Slowly acting calcium antagonists and their merits

Effects of lovastatin on the pharmacokinetics of nicardipine in rats

It has been reported that both nicardipine and lovastatin are substrates of both the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A subfamily and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and P-gp transport is unlikely to be a significant factor. Thus, the effects of oral lovastatin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral nicardipine were investigated in rats. Nicardipine was administered intravenously (4 mg/kg) and orally (12 mg/kg) with 0 (control), 0.3 and 1 mg/kg of oral lovastatin to rats. Lovastatin was administered 30 min before nicardipine administration. After intravenous administration of nicardipine with 0, 0.3 and 1  mg/kg of lovastatin, the total areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCs) of nicardipine were not changed by lovastatin. However, after oral administration of nicardipine with 1 mg/kg of oral lovastatin, the AUC of nicardipine was significantly greater (by 67.4%), and the extent of absolute oral bioavailability (F) of nicardipine was increased (by 38.5%). The above data suggest that lovastatin did not considerably inhibit the metabolism of nicardipine via the hepatic CYP3A subfamily, but inhibited intestinal P-gp and/or the CYP3A subfamily.

Effects of morin on the pharmacokinetics of nicardipine after oral and intravenous administration of nicardipine in rats

This study investigated the effects of orally administered morin, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), on the pharmacokinetics of orally and intravenously administered nicardipine in rats. Nicardipine is reportedly a substrate for CYP3A4 and P-gp. Nicardipine was administered orally (12 mgkg−1) with or without orally administered morin (1.5, 7.5 and 15 mgkg−1), and intravenously (4 mgkg−1) with or without orally administered morin (7.5 and 15 mgkg−1). In the presence of morin, the pharmacokinetic parameters of nicardipine were significantly altered in the oral group but not in the intravenous group, suggesting that CYP3A-mediated metabolism of nicardipine in the liver is not significantly inhibited by morin. The presence of 7.5 and 15 mgkg−1 of morin significantly increased (P< 0.01, 67.8–112%) the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and the peak plasma concentration (P< 0.01, 53.5–93.1%) of orally administered nicardipine. The presence of 7.5 and 15 mgkg−1 of morin significantly decreased (P < 0.01, 40.4–52.8%) the total body clearance of orally administered nicardipine compared with the control group. The enhanced oral bioavailability of nicardipine suggests that intestinal-mediated CYP3A4 metabolism and P-gp-mediated efflux of nicardipine are inhibited by morin. Based on these results, concomitant use of morin or morin-containing dietary supplements with nicardipine may require close monitoring for potential drug interactions.

Evolving role of calcium antagonists in the management of hypertension

What, if anything, should physicians make of these apparently disparate hazards in a group of drugs that they prescribe so widely? The authors, and many of our colleagues, still believe that most patients clearly benefit from the judicious use of calcium antagonists. Reports of several large, powered prospective, randomized outcome studies including ALLHAT commend the use of long-acting calcium antagonists that, by virtue of their ability to attain more gradual and sustained plasma levels, do not evoke reactive sympathetic activation and consequently are safe. Concomitantly, such formulations should promote increased patient compliance and thereby favorably influence hypertension-related morbidity and mortality.

De la première à la quatrième génération de dihydropyridines : vers une meilleure efficacité et une meilleure tolérance

Dihydropyridines are among the most widely used drugs for the management of cardiovascular disease. Introduced in the 1960s, dihydropyridines have undergone several changes to optimise their efficacy and safety. Four generations of dihydropyridines are now available. The first-generation (nicardipine) agents have proven efficacy against hypertension. However, because of their short duration and rapid onset of vasodilator action, these drugs were more likely to be associated with adverse effects. The pharmaceutical industry responded to this problem by designing slow-release preparations of the short-acting drugs. These new preparations (second generation) allowed better control of the therapeutic effect and a reduction in some adverse effects. Pharmacodynamic innovation with regard to the dihydropyridines began with the third-generation agents (amlodipine, nitrendipine). These drugs exhibit more stable pharmacokinetics, are less cardioselective and, consequently, well tolerated in patients with heart failure. Highly lipophilic dihydropyridines are now available (lercanidipine, lacidipine). These fourth-generation agents provide a real degree of therapeutic comfort in terms of stable activity, a reduction in adverse effects and a broad therapeutic spectrum, especially in myocardial ischaemia and potentially in congestive heart failure.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of 10 and 20 mg lercanidipine in patients with stable effort angina: effects on myocardial ischemia and heart rate variability

We evaluated the anti-ischemic action and the effects on autonomic function of lercanidipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, in 25 patients with stable effort angina in a randomized, double-blind, parallel trial. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients entered a 2-week treatment period with 10 or 20 mg of lercanidipine once daily. During the placebo run-in period and at the study end, the patients underwent clinical examination, electrocardiography, exercise tests, 24-hour Holter electrocardiography for long-term heart rate variability evaluation, and short-term spectral analysis of heart rate and systolic blood pressure variability and plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels at rest and during tilting. Results showed that time to onset of ST segment depression > or =1 mm was significantly increased by both drug doses. No significant change was recorded in the average hourly heart rate after treatment with both 10 and 20 mg of lercanidipine. During the 24-hour recordings, no significant change was observed in low-frequency power, high-frequency power, or low frequency/high frequency. In the standing position, there was a significant increase in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentration in both groups, and no change in the supine position after 10 and 20 mg of lercanidipine. When considering short-term heart rate variability, no significant difference was observed in either treatment group in low frequency, high frequency, or their ratio on electrocardiographic R-R spectra. The blood pressure spectral component was also unchanged. In conclusion, lercanidipine is effective in reducing ischemia in patients with stable effort angina. Moreover, lercanidipine does not cause adrenergic activation, which is the main mechanism hypothesized to explain the negative effect on cardiovascular mortality assigned to short-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonists.

Differential effects of a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (temocapril) and a long-acting calcium antagonist (amlodipine) on ventricular ectopic beats in older hypertensive patients

We studied differences in the effects of a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (temocapril) and a long-acting calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) on ventricular ectopic beats (VEB) in relation to sympathetic nerve activity in 46 patients with essential hypertension. We performed 24-h Holter electrocardiography and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring simultaneously, and examined blood samples during the baseline, temocapril and amlodipine treatment periods. The ambulatory BP was lower in the amlodipine period than in the temocapril period. However, the number of VEB was significantly increased in the amlodipine period compared to that in the baseline period (11.9 vs. 7.4/day, p<0.05). In the temocapril period, the number of VEB was not significantly increased compared to that in the baseline period (8.6 vs. 7.4/day, p=0.30). Ambulatory heart rate (HR) was significantly increased in the amlodipine period compared to that in the baseline period (24-h HR: 70 vs. 66 bpm, p<0.001; daytime HR: 75 vs. 71 bpm, p<0.001; nocturnal HR: 60 vs. 58 bpm, p<0.05). Plasma norepinephrine (NE) also was significantly increased in the amlodipine period compared to that in the baseline period (457 vs. 369 pg/ml, p<0.001). However, when patients receiving amlodipine were divided into a high dose group (8.6 +/- 1.2 mg/day) and a low dose group (4.6 +/- 1.2 mg/day), increases in HR and plasma NE levels were found only in the high dose group. These results indicate that amlodipine is effective at lowering BP in older hypertensives, although it may increase VEB, especially when given at a high dose.

The Growing Role of Calcium Antagonists in Treating Hypertension in the Elderly

Increasing attention has focused on the magnitude of hypertension in the elderly, with recent data indicating that it afflicts over 50% of people greater than 65 years of age. Recent studies have clearly demonstrated that treatment of isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension in older patients confers substantive protection against hypertension induced morbidity and mortality, to an extent greater than previously appreciated. The results of the recent Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial have demonstrated a striking decrease in the occurrence of strokes, as well as heart failure and all cardiac events in the active treatment group. Because a long acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist was used in the Syst-Eur trial, it is reasonable and appropriate to recommend a long acting calcium antagonist as one of the preferred agents in the management of isolated systolic hypertensive (ISH) patients. Recent attention has also focused on the importance of formulation and pharmacokinetics as a determinant of cardiovascular risk. It is clear that the newer slow release formulations and intrinsically long acting calcium antagonists are to be preferred. By virtue of their ability to attain more gradual and sustained plasma levels, they do not evoke reactive sympathetic activation. Concomitantly, such formulations should promote increased patient compliance and thereby favorably influence hypertension related morbidity and mortality. (c)2000 by CVRR, Inc.

Pretreatment with enalaprilat blunts nicardipine-induced sympathetic activation in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats

OBJECTIVE

We measured changes in heart rate and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity in conscious, spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats during acute blood pressure lowering with nicardipine, enalaprilat and concomitant nicardipine/enalaprilat administration. In a second experiment, we determined the effect of these drugs on arterial baroreflex control of lumbar sympathetic nerve activity.

METHODS

Male spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats were instrumented for continuous heart rate, blood pressure and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity recordings. Twenty-four hours later in conscious rats, nicardipine, enalaprilat and enalaprilat/nicardipine were infused at sufficient doses to reduce mean arterial pressure by 20 mmHg over 30 min. In a second experiment with the same drugs, baroreflex curves relating lumbar sympathetic nerve activity to mean arterial pressure were analyzed using a logistic curve-fitting program.

RESULTS

Blood pressure reductions induced by the three infusion protocols were similar in magnitude and profile. In both spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats, nicardipine induced greater reflexive increases in lumbar sympathetic nerve activity than enalaprilat Pretreatment with a reduced dose of enalaprilat blunted subsequent nicardipine-induced sympathetic activation. Nicardipine tended to induce greater increases in the heart rate than enalaprilat, but overall, the difference was not significant Baroreflex sensitivity was similar regardless of drug class. Nicardipine significantly increased minimum nerve activity compared with enalaprilat in spontaneously hypertensive rats (similar trends were observed in Wistar-Kyoto rats). This increase in minimum nerve activity was blunted by enalaprilat

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that pretreatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor minimizes dihydropyridine-induced increases in sympathetic activity. This beneficial effect is attributable to suppression of minimum sympathetic activity. These data suggest that co-administration of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor may improve the long-term cardiovascular benefit of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.

Extraction and quantification of nicardipine in human plasma

A novel simple method of extraction, separation, identification and quantification of nicardipine in human plasma samples was completely studied. The human plasma samples were initially purified by solid-phase extraction (SPE) using a C18 cartridge. The extracted samples were separated and nicardipine present in the samples was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a reversed-phase C18 column employing a mobile phase consisting of 60% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.02 M NaH2PO4 with pH of 6.3 and a variable wavelength UV detector set at 254 nm. The recovery of nicardipine from plasma samples using selective SPE was 91+/-6.0% and had less interfering compounds in the HPLC analysis compared to the use of liquid-liquid (L/L) extraction. In the HPLC analysis, examining the effect of pH values of the mobile phase on the capacity factor (k') of nicardipine revealed a method for selecting a critical k' value of nicardipine to eliminate interfering peaks near the peak specific to the analyte. This method for quantification of nicardipine in human plasma samples was suitable for studying the pharmacokinetic profile of nicardipine administered as an intravenous bolus to cardiac surgical patients.

Are calcium antagonists proarrhythmic?

Clinical and experimental studies demonstrate that calcium (Ca2+) overload in myocardial cells is an important factor in the genesis of various serious arrhythmias. Calcium antagonists block voltage-dependent channels and thus reduce entry of Ca2+ into heart cells. Because of their specificity for atrioventricular nodal cells, verapamil and diltiazem are used clinically to treat supraventricular arrhythmias involving transmission in the atrioventricular node. These two drugs and the dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium antagonists have been shown to prevent ventricular ischemic and reperfusion arrhythmias in the laboratory. Despite these data indicating that calcium antagonists are antiarrhythmic, a recent controversy has raised the possibility that certain calcium antagonists are unsafe to use, especially for patients with coronary heart disease. Proarrhythmia has been proposed to be a mechanism contributing to potentially adverse outcomes. Although excessive concentrations of verapamil and diltiazem may cause sino-atrial nodal asystole and varying degrees of atrioventricular block, there is little direct evidence that this contributes to significant proarrhythmia, for example, ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Nonetheless, although it appears paradoxical that agents which block the entry of Ca2+ into heart cells may be considered arrhythmogenic, there are circumstances under which dosage with certain calcium antagonists potentially leads to myocardial Ca2+ overload. For example, bouts of neurohormonal activation brought about by calcium antagonist-induced abrupt reductions in blood pressure may be accompanied each time by significant beta-adrenergic-enhanced influx of Ca2+ through the L-type cardiac calcium channels. This elevates the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and disturbs Ca2+ regulation, especially in diseased hearts whose intracellular Ca2+ regulation has already been compromised, and might induce alterations in cardiac electrical activity. In the present article, interactions among cardiac calcium channels, classes of calcium antagonists, and specific formulations of certain antagonists are considered with respect to directly induced ventricular arrhythmogenesis. Indirect potentially proarrhythmic actions of the calcium antagonists are also discussed. We outline some of the many questions that remain to be answered with respect to the actions of DHP on the heart including that of whether beta-adrenergic stimulation modifies the degree of cardiac Ca2+ channel inhibition by DHP-type calcium antagonists.