A prospective study of urinary ligandin in patients at risk of renal tubular injury

A Comparison of the Effects of Prolonged (>10 Hour) Low-flow Sevoflurane, High-flow Sevoflurane, and Low-flow Isoflurane Anaesthesia on Hepatorenal Function in Orthopaedic Patients

This study compared the effects of low-flow sevoflurane, high-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane on hepatorenal function during and after more than 10 hours of anaesthesia. Twenty-five patients scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery were categorized into three groups; low-flow sevoflurane (fresh gas flow at 1 litre/min, n=9), high-flow sevoflurane (5 l/min, n=7), or low-flow isoflurane (1 l/min, n=9). Inspiratory compound A concentrations were measured. The groups had similar duration of anaesthesia and exposure to anaesthetic agents. The area under the curve of concentration (mean, SD) of compound A in the low-flow sevoflurane group (359.8, 106.1 ppm.h) was greater than that in the high-flow sevoflurane group (61.1, 29.3 ppm.h; P<0.01). All groups showed normal plasma creatinine and creatinine clearance, and transient postoperative increases in plasma alanine aminotrans-ferase and alpha glutathione-S-transferase, as well as urinary glucose and alpha glutathione-S-transferase, with no significant differences between groups. There were no significant relationships between the area under the curve of concentration of compound A and the biomarkers. These findings suggest that prolonged anaesthesia with low-flow sevoflurane has similar effects on hepatorenal function to prolonged anaesthesia with high-flow sevoflurane and low-flow isoflurane.

Cell-specific biomarkers in renal medicine and research

Histopathology is the gold standard for defining renal injury, but it is invasive, time-consuming and expensive, plus it is seldom used in subjects with mild renal injury. Using biomarkers linked to distinct, defined cell types and tissues provides a direct link to histopathology without its drawbacks, plus it provides increased sensitivity, and specificity. The nephron consists of several sections, each with its own specific biomarkers; therefore, by the use of a battery of tests injuries can be localised to distinct areas of it. Using urine samples simplifies repeated sampling from the same subject or animal leading to better defined toxicokinetics and disease monitoring.Serum creatinine is the most widely used renal biomarker in spite of its known shortcomings. Cell-specific biomarkers are more specific and sensitive and have been known for over 40 years, but they are still underused in renal medicine and research. In particular, while many studies have shown cell-specific biomarkers to be valuable in diagnosis, there are few studies where they have been used to guide therapy or linked to quantitative changes in the kidney. Furthermore, the great majority of cell-specific biomarkers are from the proximal tubule, which may have hindered research into the study of conditions where the distal tubules are affected. Recently, the range of biomarkers and their applications has been expanded by the introduction of indicators of cellular regeneration.This chapter will discuss how using biomarkers with a known cellular origin, renal effects may be found earlier and at lower levels of injury. Their use in both renal medicine and drug research will be presented. Knowledge of these existing markers lays the foundation for evaluation, comparison, and characterisation of new markers that will be identified in the future.

Diltiazem may preserve renal tubular integrity after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of dopamine and diltiazem on renal function and markers for acute renal failure, including urinary alpha-glutathion s-transferase (alpha-GST), alpha-1-microglobulin (alpha(1)-MG) and N-acetyl-ss-glucosaminidase (ss-NAG) after extracorporeal circulation.

METHODS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial we evaluated the efficacy of dopamine (2.5 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1)), diltiazem (2 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or placebo administered over 48 hr postoperatively to maintain renal tubular integrity in 60 elective cardiac surgery patients. alpha-GST, alpha(1)-MG, ss-NAG, and creatinine clearance were measured from urine collected during surgery (T0), the first four hours (T1), 24 hr (T2) and 48 hr (T3) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Cumulative urine output in the diltiazem group (9.0 +/- 2.8 L) increased significantly compared with placebo (7.0 +/- 1.6 L), but not compared with dopamine (7.8 +/- 1.8 L). Creatinine clearance showed no significant intergroup differences. In all groups alpha(1)-MG increased from T0 to T3, but we found no significant intergroup differences. alpha-GST increased significantly from T0 to T3 in the placebo (2.1 +/- 1.8 to 11.4 +/- 8.6 micro g x L(-1)) and in the dopamine groups (2.7 +/- 1.8 to 13.6 +/- 14.9 micro g x L(-1)), but not in the diltiazem group (1.8 +/- 1.4 to 3.2 +/- 3.2 micro g x L(-1)). Forty-eight hours postoperatively alpha-GST was significantly lower in the diltiazem group than in both other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Diltiazem stimulates urine output, reduces excretion of alpha-GST and ss-NAG and may be useful to maintain tubular integrity after cardiac surgery.