Short term effects of pravastatin on blood pressure in hypercholesterolaemic hypertensive patients

Pravastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

A detailed summary and meta-analysis of the dose-related effect of pravastatin on lipids is not available.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To assess the pharmacology of pravastatin by characterizing the dose-related effect and variability of the effect of pravastatin on the surrogate marker: low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol). The effect of pravastatin on morbidity and mortality is not the objective of this systematic review. Secondary objectives • To assess the dose-related effect and variability of effect of pravastatin on the following surrogate markers: total cholesterol; high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol); and triglycerides. • To assess the effect of pravastatin on withdrawals due to adverse effects.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2021: CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Bireme LILACS, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of pravastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered lipid data from placebo-controlled trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous data and withdrawal due to adverse effects (WDAEs) data as dichotomous data. We searched for WDAEs information from all trials. We assessed all trials using Cochrane's risk of bias tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-four RCTs evaluated the dose-related efficacy of pravastatin in 9771 participants. The participants were of any age, with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and pravastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over the doses of 5 mg to 160 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of pravastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%. The certainty of evidence for these effects was judged to be moderate to high. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 4.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol. This represented a dose-response slope that was less than the other studied statins: atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. From other systematic reviews we conducted on statins for its effect to reduce LDL cholesterol, pravastatin is similar to fluvastatin, but has a decreased effect compared to atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. The effect of pravastatin compared to placebo on WADES has a risk ratio (RR) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03). The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pravastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with pravastatin because of the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 48.4% of the randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Effects of combined statin and ACE inhibitor therapy on endothelial function and blood pressure in essential hypertension - a randomised double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study

Background:

The aim of this study was to compare the influence of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on endothelial function and blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension on long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

Method:

The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover clinical trial. Twenty patients with essential hypertension were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; the control group included 10 healthy subjects. Hypertensive patients received in random order 80 mg of fluvastatin daily or placebo for 6 weeks. The following parameters were assessed at baseline and after each treatment period: serum lipids, flow-mediated vasodilation, activity of von Willebrand factor, concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor, C-reactive protein and 24-hour blood pressure profile.

Results:

Hypertensive patients did not differ from healthy subjects with respect to age, body mass and biochemical parameters, with the exception of C-reactive protein, which was higher in hypertensive patients (P=0.02). After statin therapy, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<0.0001), C-reactive protein (P=0.03), von Willebrand factor (P=0.03) and vascular endothelial growth factor (P<0.01) decreased and flow-mediated vasodilation improved (P<0.001). Statins had no significant effect on blood pressure.

Conclusions:

Statins added to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may improve endothelial function and ameliorate inflammation independently of blood pressure.

Do Statins Lower Blood Pressure?

Hypercholesterolemia is present in many patients with hypertension and adds a significant component of cardiovascular risk. The 3-hydroxy-3 methyl-glutarylcoenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but also inhibit many of the structural and functional components of the arteriosclerotic process. Structural effects include reductions in vascular smooth muscle hypertrophy and proliferation, fibrin deposition, and collagen cross-linking. Among the functional effects are improvements in endothelial function, reduction in inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species, and down-regulation of angiotensin II and endothelin receptors. These would be expected to reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension; 14 studies have shown statin-induced decrease in blood pressure, but 11 studies showed no effect. Many of the studies had no placebo controls, were of short duration, or had small sample sizes, or combinations of these. Despite predictions made on the basis of the vasoprotective actions of statins, the blood-pressure-lowering effects of statins are at best modest.

The effects of statins on blood pressure in normotensive or hypertensive subjects--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether statin therapy is associated with blood pressure (BP)-lowering in patients with or without hypertension.

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of statins on the cardiovascular system may in part be related to effects beyond lipid-lowering. It has been suggested that statins may reduce BP; however the available data are still ambiguous and often conflicting.

METHODS

Data from Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the years 1966-January 2012 were searched for studies that investigated the effect of statins on BP in normotensive or in hypertensive subjects. We included all randomized controlled clinical trials that investigated this effect. Changes in systolic and diastolic BP were the key outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 18 trials and 5628 subjects (4692 normotensive and 936 hypertensive patients) randomized to receive either statins or placebo. The weighted mean difference of systolic (∆SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (∆DBP) in normotensive patients for the 11 statin trials included were 0.03 (95% CI: -0.95-1.02; p = 0.95) and -0.28 (95% CI: -0.80-0.24; p = 0.29), respectively. For hypertensive patients treated with statins (8 trials) the weighted mean difference of ∆SBP and ∆DBP were 1.45 (95% CI: -0.49-3.39; p = 0.14) and -1.32 (95% CI: -3.93-1.28; p = 0.32) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite previous suggestions statin therapy in normotensive or hypertensive patients does not lead to significant reductions in systolic or diastolic BP.

Hypotensive effect of atorvastatin in hypertensive patients: the association among flow-mediated dilation, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the hypothesis that atorvastatin decreases blood pressure (BP) values and improves endothelial function assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in normolipidaemic hypertensive patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-six hypertensive patients were randomized in a 2 : 1 proportion to atorvastatin (80 mg/day/3 months; group A; n = 39) or previous standard anti-hypertensive therapy (group B), which means the patients were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, β-blockers, calcium antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers. The study had a crossover design: after 3 months, both groups were changed (group A* stopped and group B* started atorvastatin treatment). Nitric oxide (NO), total antioxidant status (TAS), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and peroxide concentrations as well as FMD were measured before, after 3 and after 6 months of treatment. Atorvastatin added to existing treatment decreased BP in both groups.

RESULTS

Flow-mediated dilation improved in both statin-treated groups, but only significantly in group B* (from 11.9 ±8.3% to 22.1 ±9.0%; p < 0.05). In patients with FMD improvement, there was a greater BP reduction. After treatment discontinuation, FMD significantly decreased (from 19.6 ±12.6% to 13.0 ±10.5%; p < 0.05), which was consistent with BP increase. Changes in FMD were not significantly related to the increase in NO and TAS concentrations and decrease in ET-1 and peroxides measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypotensive effect of atorvastatin is associated with FMD improvement in normolipidaemic, hypertensive patients. Although this could be related to changes in oxidative stress and endothelial function, this was not demonstrated in this study and warrants further investigation.

Long-term effects of Xuezhikang on blood pressure in hypertensive patients with previous myocardial infarction: data from the Chinese Coronary Secondary Prevention Study (CCSPS)

Several previous trials from Western population studies have showed that statins may help reduce blood pressure (BP). However, randomized clinical data is limited. Xuezhikang, a partially extract of red yeast rice, contains a family of naturally occurring statins, and has a marked impact on lipids, but it is unknown whether Xuezhikang has any effect on BP during long-term follow-up in the Chinese population. This is a post-hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical trial, Chinese Coronary Secondary Prevention Study (CCSPS). A total of 2704 hypertensive patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) were assigned either to placebo (n = 1341) or to Xuezhikang (n = 1363) daily for an average of 4.5 years. The primary outcome was the unadjusted changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline to 6 months. We also assessed systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure. Analysis of covariance was used to calculate the adjusted effects of treatment on changes in these outcomes at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months post-randomization, after controlling for potential confounders. This analysis included 2704/4870 (55.5%) hypertensive patients for whom BP was measured at baseline and at least one follow-up visit after randomization. Median duration of the follow-up was 4.5 years (54 months), and 25 patients (0.92%) were lost to the last follow-up because of adverse effects. The results showed that the unadjusted and adjusted changes in MAP, SBP, DBP, or pulse pressure from baseline were not significantly different for Xuezhikang or placebo recipients at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after randomization. In this post-hoc subgroup analysis, we failed to demonstrate any significant reducing effects of Xuezhikang on BP in Chinese hypertensive patients with previous MI, suggesting that further prospective study on the effects of statins on BP would be needed, especially in high-risk patients.

Effects of fluvastatin on insulin resistance and cardiac morphology in hypertensive patients

Among hypertensive patients, cardiovascular disease morbidity is common, even in those who are adequately treated. New pharmacological strategies to mitigate the burden of arterial hypertension are needed. This 12-month, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of statin (fluvastatin) treatment on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), exercise blood pressure (EBP), myocardial structure, endothelial function and insulin resistance in 50 hypertensive patients. At baseline, the groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, ABP, EBP, endothelial function and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). At the end of the study, there was no difference between groups in terms of resting systolic blood pressure. However, maximum systolic EBP was lower in the treatment group than in the placebo group (175 ± 18 vs 192 ± 23 mm Hg, P<0.05), as was left ventricular mass index (LVMI; 82 ± 15 vs 100 ± 23, P<0.05), and HOMA-IR index was lower after fluvastatin treatment (2.77 ± 1.46 vs 3.33 ± 1.73, P<0.05). Changes in lipid profile were not correlated with blood pressure, endothelial function, LVMI or HOMA-IR data. In hypertensive patients, fluvastatin can improve maximum systolic EBP, myocardial remodelling and insulin resistance, independently of lipid profile variations and endothelial function.

Statins in hypertension: are they a new class of antihypertensive agents?

High blood pressure is a very common disease in hypercholesterolemic and diabetic patients and contributes to the increase in cardiovascular risk. Inhibitors of 3OH-3methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase are the most effective and widely used cholesterol-lowering drugs. They significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and death in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Although the long-term benefit by statin treatment is largely attributed to their cholesterol-lowering action, increasing attention focuses on additional actions called "pleitropic effects" that might explain the cardiovascular protection seen shortly after the initiation of therapy. Very few and small studies have investigated the antihypertensive effect of statins in patients with hypertension associated with hypercholesterolemia, and the results of recently published large statin studies (albeit not designed to answer this question) have attracted the interest on this subject. Many other studies, also not specifically aimed at the evaluation of the statins' antihypertensive effect, have provided information concerning changes in blood pressure during treatment with statins, but severe limitations such as inadequate study design, small or very small sample size, too short of a treatment period, and modification of concomitant antihypertensive therapy have prevented finding a definitive effect on blood pressure. From the available results, it appears consistent that statins may be useful in hypertensives with high serum total cholesterol, in those whose hypertension is not well controlled with antihypertensive agents even without high serum total cholesterol, in hypertensive subjects well controlled with antihypertensives without high serum cholesterol when they have high polymerase chain reaction levels, in those who require preventive measures because of other concomitant cardiovascular risk factors, or when they require secondary prevention. Future research could further characterize the impact of statin use alone or in combination with antihypertensive agents to delay the development of Stage 1 hypertension in prehypertension.

Current role of statins in the treatment of essential hypertension

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Hypertension and hyperlipidemia often co-exist and seem to be interrelated through common pathophysiological pathways. Drugs employing beneficial effects in both conditions could be advantageous in a concerted effective management of patients at high cardiovascular risk. Statins are known to enhance cardiovascular protection beyond their lipid-lowering capacity.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

MEDLINE was searched, up to January 2010, for studies assessing the effect of statin treatment on blood pressure control in various populations or animal models of hypertension. The potential mechanisms implicated in the putative antihypertensive action of statins are also reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

To learn about the role of statins as potential antihypertensive drugs in various populations. Clinical advice for the use of statins either as monotherapy or in combination with antihypertensive drugs in high-risk populations is also provided.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Statins may exert a mild, but clinically relevant, antihypertensive effect which is probably mediated by mechanisms that are independent of their lipid-lowering effects. Patients with high BP levels at baseline as well as those treated with ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers are expected to benefit more in this regard.

Blood pressure-lowering effects of statins: who benefits?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if the effect of statins on blood pressure is similar in patients grouped by use of antihypertensive medication, level of blood pressure, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).

METHODS

Blood pressure was compared in statins users (n = 995) and nonusers (n = 9536) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. The overall effect of statins and their interactions with antihypertensive medication, blood pressure, and HDL-C were estimated using multiple linear and quantile regression.

RESULTS

Adjusted systolic blood pressure was on average 1.8 mmHg lower in statins users than in nonusers (P = 0.05). Although statins had no significant effect among nonusers, it decreased systolic blood pressure by 3.3 mmHg among users of antihypertensive medication (interaction P = 0.02). The effect of statins on systolic blood pressure was similar in individuals with HDL-C levels above and below the median (49 mg/dl). Statins also lowered diastolic blood pressure by an average of 1.9 mmHg (P < 0.01), regardless of antihypertensive medication use. Among individuals with high HDL-C statins did not lower diastolic blood pressure, whereas in those with low HDL-C diastolic blood pressure was reduced by 3.4 mmHg. The effect of statins on systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased with higher blood pressure and changed little with adjustment for total cholesterol.

CONCLUSION

Statins lower blood pressure by cholesterol-independent mechanisms, and the reduction is larger in individuals with higher blood pressure and those with low HDL-C. Statins may be beneficial in preventing hypertension and may contribute to better blood pressure control in hypertensive patients.

Reduction in blood pressure with statins: results from the UCSD Statin Study, a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Some studies have suggested reductions in blood pressure (BP)with statin treatment, particularly in persons with hypertension. Randomized trial evidence is limited.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with equal allocation to simvastatin, 20 mg; pravastatin sodium,40 mg; or placebo for 6 months. Nine hundred seventy-three men and women without known cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol screening levels of 115 to 190 mg/dL, had assessment of systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP, respectively). Blood pressure values were compared for placebo vs statins by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Additional analyses were performed that (1) were confined to subjects with neither high baseline BP (SBP>140 mm Hg or DBP>90 mm Hg) nor receiving BP medications, to exclude groups in whom BP medications or medication changes may have influenced results, and (2) separately evaluated simvastatin and pravastatin (vs placebo). The time course of BP changes after statin initiation and the effect of stopping statins on BP were examined.

RESULTS

Statins modestly but significantly reduced BP relative to placebo,by 2.2 mm Hg for SBP (P=.02) and 2.4 mm Hg for DBP (P<.001) in ITT analysis. Blood pressure reductions ranged from 2.4 to 2.8 mm Hg for both SBP and DBP with both simvastatin and pravastatin, in those subjects with full follow-up, and without potential for influence by BP medications (ie, neither receiving nor meriting BP medications).

CONCLUSIONS

Reductions in SBP and DBP occurred with hydrophilic and lipophilic statins and extended to normotensive subjects. These modest effects may contribute to the reduced risk of stroke and cardiovascular events reported on statins. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00330980.

Are statins effective for simultaneously treating dyslipidemias and hypertension?

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are unequivocally useful for lowering cholesterol levels in patients with dyslipidemias characterized by elevations in total and/or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The beneficial effects of statins to lower serum cholesterol translate into significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition to lowering cholesterol levels, statins have other biological effects relevant to cardiovascular homeostasis including anti-inflammatory actions and downregulation of angiotensin type 1 receptor expression that contribute to improvements in endothelial function and arterial compliance. Since endothelial dysfunction and reduced arterial compliance are important pathophysiological determinants of essential hypertension, these actions of statins raise the possibility that statin therapy may be useful for simultaneously treating dyslipidemias and hypertension. However, it has been unclear whether statins are effective in lowering blood pressure. This controversy stems from a variety of methodological limitations including inadequate sample size, confounding effects of antihypertensive drugs, differences in blood pressure measurement techniques, and differences in patient populations. However, based on published results from both small clinical studies and large randomized clinical trials, statins modestly lower blood pressure in patients with high, but not normal, blood pressure, regardless of cholesterol level.

Statins and Blood Pressure: Is There an Effect or Not?

In addition to the lipid-lowering effects of statins, several basic and clinical studies in recent years have examined the effects of these agents on other cardiovascular parameters. Some of these studies investigated the general impact of a statin on blood pressure (BP) among various other factors, while others were specifically designed to determine this effect. Data from animal studies are conflicting but the majority of human studies in the field report a beneficial effect, and most available statin compounds are reported to lower BP levels. Recent clinical studies using ambulatory BP measurements support these findings. Although the exact actions of statins involved in this effect are unknown, several possible mechanisms can be hypothesized. This review summarizes existing data on the effect of statins on BP, aiming to give an overview of the current knowledge and to provide perspectives for future research in the field.

Do Statins Reduce Blood Pressure?

A meta-analysis was performed of the effect of 3hydroxy3methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) on blood pressure in humans including the randomized, controlled trials of statin therapy (20 trials and 828 patients) in which concomitant antihypertensive treatment (if any) remained unchanged throughout the study. A total of 291 and 272 patients were given a statin or placebo, respectively, in parallel group trials, whereas 265 took part in crossover trials receiving a statin and placebo (or probucol, in 1 trial). Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in patients on statin than in those on placebo or control hypolipidemic drug (mean difference: -1.9 mm Hg; 95% CI: -3.8 to -0.1). The effect was greater when the analysis was restricted to studies with a baseline systolic blood pressure >130 mm Hg (Delta systolic blood pressure: -4.0; 95% CI: -5.8 to -2.2 mm Hg). There was a trend for lower diastolic blood pressure in patients receiving statin therapy compared with control: -0.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.0 to 0.2) overall and -1.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.6 to 0.1) in studies with a baseline diastolic blood pressure >80 mm Hg. In general, the higher the baseline blood pressure, the greater the effect of statins on blood pressure (P=0.066 for systolic blood pressure and P=0.023 for diastolic blood pressure). The blood pressure response to statins was unrelated to age, changes in serum cholesterol, or length of the trial. In conclusion, statin therapy has a relatively small but statistically significant and clinically meaningful effect on blood pressure.

The role of statins in endothelial dysfunction in hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension and dyslipidemia frequently coexist, and endothelial dysfunction is associated with the pathophysiology of both atherosclerosis and hypertension. Evidence is convincing for an overlapping role of oxidative stress, renin-angiotensin system activation, and dyslipidemia in the genesis of endothelial dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ample experimental and human data suggest that common cellular pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension, increased vascular resistance, and plaque formation. Multiple interventions such as dietary modification, exercise, antioxidants, and antihypertensive drugs improve endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. Statin drugs are a cornerstone of dyslipidemia therapy. Studies have demonstrated that statins correct endothelial function and vascular stiffening and may be useful in reducing blood pressure to target levels.

SUMMARY

Statins may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of hypertension in patients with dyslipidemia and possibly those with normal cholesterol levels.

Effect of pravastatin on blood pressure in people with cardiovascular disease

Experimental evidence and several small studies in humans suggest that HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce blood pressure, perhaps through effects on endothelial function or by reducing inflammation. We tested the hypothesis that pravastatin would reduce blood pressure at 3 months and the risk of developing new hypertension over a follow-up period of 5 years. This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin 40 mg daily vs placebo in 4159 participants with previous myocardial infarction and total plasma cholesterol <240 mg/dl (6.2 mmol/l). The primary outcome was the unadjusted change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline to 3 months. We also considered systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and pulse pressure. Analysis of covariance was used to calculate the adjusted effect of treatment on change in these outcomes at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postrandomization, after controlling for potential confounders. Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted effect of treatment on incident hypertension (blood pressure > or =140/90 in those without known hypertension at baseline). This analysis included 4126/4159 (99.2%) participants for whom blood pressure was measured at baseline and during at least one follow-up visit. Median duration of follow-up was 57.8 months. The unadjusted and adjusted change in MAP, SBP, DBP or pulse pressure from baseline was not significantly different for pravastatin or placebo recipients at 3, 6, 12 or 24 months after randomization, or at last follow-up. Pravastatin did not reduce the adjusted risk of incident systolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.23), or incident diastolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.27). In summary, pravastatin 40 mg daily did not reduce blood pressure in survivors of myocardial infarction without overt hypercholesterolaemia.

The effects of lipid-lowering drug therapy on cardiovascular responsiveness in type 2 diabetic patients

Type 2 diabetes is associated with a high prevalence of dyslipidaemia and a high incidence of cardiovascular disease. Lipid lowering therapy with HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients, effects which are believed to be partly due to improvements in vascular function. The aetiology of abnormal vascular function in type 2 diabetics is likely to be multifactorial and the pattern of vascular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes may differ from that which occurs in non-diabetic patients with dyslipidaemia. Abnormalities in endothelium derived hyperpolarising factor (EDHF) mediated vasodilation in resistance vessels may be more prominent in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes than in non-diabetic patients with endothelial dysfunction. The effects of lipid lowering therapy on vascular responsiveness may differ in type 2 diabetic patients from those found in non-diabetic patients. Statin therapy does not appear to improve responses to endothelial dependent vasodilators in type 2 diabetics, but may alter the ratio between nitric oxide (NO) and EDHF mediated responses. Fibrate therapy improves flow mediated dilation of brachial arteries in type 2 diabetic patients, but only appears to improve endothelium dependant vasodilator responses in resistance vessels when given in conjunction with co-enzyme Q.

Pravastatin Decreases Blood Pressure in Hypertensive and Hypercholesterolemic Patients Receiving Antihypertensive Treatment

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that the lipid-lowering agents, statins, may help reduce blood pressure (BP). The goal of the present study was to characterize the effect of pravastatin on BP in hypercholesterolemic and hypertensive patients already receiving antihypertensive drugs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty-two patients with hypercholesterolemia were retrospectively studied before and after 3 months of treatment with pravastatin. Forty-four patients had hypertension (HT group) and were receiving antihypertensive treatment, while the remaining 38 patients were normotensive (NT group). Patients in the HT group were further subdivided into those with uncontrolled or controlled BP. Pravastatin treatment significantly reduced systolic BP (SBP) in the HT group (134+/-16 to 130+/-13 mmHg, p<0.005) but not in the NT group (124+/-10 to 123+/-9 mmHg, p=0.52), despite the fact that treatment significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both groups (HT group 178+/-27 to 132+/-17 mg/dl, p<0.0001; NT group 169+/-27 to 125+/-21 mg/dl, p<0.0001). Further, pravastatin significantly decreased SBP in the uncontrolled BP group (148+/-7 to 138+/-12 mmHg, p<0.005) but not in the controlled BP group (122+/-10 to 123+/-9 mmHg, p=0.72).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant use of statins and antihypertensive drugs could result in improved BP control in hypertensive patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Lowering of Elevated Ambulatory Blood Pressure by HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Controversial results were reported as to a possible blood pressure-lowering effect of statins. This may relate to methodological limitations (blood pressure measuring techniques) or to putative different effects of statins in different biologic conditions (cholesterol or blood pressure levels, age, etc). Patients with cholesterol>200 mg/dL and no previous statin treatment underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring and were classified as normotensives or hypertensives according to their ABP. They were randomized to statin (n=51, simvastatin or pravastatin, 10-20 mg/d; atorvastatin, 5-10 mg/d) or control treatment (n=23, soy lecithin, 20 g/d) for 2 months, after which ABP assessment was repeated. No consistent treatment-related reduction in ABP was observed in lecithin-treated patients (either hypertensives or normotensives) or in statin-treated normotensive patients (-0.7+/-5.1/-1.0+/-4.6 mm Hg, both P=ns). In contrast, statin-treated hypertensive patients showed lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-5.7+/-5.8/-3.5+/-3.9 mm Hg, both P<0.001), the effect was entirely accounted for by reduced daytime values with no change in nighttime values, and it was unrelated to the concomitant statin-induced cholesterol reduction. Statins moderately but significantly lower blood pressure in patients with high (but not with normal) ABP; the effect is confined to the daytime period and is unrelated to the extent of the cholesterol lowering.

Effects of cerivastatin on forearm vascular responses, blood pressure responsiveness and ambulatory blood pressure in type 2 diabetic men

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of cerivastatin therapy on forearm endothelial dependent acetylcholine (ACH) and independent (nitroprusside) vasodilator responses, blood pressure (BP) responses to intravenous infusions of angiotensin II (AII) and noradrenaline (NA) and on 24-h ambulatory BP recordings in type 2 diabetic men.

DESIGN

Eleven type 2 diabetic men aged 59 +/- 9 years with total cholesterol levels of 5.0 +/- 1.26 mmol/l, triglycerides of 2.23 mmol/l and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of 1.24 mmol/l completed a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial comparing 8 weeks of cerivastatin therapy (800 microg of nocte) with placebo. Forearm vascular resistance (FVR) responses to intrabrachial-arterial infusions of ACH (3-24 microg/min), nitroprusside (2-16 microg/min), the nitric oxide(NO) synthase inhibitor l-nitro-mono-methyl arginine (l-nmma) (8 micromol/min), ACH during l-NMMA infusion and BP responses to intravenous infusions of AII (12.5-50 ng/min) and NA (20-400 ng/min) were measured at the end of each treatment period. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP recordings were also performed.

RESULTS

FVR responses to ACH during l-NMMA infusion were significantly (p = 0.026) greater during cerivastatin than during placebo therapy. In contrast, FVR responses to ACH in the absence of NO synthase inhibition did not differ significantly between cerivastatin and placebo therapies (p = 0.81). FVR increased by 31.4 +/- 57.3% in response to l-NMMA infusion during cerivastatin therapy compared with 6.1 +/- 41.2% during placebo therapy (p = 0.20). FVR responses to nitroprusside did not differ between cerivastatin and placebo therapies (p = 0.28), nor did BP responses to AII (systolic BP, p = 0.99; diastolic BP, p = 0.98) or NA (systolic BP, p = 0.21; diastolic BP, p = 0.48). Mean 24-h BP was similar during cerivastatin (123 +/- 10 or 70 +/- 7 mmHg) and placebo therapies (129 +/- 11 or 74 +/- 7 mmHg) (systolic BP, p = 0.26; diastolic BP, p = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Cerivastatin increases FVR responses to ACH in type 2 diabetic men with mild dyslipidaemia but only following NO synthase inhibition. This may indicate an improvement in endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated responses.

Association between different lipid-lowering treatment strategies and blood pressure control in the Brisighella Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Small studies have suggested that lipid-lowering strategies, and particularly statins, could influence blood pressure (BP) control. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different lipid-lowering strategies on BP control of subjects with hypercholesterolemia who were enrolled in the prospective, population-based, longitudinal Brisighella Heart Study.

METHODS

A total of 1356 subjects with total cholesterol levels >or=239 mg/dL were randomly treated for 5 years (1988-1993) with 1 of these lipid-lowering regimens: low-fat diet, cholestyramine, gemfibrozil, or simvastatin. Participants were divided at baseline into 4 quartiles according to systolic BP level and examined for the percent change in systolic and diastolic BP during the 5 years of treatment.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in BP was observed in the 2 upper quartiles of systolic BP (>or=140 mm Hg) and was greater in subjects treated with cholesterol-lowering drugs who also had a greater reduction in plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The BP decrease was greater in patients treated with statin drugs and, among those treated with antihypertensive drugs, in subjects in the fourth quartile.

CONCLUSION

The use of lipid-lowering measures could significantly improve BP control in subjects with both hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. The reduction in BP seems to be enhanced in subjects treated with statins.

Effects of simvastatin on blood pressure in hypercholesterolemic patients: An open-label study in patients with hypertension or normotension

BACKGROUND

Simvastatin has been reported to improve endotheliumdependent vascular relaxation in patients with hypercholesterolemia. The consequent decrease in arterial stiffness might be associated with a decrease in blood pressure (BP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether simvastatin 20 and 40 mg/d have an effect on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and, if so, whether the effect is dose dependent and/or is related to the changes in the serum lipid profile.

METHODS

This 6-month, open-label study was conducted at the Lipid Clinics of the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Milan, Maggiore Hospital IRCCS, and of the Department of Internal Medicine 1, G. Salvini Hospital, Garbagnate Milanese (Milan, Italy). Patients aged 18 to 80 years with primary hypercholesterolemia who were following a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet for >2 months before the study were enrolled. Patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II guidelines, were given simvastatin 20 mg (tablet) QD for 3 months, and those at low risk for CVD continued with diet only for 3 months (controls). Efficacy variables included body weight, SBP, DBP, and serum lipid levels (total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], and triglycerides [TG]). At 3 months, patients in the simvastatin + diet group who reached their therapeutic goal continued to receive simvastatin 20 mg/d for 3 additional months. In simvastatintreated patients who were normotensive at baseline or who became normotensive at 3 months but who did not reach the therapeutic goal, the simvastatin dosage was increased to 40 mg/d. Patients in both groups who remained hypertensive at 3 months were switched to hypotensive therapy. In the diet-only group, patients who were formerly normotensive or who became normotensive at 3 months but who did not reach their therapeutic goal continued with diet only or started lipid-lowering therapy. All other patients in the diet-only group continued to be treated with diet only, for 3 additional months. Efficacy variables were measured again at 6 months. Tolerability of simvastatin was assessed at each visit using patient interview and measurement of serum aminotransferase and creatine phosphokinase levels.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 222 patients (132 women, 90 men; mean [SEM] age, 53.9 [0.95] years [range, 23-76 years]); 115 high-risk patients (57 with untreated stage 1 hypertension) were assigned to the simvastatin + diet group, and 107 low-risk patients (29 with untreated stage 1 hypertension) were assigned to the diet-only group. In the simvastatin group, after 3 months of therapy, mean SBP was decreased by 3.9 (1.49) mm Hg (change, -2.9%), mean DBP decreased by 3.0 (0.87) mm Hg (change, -3.7%), mean TC decreased by 90.6 (3.98) mg/dL (change, -27.0%), mean LDL-C decreased by 88.9 (3.88) mg/dL (change, -35.6%), and mean TG decreased by 26.3 (7.34) mg/dL (change, -15.8%) (all, P < 0.001). Mean HDL-C increased by 3.6 (1.16) mg/dL (change, 6.9%; P < 0.001). The BP-lowering effect was found only in patients with hypertension at baseline (n = 57); in these patients, mean SBP decreased by 7.2 (2.44) mm Hg (change, -4.8%; P < 0.005 vs baseline) and DBP decreased by 4.8 (1.29) mm Hg (change, -5.6%; P < 0.001 vs baseline). Also in the simvastatin group, 26 patients (22.6%) achieved their target SBP/DBP. In patients with normotension at baseline (n = 58), neither SBP nor DBP was changed significantly (changes, -0.8 [1.65] and -1.4 [1.15] mm Hg, respectively [-0.6% and -1.8%, respectively]). The changes in serum lipid levels were similar between hypertensive and normotensive patients in the simvastatin group. Forty-one patients (18 hypertensive and 23 normotensive at baseline) were treated with simvastatin 40 mg/d plus diet between months 3 and 6. At 6 months, no further significant decrease was observed in mean BP. In contrast, the expected dose-dependent response was observed for TC and LDL-C levels. In the diet-only group, no significant changes occurred in BP or serum lipid levels. Changes in BP, TC, LDL-C, TG, and HDL-C were significantly greater in the simvastatin + diet group than in the diet-only group (all, P < 0.001). Body weight did not change significantly in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of patients with hypercholesterolemia, the starting dosage of simvastatin (20 mg/d) was associated with reductions in SBP and DBP within 3 months of treatment in patients with hypertension, and this effect was independent of the lipid-lowering properties of the drug. Although the decrease in BP was modest, it is likely clinically relevant. Further studies on this topic are advisable.

Interactions between hypercholesterolemia and hypertension: implications for therapy

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of the present review is to summarize the available information that supports the therapeutic role for the concomitant and aggressive management of hypercholesterolemia and hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

A concomitant management of hypertension and high-plasma cholesterol has been suggested to significantly reduce the extent of cardiovascular complications. Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) have been demonstrated to be very effective in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia where they reduce the rate of coronary and cerebrovascular complications. This benefit is largely extended to the hypertensive population. Very recently some studies have demonstrated the capacity of statins to improve blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and this effect, which has not been demonstrated for the other lipid-lowering drugs, could be very important in the clinical management of overall cardiovascular risk.

SUMMARY

These findings confirm that the prevention of cardiovascular diseases should be based on the aggressive treatment of many different risk factors. This is particularly true for patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia for whom the negative interaction between risk factors could be effectively managed by an appropriate choice of both antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs.

Intensive cholesterol reduction lowers blood pressure and large artery stiffness in isolated systolic hypertension

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the effects of intensive cholesterol reduction on large artery stiffness and blood pressure in normolipidemic patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH).

BACKGROUND

Isolated systolic hypertension is associated with elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and is primarily due to large artery stiffening, which has been independently related to cardiovascular mortality. Cholesterol-lowering therapy has been efficacious in reducing arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and thus may be beneficial in ISH.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study design, 22 patients with stage I ISH received three months of atorvastatin therapy (80 mg/day) and three months of placebo treatment. Systemic arterial compliance was measured noninvasively using carotid applanation tonometry and Doppler velocimetry of the ascending aorta.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin treatment reduced total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels by 36 +/- 2% (p < 0.001), 48 +/- 3% (p < 0.001) and 23 +/- 5% (p = 0.003), respectively, and increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol by 7 +/- 3% (p = 0.03). Systemic arterial compliance was higher after treatment (placebo vs. atorvastatin: 0.36 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.05 ml/mm Hg, p = 0.03). Brachial systolic blood pressure was lower after atorvastatin treatment (154 +/- 3 vs. 148 +/- 2 mm Hg, p = 0.03), as were mean (111 +/- 2 vs. 107 +/- 2 mm Hg, p = 0.04) and diastolic blood pressures (83 +/- 1 vs. 81 +/- 2 mm Hg, p = 0.04). There was a trend toward a reduction in pulse pressure (71 +/- 3 vs. 67 +/- 2 mm Hg, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive cholesterol reduction may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with ISH and normal lipid levels, through a reduction in large artery stiffness.

Effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension and primary hypercholesterolemia

Certain hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, ie, statins, may cause vasodilation by restoring the endothelial dysfunction that frequently accompanies hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Several studies have found that a blood pressure reduction is associated with the use of statins, but conclusive evidence from controlled trials is lacking. After an 8-week placebo and diet run-in period, 30 persons with moderate hypercholesterolemia and untreated hypertension (total cholesterol 6.29+/-0.52 mmol/L, systolic and diastolic blood pressure 149+/-6 and 97+/-2 mm Hg) were randomized in a double-blind manner to placebo or pravastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) in a crossover design. In 25 participants who completed the 32-week trial, pravastatin decreased total and LDL cholesterol (both -1.09 mmol/L, P=0.001), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-8 and -5 mm Hg, both P=0.001), and pulse pressure (-3 mm Hg, P=0.011) and blunted the blood pressure increase caused by the cold pressor test (-4 mm Hg, P=0.005) compared with placebo. It also reduced the level of circulating endothelin-1 (P=0.001). The blood pressure results were virtually unchanged in stratified analyses according to gender and age and in intention-to-treat analyses that included the 5 patients who dropped out of the study. When the participants were taking either placebo or pravastatin, blood pressure was not significantly correlated with total or LDL cholesterol or with circulating endothelin-1. Pravastatin decreases systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures in persons with moderate hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. This antihypertensive effect may contribute to the documented health benefits of certain statins.