Familial Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and relation to immune defects, autoimmune diseases, and haematological malignancies--A population-based study from northern Sweden

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia - A State-of-the-Art Review: Part 1: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinicopathologic Characteristics, Differential Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Clinical Problems

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is an infrequent variant of lymphoma, classified as a B-cell malignancy identified by the presence of IgM paraprotein, infiltration of clonal, small lymphoplasmacytic B cells in the bone marrow, and the MYD88 L265P mutation, which is observed in over 90% of cases. The direct invasion of the malignant cells into tissues like lymph nodes and spleen, along with the immune response related to IgM, can also lead to various health complications, such as cytopenias, hyperviscosity, peripheral neuropathy, amyloidosis, and Bing-Neel syndrome. Chemoimmunotherapy has historically been considered the preferred treatment for WM, wherein the combination of rituximab and nucleoside analogs, alkylating drugs, or proteasome inhibitors has exhibited notable efficacy in inhibiting tumor growth. Recent studies have provided evidence that Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKI), either used independently or in conjunction with other drugs, have been shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of WM. The disease is considered to be non-curable, with a median life expectancy of 10 to 12 years.

The epidemiology of Waldenström macroglobulinemia

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by the presence of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) in the bone marrow accompanied by a monoclonal immunoglobulin type M (IgM) in the serum. WM was first described only 80 years ago and became reportable in the US as a malignancy in 1988. Very little systematic research was conducted prior to 2000 to characterize incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors or diagnostic and prognostic criteria, and there were essentially no WM-specific clinical interventional trials. Since the inaugural meeting of the International Workshop in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM) in 2000, WM has become the focus of a steadily increasing and productive body of research, engaging a growing number of investigators throughout the world. This introductory overview provides summary of the current understanding of the epidemiology of WM/LPL as a backdrop for a series of consensus panel recommendations arising from research presented at the 11th IWWM.

Real-world data on the survival outcome of patients with newly diagnosed Waldenström macroglobulinemia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder that usually follows an indolent clinical course. However, some patients show an aggressive clinical course leading to death. We explored the risk factors predicting poor prognosis in WM patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 47 patients diagnosed with WM between 2000 and 2018 to explore risk factors predicting poor prognosis using various clinical and laboratory parameters and risk models including the International Prognostic Staging System for WM (IPSS-WM).

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up duration of 80.4 months, 29 patients died. The main causes of death were disease progression, organ failure related to amyloidosis, and infection. The median overall survival (OS) was 55.1 months, and 14 patients, including three with amyloidosis, died within 2 years. Serum β2-microglobulin level higher than 4 mg/dL was significantly associated with poor OS. Accordingly, the IPSS-WM showed a significant association with poor prognosis compared with other risk models, and the low-risk group had better OS than intermediate- and high-risk groups. In the retrospective analysis using the results of targeted sequencing in two cases representing good and bad prognosis, different patterns of mutation profiles were observed, including mutations of MYD88, TP53, ARID1A, and JAK2 in a refractory case.

CONCLUSION

Serum β2-microglobulin could be a single biomarker strongly predictive of poor survival of WM patients, and the low-risk group of the IPSS-WM risk model including serum β2-microglobulin has better prognostic value than other risk models. Mutation analysis also might provide additional information to predict high-risk patients.

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Clinico-pathological Profile and Treatment Outcomes of Patients from a Tertiary Care Centre of North India

Waldenstorms Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare mature B cell neoplasm characterized by a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and an IgM monoclonal protein. It is managed by Rituximab based chemotherapy. A single-centre retrospective study was carried out to analyse the clinical presentation, laboratory features, and treatment outcomes of all consecutive patients of WM, diagnosed over a period of 86 months. First-line treatment regimens included RCD (Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Dexamethasone), BDR (Bortezomib /Dexamethasone/ Rituximab) and (Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone). A total of 26 patients of WM were diagnosed during this period, with a median age of 65 years. Majority (89%) of these patients were of intermediate (47%) to high risk (42%). An overall response rate of 76.4% was achieved. RCD was found superior to BDR in terms of treatment response. For those who required 2nd line chemotherapy, the median time to next treatment was 22 months. To conclude, a late presentation and higher risk categories were common in our cohort of patients. Treatment outcome was comparable to those reported in western literature. RCD regimen was found to be a better treatment option in terms of overall survival.

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma associated with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Progression or divergent evolution?

Aim

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is an indolent mature B-cell-neoplasm with involvement of the bone marrow. At least 90% of LPLs carry MYD88-L265P mutation and some of them (~10%) transform into diffuse large B-cell-lymphoma (DLBCL).

Material and methods

Over the past 15 years we have collected 7 cases where the both LPL and DLBCL were diagnosed in the same patient. Clinical records, analytical data and histopathological specimens were reviewed. FISH studies on paraffin-embedded tissue for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 genes were performed, as well as MYD88-L265P mutation and IGH rearrangement analysis by PCR. A mutational study was done by massive next generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

There were 4 women and 3 men between 36–91 years of age. Diagnoses were made simultaneously in 4 patients. In two cases the LPL appeared before the DLBCL and in the remaining case the high-grade component was discovered 5 years before the LPL. In 6 cases both samples shared the MYD88-L265P mutation. IGH rearrangement analysis showed overlapping features in two of 6 cases tested. Mutational study was evaluable in three cases for both samples showing shared and divergent mutations.

Conclusions

These data suggest different mechanisms of DLBCL development in LPL patients.