment when applying a daily online bone match. However, two patients with extreme esophageal interfraction motion were insufficiently covered with these margins and were identified as patients requiring replanning to achieve full target coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Boekhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| | - I L Defize
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - A S Borggreve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - A N T J Kotte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - J J W Lagendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - A L H M W van Lier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - N Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - S Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - G J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Møller DS, Poulsen PR, Hagner A, Dufour M, Nordsmark M, Nyeng TB, Mortensen HR, Lutz CM, Hoffmann L. Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:539-548. [PMID: 33974885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy of esophageal cancer is superior to photon radiation therapy in terms of normal tissue sparing. However, respiratory motion and anatomical changes may compromise target dose coverage owing to density changes, geometric misses, and interplay effects. Here we investigate the combined effect on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and compare proton therapy with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This study includes 26 patients with esophageal cancer previously treated with IMRT planned on 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). For each patient, 7 proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) plans were created with different field configurations and optimization strategies. The effect of respiration was investigated by calculating the phase doses, 4D dose, and 4D dynamic dose (including interplay effects). The effect of anatomical changes was investigated by recalculating all plans on all phases of a 4D-CT surveillance scan. RESULTS The most robust PBS plans were achieved using 2 posterior beams requiring coverage of planning target volume (PTV) and simultaneously using robust optimization (RO) of CTV (2PAPTVRO), resulting in only 1 patient showing V95%CTV <97% in 1 or more phases of the planning CT. For the least robust PBS plans obtained using lateral + posterior beams and CTV-RO, but not requiring PTV coverage (2LPRO), 10 patients showed underdosage. For IMRT, 2 patients showed underdosage. Interplay effects reduced V95%CTV significantly when delivering only 1 fraction, but the effects generally averaged out after 10 fractions. The effect of interplay was significantly larger for RO-only plans compared with plans optimized with RO combined with PTV coverage. Combining the effect of anatomical changes and respiration on the 4D-CT surveillance scan resulted in V95%CTV <97% for 3 2PAPTVRO, 16 2LPRO, and 8 IMRT patients. CONCLUSIONS PBS using posterior beam angles was more robust to anatomical changes and respiration than IMRT. The effect of respiration was enhanced when anatomical changes were present. Single fraction interplay effects deteriorated the dose distribution but were averaged out after 10 fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ditte Sloth Møller
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Per Rugaard Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Andreas Hagner
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mathieu Dufour
- Department of Physics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scott J, Dundas K, Surjan Y, King O, Arumugam S, Deshpande S, Udovitch M, Lee M. Quantifying and Assessing the Dosimetric Impact of Changing Gas Volumes Throughout the Course of VMAT Radiation Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Tumors. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100650. [PMID: 34195488 PMCID: PMC8233468 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This retrospective patient study assessed the consistency of abdominal gas presence throughout radiation therapy for patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer and determined the impact of variations in gas volume on the calculated dose distribution of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Methods and Materials Eight patients with pancreatic cancer were included for analysis. A plan library consisting of 3 reference plans per patient (Ref0.0, Ref0.5, and Ref1.0) was created based on planning computed tomography (CT) with density overrides of 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0 applied to gas volumes, respectively. Corresponding cone beam CT (CBCT) data sets were obtained and density overrides were applied to enable fractional dose calculation. Variation in gas volume relative to initial volume determined from CT was assessed. Dose metrics for targets and organs at risk were compared between the accumulated CBCT dose and the planned dose of the 3 reference plans for each patient. Results There was a significant decrease in gas present from CT to treatment CBCT, with a mean decrease in volume of 48.6% for the entire cohort. Dosimetrically, all accumulated target and organ-at-risk parameters, aside from the kidneys, exhibited the smallest mean deviation from the Ref0.0 plan and largest mean deviation from the Ref1.0 plan. A statistically significant difference in mean accumulated dose to Ref0.0 and Ref1.0 was observed for the dose delivered to 95% of the planning target volume. Conclusions Significant variation in gas volumes from CT to treatment can occur throughout volumetric modulated arc therapy for pancreatic cancer. Through the use of a plan library, it was determined that initial assessment of a patient's treatment plan with an assigned gas density of 0.0 provided the most accurate prediction of the accumulated dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Scott
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Liverpool-Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool and Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kylie Dundas
- Liverpool-Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool and Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yolanda Surjan
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Odette King
- Liverpool-Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool and Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sankar Arumugam
- Liverpool-Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool and Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shrikant Deshpande
- Liverpool-Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool and Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Udovitch
- Liverpool-Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool and Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Lee
- Liverpool-Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool and Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Image-guided Radiotherapy to Manage Respiratory Motion: Lung and Liver. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:792-804. [PMID: 33036840 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Organ motion as a result of respiratory and cardiac motion poses significant challenges for the accurate delivery of radiotherapy to both the thorax and the upper abdomen. Modern imaging techniques during radiotherapy simulation and delivery now permit better quantification of organ motion, which in turn reduces tumour and organ at risk position uncertainty. These imaging advances, coupled with respiratory correlated radiotherapy delivery techniques, have led to the development of a range of approaches to manage respiratory motion. This review summarises the key strategies of image-guided respiratory motion management with a focus on lung and liver radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Anakotta RM, van der Laan HP, Visser S, Ribeiro CO, Dieters M, Langendijk JA, Both S, Korevaar EW, Sijtsema NM, Knopf A, Muijs CT. Weekly robustness evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oesophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 151:66-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
13
|
Boekhoff M, Defize I, Borggreve A, Takahashi N, van Lier A, Ruurda J, van Hillegersberg R, Lagendijk J, Mook S, Meijer G. 3-Dimensional target coverage assessment for MRI guided esophageal cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
14
|
Forghani F, Mahl A, Patton TJ, Jones BL, Borden MA, Westerly DC, Altunbas C, Miften M, Thomas DH. Simulation of x-ray-induced acoustic imaging for absolute dosimetry: Accuracy of image reconstruction methods. Med Phys 2020; 47:1280-1290. [PMID: 31828781 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Three-dimensional in-vivo dose verification is one of the standing challenges in radiation therapy. X-ray-induced acoustic tomography has recently been proposed as an imaging method for use in in-vivo dosimetry. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) absolute dose using x-ray-induced acoustic tomography. We performed this investigation using two different tomographic dose reconstruction techniques. METHODS Two examples of 3D dose reconstruction techniques for x-ray acoustic imaging are investigated. Dose distributions are calculated for varying field sizes using a clinical treatment planning system. The induced acoustic pressure waves which are generated by the increase in temperature due to the absorption of pulsed MV x-rays are simulated using an advanced numerical modeling package for acoustic wave propagation in the time domain. Two imaging techniques, back projection and iterative time reversal, are used to reconstruct the 3D dose distribution in a water phantom with open fields. Image analysis is performed and reconstructed depth dose curves from x-ray acoustic imaging are compared to the depth dose curves calculated from the treatment planning system. Calculated field sizes from the reconstructed dose profiles by back projection and time reversal are compared to the planned field size to determine their accuracy. The iterative time reversal imaging technique is also used to reconstruct dose in an example clinical dose distribution. Image analysis of this clinical test case is performed using the gamma passing rate. In addition, gamma passing rates are used to validate the stopping criteria in the iterative time reversal method. RESULTS Water phantom simulations showed that back projection does not adequately reconstruct the shape and intensity of the depth dose. When compared to the depth of maximum dose calculated by a treatment planning system, the maximum dose depth by back projection is shifted deeper by 55 and 75 mm for 4 × 4 cm and 10 × 10 cm field sizes, respectively. The reconstructed depth dose by iterative time reversal accurately agrees with the planned depth dose for a 4 × 4 cm field size and is shifted deeper by 12 mm for the 10 × 10 cm field size. When reconstructing field sizes, the back projection method leads to 18% and 35% larger sizes for the 4 × 4 cm and 10 × 10 cm fields, respectively, whereas the iterative time reversal method reconstructs both field sizes with < 2% error. For the clinical dose distribution, we were able to reconstruct the dose delivered by a 1 degree sub-arc with a good accuracy. The reconstructed and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis, with> 96% gamma passing rate at 3%/2 mm. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that the 3D x-ray acoustic reconstructed dose by iterative time reversal is considerably more accurate than the dose reconstructed by back projection. Iterative time reversal imaging has a potential for use in 3D absolute dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farnoush Forghani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Adam Mahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Taylor J Patton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Bernard L Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Mark A Borden
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - David C Westerly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Cem Altunbas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Moyed Miften
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - David H Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Briens A, Castelli J, Barateau A, Jaksic N, Gnep K, Simon A, De Crevoisier R. Radiothérapie adaptative : stratégies et bénéfices selon les localisations tumorales. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:592-608. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
16
|
Setup strategies and uncertainties in esophageal radiotherapy based on detailed intra- and interfractional tumor motion mapping. Radiother Oncol 2019; 136:161-168. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
17
|
Validation of a robust strategy for proton spot scanning for oesophageal cancer in the presence of anatomical changes. Radiother Oncol 2019; 131:174-178. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
18
|
Men K, Dai J. A comprehensive evaluation of angular range and separation on image quality, image registration, and imaging dose for cone beam computed tomography in radiotherapy. Med Dosim 2019; 44:67-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
19
|
Jin P, Crama KF, Visser J, van Wieringen N, Bel A, Hulshof MC, Alderliesten T. Density override in treatment planning to mitigate the dosimetric effect induced by gastrointestinal gas in esophageal cancer radiation therapy. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1646-1654. [PMID: 30289340 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1518590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the dosimetric effect of variable gas volume in esophageal cancer radiation therapy (RT) and whether a density override (DO) in treatment planning can effectively mitigate this dosimetric effect. MATERIAL AND METHODS Nine patients with gastrointestinal gas pockets in the planning computed tomography (pCT) were retrospectively included. Per patient, the intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans associated with no DO, DO = 0.5, and DO = 1 in the gas pockets were made. Initial and follow-up gas volumes were assessed from the pCTs and cone-beam CTs (CBCTs), respectively. Fractional CTs were created based on the pCT and CBCTs to calculate the fractional doses using all six plans. We then investigated for all six plans the correlation between the gas volume difference (relative to initial gas volume) and the dose difference (relative to planned dose). We also calculated and compared the accumulated dose by summing the fractional doses using two strategies: single-plan strategy (i.e. using each of the six plans separately) and plan-selection strategy (i.e. selecting one of the three plans depending on the fractional gas volume for IMRT and VMAT planning separately). RESULTS The dose difference was approximately linearly correlated to the gas volume difference. Underdoses of >3.5% and overdoses of >7% were found for gas volume decreases >160 mL/330 mL and increases >260 mL/370 mL for IMRT/VMAT planning, respectively. Moreover, for most patients, the single-plan strategy with the use of DO = 0.5 resulted in neither undesired underdose nor much overdose. The plan-selection strategy, however, can always ensure sufficient target coverage and minimize high dose regions to the most extent. CONCLUSIONS The variation in gas volume during the treatment course can result in clinically undesired underdose or overdose. The DO-based plan-selection strategy can effectively mitigate the gas-induced underdose and minimize the overdose for esophageal cancer RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen F. Crama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jorrit Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Niek van Wieringen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten C.C.M. Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tanja Alderliesten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wolfs CJA, Swinnen ACC, Nijsten SMJJG, Verhaegen F. Should dose from small fields be limited for dose verification procedures?: uncertainty versus small field dose in VMAT treatments. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:20NT01. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
21
|
Grant SR, Page CM, Diaz I, Bush S, Bista T, Turner LM, Walker GV. The great esophageal escape: A case of extreme esophageal interfraction motion during neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:e251-e254. [PMID: 29861350 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Grant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chelsea M Page
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Irma Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Stephen Bush
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Tomasz Bista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Lehendrick M Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Gary V Walker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bulens P, Thomas M, Deroose CM, Haustermans K. PET imaging in adaptive radiotherapy of gastrointestinal tumors. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2018; 62:385-403. [PMID: 29869484 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03081-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the multimodality treatment of several gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Positron-emission tomography (PET) has an established role in the diagnosis, response assessment and (re-)staging of these tumors. Nevertheless, the value of PET in adaptive radiotherapy remains unclear. This review focuses on the role of PET in adaptive radiotherapy, i.e. during the treatment course and in the delineation process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The MEDLINE database was searched for the terms ("Radiotherapy"[Mesh] AND "Positron-Emission Tomography"[Mesh] AND one of the site-specific keywords, yielding a total of 1710 articles. After abstract selection, 27 papers were identified for esophageal neoplasms, 1 for gastric neoplasms, 9 for pancreatic neoplasms, 6 for liver neoplasms, 1 for biliary tract neoplasms, none for colonic neoplasms, 15 for rectal neoplasms and 12 for anus neoplasms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The use of PET for truly adaptive radiotherapy during treatment for GI tumors has barely been investigated, in contrast to the potential of the PET-defined metabolic tumor volume for optimization of the target volume. The optimized target definition seems useful for treatment individualization such as focal boosting strategies in esophageal, pancreatic and anorectal cancer. Nevertheless, for all GI tumors, further investigation is needed. CONCLUSIONS In general, too little data are available to conclude on the role of PET imaging during radiotherapy for ART strategies in GI cancer. On the other hand, based on the available evidence, the use of biological imaging for target volume adaptation seems promising and could pave the road towards individualized treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Bulens
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melissa Thomas
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium - .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Grau C, Høyer M, Poulsen PR, Muren LP, Korreman SS, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC, Alsner J, Overgaard J. Rethink radiotherapy - BIGART 2017. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1341-1352. [PMID: 29148908 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1371326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Ludvig Paul Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Nunen A, van der Sangen MJC, van Boxtel M, van Haaren PMA. Cone-Beam CT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer: Evaluation of registration methods and anatomical changes during radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2017; 3-4:30-36. [PMID: 32095564 PMCID: PMC7033772 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate different registration methods, setup margins and number of corrections for CBCT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer and to evaluate anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy treatment. Methods From 50 patients, 440 CBCT-scans were registered automatically using a soft tissue or bone registration algorithm and compared to the clinical match. Moreover, relevant anatomical changes were monitored. A sub-analysis was performed to evaluate if tumour location influenced setup variations. Margin calculation was performed and the number of setup corrections was estimated. Results were compared to a patient group previously treated with MV-EPID based position verification. Results CBCT-based setup variations were smaller than EPID-based setup variations, resulting in smaller setup margins of 5.9 mm (RL), 7.5 mm (CC) and 4.7 mm (AP) versus 6.0 mm, 7.8 mm and 5.5 mm, respectively. A reduction in average number of setup corrections per patient was found from 0.75 to 0.36. From all automatically registered CBCT-scans, a clipbox around PTV and vertebras combined with soft tissue registration resulted in the smallest setup margins of 5.9 mm (RL), 7.7 mm (CC), 4.8 mm (AP) and smallest average number of corrections of 0.38. For distally located tumours, a setup margin of 7.7 mm (CC) was required compared to 5.6 mm for proximal tumours. Reduction of GTV volume, heart volume and change in diaphragm position were observed in 16, 10 and 15 patients, respectively. Conclusions CBCT-based set-up variations are smaller than EPID-based variations and vary according to tumour location. When using kV-CBCT a large variety of anatomical changes is revealed, which cannot be observed with MV-EPID.
Collapse
Key Words
- AC, Adenocarcinoma
- Anatomical changes
- CBCT, Cone Beam Computed Tomography
- CTV, Clinical Target Volume
- Cone-Beam CT
- EPID, Electronic Portal Imaging Device
- EUS, Endoscopic UltraSound
- GTV, Gross Tumor Volume
- IGRT, Image Guided RadioTherapy
- IMRT, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
- OAR, Organs at Risk
- Oesophageal cancer
- PET/CT, Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
- PTV, Planning Target Volume
- SAL, Shrinking Action Level
- SCC, Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Setup margins
- Setup variations
- TPS, Treatment Planning System
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A van Nunen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - M van Boxtel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - P M A van Haaren
- Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Men K, Dai J, Chen X, Li M, Zhang K, Huang P. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med 2017; 36:110-118. [PMID: 28410679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Revised: 03/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve the image quality and accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography (CT) images through implementation of a dual-energy cone-beam computed tomography method (DE-CBCT), and evaluate the improvement quantitatively. METHODS Two sets of CBCT projections were acquired using the X-ray volumetric imaging (XVI) system on a Synergy (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) system with 120kV (high) and 70kV (low) X-rays, respectively. Then, the electron density relative to water (relative electron density (RED)) of each voxel was calculated using a projection-based dual-energy decomposition method. As a comparison, single-energy cone-beam computed tomography (SE-CBCT) was used to calculate RED with the Hounsfield unit-RED calibration curve generated by a CIRS phantom scan with identical imaging parameters. The imaging dose was measured with a dosimetry phantom. The image quality was evaluated quantitatively using a Catphan 503 phantom with the evaluation indices of the reproducibility of the RED values, high-contrast resolution (MTF50%), uniformity, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Dose calculation of two simulated volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using an Eclipse treatment-planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was performed on an Alderson Rando Head and Neck (H&N) phantom and a Pelvis phantom. Fan-beam planning CT images for the H&N and Pelvis phantom were set as the reference. A global three-dimensional gamma analysis was used to compare dose distributions with the reference. The average gamma values for targets and OAR were analyzed with paired t-tests between DE-CBCT and SE-CBCT. RESULTS In two scans (H&N scan and body scan), the imaging dose of DE-CBCT increased by 1.0% and decreased by 1.3%. It had a better reproducibility of the RED values (mean bias: 0.03 and 0.07) compared with SE-CBCT (mean bias: 0.13 and 0.16). It also improved the image uniformity (57.5% and 30.1%) and SNR (9.7% and 2.3%), but did not affect the MTF50%. Gamma analyses of the 3D dose distribution with criteria of 1%/1mm showed a pass rate of 99.0-100% and 85.3-97.6% for DE-CBCT and 73.5-99.1% and 80.4-92.7% for SE-CBCT. The average gamma values were reduced significantly by DE-CBCT (p< 0.05). Gamma index maps showed that matching of the dose distribution between CBCT-based and reference was improved by DE-CBCT. CONCLUSIONS DE-CBCT can achieve both better image quality and higher accuracy of dose calculation, and could be applied to adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuo Men
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Xinyuan Chen
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Minghui Li
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Peng Huang
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jan N, Guy C, Reshko LB, Hugo GD, Weiss E. Lung and Heart Dose Variability During Radiation Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:683-690. [PMID: 28581410 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the hypothesis that positional and anatomic variations during radiation therapy induce changes in lung and heart volumes and associated radiation doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this longitudinal investigation, variations in lung and heart volumes and standard dose parameters of mean lung dose, lung V20Gy, mean heart dose, and heart V40Gy were analyzed on weekly 4-dimensional CT scans of 15 lung cancer patients during conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy. Tumor, individual lung lobes, and heart were delineated on the mid-ventilation phase of weekly 4-dimensional CT scans. Lung lobes and heart were also contoured on individual breathing phases of pre-, mid-, and end-of-treatment scans. Planning dose was transferred to consecutive scans via rigid registration. Volume and dose variations were assessed relative to the initial planning scan. RESULTS Interfraction lung volume variability relative to week 0 was twice as large as tidal volume variability (8.0% ± 5.3% vs 4.0% ± 3.3%, P=.003). Interfraction lung volume variation ranged between 0.8% and 17.1% for individual patient means. Lower lung lobes had larger volume variability compared with upper lobes (13.5% ± 8.1% vs 7.0% ± 5.0%, P<.00001). Average mean lung dose variation was 0.5 Gy (range, 0.2-1.0 Gy for individual patient means) and average lung V20Gy variation 0.9% (range, 0.2%-1.6%). Average heart volume variation was 7.2% (range, 3.4%-12.6%). Average mean heart dose variation was 1.2 Gy (range, 0.1-3.0 Gy) and average heart V40Gy variation 1.4% (range, 0%-4.2%). CONCLUSIONS Anatomic and positional variations during radiation therapy induce changes in radiation doses to lung and heart. Repeated lung and heart dose assessment will provide a better estimate of the actual delivered dose and will improve prediction models for normal tissue toxicity, if assessed in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuzhat Jan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Christopher Guy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Geoffrey D Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Elisabeth Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|