The Effect of Corneal Epithelium on Corneal Curvature in Patients with Keratoconus

Corneal Epithelium Asymmetry in Children With Atopy: The Effect of Hand Dominance

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of eye rubbing on the epithelial thickness profile in tomographically normal corneas by AS-OCT and to compare right and left eyes in right-handed children.

Methods

Thirty right-handed boys (mean age 11.2 years) with ocular allergy and history of eye rubbing were evaluated using Scheimpflug (Pentacam HR, Oculus Wetzlar, Germany) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Epithelial thickness (ET) and full corneal thickness (CT) parameters were compared between right and left eyes with a non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. A p-value lower than 0.05 was considered for statistical significance.

Results

No eyes had topometric nor tomographic criteria for keratoconus. The min-max ET was lower in right eyes (−2.8 µm vs −3.5; p = 0.02). The difference between inferior and superior (I-S) octants was lower in right eyes (1.1 µm vs 1.9 µm; p = 0.03) as a result of inferotemporal thinning. The highest ET difference was registered between nasal and temporal octants and was more pronounced in the right eyes (2 µm vs 3.1 µm; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

AS-OCT analyses reveal different epithelial thickness patterns between the eyes in young atopic patients, likely eye rubbers. Inferior and temporal epithelial thickness seem to be more affected by thinning in the eye on the side of the dominant hand.

Corneal Epithelial Thickness Profile in Healthy Portuguese Children by High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography

Introduction and Objective

To evaluate corneal epithelial thickness (ET) and corneal thickness (CT) profiles in healthy eyes of Portuguese children and provide information to establish the first normative Caucasian database for these age group.

Methods

Sixty healthy eyes of 60 children aged between 8 and 18 were evaluated using the Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography device. The average ET and CT were assessed using Cirrus Review Software with predefined concentric corneal ring-shaped zones. Specific regions of ET (central, superior, inferior, temporal, nasal, superonasal, inferotemporal, superotemporal and inferonasal) were also assessed. The mean ET, the mean CT and the difference of ET in corresponding octants were compared by gender. Correlations between central epithelial thickness (CET), age and refractive error were evaluated.

Results and Discussion

The average ET was lower in the peripheric zones, whereas the average CT was higher. ET was thinner in the superior area than in the inferior (p<0.05). ET was thicker in boys than in girls (p<0.05), but CT did not differ. CET was not correlated with older age or refractive error.

Conclusion

Optical coherence tomography analysis of ET reveals that it is thinner in the periphery, where the CT is thicker. Unlike CT, ET seems to be influenced by gender. ET profile proved to be a useful tool in keratoconus diagnosis and subclinical keratoconus detection in adults. As epithelial changes occur early in the disease and keratoconus is more aggressive in pediatric population, a normative database of ET profile could contribute to enhance early recognition of the disease in this age group.

Histological Patterns of Epithelial Alterations in Keratoconus

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to confirm the presence of specific patterns of epithelial response in corneal buttons from keratoconus patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective and descriptive study. 90 penetrating keratoplasty specimens obtained from patients diagnosed with keratoconus were evaluated using bright-field microscopy. Morphologically identifiable characteristics including epithelial cell density and epithelial thickness were analyzed on hematoxylin and eosin- (H&E-) and periodic acid of Schiff- (PAS-) stained slides.

Results

Three distinctive patterns of epithelial alteration of the central cornea were established. Pattern 3, in which the central epithelium was as thick as peripheral epithelium, was the commonest (44.4%), followed by the pattern 2, defined as central epithelium thinner than periphery epithelium (38.9%), and the uncommonest pattern was number 1, with central epithelium thicker than the periphery (16.7%).

Conclusions

Three distinctive histologic patterns that could potentially have a diagnostic and prognostic value in keratoconus patients were found.

Measurement of refractive, wavefront, topographic, and keratometric changes attributable to epithelial removal in keratoconus

OBJECTIVE

The corneal epithelium is able to mask topographic and keratometric abnormalities of the underlying Bowman layer in keratoconus, but its contribution to refractive and wavefront parameters has not yet been studied. This study compared the refractive and aberrometric features of the corneal epithelium and Bowman layer in eyes with keratoconus before and after epithelial debridement.

METHODS

Corneal refractive and wavefront variables were measured in patients with keratoconus undergoing corneal crosslinking-immediately before and after epithelial debridement using a third-generation combined corneal topographer, autorefractor, and aberrometer.

RESULTS

After epithelial debridement, there were significant changes in spherical equivalent (-1.37 D; p < 0.01) and asphericity (-0.64; p = 0.03). The mean difference in the magnitude of epithelium-induced astigmatism in the 3rd and 5th central millimeter rings was 0.44 ± 3.20 D × 8 and 0.43 ± 2.75 D × 21 (positive cylinder), respectively. Corneal astigmatism axis shifted in the against-the-rule orientation after epithelial debridement. There were no significant changes in any corneal higher-order aberration parameter after epithelial debridement (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In eyes with keratoconus, epithelial debridement increased the magnitude of anterior corneal prolateness and tended to increase astigmatism and shift its axis toward the against-the-rule orientation. This study supports the notion that the corneal epithelium smooths underlying Bowman layer irregularity in keratoconus.