Occurrence of spinal pain syndromes in a group of apparently healthy and physically fit sportsmen (orienteers)

PROBIOTICS - A PROBABLE THERAPEUTIC AGENT FOR SPONDYLOARTHROPATHY

Spondyloarthropathy (SpA) or spondyloarthrosis refers to any joint disease of the vertebral column. Among the entities of SpA, ankylosing spondylitis has drawn the attention of some researchers, because of its specific mechanism of disease progression. It has been studied earlier that its progression is due to the presence of HLA (human leukocyte antigen) - B27. It shows molecular similarity and immunological cross-reactivity with some of the gut microbiome. Since SpA could be treated or its symptoms could be lessen by medications, but medications itself show many side effects and other complications. Probiotic- being the natural product has been found to be effective against many SpA entities, including Ankylosing Spondylitis. It alters gut microflora somehow in such a way that it helps in reducing the predisposition of any factor to SpA. Here we consider the complex relationship between SpA pathogenesis and gut microbes; with discussion that how use of probiotics as an alternative drug therapy may treat or reduce the progression of SpA, which could be a better future target to treat SpA entities.

Classification criteria for spondyloarthropathies

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are a group of inflammatory arthritis which consist of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), reactive arthritis, arthritis/spondylitis associated with psoriasis (PsA), and arthritis/spondylitis associated with inflammatory bowel diseases. It is now more important than ever to diagnose and treat SpA early. New therapeutic agents including blockers of tumor necrosis factor have yielded tremendous responses not only in advanced disease but also in the early stages of the disease. Sacroiliitis on conventional radiography is the result of structural changes which may appear late in the disease process. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can visualize active inflammation at sacroiliac joints and spine in recent onset disease. The modified New York criteria, the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group criteria and the Amor criteria do not include advanced imaging techniques like MRI which is very sensitive to the early Inflammatory changes. Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society has defined MRI methods for the assessment of sacroiliac joints and spine, criteria for inflammatory back pain and developed new criteria for classification of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis. These new criteria are intended to be used for patients with SpA at the very early stage of their disease. Also, classification of psoriatic arthritis study group developed criteria for the classification of PsA. The widespread use of these criteria in clinical trials will provide evidence for a better definition of early disease and recognize many patients who may further develop classical AS or PsA. These efforts will guide therapeutic trials of potent drugs like biological agents in the early stage of these diseases.

Preliminary validation of a self-reported screening questionnaire for inflammatory back pain

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory back pain (IBP) is an important feature of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) that is poorly recognized in primary care, perhaps delaying diagnosis of SpA. We aimed to develop and validate a self-report questionnaire using important domains reported by patients with IBP.

METHODS

We developed a 6-item questionnaire assessing spinal/hip stiffness, nocturnal pain, diurnal variation, effects of exercise/rest, and peripheral joint pain/swelling. This was compared with the Calin questionnaire and the domains comprising the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for IBP in 220 patients with established axial SpA and 66 patients with mechanical back pain followed in tertiary care rheumatology clinics. The classification utility of each item was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR). Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze different combinations of items to develop candidate scoring systems.

RESULTS

The single item "diurnal variation" had the highest combination of sensitivity (49%) and specificity (92%) for IBP (positive LR 5.95, 95% CI 2.54-13.94), outperforming the Calin and ASAS IBP criteria, which had sensitivities of 83% and 59%, specificities 42% and 66%, positive LR 1.42 and 1.72, negative LR 0.41 and 0.62, respectively. Classification utility of this item was even higher in SpA patients with disease duration < 6 years (sensitivity 48%, specificity 96%, positive LR 12, negative LR 0.54). The other 5 items did not improve classification utility in any combination.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of a single self-reported item, "diurnal variation," had substantial classification utility for IBP. This domain is not addressed in existing criteria for IBP, indicating a potentially important omission.

Undifferentiated spondyloarthritis: a global perspective

This paper reviews the concept and outcome of undifferentiated spondyloarthritis (SpA) as reported in retrospective and prospective studies from different parts of the world. Although the designs and definitions vary across different studies, clearly a significant proportion of patients with undifferentiated SpA will fulfill ankylosing spondylitis within 10 years in association with certain prognostic factors. The paper also examines the concept of axial SpA and its importance as an early indicator of ankylosing spondylitis. Ultimately, the recognition of undifferentiated SpA and axial SpA may lead to early treatment with highly efficacious drugs.

Prevalence and characteristics of upper or mid-back pain in Finnish men

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiologic study.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the 1-year prevalence, severity, and frequency of mid-back pain in a general population sample of men, with comparisons to neck and low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No previous studies reporting the characteristics of mid-back pain in a general population were found.

METHODS

A total of 600 Finnish men 35 to 70 years of age were drawn from a population-based twin sample and interviewed with standardized pain questions.

RESULTS

The 1-year prevalence of mid-back pain was 17.0% (95% confidence interval, 14.3-19.7) compared to 64.0% (95% confidence interval, 60.6-67.5) for neck and 66.8% (95% confidence interval, 63.4-70.3) for low back pain. The frequency of pain over the previous year among those with mid- and low back pain was less than for neck pain. The mean severity of the worst pain episode was highest for low back pain followed by mid-back and neck pain, which were similar. Associated disability tended to be less frequent from mid-back pain (23.5% vs. 30.3%-41.1%). Odds ratios for neck and low back pain when mid-back pain was reported were 2.32 and 2.86, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of mid-back pain was approximately one fourth that of neck and low back pain and was somewhat less likely to be disabling. In cases of mid-back pain, spinal comorbidity was nearly always reported.

Inflammatory back pain in ankylosing spondylitis: a reassessment of the clinical history for application as classification and diagnostic criteria

OBJECTIVE

Back pain associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is referred to as inflammatory back pain (IBP). The value of the clinical history in differentiating IBP from mechanical low back pain (MLBP) has been investigated in only a few studies. In this exploratory study, we sought to evaluate the individual features of IBP and to compose and compare various combinations of features for use as classification and diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

We assessed the clinical history of 213 patients (101 with AS and 112 with MLBP) younger than 50 years who had chronic back pain. Single clinical parameters and combinations of parameters were compared between the AS and MLBP patient groups.

RESULTS

Morning stiffness of >30 minutes' duration, age at onset of back pain, no improvement in back pain with rest, awakening because of back pain during the second half of the night only, alternating buttock pain, and time period of the onset of back pain were identified as independent contributors to IBP. Importantly, none of the single parameters sufficiently differentiated AS from MLBP. In contrast, several sets of combined parameters proved to be well balanced between sensitivity and specificity. Among these, a new candidate set of criteria for IBP, which consisted of morning stiffness of >30 minutes' duration, improvement in back pain with exercise but not with rest, awakening because of back pain during the second half of the night only, and alternating buttock pain, yielded a sensitivity of 70.3% and a specificity of 81.2% if at least 2 of these 4 parameters were fulfilled (positive likelihood ratio 3.7). If at least 3 of the 4 parameters were fulfilled, the positive likelihood ratio increased to 12.4.

CONCLUSION

A new set of criteria for IBP performed better than previous criteria in AS patients with established disease. A prospective study is needed to validate the diagnostic properties of the new candidate criteria set in patients with early disease.

How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (LBP), the leading symptom of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and undifferentiated axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), precedes the development of radiographic sacroiliitis, sometimes by many years.

OBJECTIVE

To assign disease probabilities and to develop an algorithm to help in the early diagnosis of axial SpA.

METHODS

Axial SpA comprises AS and undifferentiated SpA with predominant axial involvement. Clinical features include inflammatory back pain (IBP), alternating buttock pain, enthesitis, arthritis, dactylitis, acute anterior uveitis, a positive family history, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and good response to NSAIDs. Associated laboratory findings include raised acute phase reactions, HLA-B27 association, and abnormalities on skeletal imaging. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios (LRs) of these parameters were determined from published studies. A 5% prevalence of axial SpA among patients with chronic LBP was used. The probability of the presence of axial SpA, depending on the presence or absence of the above clinical features of SpA, was determined. A probability of > or = 90% was used to make a diagnosis of axial SpA.

RESULTS

The presence of inflammatory back pain features increased the probability of axial SpA from the background 5% prevalence to 14%. The presence of 2-3 SpA features was necessary to increase the probability of axial SpA to 90%. The highest LRs were obtained for HLA-B27 and MRI. Diagnostic algorithms to be used in daily practice were suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach can help clinicians to diagnose with a high degree of confidence axial SpA at an early stage in patients with IBP who lack radiographic sacroiliitis.

How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (LBP), the leading symptom of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and undifferentiated axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), precedes the development of radiographic sacroiliitis, sometimes by many years.

OBJECTIVE

To assign disease probabilities and to develop an algorithm to help in the early diagnosis of axial SpA.

METHODS

Axial SpA comprises AS and undifferentiated SpA with predominant axial involvement. Clinical features include inflammatory back pain (IBP), alternating buttock pain, enthesitis, arthritis, dactylitis, acute anterior uveitis, a positive family history, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and good response to NSAIDs. Associated laboratory findings include raised acute phase reactions, HLA-B27 association, and abnormalities on skeletal imaging. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios (LRs) of these parameters were determined from published studies. A 5% prevalence of axial SpA among patients with chronic LBP was used. The probability of the presence of axial SpA, depending on the presence or absence of the above clinical features of SpA, was determined. A probability of > or = 90% was used to make a diagnosis of axial SpA.

RESULTS

The presence of inflammatory back pain features increased the probability of axial SpA from the background 5% prevalence to 14%. The presence of 2-3 SpA features was necessary to increase the probability of axial SpA to 90%. The highest LRs were obtained for HLA-B27 and MRI. Diagnostic algorithms to be used in daily practice were suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach can help clinicians to diagnose with a high degree of confidence axial SpA at an early stage in patients with IBP who lack radiographic sacroiliitis.

Risk factors for non-specific low back pain in schoolchildren and their parents: a population based study

A survey of adolescent schoolchildren and their parents through a self-administered questionnaire was conducted to determine the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in schoolchildren and their parents and to assess its association with exposure to known and presumed risk factors. A previously validated, self-administered questionnaire was used for collecting information on back pain history, anthropometric measures, physical and sports activity, academic problems, hours of leisure sitting, smoking, and alcohol intake. Schoolchildren between the ages of 13 and 15 in schools of the island of Mallorca and their parents (n=16,394) took part in the study. The lifetime prevalence of LBP was 50.9% for boys and 69.3% for girls; point prevalence (7 days) was 17.1% for boys and 33% for girls. There was a significant association with LBP and pain in bed (OR=13.82, 95% CI: 10.47-18.25, P<0.001), reporting scoliosis (OR=2.87, 95% CI: 2.45-3.37, P<0.001), reporting difference in leg length (OR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, P=0.033), practice of any sport more than twice a week (OR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.39, P=0.001) and being female (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.19, P=0.001). There was no association found between LBP and body mass index, the manner in which books were transported, hours of leisure sitting, alcohol intake or cigarette smoking. Among parents, the lifetime prevalence of LBP was 78.2% for mothers and 62.6% for fathers; point prevalence (7 days) was 41% for mothers and 24.3% for fathers, and there were significant associations with LBP and pain in bed (OR=18.07, 95% CI: 14.72-22.19, P<0.001), report of scoliosis (OR=8.77, 95% CI: 6.44-11.95, P<0.001), report of difference in leg length (OR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.60-3.04, P<0.001), being a university graduate (OR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.21-2.98, P=0.006), being female (OR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.33-1.67, P<0.001), and swimming (OR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.4-1.18, P=0.002). There was no association found between LBP and alcohol intake, cigarette smoking or the practice of other sports. Although there was a positive association in terms of scoliosis between biological parents and their children (P<0.001), there was no association found in familial (biological or not) occurrence of LBP. The prevalence of LBP among adolescents in southern Europe is similar to northern Europe, it is comparable to that in adults, and is associated with several factors. There is a strong association between pain in bed or upon rising in both adolescents and adults. Scoliosis, but not LBP, appears to be related to heredity. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to establish risk factors that are predictive for LBP in adolescents.

Ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical features

The clinical spectrum of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is wider than just symptomatic sacroiliitis. The disease may be atypical or may occur as forme fruste. Atypical cases are encompassed in classification criteria for the whole family of spondyloarthropathies. AS may result primarily from additive genetic variability. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physical exercise remain the cornerstone in the treatment of AS. Core sets for the assessment of the disease now exist for different treatment settings.

[National Research Program. Part B: Chronicity of backache]

The main goal of part B of the National Research Program No 26 is to investigate the process leading to chronic low back pain. Starting from epidemiological facts the main risk factors are described from a systemic viewpoint. The rapid increase of disabling low back pain in the past decades makes it clear that factors outside the spine have to be made responsible for this process. There are changes in life-style and interpersonal relations, as well as in society and the health-care system. From these factors means of prevention are derived. Besides psychological factors general fitness and the training condition of the back muscles play an important role in effective prevention.