Circadian expression of the light-harvesting complex protein genes in plants

Diurnal transcriptome dynamics reveal the photoperiod response of Pyrus

Photoperiod provides a key environmental signal that controls plant growth. Plants have evolved an integrated mechanism for sensing photoperiods with internal clocks to orchestrate physiological events. This mechanism has been identified to enable timely plant growth and improve fitness. Although the components and pathways underlying photoperiod regulation have been described in many species, diurnal patterns of gene expression at the genome-wide level under different photoperiods are rarely reported in perennial fruit trees. To explore the global gene expression in response to photoperiod, pear plants were cultured under long-day (LD) and short-day (SD) conditions. A time-series transcriptomic study was implemented using LD and SD samples collected at 4 h intervals over 2 days. We identified 13,677 rhythmic genes, of which 7639 were identified under LD and 10,557 under SD conditions. Additionally, 4674 genes were differentially expressed in response to photoperiod change. We also characterized the candidate homologs of clock-associated genes in pear. Clock genes were involved in the regulation of many processes throughout the day, including photosynthesis, stress response, hormone dynamics, and secondary metabolism. Strikingly, genes within photosynthesis-related pathways were enriched in both the rhythmic and differential expression analyses. Several key candidate genes were identified to be associated with regulating photosynthesis and improving productivity under different photoperiods. The results suggest that temporal variation in gene expression should not be ignored in pear gene function research. Overall, our work expands the understanding of photoperiod regulation of plant growth, particularly by extending the research to non-model trees.

Evolutionary conservations, changes of circadian rhythms and their effect on circadian disturbances and therapeutic approaches

The circadian rhythm is essential for the interaction of all living organisms with their environments. Several processes, such as thermoregulation, metabolism, cognition and memory, are regulated by the internal clock. Disturbances in the circadian rhythm have been shown to lead to the development of neuropsychiatric disorders, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Interestingly, the mechanism of the circadian rhythms has been conserved in many different species, and misalignment between circadian rhythms and the environment results in evolutionary regression and lifespan reduction. This review summarises the conserved mechanism of the internal clock and its major interspecies differences. In addition, it focuses on effects the circadian rhythm disturbances, especially in cases of ADHD, and describes the possibility of recombinant proteins generated by eukaryotic expression systems as therapeutic agents as well as CRISPR/Cas9 technology as a potential tool for research and therapy. The aim is to give an overview about the evolutionary conserved mechanism as well as the changes of the circadian clock. Furthermore, current knowledge about circadian rhythm disturbances and therapeutic approaches is discussed.

The nucleoid-associated protein WHIRLY1 is required for the coordinate assembly of plastid and nucleus-encoded proteins during chloroplast development

Chloroplasts deficient in the major chloroplast nucleoid-associated protein WHIRLY1 have an enhanced ratio of LHCs to reaction centers, indicating that WHIRLY1 is required for a coordinate assembly of the photosynthetic apparatus during chloroplast development. Chloroplast development was found to be delayed in barley plants with an RNAi-mediated knockdown of WHIRLY1 encoding a major nucleoid-associated protein of chloroplasts. The plastids of WHIRLY1 deficient plants had a reduced ribosome content. Accordingly, plastid-encoded proteins of the photosynthetic apparatus showed delayed accumulation during chloroplast development coinciding with a delayed increase in photosystem II efficiency measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. In contrast, light harvesting complex proteins being encoded in the nucleus had a high abundance as in the wild type. The unbalanced assembly of the proteins of the photosynthetic apparatus in WHIRLY1-deficient plants coincided with the enhanced contents of chlorophyll b and xanthophylls. The lack of coordination was most obvious at the early stages of development. Overaccumulation of LHC proteins in comparison to reaction center proteins at the early stages of chloroplast development did not correlate with enhanced expression levels of the corresponding genes in the nucleus. This work revealed that WHIRLY1 does not influence LHC abundance at the transcriptional level. Rather, WHIRLY1 in association with nucleoids might play a structural role for both the assembly of ribosomes and the complexes of the photosynthetic apparatus.

Transcription through the eye of a needle: daily and annual cyclic gene expression variation in Douglas-fir needles

BACKGROUND

Perennial growth in plants is the product of interdependent cycles of daily and annual stimuli that induce cycles of growth and dormancy. In conifers, needles are the key perennial organ that integrates daily and seasonal signals from light, temperature, and water availability. To understand the relationship between seasonal cycles and seasonal gene expression responses in conifers, we examined diurnal and circannual needle mRNA accumulation in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) needles at diurnal and circannual scales. Using mRNA sequencing, we sampled 6.1 × 10⁹ reads from 19 trees and constructed a de novo pan-transcriptome reference that includes 173,882 tree-derived transcripts. Using this reference, we mapped RNA-Seq reads from 179 samples that capture daily and annual variation.

RESULTS

We identified 12,042 diurnally-cyclic transcripts, 9299 of which showed homology to annotated genes from other plant genomes, including angiosperm core clock genes. Annual analysis revealed 21,225 circannual transcripts, 17,335 of which showed homology to annotated genes from other plant genomes. The timing of maximum gene expression is associated with light intensity at diurnal scales and photoperiod at annual scales, with approximately half of transcripts reaching maximum expression +/- 2 h from sunrise and sunset, and +/- 20 days from winter and summer solstices. Comparisons with published studies from other conifers shows congruent behavior in clock genes with Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria), and a significant preservation of gene expression patterns for 2278 putative orthologs from Douglas-fir during the summer growing season, and 760 putative orthologs from spruce (Picea) during the transition from fall to winter.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlight the extensive diurnal and circannual transcriptome variability demonstrated in conifer needles. At these temporal scales, 29% of expressed transcripts show a significant diurnal cycle, and 58.7% show a significant circannual cycle. Remarkably, thousands of genes reach their annual peak activity during winter dormancy. Our study establishes the fine-scale timing of daily and annual maximum gene expression for diverse needle genes in Douglas-fir, and it highlights the potential for using this information for evaluating hypotheses concerning the daily or seasonal timing of gene activity in temperate-zone conifers, and for identifying cyclic transcriptome components in other conifer species.

Sulphur responsiveness of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii LHCBM9 promoter

A 44-base-pair region in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii LHCBM9 promoter is essential for sulphur responsiveness. The photosynthetic light-harvesting complex (LHC) proteins play essential roles both in light capture, the first step of photosynthesis, and in photoprotective mechanisms. In contrast to the other LHC proteins and the majority of photosynthesis proteins, the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii photosystem II-associated LHC protein, LHCBM9, was recently reported to be up-regulated under sulphur deprivation conditions, which also induce hydrogen production. Here, we examined the sulphur responsiveness of the LHCBM9 gene at the transcriptional level, through promoter deletion analysis. The LHCBM9 promoter was found to be responsive to sulphur deprivation, with a 44-base-pair region between nucleotide positions -136 and -180 relative to the translation start site identified as essential for this response. Anaerobiosis was found to enhance promoter activity under sulphur deprivation conditions, however, alone was unable to induce promoter activity. The study of LHCBM9 is of biological and biotechnological importance, as its expression is linked to photobiological hydrogen production, theoretically the most efficient process for biofuel production, while the simplicity of using an S-deprivation trigger enables the development of a novel C. reinhardtii-inducible promoter system based on LHCBM9.

Regulation of isoprene emission from poplar leaves throughout a day

Isoprene is a biogenic hydrocarbon that significantly affects tropospheric chemistry. Numerous plant species, including many trees, emit isoprene. Isoprene is synthesized by isoprene synthase (IspS), from dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMADP) made by the methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway. It has been demonstrated that in developing leaves, isoprene emission is regulated by transcriptional control of IspS, while in mature leaves subjected to changing growth temperature, regulation of emission is shared between IspS and DMADP supply from the MEP pathway. Isoprene emission also varies throughout a day, with circadian regulation implicated. This study investigated changes in isoprene emission capacity, and expression of IspS and the enzymes of the MEP pathway throughout several days, with Populus trichocarpa grown at different temperatures to induce different levels of isoprene emission. Isoprene emission capacity exhibited ultradian regulation, with a period of about 12 h; peak capacity was observed at 0300 and 1500 h daily. Several of the enzymes of the MEP pathway had previously been suggested to have regulatory roles in the production of other plastidic terpenoids, and transcript accumulation for these enzymes, combined with in silico promoter analyses, supported a regulatory role for deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS) in particular.

Comparative genetic studies on the APRR5 and APRR7 genes belonging to the APRR1/TOC1 quintet implicated in circadian rhythm, control of flowering time, and early photomorphogenesis

In Arabidopsis thaliana, a number of circadian-associated factors have been identified. Among those, TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) is believed to be a component of the central oscillator. TOC1 is a member of a small family of proteins, designated as Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS (APRR1/TOC1, APRR3, APRR5, APRR7, and APRR9). Nonetheless, it is not very clear whether or not the APRR family members other than APRR1/TOC1 are also implicated in the mechanisms underlying the circadian rhythm. To address this issue further, here we characterized a set of T-DNA insertion mutants, each of which is assumed to have a severe lesion in each one of the quintet genes (i.e. APRR5 and APRR7). For each of these mutants (aprr5-11 and aprr7-11) we demonstrate that a given mutation singly, if not directly, affects the circadian-associated biological events simultaneously: (i) flowering time in the long-day photoperiod conditions, (ii) red light sensitivity of seedlings during the early photomorphogenesis, and (iii) the period of free-running rhythms of certain clock-controlled genes including CCA1 and APRR1/TOC1 in constant white light. These results suggest that, although the quintet members other than APRR1/TOC1 may not be directly integrated into the framework of the central oscillator, they are crucial for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the Arabidopsis circadian clock.

The function of circadian RNA-binding proteins and their cis-acting elements in microalgae

An endogenous clock regulates the temporal expression of genes/mRNAs that are involved in the circadian output pathway. In the bioluminescent dinoflagellate Gonyaulax polyedra circadian expression of the luciferin-binding protein (LBP) is controlled at the translational level. Thereby, a clock-controlled RNA-binding protein, called circadian controlled translational regulator (CCTR), interacts specifically with an UG-repeat, which is situated in the lbp 3' UTR. Its binding activity correlates negatively with the amount of LBP during a circadian cycle. In the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a clock-controlled RNA-binding protein (CHLAMY 1) was identified, which represents an analog of the CCTR from the phylogenetically diverse alga G. polyedra. CHLAMY 1 binds specifically to the 3' UTRs of several mRNAs and recognizes them all via a common cis-acting element, composed of at least seven UG-repeats. The binding strength of CHLAMY 1 is strongest to mRNAs, whose products are key components of nitrogen metabolism resulting in arginine biosynthesis as well as of CO2 metabolism. Since temporal activities of processes involved in nitrogen metabolism have an opposite phase than CHLAMY 1 binding activity, the protein might repress the translation of the cognate mRNAs.

Chronopathological aspects of disease incidence in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Rice seedlings maintained under uncontrolled glasshouse conditions were inoculated with conidial suspensions of a fungal pathogen, Helminthosporium oryzae, at various times during the 24h. Significant increase in the percent germination and germ tube length of conidia were observed in the rice samples inoculated at 02:00 and 06:00h. The 24 h temporal variation in leaf temperature was positively correlated with variation in stomatal movements. The results indicate a 24 h rhythm in the behavior of the fungal pathogen on the host in relation to the conditions of the growing environment. In all the inoculated seedlings, the appearance of a large number of brown leaf spots was confined to the light span. Among the plants inoculated, earlier initiation of brown leaf spot appearance, maximum number of leaf spots, and highest disease severity were observed when plants were inoculated at 02:00h. There was a positive correlation between disease severity of the host and in vivo values of percent germination of conidia and germ tube length of the pathogen in plants inoculated between 02:00 and 06:00h. The findings of this study implicate that light intensity and temperature could play a predominant role in controlling disease susceptibility rhythms in plants.

GIGANTEA and SPINDLY genes linked to the clock pathway that controls circadian characteristics of transpiration in Arabidopsis

Several "clock" genes that regulate the circadian system in Arabidopsis thaliana have been identified. The GIGANTEA (GI) gene has been shown to participate in the circadian system that is linked to overt rhythms in gene expression, leaf movements, hypocotyl elongation, and photoperiodic control of flowering in Arabidopsis. During continuous light (LL), circadian expression patterns in gi-2 mutants show reduced amplitudes and altered period lengths when compared with controls. Rhythms in stomatal function, such as transpiration, have been shown to be endogenous and persist in constant lighting conditions. In order to test for a physiologic variable that might be affected by the circadian clock via the GI gene, we compared circadian characteristics of transpiration between three Arabidopsis mutants (gi-2, spy-4, spy-4/gi-2) and wild-type (WT) controls in synchronized (LD for 2.5d) and free-running (LL for 3d) conditions. Each genotype showed a significant circadian rhythm in LD at p < 0.001, with acrophases located near the middle of the daily 14h L-span, with average amplitudes for WT: 18.9%, gi-2: 16.1%, spy-4: 7.7%, and spy-4/gi-2: 5.3%. On the first day in LL, the circadian amplitude was dramatically reduced to 3.1% for gi-2 compared with WT (11.9%), while amplitudes for spy-4 (6.9%) and spy-4/gi-2 (5.7%) were not significantly changed from LD. The amplitude for gi-2 remained low during days 2 (4.2%) and 3 (2.1%) in LL, while it slowly dampened for the WT (8.6 and 6.6%). The amplitudes for spy-4 (6.6%) and spy-4/gi-2 (5.6%) on day 2 in LL were indistinguishable from the LD span, but finally dampened on day 3 in LL (1.9 and 2.3%, respectively). These data suggest that transpiration is a physiologic variable controlled by a circadian system that involves both the GI and SPY proteins.

Aberrant expression of the Arabidopsis circadian-regulated APRR5 gene belonging to the APRR1/TOC1 quintet results in early flowering and hypersensitiveness to light in early photomorphogenesis

In Arabidopsis thaliana, the transcripts of the APRR1/TOC1 family genes each start accumulating after dawn rhythmically and one after another at intervals in the order of APRR9-->APRR7-->APRR5-->APRR3-->APRR1/TOC1 under continuous light. Except for the well-characterized APRR1/TOC1, however, no evidence has been provided that other APRR1/TOC1 family genes are indeed implicated in the mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms. We here attempted to provide such evidence by characterizing transgenic plants that constitutively express the APRR5 gene. The resulting APRR5-overexpressing (APRR5-ox) plants showed intriguing properties with regard to not only circadian rhythms, but also control of flowering time and light response. First, the aberrant expression of APRR5 in such transgenic plants resulted in a characteristic phenotype with regard to transcriptional events, in which free-running rhythms were considerably altered for certain circadian-regulated genes, including CCA1, LHY, APRR1/TOC1, other APRR1/TOC1 members, GI and CAB2, although each rhythm was clearly sustained even after plants were transferred to continuous light. With regard to biological events, APRR5-ox plants flowered much earlier than wild-type plants, more or less, in a manner independent of photoperiodicity (or under short-day conditions). Furthermore, APRR5-ox plants showed an SRL (short-hypocotyls under red light) phenotype that is indicative of hypersensitiveness to red light in early photomorphogenesis. Both APRR1-ox and APRR9-ox plants also showed the same phenotype. Therefore, APRR5 (together with APRR1/TOC1 and APRR9) must be taken into consideration for a better understanding of the molecular links between circadian rhythms, control of flowering time through the photoperiodic long-day pathway, and also light signaling-controlled plant development.

Aberrant expression of the light-inducible and circadian-regulated APRR9 gene belonging to the circadian-associated APRR1/TOC1 quintet results in the phenotype of early flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana

Several Arabidopsis genes have been proposed to encode potential clock-associated components, including the Myb-related CCA1 and LHY transcription factors and a member (APRR1/TOC1) of the family of pseudo-response regulators. We previously showed that transcripts of the APRR1/TOC1 family genes each start accumulating after dawn rhythmically and sequentially at intervals in the order of APRR9-->APRR7-->APRR5-->APRR3-->APRR1/TOC1, under the conditions of continuous light. Nevertheless, no evidence has been provided that each member of the APRR1/TOC1 quintet, except for APRR1/TOC1, is indeed relevant to the mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms. Here we attempt to provide such evidence by characterizing transgenic plants that aberrantly (or constitutively) express the APRR9 gene in a manner independent of circadian rhythms. The resulting APRR9-ox plants showed intriguing phenotypes with regard to circadian rhythms, in two aspects. First, the aberrant expression of APRR9 resulted in a characteristic phenotype with regard to transcriptional events, in which short-period rhythms were commonly observed for certain circadian-regulated genes, including CCA1, LHY, APRR1/TOC1, other APRR1/TOC1 members, ELF3, and CAB2. With regard to biological consequences, such APRR9-ox plants flowered much earlier than wild-type plants, in a manner independent of photoperiodicity (or under short-day conditions). These results suggest that APRR9 (and perhaps other members of the APRR1/TOC1 quintet) must also be taken into consideration for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms, and also underlying control of the flowering time through the photoperiodic long-day pathway.

Regulation of the tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway leading to heme and chlorophyll in plants and cyanobacteria

Photosynthetic organisms synthesize chlorophylls, hemes, and bilin pigments via a common tetrapyrrole biosynthetic pathway. This review summarizes current knowledge about the regulation of this pathway in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. Particular emphasis is placed on the regulation of glutamate-1-semialdehyde formation and on the channelling of protoporphyrin IX into the heme and chlorophyll branches. The potential role of chlorophyll molecules that are not bound to photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes ('free chlorophylls') or of other Mg-containing porphyrins in regulation of tetrapyrrole synthesis is also discussed.

The Arabidopsis circadian system

Rhythms with periods of approximately 24 hr are widespread in nature. Those that persist in constant conditions are termed circadian rhythms and reflect the activity of an endogenous biological clock. Plants, including Arabidopsis, are richly rhythmic. Expression analysis, most recently on a genomic scale, indicates that the Arabidopsis circadian clock regulates a number of key metabolic pathways and stress responses. A number of sensitive and high-throughput assays have been developed to monitor the Arabidopsis clock. These assays have facilitated the identification of components of plant circadian systems through genetic and molecular biological studies. Although much remains to be learned, the framework of the Arabidopsis circadian system is coming into focus.DedicationThis review is dedicated to the memory of DeLill Nasser, a wonderful mentor and an unwavering advocate of both Arabidopsis and circadian rhythms research.

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a unicellular model for circadian rhythm analysis

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has been used as an experimental model organism for circadian rhythm research for more than 30 yr. Some of the physiological rhythms of this alga are well established, and several clock mutants have been isolated. The cloning of clock genes from these mutant strains by positional cloning is under way and should give new insights into the mechanism of the circadian clock. In a spectacular space experiment, the question of the existence of an endogenous clock vs. an exogenous mechanism has been studied in this organism. With the emergence of molecular analysis of circadian rhythms in plants in 1985, a circadian gene expression pattern of several nuclear and chloroplast genes was detected. Evidence is now accumulating that shows circadian control at the translational level. In addition, the gating of the cell cycle by the circadian clock has been analyzed. This review focuses on the different aspects of circadian rhythm research in C. reinhardtii over the past 30 yr. The suitability of Chlamydomonas as a model system in chronobiology research and the adaptive significance of the observed rhythms will be discussed.

Circadian rhythms in microalgae

Circadian rhythms have been described in a variety of microalgae. In each group, some model organisms arose and most detailed studies have been done with them. They include the cyanobacterium ("blue-green alga") Synechococcus and eukaryotic microalgae Gonyaulax polyedra (Dinophyta), Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlorophyta), and Euglena gracilis (Euglenophyta). This review focuses on recent approaches to depict molecular components of the circadian system and the mechanisms of regulation in these organisms. In Synechococcus, the identification of the kailocus, which represents a central part of its oscillatory system, is discussed, as well as diverse approaches based on a luminescent reporter gene, which is driven by a clock-controlled cyanobacterial promoter. In eukaryotic microalgae, the diversity of genes/proteins that are controlled by the circadian clock is described and the kind of regulation (transcriptional and translational control) is emphasized. The role and function of conserved clock-controlled RNA-binding proteins such as CCTR from Gonyaulaxor Chlamy 1 from Chlamydomonas are discussed.

The APRR1/TOC1 quintet implicated in circadian rhythms of Arabidopsis thaliana: II. Characterization with CCA1-overexpressing plants

We previously identified a novel class of proteins, named pseudo-response regulators (APRRs) in Arabidopsis thaliana, each of which (APRR1, APRR3, APRR5, APRR7, and APRR9) has an intriguing structural design containing an N-terminal pseudo receiver domain and a C-terminal CONSTANS motif. Among them, APRR1 is identical to TOC1, previously proposed to be a candidate component of an Arabidopsis circadian clock. Intriguingly, expressions of the APRR1/TOC1 family of genes are under control of coordinate circadian rhythms at the level of transcription, in the manner that each APRR-transcript starts accumulating sequentially after dawn with 2 to 3 h intervals in the order: APRR9-->APRR7-->APRR5-->APRR3-->APRR1/TOC1. Here we examined this circadian-related event, "circadian waves of the APRR1/TOC1 quintet", by employing CCA1-overexpression (CCA1-ox) transgenic plants, based on the fact that CCA1 is a well-characterized and the most plausible oscillator component. It was found that aberrant overexpression of the CCA1 gene severely perturbed free-running and sequential rhythms of the APRR1/TOC1 family of genes. In the accompanying paper, it was shown that overexpression of APRR1 also results in a marked alteration of the CCA1 circadian rhythm, and vice versa. Taken together, it was suggested that there are intimate and mutual links between these two types of circadian-associated components (APRRs and CCA1).

The APRR1/TOC1 quintet implicated in circadian rhythms of Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Characterization with APRR1-overexpressing plants

Several Arabidopsis genes have been proposed to encode potential clock-associated components, including the Myb-related CCA1 and LHY transcription factors and a member of the novel family of pseudo response regulators (APRR1/TOC1). We previously showed that mRNAs of the APRR1/TOC1 family of genes start accumulating after dawn rhythmically and sequentially at approximately 2 h intervals in the order: APRR9--> APRR7-->APRR5-->APRR3-->APRR1/TOC1. Here we constructed APRR1-overexpressing (APRR1-ox) plants, and examined certain circadian profiles for APRRs, CCA1, LHY, GI, CCR2, and CAB2. The free-running circadian rhythms of the APRR1/TOC1 family of genes, including APRR1, were dampened in APRR1-ox plants. In particular, the light-inducible expression of APRR9 was severely repressed in APRR1-ox plants, suggesting that there is a negative APRR1-->APRR9 regulation. The free-running robust rhythm of CAB2 was also dampened in APRR1-ox. The circadian profiles of potential clock-associated genes, CCA1, LHY, GI, and CCR2 were all markedly altered in APRR1-ox, each in characteristic fashion. To gain further insight into the molecular function of APRR1, we then identified a novel Myc-related bHLH transcription factor, which physically associated with APRR1. This protein (named PIL1) is similar in its amino acid sequence to PIF3, which has been identified as a phytochrome-interacting transcription factor. These results are discussed in relation to the current idea that APRR1 (TOC1) plays a role within, or close to, the Arabidopsis central oscillator.

Post-transcriptional light regulation of nuclear-encoded genes

A significant number of studies have detected a post-transcriptional component in the light responses of nuclear genes. As yet there are few in-depth studies of the mechanism(s) involved, and it seems likely some additional examples have been missed. For instance, transcriptional responses have sometimes been inferred on the basis of experiments with translational fusions containing both the promoter and 5' UTR of the test gene, but we now know that elements within the 5' UTR can mediate post-transcriptional light responses. Similarly, because of possible changes in translation rates and protein turnover, the common assumption that mRNA levels directly dictate protein levels is tenuous at best. It is no longer permissible to assume that the biological effect of a gene is a simple function of its transcription. Thus it is likely that with careful experimental design, reports of nuclear-encoded post-transcriptional gene regulation will become increasingly prevalent.

Light regulation of circadian clock-controlled gene expression in rice

Using transgenic rice seedlings expressing a firefly luciferase (luc) gene under the control of a rice CAB (chlorophyll a/b binding protein) promoter, we demonstrated how light affects circadian clocks in the transcription of the CAB gene. Rhythmic luc expression was observed for more than 5 d under constant light and dark (DD) conditions after light/dark entrainment. After a light pulse was applied at different time points in DD various temporal patterns of CAB gene expression were individually observed. We first examined two distinct properties related to the entrainment mechanism of the circadian clock: fluence-rate dependence of free-running periods (FRPs) and phase resetting by a light pulse. Although fluence-rate dependent shortening of FRP was demonstrated, the FRP in DD was almost equal to that in constant light of a middle fluence-rate, indicating that this fluence-rate dependence may not fully describe the entrainment of the circadian clock in rice. Typical phase responses of the circadian clock by a single light pulse were also observed at the transcriptional level in rice seedlings. Thus, the phase resettings upon the light/dark transitions of daily cycles may be sufficient to explain the entrainment mechanisms of rice. We have further demonstrated that, in addition to having a gating effect to acute response, a light pulse can activate the circadian clock-controlled CAB1R gene expression at the first circadian peak in a phase-dependent manner. This suggests that light activates circadian clock activity in the diurnal CAB gene expression under daily light/dark cycles.

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS IN PLANTS

Circadian rhythms, endogenous rhythms with periods of approximately 24 h, are widespread in nature. Although plants have provided many examples of rhythmic outputs and our understanding of photoreceptors of circadian input pathways is well advanced, studies with plants have lagged in the identification of components of the central circadian oscillator. Nonetheless, genetic and molecular biological studies, primarily in Arabidopsis, have begun to identify the components of plant circadian systems at an accelerating pace. There also is accumulating evidence that plants and other organisms house multiple circadian clocks both in different tissues and, quite probably, within individual cells, providing unanticipated complexity in circadian systems.

Evidence for non-circadian light/dark-regulated expression of Hsp70s in spinach leaves

Expression of six Hsp70s in spinach (Spinacia oleracea cv Longstanding Bloomsdale) leaves grown under isothermal conditions is regulated by a light/dark (L/D) mechanism distinctly different from the light-regulated mechanism for the chlorophyll a/b-binding protein (cab) or small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (rbcS). Subjecting entrained plants to two or three L/D cycles within a 24-h period resulted in an equal number of oscillations in expression for five out of six 70-kD heat shock proteins (Hsp70s). Three cycles appear to be the maximum, as shorter L/D treatments do not consistently increase the number of cycles in a 24-h period. The expression response of Hsp70s to L/D is overridden by heat shock. Protein disulfide isomerase, a second molecular chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum, has an expression pattern in entrained plants that is similar to hsc70-2, the endoplasmic reticulum luminal Hsp70 binding protein. The parallel expression patterns for the various Hsp70s and protein disulfide isomerase indicate a likely general coordinate L/D regulation for molecular chaperones in plants. Multiple inductions in response to successive L/D treatments within a 24-h period in entrained plants for five of six Hsp70s support the conclusion that expression is not a consequence of circadian control, but instead is independently cued by non-circadian-mediated L/D signals where peak Hsp70 expression precedes the daily thermoperiod maximum.

Light response of the circadian waves of the APRR1/TOC1 quintet: when does the quintet start singing rhythmically in Arabidopsis?

We previously identified a novel class of proteins, named A:rabidopsis pseudo-response regulators (APRRs), each of which (APRR1/TOC1, APRR3, APRR5, APRR7, APRR9) has an intriguing structural design containing an N-terminal pseudo-receiver domain and a C-terminal CONSTANS motif. Expression of these APRR1/TOC1 family members is under the control of a coordinate circadian rhythm at the level of transcription such that the APRR-mRNAs start accumulating sequentially after dawn with 2 to 3 h intervals in the order of APRR9-->APRR7-->APRR5-->APRR3-->APRR1/TOC1 in a given 24 h photo-period. Based on these data, we previously proposed that these sequential and rhythmic events of transcription, termed 'circadian waves of APRR1/TOC1 quintet', may be a basis of a presumed Arabidopsis biological clock (named 'bar code clock') [Matsushika et al. (2000) Plant and Cell Physiol. 41: 1002]. Here we further characterized the event of circadian waves, by demonstrating that certain light stimuli are crucial determinants to induce the robust circadian waves, and accordingly, the first-boosted and light-induced APRR9 appears to be primarily responsible for this light response of the circadian waves. Also, as such a light stimulus, a red light pulse that is presumably perceived by phytochromes appears to be sufficient to induce (or synchronize) the APRR1/TOC1 circadian waves.

Circadian waves of expression of the APRR1/TOC1 family of pseudo-response regulators in Arabidopsis thaliana: insight into the plant circadian clock

The Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulator, APRR1, has a unique structural design containing a pseudo-receiver domain and a C-terminal CONSTANS motif. This protein was originally characterized as a presumed component of the His-to-Asp phosphorelay systems in Arabidopsis thaliana. Recently, it was reported that APRR1 is identical to the TOC1 gene product, a mutational lesion of which affects the periods of many circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis plants. TOC1 is believed to be a component of the presumed circadian clock (or central oscillator). Based on these facts, in this study four more genes, each encoding a member of the APRR1/TOC1 family of pseudo-response regulators were identified and characterized with special reference to circadian rhythms. It was found that all these members of the APRR1/TOC1 family (APRR1, APRR3, APRR5, APRR7, and APRR9) are subjected to a circadian rhythm at the level of transcription. Furthermore, in a given 24 h period, the APRR-mRNAs started accumulating sequentially after dawn with 2-3 h intervals in the order of APRR9-->APRR7-->APRR5-->APRR3-->APRR1. These sequential events of transcription, termed 'circadian waves of APRR1/TOCI', were not significantly affected by the photoperiod conditions, if any (e.g. both long and short days), and the expression of APRR9 was first boosted always after dawn. Among these APRRs, in fact, only the expression of APRR9 was rapidly and transiently induced also by white light, whereas such light responses of others were very dull, if any. These results collectively support the view that these members of the APRR1/TOC1 family are together all involved in an as yet unknown mechanism underlying the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Here we propose that the circadian waves of the APRR1/TOC1 family members are most likely a molecular basis of such a biological clock in higher plants.

The circadian system of Arabidopsis thaliana: forward and reverse genetic approaches

It is now widely accepted that autoregulatory circuits involving transcription/translation of clock genes form the molecular basis of the endogenous circadian clock in different organisms. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the RNA-binding protein AtGRP7 (Arabidopsis thaliana glycine-rich protein) has been identified as part of a negative-feedback loop through which AtGRP7 regulates the circadian oscillations of its own transcript. Experimental evidence indicates that this feedback loop also is influenced by another oscillator. Support for this hypothesis comes from the characterization of the clock mutant toc1 (timing of cab expression) and the recent isolation of two candidate clock molecules, LHY (late elongated hypocotyl) and CCA1 (circadian clock associated). TOC1, as well as the LHY and CCA1 oscillatory feedback loops, influence several rhythmic physiological and molecular processes in Arabidopsis, including cyclic Atgrp7 gene expression. We discuss the features of these feedback loops with relation to the organization of the circadian system in Arabidopsis.