Expanding Application of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis Due to Advances in Design and Improved Post-operative Therapeutic Strategies

Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) without contact lens wearing in end-stage corneal disease: The APEC experience

PURPOSE

To report the visual outcomes and survival analysis of keratoprosthesis without contact lens wearing in a tertiary eye care hospital in Mexico City, Asociación Para Evitar La Ceguera (APEC, Coyoacán, México).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort with survival analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-three eyes (22 patients) received KPro type 1 between 2015 and 2020 with a follow-up time of three years.

METHODS

We included analyzed data about past medical history, preoperative diagnosis, best-spectacle visual acuity (BSCVA), postoperative complications and retention rate. Univariate, bivariate and survival analysis were performed and reported.

RESULTS

The mean age was 58 ± 13.5 years (SD). 60.86% were male patients (14 eyes). Twelve-eyes (52%) achieved a BSCVA of 20/200 or better in the first and second year of follow-up. At 3 years, only 35% achieved 20/200 or better (BSCVA). Retention rate of Boston type 1 KPro was 87% (20 eyes) at 3 years follow-up. The most common complication was retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) which occurred in 9 eyes (39.1%), followed by corneal melting in 7 eyes (30.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the results of a retrospective cohort of twenty-three eyes (22 patients) who were implanted with a Boston type 1 KPro without contact lens wearing to treat corneal blindness. BSCVA improved significantly in most patients achieving 20/200 or better at the 2-year follow-up. Retention rate was 87%, with the presence of RPM as the most common complication.

Mechanical, optical, chemical, and biological evaluations of fish scale-derived scaffold for corneal replacements: A systematic review

Corneal blindness is commonly treated through corneal replacement with allogeneic corneal donors, which may face shortage. Regarding this issue, xenogeneic alternatives are explored. Fish scale-derived scaffolds (FSSs) are among the alternatives due to the lower risk of infection and abundant sources of raw materials. Unfortunately, the information about mechanical, optical, chemical, and biological performances of FSSs for corneal replacements is still scattered, as well as about the fabrication techniques. This study aims to gather scattered pieces of information about the mentioned performances and fabrication techniques of FSSs for corneal replacements. Sorted from four scientific databases and using the PRISMA checklist, eleven relevant articles are collected. FSSs are commonly fabricated using decellularization and decalcification processes, generating FSSs with parallel multilayers or crossed fibers with topographic microchannels. In the collected studies, similar mechanical properties of FSSs to native tissues are discovered, as well as good transparency, light remittance, but poorer refractive indexes than native tissues. Biological evaluations mostly discuss histology, cell proliferations, and immune responses on FSSs, while only a few studies examine the vascularization. No studies completed comprehensive evaluations on the four properties. The current progress of FSS developments demonstrates the potential of FSS use for corneal replacements.

Replace or Regenerate? Diverse Approaches to Biomaterials for Treating Corneal Lesions

The inner structures of the eye are protected by the cornea, which is a transparent membrane exposed to the external environment and subjected to the risk of lesions and diseases, sometimes resulting in impaired vision and blindness. Several eye pathologies can be treated with a keratoplasty, a surgical procedure aimed at replacing the cornea with tissues from human donors. Even though the success rate is high (up to 90% for the first graft in low-risk patients at 5-year follow-up), this approach is limited by the insufficient number of donors and several clinically relevant drawbacks. Alternatively, keratoprosthesis can be applied in an attempt to restore minimal functions of the cornea: For this reason, it is used only for high-risk patients. Recently, many biomaterials of both natural and synthetic origin have been developed as corneal substitutes to restore and replace diseased or injured corneas in low-risk patients. After illustrating the traditional clinical approaches, the present paper aims to review the most innovative solutions that have been recently proposed to regenerate the cornea, avoiding the use of donor tissues. Finally, innovative approaches to biological tissue 3D printing and xenotransplantation will be mentioned.

Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty and keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

To compare visual and glaucoma outcomes in patients with known glaucoma after a penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or a Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 (KPro) as a second corneal replacement procedure.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Charts of 141 eyes that underwent either a PKP or KPro at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal after one failed PKP from 2008 to 2020 were reviewed. Forty-six eyes with preoperative glaucoma were included.

METHODS

Data collected included demographics, indication for the initial surgery, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), concurrent ocular disorders, number of glaucoma medications, need for glaucoma surgery, cup-to-disc ratios (CDRs), mean RNFL thickness, and visual field (VF) characteristics. Primary outcomes were glaucoma progression trends. Secondary outcomes were visual outcomes and need for additional procedures.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 4.7 years for the PKP and 7.3 for the KPro group (P<0.007). 30.6% of PKP compared to 70.5% of KPro patients were diagnosed with glaucoma preoperatively. Glaucoma worsened similarly in both groups; this is based on an analysis of the number of glaucoma medications, CDR, need for glaucoma surgery, and characteristic VF changes. Patients in the PKP group required significantly more regrafts than patients in the KPro group (31.8 vs. 8.3%; P=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative diagnosis of glaucoma does not preclude KPro implantation. In glaucomatous eyes, the disease progressed similarly in both groups. Since both procedures increase the risk of worsening glaucoma, close follow-up is recommended. KPro may decrease the need for further corneal transplantation surgery.

Use of PROSE for long-term ocular surface support in patients with a permanent keratoprosthesis

Purpose

To describe the long-term outcome of the use of a specialized scleral lens known as a prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) device to support the ocular surface in patients with a Boston Keratoprosthesis (KPro) Type I. All patients in this series were unable to pursue continuous wear of a bandage soft contact lens (BSCL) - a critical aspect of post KPro implantation management intended to protect the corneal carrier tissue from desiccation and stromal melting.

Observations

Four eyes of four patients with a Boston KPro Type I were included. All four had failed BSCL wear and were instead treated with PROSE device wear. All four patients had underlying diagnoses associated with a diseased ocular surface (Stevens-Johnson Syndrome [one patient], prior failed penetrating keratoplasty associated with herpes zoster-related neurotrophic keratopathy [one patient], and prior failed penetrating keratoplasty associated with severe dry eye disease [two patients]). Causes of failure of BSCL wear included poor retention, discomfort, and poor vision. PROSE device wear was initiated on average seven and a half (range four to 14) months post-KPro implantation. The wear schedule varied and ranged from waking-hour wear only to 24-h wear. The average duration of device wear was 59.3 (range 28-103) months. Two patients exhibited persistent corneal epithelial defect formation with waking-hour wear, which resolved within 10 days with 24-h device wear. All patients exhibited improvement in vision with PROSE compared to baseline, averaging six and a half (range six to eight) lines of improvement in Snellen acuity, and all patients reported increased comfort. There was no incidence of microbial keratitis, KPro device instability, or other complication throughout the duration of device wear.

Conclusions and Importance

This report offers a novel alternate approach to long-term support of the ocular surface in patients with a Boston KPro who fail standard continuous BSCL wear.

The Boston Keratoprosthesis-The First 50 Years: Some Reminiscences

Millions of people worldwide are bilaterally blind due to corneal diseases including infectious etiologies, trauma, and chemical injuries. While corneal transplantation can successfully restore sight in many, corneal graft survival decreases in eyes with chronic inflammation and corneal vascularization. Additionally, the availability of donor cornea material can be limited, especially in underdeveloped countries where corneal blindness may also be highly prevalent. Development of methods to create and implant an artificial cornea (keratoprosthesis)may be the only option for patients whose eye disease is not suitable for corneal transplantation or who live in regions where corneal transplantation is not possible. The Boston keratoprosthesis (B-KPro) is the most commonly implanted keratoprosthesis worldwide, having restored vision in thousands of patients. This article describes the initial design of the B-KPro and the modifications that have been made over many years. Additionally, some of the complications of surgical implantation and long-term care challenges, particularly complicating inflammation and glaucoma, are discussed. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Vision Science, Volume 8 is September 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Graphene-Lined Porous Gelatin Glycidyl Methacrylate Hydrogels: Implications for Tissue Engineering

Despite rigorous research, inferior mechanical properties and structural homogeneity are the main challenges constraining hydrogel's suturability to host tissue and limiting its clinical applications. To tackle those, we developed a reverse solvent interface trapping method, in which organized, graphene-coated microspherical cavities were introduced into a hydrogel to create heterogeneity and make it suturable. To generate those cavities, (i) graphite exfoliates to graphene sheets, which spread at the water/ heptane interfaces of the microemulsion, (ii) heptane fills the microspheres coated by graphene, and (iii) a cross-linkable hydrogel dissolved in water fills the voids. Cross-linking solidifies such microemulsion to a strong, suturable, permanent hybrid architecture, which has better mechanical properties, yet it is biocompatible and supports cell adhesion and proliferation. These properties along with the ease and biosafety of fabrication suggest the potential of this strategy to enhance tissue engineering outcomes by generating various suturable scaffolds for biomedical applications, such as donor cornea carriers for Boston keratoprosthesis (BK).

Vitreoretinal Complications in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of vitreoretinal complications, treatment modalities, and the visual outcomes in a large cohort of eyes that underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

132 eyes of 114 patients who underwent KPro implantation at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal from 2008 to 2017 were included with at least 1 year follow-up. Charts were reviewed and data was collected, including demographics, initial corneal indication for surgery, posterior segment complications, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 68.2 months and 61.4% of eyes developed postoperative vitreoretinal complications (VRC). The most common VRC was RPM formation (38.6%, n=51) followed by RD (15.2%, n=20), CME (12.1%, n=16), ERM (9.8%, n=13), endophthalmitis (9.1%, n=12), sterile vitritis (7.6%, n=10), vitreous hemorrhage (6.8%, n=9), choroidal detachment (3.0%, n=4) and central retinal vein occlusion (0.7%, n=1). BCVA improved in the no VRC group from 1.74 ± 0.33 logMAR to 1.33±0.83 logMAR and in the VRC group from 1.74±0.36 logMAR to 1.52±0.83 logMAR, without any statistically significant intergroup differences (p=0.231). RD was the only significant complication associated with poorer visual outcomes (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Potentially blinding secondary complications occur in the majority of patients and frequent monitoring is necessary, specifically in the early and intermediate postoperative periods. This study evidenced significant improvements in visual outcomes of KPro eyes, including those that developed postoperative vitreoretinal complications.

Infectious Keratitis After Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation

PURPOSE

To identify the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of infectious keratitis after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (kpro) implantation.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of kpro procedures at the Stein Eye Institute and the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal between May 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018. Data were collected regarding ocular history, operative details, postoperative management, microbiologic profile, treatment, and outcomes. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) were used to evaluate for an association between risk factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 349 kpro procedures were performed in 295 eyes of 268 patients. Fifty-seven cases of presumed infectious keratitis were identified after 53 procedures (15.2%) in 50 eyes (16.9%) of 49 patients (18.3%). The incidences of culture-positive bacterial and fungal keratitis were 0.014 and 0.004 per eye-year, respectively. Persistent corneal epithelial defect formation (P < 0.001) and cicatricial disease (HR: 1.98, 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.83) were associated with a significantly higher incidence of infectious keratitis. For the 53 cases with a known outcome, medical therapy achieved resolution of infection in 34 cases (64.2%), whereas kpro explantation was required in 19 cases (35.8%). Infectious keratitis was associated with an increased risk for kpro explantation (HR: 3.09, 95% confidence interval, 1.92-4.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Infectious keratitis develops in approximately 17% of eyes after kpro implantation, with a higher rate of culture-positive bacterial than fungal keratitis. The observed rate of microbial keratitis suggests the need for additional topical antimicrobial prophylaxis in eyes at higher risk, such as those with preexisting cicatricial disease or postoperative persistent corneal epithelial defect formation.

Electron Beam Sterilization of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)-Physicochemical and Biological Aspects

Electron beam (E-beam) irradiation is an attractive and efficient method for sterilizing clinically implantable medical devices made of natural and/or synthetic materials such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). As ionizing irradiation can affect the physicochemical properties of PMMA, understanding the consequences of E-beam sterilization on the intrinsic properties of PMMA is vital for clinical implementation. A detailed assessment of the chemical, optical, mechanical, morphological, and biological properties of medical-grade PMMA after E-beam sterilization at 25 and 50 kiloGray (kGy) is reported. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry studies indicate that E-beam irradiation has minimal effect on the chemical properties of the PMMA at these doses. While 25 kGy irradiation does not alter the mechanical and optical properties of the PMMA, 50 kGy reduces the flexural strength and transparency by 10% and 2%, respectively. Atomic force microscopy demonstrates that E-beam irradiation reduces the surface roughness of PMMA in a dose dependent manner. Live-Dead, AlamarBlue, immunocytochemistry, and complement activation studies show that E-beam irradiation up to 50 kGy has no adverse effect on the biocompatibility of the PMMA. These findings suggest that E-beam irradiation at 25 kGy may be a safe and efficient alternative for PMMA sterilization.

Toward electron-beam sterilization of a pre-assembled Boston keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation on the human cornea and the potential for E-beam sterilization of Boston keratoprosthesis (BK) devices when pre-assembled with a donor cornea prior to sterilization.

METHODS

Human donor corneas and corneas pre-assembled in BK devices were immersed in recombinant human serum albumin (rHSA) media and E-beam irradiated at 25 kGy. Mechanical (tensile strength and modulus, and compression modulus), chemical, optical, structural, and degradation properties of the corneal tissue after irradiation and after 6 months of preservation were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mechanical evaluation showed that E-beam irradiation enhanced the tensile and compression moduli of human donor corneas, with no impact on their tensile strength. By chemical and mechanical analysis, E-beam irradiation caused a minor degree of crosslinking between collagen fibrils. No ultrastructural changes due to E-beam irradiation were observed. E-beam irradiation slightly increased the stability of the cornea against collagenase-induced degradation and had no impact on glucose diffusion. The optical evaluation showed transparency of the cornea was maintained. E-beam irradiated corneal tissues and BK-cornea pre-assembled devices were stable for 6 months after room-temperature preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

E-beam irradiation generated no detrimental effects on the corneal tissues or BK-cornea pre-assembled devices and improved native properties of the corneal tissue, enabling prolonged preservation at room temperature. The pre-assembly of BK in a donor cornea, followed by E-beam irradiation, offers the potential for an off-the-shelf, ready to implant keratoprosthesis device.

Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives

The use of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (BKPro) has significantly increased worldwide. It is no longer considered a procedure of last resort but a reasonable option for patients with otherwise poor prognosis for a traditional penetrating keratoplasty. BKPro was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1992 for bilateral severe corneal blindness due to multiple corneal transplant failure. Over the years, indications have extended beyond recurrent immunologic rejection to include other conditions such as chemical injury and other causes of bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency, extensive corneal neovascularization, neurotrophic corneas and hypotony, among others. Numerous advances in the design of the BKPro, improvement of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management have resulted in favorable outcomes and a reduction in postoperative complications. Accordingly, many studies have shown that implantation of this device is highly effective in restoring vision with very good short-term outcomes. However, due to the lifetime risk of sight-threatening complications after BKPro implantation, a longer follow-up period should provide outcomes that are more realistic. In this review, the authors examined only the results of publications with an average of at least 2 years of follow-up. The overall intermediate to long-term visual outcomes and retention rate in BKPro seem to be favorable. However, autoimmune diseases and cicatrizing conditions continue to show a higher incidence of postoperative complications that require further management.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

The Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro), used in patients with high risk of corneal graft failure, is increasingly being used. However, the medium- to long-term outcomes are currently unclear. We analyzed the medium- (2-5 years) and long-term (>5 years) efficacy and safety of the Boston type 1 KPro in terms of visual outcomes, device retention, and postoperative complications.

METHODS

We last searched electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) on March 31, 2018. Visual outcomes and device retention at 2 and 5 years, alongside postoperative complications, were primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

We identified 407 articles. Thirty studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The combined proportion of eyes with ≥6/60 vision was 62% at 2 years and 51% at 5 years. The combined retention rate was 88% at 2 years and 74% at 5 years. Retroprosthetic membrane (36.6%) and glaucoma (39.3%) were found to be the most common long-term complications. Very few studies showed visual outcomes or retention rates at 5 years, with results sparse and collectively not meaningful because of small patient numbers and ambiguous reporting of follow-up times.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-year results indicate that there is a place for the Boston type 1 KPro in the management of corneal blindness. However, there is scarce evidence regarding its medium- and long-term efficacy and safety. The high rate of reported complications necessitates strict patient selection and stringent follow-up.

The Aurolab Keratoprosthesis (KPro) versus the Boston Type I Kpro: 5-year Clinical Outcomes in 134 Cases of Bilateral Corneal Blindness

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of Boston Type I keratoprosthesis (Boston Kpro) with its low-cost version, the Aurolab Kpro (auroKPro).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative case series.

METHODS

This study included 134 eyes of 130 patients with severe bilateral corneal blindness but with wet ocular surfaces. The patients underwent either Boston Kpro (n = 78) or auroKPro (n = 56) implantation based on the device availability and patient's affordability. The primary outcome measurements were anatomical retention (defined as absence of device extrusion, exchange, or explantation) and functional recovery of 20/200 or better visual acuity at yearly time points until 5-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Limbal stem cell deficiency was the most common indication (60.5%) for surgery, followed by multiple failed grafts (35%). Both groups were comparable at baseline with respect to indications for surgery and associated ocular co-morbidities (P > 0.05). The overall anatomical retention rates were similar in the Boston Kpro (55 of 78, 70.5%) and auroKPro (35 of 56, 62.5%) groups (P = 0.11). Kaplan-Meier survival rates at 5 years of follow-up were greater for the Boston Kpro with respect to both anatomical retention (63 ± 6% vs. 43.4 ± 10%, respectively; P = 0.057) and functional recovery (42.4 ± 6% vs. 32.2 ± 7%, respectively; P = 0.345), but these differences were not statistically significant. Complications such as intraoperative device breakage (7%) and postoperative extrusions (12.5%) were significantly more common with the auroKPro (P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the auroKPro and the Boston Kpro are effective treatment options for patients with severe bilateral corneal blindness. The auroKPro can be considered an alternative to the Boston Kpro when affordability or availability of the Boston Kpro is a limiting factor.

Lucia and Beyond: Development of an Affordable Keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

Severe corneal disease contributes significantly to the global burden of blindness. Corneal allograft surgery remains the most commonly used treatment, but does not succeed long term in every patient, and the odds of success fall with each repeated graft. The Boston keratoprosthesis type I has emerged as an alternative to repeat corneal allograft. However, cost limits its use in resource-poor settings, where most corneal blind individuals reside.

METHODS

All aspects of the Boston keratoprosthesis design process were examined to determine areas of potential modification and simplification, with dual goals to reduce cost and improve the cosmetic appearance of the device in situ.

RESULTS

Minor modifications in component design simplified keratoprosthesis manufacturing. Proportional machinist time could be further reduced by adopting a single axial length for aphakic eyes, and a single back plate diameter. The cosmetic appearance was improved by changing the shape of the back plate holes from round to radial, with a petaloid appearance, and by anodization of back plate titanium to impute a more natural color.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a modified Boston keratoprosthesis type I, which we call the "Lucia." The Lucia retains the 2 piece design and ease of assembly of the predicate device, but would allow for manufacturing at a reduced cost. Its appearance should prove more acceptable to implanted patients. Successful keratoprosthesis outcomes require daily medications for the life of the patient and rigorous, frequent, postoperative care. Effective implementation of the device in resource-poor settings will require further innovations in eye care delivery.

Retroprosthetic Membrane Formation in Boston Keratoprosthesis: A Case-Control-Matched Comparison of Titanium Versus PMMA Backplate

PURPOSE

Retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) formation is the most common complication after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation. It affects visual acuity and can predispose to corneal melt. Two KPro backplate materials are available: titanium and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). This study investigates the influence of the KPro backplate material on visually significant RPM formation.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control-matched study involving 40 patients; 20 eyes implanted with a titanium backplate KPro were case-matched with 20 eyes implanted with a PMMA backplate KPro between 2007 and 2015 with 1-year minimum follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 28.1 ± 8.9 and 53.6 ± 24.3 months in the titanium and PMMA groups, respectively. At 12 months postoperatively, 7 eyes with titanium and 6 eyes with PMMA backplates developed a visually significant RPM. By the end of the study, a total of 11 eyes with titanium and 9 eyes with PMMA KPros developed a visually significant RPM. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Three of 11 eyes with titanium KPros that had a visually significant RPM required surgical membranectomy, whereas all eyes with PMMA KPros were successfully treated with the yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Recurrence of RPMs was found in 7/11 eyes in the titanium group and 2/9 eyes in the PMMA group with no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Titanium backplate KPros do not significantly reduce RPM formation compared with PMMA backplate KPros in a case-control-matched setting. A larger prospective study is warranted to evaluate comparative long-term performance and guide newer designs.

Visual Outcomes and Complications of Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis in Children: A Retrospective Multicenter Study and Literature Review

PURPOSE

To report outcomes and complications of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation in children.

DESIGN

Retrospective, multicenter case series.

PARTICIPANTS

All children 16 years of age or younger who underwent KPro surgery at 3 ophthalmology centers in Canada between January 2010 and November 2014.

METHODS

Records of patients having undergone KPro implantation were reviewed. Data on preoperative characteristics, surgical procedure(s) performed, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraoperative and postoperative complications, device retention, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

The KPro was implanted in 11 eyes of 11 patients 0.9 to 15.5 years of age, with 6 being primary corneal procedures. Best-corrected visual acuity recorded before surgery ranged from 20/600 to light perception (LP), and vision in 2 eyes was fix and follow. All patients had been diagnosed with glaucoma and 6 eyes had glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) inserted before KPro implantation. At last follow-up (mean, 41.8 months; range, 6.5-85.0 months), 2 eyes retained BCVA of 20/400 or better, whereas 5 eyes lost LP. Postoperative complications included retroprosthetic membrane (9 eyes), corneal melt (5 eyes), infectious keratitis (3 eyes), endophthalmitis (3 eyes), GDD erosion (2 eyes), and retinal detachment (5 eyes). The initial KPro was retained in 4 eyes (36.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation in children is associated with a substantially higher rate of complications, higher chance of device failure, and worse visual outcomes than observed in adults. In view of these results, the authors do not recommend the use of the KPro in the pediatric population.

Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis for Gelatinous Drop-Like Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis in the management of advanced gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy (GDLD).

METHODS

A retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series was conducted at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Four eyes of three siblings with molecularly and histologically confirmed GDLD from a Thai family underwent an uneventful Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation for visual rehabilitation. Clinical data were obtained from a review of the medical records. Visual acuity, device retention, and postoperative complications were the main outcome measures. The follow-up ranged from 8 to 96 months.

RESULTS

One eye received keratoprosthesis surgery as a primary penetrating procedure. The other three eyes had the surgery as a secondary procedure after graft failure. Best-corrected visual acuity was favorably improved from counting fingers to 20/25 in two eyes, from hand movement to 20/20 in one eye, and from hand movement to counting fingers at 2 feet in one eye caused by severe amblyopia. The improved vision was maintained for 8 months to 6.2 years after surgery. Postoperative complications included disease recurrence in the donor graft (N = 3), manageable retroprosthetic membrane (N = 3), intraocular pressure elevation responded to antiglaucoma drugs (N = 2), and Pseudomonas keratitis with severe corneal melting requiring device removal (N = 1). All of our patients failed to have a comfortably well-fitting contact lens after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis could be considered as a reasonable option in the management of advanced GDLD. However, patients remain at risk for sight-threatening postoperative complications as long as the keratoprosthesis is retained. The use of Boston keratoprosthesis implantation needed to be individualized on a case-by-case basis.

Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 in Chemical Burns

PURPOSE

To describe and further analyze the long-term results in visual acuity (VA), anatomical retention, and rate of complications from patients who underwent Boston keratoprosthesis (B-Kpro) type 1 after ocular chemical burns in the Dominican Republic.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 42 eyes (22 OD:20 OS) of 36 patients who underwent B-Kpro type 1 implantation after severe ocular burn at Hospital Elías Santana in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, between April 2006 and October 2014, were included.

RESULTS

Demographics, VA, anatomical retention, and the rates of postoperative complications and concurrent surgeries were evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent anatomical retention rates and visual outcomes presented in this study support the remarkable capability of B-Kpro type 1 to restore functional VA in eyes with severe chemical injuries. However, strict control of the postoperative complications is necessary for long-term success. In conclusion, the use of a B-Kpro type 1 after severe chemical burn is a viable option in patients otherwise condemned to the high risk of failure associated with conventional corneal grafts.

Outcomes of bilateral sequential implantation of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risks and benefits of sequential bilateral Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation for bilateral corneal blindness.

DESIGN

Comparative retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent a sequential bilateral KPro surgery.

METHODS

All 11 patients who underwent sequential bilateral KPro surgery at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal between October 2008 and October 2011 were recruited. Data from the 22 patient eyes in our study were separated in 2 groups based on the first (group 1) or second eye (group 2) implanted with the Kpro. Both groups were then compared for the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and complications. Bilateral BCVA following both surgeries and the overall number of complications that affected each patient after both interventions were also analyzed.

RESULTS

At 24 months, BCVA was 20/150 in group 1 and 20/200 in group 2 (p = 0.67). Throughout the study, there was no significant difference in BCVA between the 2 groups (p > 0.05), and bilateral BCVA was similar. The complication rate was comparable in the 2 groups. Patients had a mean of 2.45 complications following the first surgery and a mean of 5.27 in both eyes combined after the second intervention (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Because visual gain observed following the second surgery was the same as that with the first and multiple surgeries increased the number of complications for each patient, we recommend saving bilateral KPro implantation for cases in which the first eye with KPro develops a disease limiting its visual potential.

Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation for the Treatment of Glaucoma in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type II Patient

We describe the surgical technique of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in a Boston keratoprosthesis type II patient. This patient with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid had pars plana endoscopic cyclophotocoagula through wounds created in the eyelids.

Microbial Keratitis and Endophthalmitis After the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence, ocular surface disease associations, microbiological profile, and clinical course of postoperative infections after implantation of the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all cases of the KPro-1 performed at a tertiary eye care center between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014.

RESULTS

Seventy-five KPro-1 procedures were included in the analysis. Postoperative infections occurred in 13 eyes (17.3%) with an incidence of 0.064 cases per eye-year. The Kaplan-Meier probability of an infection-free graft was 0.96, 0.90, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.86 at years 1 through 5, respectively. The rate of infections was greater in eyes with ocular surface disease (26.3% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.06), especially in those with a history of chemical or thermal injury or herpes zoster keratopathy (P = 0.001). There were 8 cases (10.7%) of microbial keratitis due to either fungi (5 cases) or bacteria (3 cases). There were 7 cases (9.3%) of endophthalmitis due to bacteria (5 cases) or intraocular extension of fungal keratitis (2 cases). The incidence of microbial keratitis and endophthalmitis was 0.034 and 0.03 cases per eye-year, respectively. Therapeutic management of the infected eyes required graft and device removal in 7 eyes (53.8%). After completion of microbiologic treatment, 7 eyes (53.8%) had lost more than 2 lines of the best-corrected preinfection visual acuity, including 5 eyes with endophthalmitis that had hand motion vision or worse.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative infections are a serious issue that compromises device retention and visual outcomes after keratoprosthesis implantation.

Long-Term Results of the Boston Keratoprosthesis for Unilateral Corneal Disease

PURPOSE

To report the results of unilateral implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis (BKPro) in patients with good visual acuity in the fellow eye.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 37 eyes of 37 patients who underwent an optical BKPro and had a preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or better in the fellow eye at Wills Eye Hospital from September 2005 to November 2013 was performed. Patients were excluded if they had less than 1 year of postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up after BKPro implantation was 31.7 months (range, 12-78 months; SD, 21). Twenty-eight patients underwent a BKPro for failed penetrating keratoplasty, and 9 patients underwent a primary BKPro. The most common complications were elevated intraocular pressure and retroprosthetic membrane formation in 16 eyes (43%) each. The mean final BCVA (1.0 ± 0.8 logMAR; median, 1.0 logMAR) was statistically better than the mean preoperative BCVA (1.8 ± 0.2 logMAR; median, 1.8 logMAR) (P < 0.001). The probability of postoperative BCVA of 20/200 or better was 54.1% with an average 45.1 ± 4.7 (confidence interval: 35.9-54.3) months of follow-up. The probability of postoperative BCVA of 20/40 or better was 37.8% with an average 51.8 ± 4.9 (confidence interval: 42.0-61.5) months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the patients in our study achieved the minimum visual acuity required for binocular functioning, whereas one-third of the patients achieved a BCVA somewhat similar to that of the contralateral eye. The complications were similar to those reported previously with good retention of the device. BKPro implantation is a reasonable option for patients with good vision in the fellow eye.

Outcomes of Repeat Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation

PURPOSE

To describe the outcomes and prognostic characteristics of patients who had a repeat Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

setting: Data regarding preoperative clinical and demographic characteristics and postoperative course during initial and repeat KPro placement were collected at multiple centers across the country.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight eyes underwent explantation of KPro owing to complications between September 2003 and August 2014 at 5 participating tertiary eye care centers in the United States. Of those, 36 eyes that received a subsequent replacement device were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity (VA) outcomes and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Ocular surface disease was significantly more common in eyes that required a device explantation, compared to those that retained the device (P < .001). Sixty-seven percent of eyes (24/36) achieved VA ≥ 20/200 vision after the repeat KPro. The probability of these 24 eyes maintaining VA ≥ 20/200 after the repeat KPro was 87% at 1 year and 75% at 2 years. Predictors of the ability to maintain vision ≥ 20/200 following surgery were a better last-recorded vision before explantation (P = .0002) and better vision immediately after repeat KPro (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ocular surface disease and its complications were associated with more frequent device removal. In these patients, repeat KPro resulted in restoration of vision. A reasonable visual acuity prior to device removal was associated with favorable long-term postoperative visual acuity and retention.

Primary implantation of type I Boston keratoprosthesis in nonautoimmune corneal diseases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report outcomes of type I Boston keratoprosthesis (KPro) as primary corneal surgery in nonautoimmune corneal disorders.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational, large single-center case series of 43 eyes (37 patients) that were followed for an average of 39 months (1-6 years), primary implantation of the type I Boston KPro was performed in all patients. Visual acuity at year 1, visual acuity at last follow-up, and postoperative complication rates were examined for all eyes.

RESULTS

Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/60 to light perception, with vision of 20/200 or worse in 88%. Vision was ≥20/200 at 1 year in 77% of eyes (P < 0.0001). Complications included retroprosthetic membrane formation (51%), glaucoma progression (47%), corneal melt (19%), and sterile vitritis (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large series with long follow-up, primary Boston KPro effectively restored vision. Close follow-up is needed to manage the known complications after Boston KPro.

Idiopathic vitritis in the setting of Boston keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to revisit the clinical paradigm attributed to Boston keratoprosthesis recipients presenting with idiopathic vitreous inflammation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of keratoprosthesis recipients at Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, from January 2000 to August 2013, for demographic data, indication(s) for surgery, timing and presentation of vitreous inflammation, and best-corrected visual acuity at baseline, on presentation, and after resolution of vitritis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (23 eyes) of 346 patients developed idiopathic vitreous inflammation after keratoprosthesis implantation. Six of 23 patients presented with signs and symptoms similar to infectious endophthalmitis but were culture negative. The proportion of patients who fit the previous paradigm of sudden painless loss of vision without external signs of infection ("sterile vitritis") at their first presentation with vitritis was only 4 of 23. Vision decline was variable (median, 9 lines on Snellen chart; range, 0-24), as was time to recovery of best vision (median, 8.9 weeks; range, 0.9-36.7). Nine eyes had repeat bouts (43 episodes in 23 patients). Ten of 43 episodes did not recover to baseline vision. Seventeen of 23 eyes with idiopathic vitritis after keratoprosthesis later developed other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The current paradigm for idiopathic vitritis after keratoprosthesis implantation includes sudden painless loss of vision with full recovery of vision on treatment with periocular corticosteroids. However, idiopathic vitritis after keratoprosthesis can also mimic infectious endophthalmitis with pain and external signs of inflammation. Visual loss can be gradual. Vision may not recover to baseline despite treatment. Vitritis may be a part of a common pathway of chronic inflammation after keratoprosthesis.

Keratoprostheses for corneal blindness: a review of contemporary devices

According to the World Health Organization, globally 4.9 million are blind due to corneal pathology. Corneal transplantation is successful and curative of the blindness for a majority of these cases. However, it is less successful in a number of diseases that produce corneal neovascularization, dry ocular surface and recurrent inflammation, or infections. A keratoprosthesis or KPro is the only alternative to restore vision when corneal graft is a doomed failure. Although a number of KPros have been proposed, only two devices, Boston type-1 KPro and osteo-odonto-KPro, have came to the fore. The former is totally synthetic and the latter is semi-biological in constitution. These two KPros have different surgical techniques and indications. Keratoprosthetic surgery is complex and should only be undertaken in specialized centers, where expertise, multidisciplinary teams, and resources are available. In this article, we briefly discuss some of the prominent historical KPros and contemporary devices.

Boston keratoprosthesis - Clinical outcomes with wider geographic use and expanding indications - A systematic review

Over 2 decades of research, several design modifications, and improvements in post-operative management have made Boston keratoprosthesis (B-KPro) a viable option for patients with corneal blindness for whom traditional keratoplasty procedure has a very low probability of success. In this systematic review, we examined the indications, visual outcomes, complications and retention rate of the literature published in the past 10 years (2005–2014). While most of the studies report smaller datasets (typically <50 eyes), some of the recent multicenter studies have reported large datasets (up to 300 eyes). Most of the literature is published from the US; however, last few years have witnessed some papers reporting the successful use of B-Kpro from developing countries or arid climatic conditions (such as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). Due to differences in the causes of corneal blindness in different geographic regions, newer indications for B-Kpro are emerging (e.g. trachoma). Additionally, improving clinical outcomes and increasing surgeon confidence have also expanded indications to include cases of unilateral visual impairment and paediatric age. We observed that there is growing body of evidence of successful clinical use of B-KPro; however, financial challenges, lack of trained surgeons, shortage of donor corneas must be overcome to improve accessibility of B-KPro.

Retinal detachments after Boston Keratoprosthesis: incidence, predisposing factors, and visual outcomes

PURPOSE

To determine the rates, predisposing factors, and visual outcomes of retinal detachment (RD) after Boston Keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation.

METHODS

In this noncomparative, interventional case series, the medical records of 170 patients (205 eyes) who underwent Boston type 1 and type 2 KPro implantation at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary between April 1993 and June 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Incidence and annual rates of RD were calculated, and the roles of possible predictive factors for RD after KPro were investigated. Main outcome measures were rates of and risk factors for RD, visual acuity after RD, and surgical outcomes after repair.

RESULTS

Sterile vitritis and autoimmune systemic disease significantly predisposed patients to RD after KPro placement. Of patients who developed RD after implantation, 50% progressed to visual acuity of no light perception despite surgical repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation plays a major role in RD development after KPro implantation. Patients with predisposing factors should be advised of the high rates of RD and comanaged with a vitreoretinal specialist.

Experience with Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 in the developing world

OBJECTIVE

To report the experience of the Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil, in performing Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 implantation in the developing world.

METHODS

We analyzed 30 eyes of 30 patients who underwent Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis surgery between 2008 and 2012 in a prospective interventional study. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed, including visual acuity (VA), keratoprosthesis stability, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Preoperative diagnoses were failed grafts in 16 eyes (53.33%), chemical injury in 10 eyes (33.33%) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome in 4 eyes (13.33%). Also, 16 eyes (53.33%) had preoperative glaucoma. Preoperative best corrected VA ranged from 20/400 to light perception. With an average follow-up of 32 months (range 1-55 months), postoperative vision improved to >20/200 in 24 eyes (80%). Postoperative VA was statistically improved compared with the preoperative measurement during all postoperative follow-ups (up to 36 months). During the follow-up period (32 months), retention of the initial keratoprosthesis was 93.3%. The incidence of retroprosthetic membrane was 26.66%. Progression of glaucoma occurred in 7 of 16 eyes (43%). Three patients experienced development of glaucoma after keratoprosthesis implantation. One eye experienced development of infectious keratitis, and 2 eyes had retinal detachment.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis in a developing country is a viable option after multiple keratoplasty failures and conditions with a poor prognosis for keratoplasty. Our experience appears similar to major reports in the field from investigators in developed countries. Adjustments to postoperative management must be considered according to the particular location.

Boston type 1 based keratoprosthesis (Auro Kpro) and its modification (LVP Kpro) in chronic Stevens Johnson syndrome

Two young women with completely dry and keratinised eyes post-Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) underwent unilateral oral mucous membrane grafts (MMGs) in preparation for modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis (MOOKP) implantation. In both cases, the mucosal graft was deemed to be too tight to accommodate the MOOKP implant. Instead of proceeding with MOOKP, the first patient underwent Auro Kpro (Boston type 1-based keratoprosthesis) implantation under the MMG, while the second patient underwent implantation of a modification of Auro Kpro with a longer optical stem (LVP Kpro) exposed through the MMG. Both patients maintained a visual acuity of 20/20, N6 at 15 months post-implantation. The first patient needed repeated mucosal trimming because of mucosal overgrowth; while in the second patient, mucosal overgrowth did not occur. This report highlights the innovative and successful use of Boston type 1-based keratoprosthesis (Auro Kpro) and its modification (LVP Kpro) in completely dry and keratinised post-SJS eyes.

Promotion of minTBP-1-PRGDN on the attachment, proliferation and collagen I synthesis of human keratocyte on titanium

AIM

To investigate the influence of minTBP-1-PRGDN on the attachment, proliferation and collagen I synthesis of human keratocyte on titanium (Ti) surface.

METHODS

The chimeric peptide RKLPDAPRGDN (minTBP-1-PRGDN) was synthesized by connecting RKLPDA (minTBP-1) to the N-terminal of PRGDN, the influence of minTBP-1-PRGDN on the attachment, proliferation and collagen I synthesis of human keratocyte on Ti surface were tested using PRGDN and minTBP-1as controls. The keratocytes attached to the surface of Ti were either stained with FITC-labeled phalloidin and viewed with fluorescence microscope or quantified with alamar Blue method. The proliferation of keratocytes on Ti were quantified with 3-(4,5-dim- ethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide up-taking methods. The secretion of type I collagen were determined using an ELISA kit.

RESULTS

The results showed that minTBP-1-PRGDN at a concentration of 100ng/mL was the most potent peptide to enhance the attachment of human keratocytes to the surface of Ti (1.40±0.03 folds, P=0.003), to promote the proliferation (1.26±0.05 folds, P=0.014) and the synthesis of type I collagen (1.530±0.128, P=0.008). MinTBP-1 at the same concentration could only promote the attachment (1.13±0.04 folds, P=0.020) and proliferation(1.15±0.06 folds, P=0.021), while PRGDN had no significant influence (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data shows that the novel chimeric peptide minTBP-1-PRGDN could promote the attachment, proliferation and type I collagen synthesis of human keratocytes on the surface of Ti.

Mucosal complications of modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis in chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome

PURPOSE

To describe clinical outcomes of complications afflicting the autologous oral mucous membrane graft after modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis surgery in chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS).

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

This study included 30 eyes of 30 patients with SJS-induced dry keratinized ocular surfaces; the patients underwent various stages of this procedure between August 2009 and February 2012. Mucosal complications were classified as either necrosis or overgrowth. Mucosal necrosis was managed according to a predesigned algorithm based on timing (pre- and postimplantation) and location (central or peripheral) of necrosis. Cases with mucosal overgrowth underwent mucosal debulking and trimming.

RESULTS

Mucosal necrosis developed in 15 (50%) eyes and overgrowth in 4 (13.3%) eyes. Preimplantation necrosis (n = 7) was initially managed conservatively, but 2 eyes required free labial-mucous membrane grafting for persistent corneal exposure. Free labial-mucous membrane grafting was performed in all cases of postimplantation necrosis (n = 10), but 8 eyes required additional tarsal pedicle flaps (n = 6, for peripheral necrosis) or through-the-lid revisions (n = 2, for central necrosis). Debulking and trimming effectively managed all cases of mucosal overgrowth, but 3 eyes required repeat procedures. At 24.1 ± 6.5 months postimplantation, the keratoprosthesis was retained in all eyes, and the probability of maintaining 20/60 or better vision was similar in eyes with or without mucosal necrosis (86 ± 8.8% vs 80 ± 10.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal complications, especially necrosis, occurred commonly following modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis surgery in dry keratinized post-SJS eyes. The algorithm-based management approach described in this study was successful in treating these complications, retaining the prosthesis and preserving useful vision.

Boston type I keratoprosthesis-donor cornea interface evaluated by high-definition spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the resolution offered by two different, recently commercially available high-resolution, spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) instruments allows for detailed anatomic characterization of the critical device-donor cornea interface in eyes implanted with the Boston type I permanent keratoprosthesis.

Methods

Eighteen eyes of 17 patients implanted with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis were included in this retrospective case series. All eyes were quantitatively evaluated using the Cirrus HD-OCT while a subset (five eyes) was also qualitatively imaged using the Spectralis Anterior Segment Module. Images from these instruments were analyzed for evidence of epithelial migration onto the anterior surface of the keratoprosthesis front plate, and presence of a vertical gap between the posterior surface of the front plate and the underlying carrier donor corneal tissue. Quantitative data was obtained utilizing the caliper function on the Cirrus HD-OCT.

Results

The mean duration between AS-OCT imaging and keratoprosthesis placement was 29 months. As assessed by the Cirrus HD-OCT, 83% of eyes exhibited epithelial migration over the edge of the front plate. Fifty-six percent of the keratoprosthesis devices displayed good apposition of the device with the carrier corneal donor tissue. When a vertical gap was present (44% of eyes), the mean gap was 40 (range 8–104) microns. The Spectralis Anterior Segment Module also displayed sufficient resolution to allow for similar characterization of the device-donor cornea interface.

Conclusion

Spectral-domain AS-OCT permits high resolution imaging of the keratoprosthesis device-donor cornea interface. Both the Cirrus HD-OCT and the Spectralis Anterior Segment module allowed for visualization of epithelial coverage of the device-donor cornea interface, as well as identification of physical gaps. These imaging modalities, by yielding information in regard to integration of the keratoprosthesis with surrounding corneal tissue, may help identify those at risk for keratoprosthesis-related complications, such as extrusion and endophthalmitis, and hence guide clinical management.