Phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in recurrent platinum resistant ovarian cancer

Pilot study of docetaxel combined with lobaplatin or gemcitabine for recurrent and metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with lobaplatin, relative to docetaxel combined with gemcitabine, for treating patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC).

METHODS

Patients with rMBC received ≥2 cycles (21 days each) of either docetaxel and lobaplatin (DL; n = 21), or docetaxel and gemcitabine (DG; n = 22). On day 1 of each cycle, all patients were given 75 mg/m intravenous docetaxel. Patients in DL and DG were also given, respectively, 35 mg/m intravenous lobaplatin (day 2) or 1000 mg/m intravenous gemcitabine (days 1, 8).

RESULTS

Five (11.6%) and 16 (37.2%) patients achieved complete remission and partial response, respectively; rates of response and disease control were 48.8%. The response rates of the groups were comparable (47.6%, 50.0%). The median survival times after relapse and metastasis of the DL group (18 months) were significantly less than that of the DG group (25 months). Median progression-free survivals after relapse and metastasis were similar (12 cf. 14 months). The main toxic side reaction was grade 2, with no treatment-related deaths. Rates of the following were comparable between DG and DL: grade 3 or 4 white blood cells (23.8%, 31.8%) and digestive tract toxicity (4.8%, 4.5%); neutropenia (28.6%, 22.7%); anemia (4.8%, nil); and thrombocytopenia (19.0%, 13.6%). Other toxicities included hepatic toxicity, myalgia, infection, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the DL and DG regimens were associated with encouraging benefits, while treatment-related toxicity was manageable. Therefore, these regimens are effective options for treatment of rMBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This clinical trial study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guizhou Cancer Hospital, and has been registered in the China Clinical Trial Center (December 8, 2014, No. ChiCTR-IPR-14005633).

Combination of Sonographic Morphology Score and Tumor Markers for Detecting Postoperative Recurrent Pelvic Ovarian Carcinoma: Compared With MRI Assessment

To assess the efficacy of the combination of sonographic morphology score (SMS) with CA125 and HE4 for detecting recurrent pelvic ovarian carcinoma (OC). Data of 58 OC patients treated in our hospital between 2014 and 2016 were analyzed. After cytoreductive surgery and routine chemotherapy, all patients were followed up by transvaginal ultrasound examination (SMS for pelvic masses based on volume and structure scores) and tumor marker (serum CA125 and HE4) detection. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent OC was based on physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging, and punctured pathology for pelvic masses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of SMS and the tumor markers were generated, and areas under the curve (AUC) values were assessed. There were 26 patients with tumor recurrence and 32 cases with no recurrence. Magnetic resonance imaging had 100% sensitivity and specificity. The areas under the ROC curves of SMS, CA125, HE4, and SMS-CA125-HE4 were 0.816, 0.825, 0.737, and 0.903, respectively. There was no significant difference in AUC values between SMS and CA125 or HE4. There were significant differences in AUC values between SMS-CA125-HE4 and SMS (Z = 2.48, P = 0.042), CA125 (Z = 2.38, P = 0.046), and HE4 (Z = 6.48, P = 0.016), respectively. With a cutoff value of SMS, 5; CA125, 35 U/mL; HE4, 105 pmol/L, the sensitivity, specificity, positive prognostic value, and negative prognostic value of SMS-CA125-HE4 for recurrent OC assessment were 0.9231, 0.8438, 0.8276, and 0.931, respectively. SMS-CA125-HE4 was correlated with recurrent OC (χ = 30.7428, P < 0.0001). Ultrasound combined with tumor markers may improve the diagnostic efficiency of recurrent OC.

Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) for epithelial ovarian cancer patients resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) experience poor outcome. Currently, no clearly superior management strategy exists for platinum-resistant EOC patients.

PURPOSE

Analyze the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in platinum resistant EOC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with platinum-based resistant EOC were included. Studied patients had received GEM at the dose of 1000mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and OX 100mg/m(2) on day 1, administered over 2h 30min after GEM infusion of 3week treatment cycle.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of tumor response, none of patients had achieved CR while PR, SD, were observed in 7 (21.9%), 9 (28.1%) respectively, clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) was recorded in 50% of patients while PD was observed in 16 (50%) patients. In regard to survival, the median value of OS was 10.5months (range, 2.2-17.5months). The median value of PFS was 6.37months (range, 1-17.5months). The one-year OS rate was 34.4% and the one-year PFS rate was 12.5%. Concerning hematological toxicity grade 3 neutropenia was recorded in 4 (12.5%) patients while grade 4 febrile neutropenia was recorded in 2 (6.3%) patients and grade 4 anemia was represented by 3.1%. Grade 1-2 fatigue was the most common non-hematological toxicity and represented by 65.6% of patients. Grade 3 non hematological toxicity was recorded with nausea/vomiting and hepatic toxicity represented by 3.1% for both.

CONCLUSION

The GEMOX combination is a regimen with a moderate therapeutic efficacy and tolerable toxic side effects in patients with platinum-resistant EOC.

In vitro synergistic action of geldanamycin- and docetaxel-containing HPMA copolymer-RGDfK conjugates against ovarian cancer

HPMA copolymer-RGDfK (HPMA-RGDfK) conjugates bearing either aminohexylgeldanamycin (AHGDM) or docetaxel (DOC) were synthesized and characterized. In vitro stability and binding were evaluated. Cytotoxicity toward ovarian cancer cells was evaluated and the ability of the conjugates to induce cell death was assessed by combination index analysis. Conjugates bearing AHGDM were more stable and exhibited slower drug release than those bearing DOC. Both conjugates demonstrated the ability to bind to avb3 integrins. In combination, HPMA-RGDfK conjugates demonstrated marked synergism as compared to their non-targeted counterparts and free drug controls. HPMA-RGDfK conjugates bearing AHGDM and DOC induce synergistic cytotoxicity in vitro, suggesting their potential as a promising combination therapy.

Gemcitabine enhances the efficacy of reovirus-based oncotherapy through anti-tumour immunological mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Reovirus preferentially infects and kills cancer cells and is currently undergoing clinical trials internationally. While oncolysis is the primary mode of tumour elimination, increasing evidence illustrates that reovirus additionally stimulates anti-tumour immunity with a capacity to target existing and possibly relapsing cancer cells. These virus-induced anti-tumour immune activities largely determine the efficacy of oncotherapy. On the other hand, anti-viral immune responses can negatively affect oncotherapy. Hence, the strategic management of anti-tumour and anti-viral immune responses through complementary therapeutics is crucial to achieve the maximum anti-cancer benefits of oncotherapy.

METHODS

Intra-peritoneal injection of mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells (ID8 cells) into wild-type C57BL/6 mice was treated with a therapeutic regimen of reovirus and/or gemcitabine and then analysed for prolonged survival, disease pathology, and various immunological parameters. Furthermore, in vitro analyses were conducted to assess apoptosis, viral spread, and viral production during reovirus and/or gemcitabine treatment.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that reovirus and gemcitabine combination treatment postpones peritoneal carcinomatosis development and prolongs the survival of cancer-bearing hosts. Importantly, these anti-cancer benefits are generated through various immunological mechanisms, including: (1) inhibition of myeloid-derived suppressor cells recruitment to the tumour microenvironment, (2) downmodulation of pro-MDSC factors, and (3) accelerated development of anti-tumour T-cell responses.

CONCLUSION

The complementation of reovirus with gemcitabine further potentiates virus-initiated anti-cancer immunity and enhances the efficacy of oncotherapy. In the context of ongoing clinical trials, our findings represent clinically relevant information capable of enhancing cancer outcomes.

Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as salvage treatment in pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer patients

Background

Currently, no clearly superior management strategy exists for recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. We tested the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in a multicentre phase II clinical trial.

Methods

Forty one patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were enrolled. Prior to study entry, all the participants had received at least one platinum-based regimen. Gemcitabine was administered at 1000 mg/m² as protracted infusion (100 min) on day 1, and oxaliplatin at the dose of 100 mg/m² on day 2 in a 2 hour infusion. Cycles were repeated every two weeks.

Results

We observed an overall response rate of 37% [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 22.3–51.7]. Objective responses plus disease stabilization (clinical benefit) occurred in 78% of patients. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.8–7.8), and median overall survival was 16.5 months (95% CI, 12.2–20.8). Median time to self-reported symptom relief, which was described by 22 out of 27 symptomatic patients (81.5%), was 4 weeks (range, 2–8). Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 2 (5%) and 1 (2.5%) patients, while grade 3 anemia was encountered in 2 (5%) patients, respectively. The most common adverse effects of any grade were gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue and neutropenia. Nine patients (22%) experienced mild allergic reaction to oxaliplatin, with no treatment discontinuation.

Conclusions

In our cohort of recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients, GEMOX showed encouraging activity and manageable toxicity. Under circumstances requiring a rapid disease control, this combination regimen may offer a particularly viable option, particularly in heavily pretreated patients.

Biodegradable multiblock poly(N-2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide gemcitabine and paclitaxel conjugates for ovarian cancer cell combination treatment

The synthesis, characterization, and in vitro evaluation of a combination delivery of multiblock poly(N-2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA), gemcitabine (GEM) and paclitaxel (PTX) conjugates is described in this study. Multiblock copolymer conjugates of a large molecular weight (Mw>200 kDa) were studied and compared to traditional, small molecular weight (Mw<45 kDa) conjugates. Stability of the conjugates in different pH was assessed, and their cytotoxicity in combination toward A2780 human ovarian cancer cells was evaluated by combination index analysis. Treatment duration (4 and 72 h) and sequence of addition were explored. In addition, an HPMA copolymer conjugate with both GEM and PTX in the side chains was evaluated in a similar manner and compared to a physical mixture of individual conjugates. Conjugates with narrow molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn<1.1) were obtained via RAFT polymerization, and drug loadings of between 5.5 and 9.2 wt% were achieved. Conjugates demonstrated moderate stability with less than 65% release over 24h at pH 7.4, and near complete drug release in the presence of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin B in 3h. In combination, the cytotoxic effects of a mixture of the conjugates were primarily additive. Synergistic effects were observed when A2780 human ovarian cancer cells were treated simultaneously for 4h with multiblock conjugates (CI<0.7). When both GEM and PTX were conjugated to the same copolymer backbone, moderate antagonism (CI 1.3-1.6) was observed. These results demonstrate that multiblock HPMA copolymer-GEM and -PTX conjugates, when delivered as a mixture of individual agents, are promising for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

A phase II trial of docetaxel and bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer within 12 months of prior platinum-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and docetaxel were evaluated in women who developed recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer within 12 months of platinum-based therapy.

METHODS

Patients received docetaxel (40 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 of a 21-daycycle. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were evaluable for PFS and 38 for best response; 46% had platinum-free intervals (PFI) of <6 months and 54% between 6 and 12 months. The 6-month PFS was 43.9% (95% confidence interval (CI(95%))=28.6-58.2%). Median PFS (months) was 5.2 (CI(95%)=4.4-7.2) for all patients, 6.2 (CI(95%)=4.1-7.4) for patients with PFI <6 months, and 5.1 (CI(95%)=3.0-7.2) for those with PFI ≥ 6 months. Twenty-two patients showed overall response (CR+PR) (57.9%; CI(95%)=40.8-73.7%), and 32 showed clinical benefit (CR+PR+SD) (84.2%; CI(95%)=68.8-94.0%). For those with complete or partial responses, median duration of response was 4.8 months (0.7-14.5). Median overall survival was 12.4 months (CI(95%)=10.0-21.9). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (14.6% of patients), followed by leukopenia, fatigue, metabolic, and gastrointestinal, with 66% showing any grade 3/4 toxicity. Most common AEs of any grade were gastrointestinal (93%), fatigue (73%), and pain (73%). Four (10%) patients developed hypertension, 1 a gastrointestinal perforation, and another a colovesicular fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab and docetaxel administered in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is an active regimen without new unanticipated toxicities. This combination should be an option for further study or clinical use in recurrent ovarian cancer.