The inflammatory theory of asthma

Animal models for testing anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma

In the first part of this review the important role played by the bronchial hyperreactivity caused by chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation in asthma is described. Deliberately, more emphasis is placed on the role of pro-inflammatory eosinophils, alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and platelets rather than on mast cells and neutrophils or the numerous mediators. The reason for this is that, on account of the large number of mediators and their multitude of functions and interactions in asthma, antagonism of a specific mediator will probably not be clinically relevant for optimally effective curative treatment of asthma. Inhibition of the infiltration and activation of pro-inflammatory cells is likely to be a more successful approach. In the second part, various animal models of bronchial hyperreactivity, which could be suitable for testing anti-asthmatic drugs, are discussed. Most animal models pay too little attention to chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation as the cause of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma. In various models the bronchial hyperreactivity is provoked by a single mediator and this leads to selection of specific antagonists which are unlikely to be of clinical benefit. Rats appear to have certain advantages over guinea-pigs as experimental animals for bronchial hyperreactivity.

Accumulation of CD8+ cells after immunization with soluble antigen

Rats were immunized with ovalbumin, either subcutaneously or by aerosol inhalation. The lymphocyte distribution in lymph nodes, peripheral blood, and spleen was investigated by flow cytometry after labelling with T pan (OX19 and W3/13), T helper lymphocytes (W3/25), T cytotoxic/suppressor lymphocytes (OX8), kappa light chain (MAR 18-5), or MHC class II (OX6) monoclonal antibodies. The influence of the neurotoxic agent capsaicin on the lymphocyte distribution was also analysed. Subcutaneous immunization resulted in an increased number of OX8+ cells in mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen, and peripheral blood but not in the draining lymph nodes, axillary, brachial, and mediastinal lymph nodes. The number of positive cells for the other cell markers used were not affected by immunization. The neuromodulatory effect of capsaicin had no effect on the lymphocyte distribution. The results showed that the type of immunization used, low amounts of antigen without adjuvant given during a prolonged period, selectively induced OX8+ cells. The patterns were unaffected by neuromodulation using capsaicin.