Chemotherapy Use in Elderly Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Population-based Study

Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Octogenarian Patients: Are Treatment Options and Oncological Outcomes Different? A SEER Retrospective Study

AIMS

As the US population continues to age, oncological strategies and outcomes for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) should continue to be examined for varying age groups. The aim of this study was analyse and compare treatment strategies and oncological outcomes for octogenarian patients with STSs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) national database were used. Varying treatment modalities were studied when utilised for specific tumour staging with respect to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer.

RESULTS

In total, 24 666 patients were included for analysis, where 3341 (14%) were 80 years old or older. The octogenarian group was diagnosed with more advanced disease (stages II-IV), relative to their younger counterparts (85% versus 75%, P < 0.001). However, a smaller proportion of the older patients underwent surgical resection (74% versus 86%, P < 0.001). Likewise, the octogenarians received less chemotherapy (4% versus 21%, P < 0.001) and radiotherapy (29% versus 42%, P = 0.010). Surgical resection and chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival for those older patients with stage II STS, whereas surgical resection and radiotherapy improved mortality in this cohort with both stage III and IV STS. Overall survival at 1 and 5 years of follow-up was lower within the octogenarian group compared with the younger group (1 year: 68% versus 88%, P < 0.001 and 5 years: 7% versus 58%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarian patients, in most cases, are diagnosed with stage III or metastatic disease. Surgical resection of the primary tumour was beneficial in both age cohorts, with radiotherapy correlating to better overall survival when used in those patients with higher stage STS. Chemotherapy was associated with better mortality in the younger cohort with respect to tumour stage. The octogenarian overall survival at 1 and 5 years was lower than for younger patients.

Anlotinib treatment in elderly patients with unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study

Palliative chemotherapy can improve outcomes in most patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), but the treatment of elderly patients remains a challenge because of older age, comorbidities and poor performance status. This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of the multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in elderly patients with advanced STS. Eligible patients included those of age at least 60 years, diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic STS, and treated with at least one cycle of anlotinib between June 2018 and September 2020 in our center. Clinical characteristics, treatment response, survival status and adverse events were analyzed by reviewing medical records. The median age of 35 eligible patients was 65 (range, 61-85) years, and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 8 (range, 4-11). Anlotinib as first-line systemic treatment was in 24 (68.6%) patients, and as second-line or third-line treatment in the remaining 11 (31.4%) patients. The objective response rate was 8.6%. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-9.6] months and the median overall survival was 14.3 (95% CI, 9.6-19.0) months. Thirteen (37.1%) patients developed at least one grade 3/4 adverse event during anlotinib treatment. Our findings suggest that anlotinib treatment has promising efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly patients with unresectable or metastatic STS. Prospective controlled trials are needed to compare the safety and efficacy of anlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced STS.

Malignant fibrous neoplasms of long bones: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database from 1973 to 2015

BACKGROUND

Malignant fibrous neoplasms (MFN) of long bones are rare lesions. Moreover, the prognostic determinants of MFN of long bones have not been reported. This study aimed to present epidemiological data and analyse the prognostic factors for survival in patients with MFN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme database was used to screen patients with malignant fibrous neoplasms (MFN) of long bones from 1973 to 2015, with attention to fibrosarcoma, fibromyxosarcoma, periosteal fibrosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma. The prognostic values of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model with univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain OS and CSS curves.

RESULTS

A total of 237 cases were selected from the SEER database. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma was the most common form of lesion in long bones. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent predictors of OS included age, stage, tumour size and surgery. Age, stage, tumour size and surgery were also independent predictors of CSS. Additionally, the most significant prognostic factor was whether metastasis had occurred at the time of initial diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with MFN of long bones, age (> 60 years), tumour size (> 10 cm), distant stage, and non-surgical treatment are factors for poor survival.

Clinical outcomes of patients with primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumor aged 65 years or older

The number of elderly patients with sarcoma (65 years or older) has increased with the rise in the aging of society. As it is difficult to treat elderly sarcoma patients in the same manner as younger patients, the present study sought to compare treatment options currently available for elderly patients. The present study was comprised 34 Japanese patients (21 men and 13 women) with malignant bone or soft tissue tumors who underwent surgery in our department from September 2004 to March 2014. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 65-86 years). Histologically, 23 cases were categorized as high-grade and 11 as low-grade. Treatments included surgery with adequate margins (25 cases), surgery with inadequate margins and radiotherapy (4 cases), surgery with inadequate margins and chemotherapy (3 cases) and intralesional resection (2 cases). The postoperative follow-up period ranged from 7 to 112 months (average, 49 months). The 5-year survival rates were determined and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) and Anesthesiologists-Physical Status (ASA-PS) scores were also determined. The overall 5-year survival rate was 86.02%; it differed significantly between patients with high-grade (100%) vs. low-grade (74.3%) neoplasms P<0.001), but not between patients aged 65-69 (76.9%) vs. ≥70 (90.2%) years-old (P=0.65). Tumor status was classified as follows: i) Continuously disease-free, n=24 cases; ii) alive with disease, n=3 cases; iii) and dead of disease, n=7 cases. The ECOG-PS status scores were 0 in 9 cases, 1 in 21 cases, and 2 in 4 cases. ASA-PS scores were also I in 9 cases and II in 23 cases. Thus, the primary treatment for elderly patients with sarcoma should be surgery alone as no additional benefits were obtained when radiotherapy or chemotherapy was also performed. Adequate margins should be confirmed along with the histology of surgical specimens.

Treatment patterns and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas

Background

To describe patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), across and by categories of specifically defined histologic subtypes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER. The study population comprised patients ≥ 65 years old with advanced STS (excluding osteosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) diagnosed from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011.

Results

Of 4274 study patients, 2103 (49.2%) were male. Mean age was 77.8 years, and 1539 (36.0%) had distant disease at initial diagnosis. The most common histologic categories were leiomyosarcoma (922[21.6%]), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (652[15.3%]), and liposarcoma (554[13.0%]). Overall, 1227 (28.7%) patients received first-line systemic therapy. Among these patients, 325 (26.5%) received docetaxel plus gemcitabine and 231 (18.8%) received doxorubicin alone. Only 476 patients received second-line therapy (11.1%), most commonly doxorubicin alone (n = 101). Median overall survival (95% confidence interval) from advanced STS diagnosis was 8.9 (8.3, 9.7) months.

Conclusions

Although previous studies of younger populations reported anthracycline-based therapy predominated in first line, our study of older advanced STS patients found that docetaxel plus gemcitabine was most commonly used. Despite variation by histologic category, prognosis remains poor for older adult patients with advanced STS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Feasibility of Preoperative Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation Therapy in Localized Soft Tissue Sarcomas of Limbs and Superficial Trunk in the Italian Sarcoma Group/Grupo Español de Investigación en Sarcomas Randomized Clinical Trial: Three Versus Five Cycles of Full-Dose Epirubicin Plus Ifosfamide

PURPOSE

We report on feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy (RT) in the context of a phase III randomized clinical trial involving localized, high-risk, soft tissue sarcomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 321 eligible patients, 161 were randomly assigned to three preoperative cycles of epirubicin 120 mg/m(2) plus ifosfamide 9 g/m(2), and 160 were randomly assigned to three preoperative plus two postoperative cycles. Among them, 303 patients were included in this analysis; 169 were male and 134 were female, with a median age of 48 years (range, 15 to 79 years). One hundred fifty-two patients received concurrent RT preoperatively at a total dose of 44 to 50 Gy. Preoperative chemotherapy-related hematologic toxicity and early postoperative complications were reported. The influence of RT, age, and sex on hematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicities and wound complications was analyzed. Chemotherapeutic dose intensity (DI) was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 61.4%, 22.4%, and 23.8% experienced, grade 4 leucopenia, grade 3 or 4 anemia, and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Respective rates were 66.4%, 24.3%, and 31.6% when RT was added preoperatively, and 56.3%, 20.5%, and 15.9% when preoperative chemotherapy was administered alone. Patient age affected grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 leucopenia and grade 3 or 4 anemia presented 2.5 times more frequently in female patients than in male patients. Wound complications were observed in 13.5% of patients: 17% with preoperative RT and 10% without. Chemotherapeutic DI was greater than 90%, even in patients receiving preoperative RT and in patients age 65 years or older.

CONCLUSION

This preoperative chemotherapy is feasible and can also be proposed for selected elderly patients. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was common, but DI was excellent. Concurrent preoperative RT is safe, although an increased rate of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and limited increase in wound complications may be observed.

Prognostic factors for elderly patients with primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumors

The number of patients with primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumors in Japan is increasing in line with the increasing size of the elderly population. The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic factors of primary malignant bone or soft tissue tumors in elderly patients. Clinical data was obtained from 90 patients, aged ≥65 years, with primary malignant bone or soft tissue tumors (bone, 20 cases; and soft tissue, 70 cases), treated at the Osaka City University Hospital between 1993 and 2013. Clinical information prior to treatment and tumor type, location, size, depth, grade and American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status (ASA-PS) score were evaluated in order to identify prognostic factors using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. In addition, 5-year survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The average follow-up period was 44.8 months and the 5-year overall survival rate was 77.5%. In the multivariate analysis, ASA-PS score and high-grade sarcoma were found to be associated with a poorer overall survival. No significant differences were observed between the patient group aged 65-74 years and that aged ≥75 years. In general, aging is associated with physically reduced function and an increased prevalence of comorbidities. It was therefore expected that increasing age may be a predictive factor for poor prognosis. However, the results of the present study suggested that ASA-PS score and tumor grade were significant factors associated with poor prognosis, whereas increasing age was not. Therefore, the treatment of elderly patients with primary bone and soft tissue tumors should not be based on age.

The diffusion of docetaxel in patients with metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Diffusion of new cancer treatments can be both inefficient and incomplete. The uptake of new treatments over time (diffusion) has not been well studied. We analyzed the diffusion of docetaxel in metastatic prostate cancer.

METHODS

We identified metastatic prostate cancer patients diagnosed from 1995 to 2007 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-Medicare database. Medicare claims through 2008 were analyzed. We assessed cumulative incidence of docetaxel by socioeconomic, demographic, and comorbidity variables, and compared diffusion patterns to landmark events including release of phase III results and FDA approval dates. We compared docetaxel diffusion patterns in prostate cancer to those in metastatic breast, lung, ovarian, and gastric cancers. To model docetaxel use over time, we used the classic "mixed influence" deterministic diffusion model. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

We identified 6561 metastatic prostate cancer patients; 1350 subsequently received chemotherapy. Among patients who received chemotherapy, docetaxel use was 95% by 2008. Docetaxel uptake was statistically significantly slower (P < .01) for patients older than 65 years, blacks, patients in lower income areas, and those who experienced poverty. Eighty percent of docetaxel diffusion occurred prior to the May, 2004 release of phase III results showing superiority of docetaxel over standard-of-care. The maximum increase in the rate of use of docetaxel occurred nearly simultaneously for prostate cancer as for all other cancers combined (in 2000).

CONCLUSION

Efforts to increase the diffusion of treatments with proven survival benefits among disadvantaged populations could lead to cancer population survival gains. Docetaxel diffusion mostly preceded phase III evidence for its efficacy in castration-resistant prostate cancer, and appeared to be a cancer-wide-rather than a disease-specific-phenomenon. Diffusion prior to definitive evidence indicates the prevalence of off-label chemotherapy use.