The efficacy and safety of irbesartan in primary hypertension even if a dose is missed: Results from the NO PROBLEM Study

Exercise testing in hypertensive patients for assessing the cardiovascular protective potential of antihypertensive drugs

Exercise testing is an established noninvasive tool in cardiology used to diagnose and guide treatment in individuals with suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease. Owing to the wealth of information it provides, exercise testing is also being utilized to evaluate prehypertensive stages, characterize hypertension, assess tolerance to exercise and the efficacy of antihypertensive therapies, and predict target organ damage and cardiovascular risk. The literature on exercise tolerance tests is relatively limited since these studies are difficult to conduct although they represent a valuable test for evaluating the benefits of antihypertensive therapies beyond their blood-pressure-lowering efficacy at rest or during exercise. Such a setting can be immensely useful for the evaluation and for the differentiation of treatments, especially in patients with evident rises in systolic blood pressure and with concomitant diseases, who are at higher risk of stroke. Exercise-induced increase in systolic blood pressure from rest to peak exercise should therefore be used as the primary efficacy variable. There is growing evidence that central pressure is a better predictor for cardiovascular risk than peripheral blood pressure, since this variable takes into account the overall effect of vascular aging and increased arterial stiffness that age and other concomitant diseases may induce. It is also important to include central aortic blood pressure and biomarkers of hypertension and cardiac disease in the overall assessment.

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice and research: a critical review of a technique in need of implementation

This review presents evidence that ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) should be used more widely in clinical practice and hypertension research. The technique, which should be mandatory in trials of antihypertensive drugs, is not being used in all studies of antihypertensive drug efficacy. ABPM is also being under-used in outcome studies. The failure to implement ABPM in primary care and hypertension research is impeding patient management and scientific advancement. ABPM offers so many advantages in assessing the efficacy of blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs that it should be mandatory in pharmacological trials. Likewise, the technique provides a means of achieving BP control in clinical practice, which is essential if we are to halt the epidemic of the cardiovascular consequences of hypertension. However, if ABPM is to be implemented for these purposes, certain requirements will need to be fulfilled. These include the availability of accurate, patient-friendly and inexpensive devices; standardization of the presentation and plotting of data with summary statistics for day-to-day practice; provision of comprehensive data analysis for research; an interpretative report to facilitate use in busy clinical practice; a trend report to demonstrate efficacy or otherwise of treatment in clinical practice and online transmission of data to provide immediate real-time data analysis. The reasons why ABPM is not being implemented are reviewed, and proposals are made to make the technique more acceptable.