An academic centre for gene therapy research with clinical grade manufacturing capability

Design and operation of a current good manufacturing practices cell-engineering laboratory

Medical centers and biotechnology companies active in cellular and gene therapy increasingly are working to design and build clinical laboratories capable of performing cellular engineering and vector production using current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs). Because cell engineering is a rapidly changing field, and definitions for cell engineering cGMPs are still being established, a cGMP cell-engineering laboratory most often should be designed with a broad range of potential applications in mind. While the laboratory facility is the most tangible aspect of cGMP, it represents only part of a larger process, which it must be designed and built to support.

Comparison of different bioreactor systems for the production of high titer retroviral vectors

Improved, human-based packaging cell lines allow the production of high-titer, RCR-free retroviral vectors. The utility of these cell lines for the production of clinical grade vectors critically depends on the definition of optimal conditions for scaled-up cultures. In this work, a clone derived from the TE Fly GALV packaging cell (Duisit et al. Hum. Gene Ther. 1999, 10, 189) that produces high titers of a lacZ containing retroviral vector with a Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus envelope glycoprotein was used. This clone can produce (2-5) x 10(6) PFU cm(-3) in small scale cultures and has been evaluated for growth and vector production in different reactor systems. The performances of fixed bed reactors [CellCube (Costar) and Celligen (New Brunswick)] and stirred tank reactors [microcarriers and clump cultures] were compared. The cells showed a higher apparent growth rate in the fixed bed reactor systems than in the suspension systems, probably as a result of the fact that aggregation and/or formation of clumps led to a reduced viability and reduced growth of cells in the interior of the clumps. As a consequence, the final cell density and number were in average 3- to 7-fold higher in the fixed bed systems in comparison to the suspension culture systems. The average titers obtained ranged from 0.5 to 2.1 x 10(7) PFU cm(-3) for the fixed bed and microcarrier systems, while the clump cultures produced only (2-5) x 10(5) PFU cm(-3). The differences in titers reflect cell densities as well as specific viral vector production rates, with the immobilization and microcarrier systems exhibiting an at least 10-fold higher production rate in comparison to the clump cultures. A partial optimization of the culture conditions in the Celligen fixed bed reactor, consisting of a 9-fold reduction of the seeding cell density, led to a 5-fold increased vector production rate accompanied by an average titer of 3 x 10(7) PFU cm(-3) (maximum titer (4-5) x 10(7) PFU cm(-3)) in the fixed bed reactor. The performance evaluation results using mathematical models indicated that the fixed bed bioreactor has a higher potential for retroviral vector production because of both the higher reactor productivity and the lower sensitivity of productivity in relation to the changes in final retrovirus titer in the range of 3 x 10(6) to 15 x 10(6) PFU cm(-3).

Gene therapy of single-gene disorders: preface to the special section

Gene therapy was introduced into clinical practice with great excitement, much publicity and considerable optimism in the early 1990s. Scientific evaluation of the early clinical trials has, however, greatly reduced the initial optimism. Follow-up studies have revealed that many early gene therapy trials mainly represented gene transfer into patients, possibly with short-term effects, but not true gene therapy where the course of the disease is permanently affected. This has lead to critical re-evaluation of the approaches taken. Clearly, more basic understanding is needed of the molecular mechanisms of the diseases treated. For this purpose, better animal models for human diseases are necessary. One of the biggest obstacles for gene therapy has been the lack of adequate vector systems. Development of new vectors for efficient and targeted delivery and uptake of therapeutic genes is a crucial area where progress needs to be made. The rationale for gene therapy depends largely on the type of disease to be treated. Recessively inherited single-gene disorders represent diseases where the concept of gene therapy--addition of a therapeutic gene to restore the lost function of two mutant alleles--is easily understood and rarely questioned. However, most gene therapy protocols are focused on multifactorial diseases such as malignancies where the therapeutic approach is quite different. While gene transfer technologies are being developed into truly effective gene therapy, the fight against inherited single-gene disorders also continues at population level by carrier screening and prenatal diagnostics where rapid methodological developments are taking place.