Performance of Methods to Assess Kidney Function in a Predominantly Overweight Sample of Patients with Liver Disease

Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate in Cirrhosis Using Creatinine-Based and Cystatin C-Based Equations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Accurate estimation of kidney function in cirrhosis is crucial for prognosis and decisions regarding dual-organ transplantation. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess the performance of creatinine-based and cystatin C (CysC)-based eGFR equations compared with measured GFR (mGFR) in patients with cirrhosis. A total of 25 studies (n = 4565, 52.0 years, 37.0% women) comprising 18 equations met the inclusion criteria. In all GFR equations, the creatinine-based equations overestimated GFR (standardized mean difference, SMD, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.71) and CysC-based equations underestimated GFR (SMD, -0.3; 95% CI, -0.60 to -0.02). Equations based on both creatinine and CysC were the least biased (SMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.18). Chronic kidney disease-Epi-serum creatinine-CysC (CESC) was the least biased but had low precision and underestimated GFR by -3.6 mL/minute/1.73 m² (95% CI, -17.4 to 10.3). All equations significantly overestimated GFR (+21.7 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; 95% CI, 17.7-25.7) at GFR <60 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; of these, chronic kidney disease-Epi-CysC (10.3 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; 95% CI, 2.1-18.4) and GFR Assessment in Liver Disease (12.6 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; 95% CI, 7.2-18.0) were the least biased followed by Royal Free Hospital (15 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; 95% CI, 5.5-24.6) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 6 (15.7 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; 95% CI, 10.6-20.8); however, there was an overlap in the precision of estimates, and the studies were limited. In ascites, overestimation of GFR was common (+8.3 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; 95% CI, -3.1 to 19.7). However, overestimation of GFR by 10 to 20 mL/minute/1.73m² is common in patients with cirrhosis with most equations in ascites and/or kidney dysfunction. A tailored approach is required especially for decisions regarding dual-organ transplantation.

Development of a new equation to estimate creatinine clearance in cancer patients

PURPOSE

Determining renal function is important for chemotherapy eligibility and dosing. Measured creatinine clearance (mCrCl) is the gold standard but is cumbersome. Equations estimating CrCl (eCrCl) based on serum creatinine (SCr) produce widely varying estimates. Considering that SCr is derived from skeletal muscle, this study prospectively developed a new eCrCl equation in cancer patients using CT-defined muscle surface area (MSA) and evaluated its utility in a separate, retrospective series.

METHODS

In a prospective, observational cohort study of cancer patients, mCrCl by 24-h urine collection was correlated with CT-determined MSA to create an equation for eCrCl [muscle surface area (cm(2)) × 42/SCr]. eCrCl by Wright, Cockcroft-Gault (CG), CKD-EPI, MDRD, and MSA was compared to mCrCl to determine fit. MSA-eCrCl was used to simulate carboplatin dosing in a retrospective series of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESULTS

Prospectively, 22 patients were accrued and evaluable (12 males; median age 69). MSA-eCrCl correlated stronger (r (2) 0.80) than current equations (r (2) 0.47-0.69) with mCrCl. In calculating carboplatin doses for 89 NSCLC patients with MSA and CG-eCrCl, median error of CG-determined carboplatin dose was 5.5 % (range -19.0 to 44.2 %), assuming that MSA was better at estimating CrCl. Forty-two patients (47 %) received doses that varied ≥10 % of what was calculated by MSA.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a new formula for eCrCl in patients that appears more accurate than current formulae and may have implications for chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Studies to validate this formula are under way.

Accuracy of urine collection methods compared to measured GFR in adults with liver disease

BACKGROUND

Assessment of kidney function is necessary to stage kidney disease, dose medications, and to make decisions about organ allocation. Estimating equations that incorporate serum creatinine (SCr) are not consistently reliable. However, assessment of creatinine clearance (CrCl) using 24-hour urine collection methods is also prone to errors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of measured CrCl determined using shorter urine collection times compared to glomerular filtration rate measured by (125)I-iothalamate clearance ((125)I-CL) in patients with liver disease.

METHODS

Adult patients with chronic liver disease were enrolled. All patients received (125)I-iothalamate and had a catheter placed for urine collection. Blood samples were collected at designated times over 8 hours to determine (125)I-CL. CrCl was determined from a 1-hour and a 4-hour urine collection and compared to (125)I-CL.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the eight patients enrolled included age 52 ± 6 years; SCr 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dL; and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of 13 ± 3. All patients were Child-Pugh Class B. Mean estimates of kidney function (mean ± SD, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) by method were 74 ± 38 for (125)I-CL, 79 ± 28 for the 1-hour urine collection, and 72 ± 26 for the 4-hour urine collection. Measured CrCl did not differ significantly from (125)I-CL (P = .641 for 1-hour CrCl versus (125)I-CL, and P = 1.0 for the 4-hour CrCl versus (125)I-CL).

CONCLUSION

When urine collection methods are necessary for an individualized assessment of kidney function, shorter collection times can provide accurate results and would be more feasible for the patient.