Influence of Central Depressants on the Central Auditory Responses in the Cat

The effects of high-dose barbiturates on the acoustic reflex and auditory evoked responses. Two case reports

The effects of high-dose barbiturates (pentobarbital) on the acoustic reflex, and the auditory brainstem (ABR) and middle-latency (AMR) responses, are illustrated with two case reports. Auditory electrophysiologic data were recorded serially during recovery from therapeutic barbiturate coma. ABR latency remained within normal limits in barbiturate coma, but amplitude of the wave I component was abnormally augmented. Contralateral and ipsilateral acoustic reflex activity, and the Pa component of the AMR, were not observed in barbiturate coma, and reappeared with the emergence of brainstem neurologic signs. These findings suggest a fundamental difference in the neurophysiologic substrate of the ABR vs. acoustic reflex and AMR. Possible mechanisms for the differential influence of barbiturates on these three auditory electrophysiologic measures are offered.

Effect of central depressants on the acoustic middle ear reflex in rabbit. A method for quantitative measurements of drug effect on the CNS

The respective effects of pentobarbital-sodium, enibumal-sodium, urethane, urethane-chloralose and lidocaine on the function of the acoustic middle ear reflex in the rabbit were studied. The response of the middle ear muscles was measured by recording changes in both ears' acoustic impedance when the reflex was elicited by applying pure tone stimuli (2,000 Hz) to the two ears one at a time. In that way both the crossed and the uncrossed reflexes were studied. All the drugs were found to depress the reflex in such a way that a higher sound intensity was required after administration to achieve the same impedance change as before. The effect of the anesthetics was roughly proportional to their known anesthetic power. Lidocaine produced only a slight depression of the reflex. The crossed reflex showed a greater susceptibility to the general anesthetics than did the uncrossed reflex which suggests a greater complexity of the crossed reflex. Because the method of recording the reflex response does not require any surgery and is equally well applicable in unrestrained rabbits and in humans, it is suggested as a way of testing the effect of drugs on the central nervous system.