Gastrointestinal complications in patients with chronic kidney disease--a 5-year retrospective study from a tertiary referral center

Patterns of gastrointestinal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease: Comparison of cases with and without sevelamer crystals

AIMS

Sevelamer is a phosphate-binding resin implicated in gastrointestinal (GI) injury. This study aimed to investigate the role of sevelamer in GI injury among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 17 CKD patients (cases) with and 18 CKD patients (comparisons) without sevelamer crystals in specimens. All cases were on sevelamer. Six comparison patients were also taking sevelamer, but crystals were absent in tissue sections. The comparison group was thus subclassified into patients who were and were not taking sevelamer. The frequency of underlying disorders was similar between two groups, including hypertension (cases = 82%; comparisons = 78%) and diabetes mellitus (cases = 53%, comparisons = 50%). The most common presentation was GI bleeding (cases = 41%, comparisons = 33%). Predominant histological patterns were also similar, with ulcers (cases = 42%; comparisons = 39%) and acute ischaemia (cases = 35%; comparisons = 28%) being predominant in both cohorts. Of note, sevelamer was present with amyloidosis and cytomegalovirus in one study case each. Two study patients who continued sevelamer had follow-up biopsies; one showed persistent ulceration and the other appeared normal. Crystals were absent in both.

CONCLUSIONS

GI injury in CKD patients in both groups had similar features regardless of presence of sevelamer, suggesting that it adheres to tissue rather than causes injury. The study highlights other histologically identifiable causes of intestinal injury, as well as injuries unassociated with sevelamer in patients undergoing therapy. Therefore, physicians should be cautious in attributing GI injuries to sevelamer to avoid overlooking other causes and unnecessary treatment discontinuation.

An unexpected cause of colitis

Gastrointestinal manifestations are common among patients with advanced kidney disease. Common symptoms include poor appetite, nausea, and vomiting. Prevalent lesions include esophagitis, gastritis, and duodenitis. Uremia-associated colitis is extremely rare. In this case report we present a young patient who present with end-stage kidney disease of unknown origin accompanied by abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography showed severe bowel wall thickening of the colon. Due to extreme uremic state uremia-associated colitis was suspected and hemodialysis was initiated immediately, resulted in clinical and radiology improvement.

Gastrointestinal symptoms in HIV-positive kidney transplant candidates and recipients from an HIV-positive donor

Gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) are common in kidney transplant candidates and recipients and may be worsened by HIV. Objective: To determine the frequency and severity of GIS in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients from HIV-positive donors, and those waiting to receive one. A GIS rating scale (GSRS) was completed by 76 participants at baseline and at 6 months. GIS frequency was defined as having at least one symptom (GSRS > 1). Severity was indicated by the GSRS score. Transplant candidates: GIS frequency was 88.9% and 86.3% at baseline and 6 months respectively. Indigestion was the most frequent (79.6% and 66.7% at baseline and 6 months), and severe GIS (GSRS 2.3). Women reported global mean (p = 0.030) severity significantly more than men. Transplant recipients: GIS frequency was 95.2% and 76.2% at baseline and 6 months respectively. At both assessment points, indigestion occurred most frequently (85.7% and 61.9% respectively). Highest GSRS was reported for indigestion at baseline (2.33) and at 6 months (1.33). Waist circumference (WC) was positively associated with the severity of constipation GSRS. GIS are common in both groups, especially indigestions. WC in transplant recipients should be monitored.

Histopathologic Patterns of Colitis in Patients With Impaired Renal Function

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the histopathologic features of colitis in patients with impaired renal function.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 413 patients who underwent colonoscopic evaluation for colitis between 2011 and 2015. Patients were divided into four groups based on estimated glomerular filtrate rates. Patients with impaired renal function were compared to overall and age-matched patients with normal renal function.

RESULTS

Compared to a preponderance of inflammatory bowel disease (33%) and lymphocytic colitis (9.6%) in patients with normal renal function, ischemic colitis (58%) was the predominant histopathologic pattern in the patients with impaired renal function. Infectious colitis was the second most common pattern (20.8%), with Clostridium difficile and cytomegalovirus infections being more frequent. Medication-induced injury was the third most common pattern, with crystal-associated injury being the exclusive pattern found in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Colitis in patients with impaired renal function is etiologically distinct from that seen in patients with normal renal function.

Particular aspects of gastroenterological disorders in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease patients: a clinically focused review

Besides renal disease, gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are frequently reported in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Related gastrointestinal symptoms tend to increase as the renal disease progresses. Also, in patients with ESRD, the modality of dialysis is related to particular forms of GI disorders.The kidney can interact with the digestive organs through functional endogenous systems such as the 'kidney-colon axis' and the 'kidney-liver axis'. Digestive diseases are one of the visible manifestations of the disturbance between hemostatic, hemodynamic and immunological balance in such patients.No clear management guidelines currently exist for many of the gastrointestinal problems that accompany renal failure. This review aims to describe the particular aspects of GI diseases present in CKD/ESRD. We focus our discussion in the specificities of epidemiology, diagnosis, and prognosis of such disorders between the different segments of the digestive system.

Cecum perforation induced by mycophenolate mofetil after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case report and review of literature

GI perforation after stem cell transplantation is extremely rare and is associated with poor prognosis. In addition, the clinical limitations of MMF are associated with GI intolerance and hematologic suppression. However, the exact mechanism whereby MMF induces changes in GI mucosa is unknown. Currently, there is no definite method to distinguish between GI toxicity associated with MMF and GVHD. It is important to recognize association between MMF and the histologic changes mimicking GVHD, given that GVHD is a significant differential diagnosis in stem cell transplant patients. MMF-induced colitis and GI perforation are extremely rare but should be considered in patients presenting with diarrhea and abdominal pain. Histology and clinical features are helpful to distinguish this condition from ischemic colitis. Early recognition of GI perforation is necessary for proper diagnosis and subsequent intervention. Emergency medical treatment and laparotomy have been shown to reduce the risk of fatal complications in patients presenting with GI symptoms suspected of GI perforation.

Successful kidney transplantation normalizes platelet function

Background

Uraemic platelet dysfunction is not completely understood, in part due to non-physiological platelet function assays. We have developed a physiological flow-based assay that quantifies platelet function in microlitre volumes of blood under arterial shear. The aim of this study was to characterize platelet function before and after kidney transplantation.

Methods

Ten patients scheduled for living donor kidney transplant surgery and nine healthy controls were analysed using the assay. The motional parameters of platelet behaviour on von Willebrand factor (VWF) were recorded using customized platelet tracking software. The assay was repeated 3–8 weeks post-transplant in the transplant group and at an interval of >3 weeks in normal healthy volunteers.

Results

Platelet–VWF interactions were markedly reduced in the 10 pre-transplant patients compared with the healthy controls. In seven patients with immediate graft function, dynamic platelet function returned to normal (despite a small decrease in haemoglobin and haematocrit), but remained markedly abnormal in the three patients with delayed graft function (DGF).

Conclusions

Dynamic platelet function returned to normal following transplantation in those with immediate graft function. This early improvement was not observed in those with DGF. There may be important clinical implications, as patients with DGF are more likely to undergo invasive procedures, including transplant biopsies and insertion of central venous catheters.

Spectrum of Drug-induced Chronic Diarrhea

The evaluation of a patient with chronic diarrhea can be quite frustrating, as it is expensive and involves multiple diagnostic studies. Moreover, identification of a drug as a cause of chronic diarrhea is a challenge in patients taking multiple medications. The disease may either be associated with intestinal mucosal changes, mimicking diseases such as celiac disease, or purely functional, with no histopathologic change. Drug-induced diarrhea may or may not be associated with malabsorption of nutrients, and a clinical improvement may occur within days of discontinuation of the drug, or may take longer when associated with mucosal injury. Diarrhea in diabetics, often attributed to poor management and lack of control, may be due to oral hypoglycaemic agents. Chemotherapy can result in diffuse or segmental colitis, whereas olmesartan and a few other medications infrequently induce a disease that mimics celiac disease, but is not associated with gluten intolerance. In short, increased awareness of a drug, as a cause for diarrhea and a clear understanding of the clinical manifestations will help clinicians to solve this challenging problem. This article aims to review drug-induced diarrhea to (a) understand known pathophysiological mechanisms; (b) assess the risk associated with frequently prescribed medications, and discuss the pathogenesis; and

Gastrointestinal symptoms: A comparison between patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis

AIM: To compare the prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-four end-stage renal disease patients participated in the study, including 182 HD and 112 PD patients. Dimension scores were calculated from a modified gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) 18-item questionnaire, including items concerning eating dysfunction, and were used for measuring GI symptoms. Information on patient age, condition contributing to end-stage renal disease and the most recent dialysis adequacy assessment (serum Kt/V urea value) was obtained from the follow-up database and by interviewing patients and/or reviewing the medical records. Differences between the HD and PD groups were evaluated using Student’s t, Pearson’s χ² or Fisher’s exact tests.

RESULTS: The overall prevalence of GI symptoms, defined by a GSRS > 1, in end-stage renal disease patients was 70.7% (208/294), which differed between HD and PD patients (76.4% vs 61.6%, P < 0.01). HD patients had a higher prevalence of constipation, abdominal pain and diarrhea compared to PD patients (36.3% vs 17.9%, 32.4% vs 5.4%, 17.6% vs 4.5%, respectively, P < 0.05). PD patients had a higher prevalence of reflux compared to HD patients (32.1% vs 24.2%, P < 0.05). Additionally, reflux and eating dysfunction were more severe in PD patients (GSRS: 1.71 ± 1.15 vs 1.30 ± 0.67, 1.57 ± 0.84 vs 1.39 ± 0.61, respectively, P < 0.05), whereas HD patients had greater abdominal pain, diarrhea and constipation (GSRS: 1.22 ± 0.39 vs 1.04 ± 0.19, 1.19 ± 0.53 vs 1.07 ± 0.35, 1.51 ± 0.83 vs 1.23 ± 0.58, respectively, P < 0.05). Finally, 14.8% (27/182) of HD patients presented with more than three GI symptoms, compared to 7.2% (8/112) of PD patients (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: HD and PD patients differ in prevalence, severity and diversity of GI symptoms.