Clinical outcomes for maintenance hemodialysis patients using a high-flux (FX60) dialyzer

Online Hemodiafiltration: A New Perspective for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

Introduction Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is the most effective renal replacement therapy (RRT), which allows the enhanced removal of small and large uremic toxins by combining diffusion and convective transport of solutes. Although the goal of OL-HDF is to provide greater clearance of solutes with a preference for intermediate molecules responsible for many of the complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the studies reported to date and their meta-analyses are conflicting in nature and do not show a significant advantage of convective therapies on patient prognosis. Materials and methods At the Clinic of Nephrology and Dialysis, University Hospital "St. Marina", Varna, Bulgaria, 41 patients were monitored in a retrospective study for a two-year period, randomized into two groups, conducting OL-HDF after dilution and hemodialysis (HD) with the aim of studying the effect of convective therapies on the clinical outcome, the achieved quality of life, and the prognosis of the patient. Results The study found a significantly higher quality of life in patients undergoing OL-HDF with significantly higher values ​​of indicators of dialysis adequacy and nutritional status, better control of the anemic syndrome with the reduction of erythropoietin doses, significantly lower frequency of episodes of intradialytic hypotension with improved recovery, and 3.6-fold lower risk of death compared with conventional dialysis. Discussion Three major randomized controlled trials have compared survival outcomes in patients receiving HD or post-dilution OL-HDF, reporting conflicting results. Meta-analyses of the published studies have also been unable to provide a clear and definitive answer regarding the potential benefits of choosing one treatment over the other. Overall mortality, anemia, phosphate control, and small molecule clearance appear to be insufficiently influenced by the treatment method. On the other hand, cardiovascular mortality, hemodynamic stability, and clearance of middle and protein-bound molecules seem to be better in patients treated with OL-HDF. Conclusions Despite the conflicting data reported so far, OL-HDF is associated with better clinical outcome and prognosis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient and undoubtedly warrants extensive future study with a view to improved quality of life in the growing dialysis population.

Effects of Low-Flux and High-Flux Dialysis Membranes on Erythropoietin Responsiveness in Hemodialysis Patients

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often accompanied by anemia. High-flux membranes contribute to a reasonable removal of uremic toxins which cause anemia in CKD. Inadequate data have described the efficiency of high-flux dialysis in promoting erythropoietin responsiveness in CKD patients in the Middle East. This study was conducted to compare the efficiency of maintaining high-flux hemodialysis versus low-flux dialysis for ≥1 year in promoting erythropoietin responsiveness and to show the factors associated with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness in Arab chronic hemodialysis patients.

Methods

It was a retrospective cohort study that involved 110 subjects who were categorized into group 1 (50 patients receiving low-flux dialysis) and group 2 (60 patients receiving high-flux dialysis). History taking, examination, and laboratory investigations were conducted for all patients every 3 months from January 2021 to January 2022.

Results

Group 2 had significantly higher weight and body mass index than group 1 but lower cholesterol and intact parathyroid hormone levels than group 1. Erythropoietin resistance index levels did not differ between the two groups upon repeated measures over a 1-year follow-up. Significant risk factors for erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness on multivariate analysis were lower weight (Odds ratio (OR): 0.966; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.94–0.992; p=0.011), longer hemodialysis vintage (OR: 1.172; 95% CI: 1.036–1.325; p=0.012), lower hemoglobin levels (OR: 0.531; 95% CI: 0.362–0.779; p=0.001), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR: 2.436; 95% CI: 1.321–4.493; p=0.004).

Conclusion

High-flux dialysis was not superior to low-flux dialysis in improving erythropoietin responsiveness.

Slipping Through the Pores: Hypoalbuminemia and Albumin Loss During Hemodialysis

Hypoalbuminemia results when compensatory mechanisms are unable to keep pace with derangements in catabolism/loss and/or decreased synthesis of albumin. Across many disease states, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypoalbuminemia is a well-established, independent risk factor for adverse outcomes, including mortality. In the setting of CKD, reduced serum albumin concentrations are often a manifestation of protein-energy wasting, a state of metabolic and nutritional alterations resulting in reduced protein and energy stores. The progression of CKD to kidney failure and the initiation of maintenance hemodialysis (HD) further predisposes an already at-risk population toward hypoalbuminemia such that approximately 60% of HD patients have albumin concentrations <4.0 g/dl. Albumin loss into the dialysate through the dialyzer appears to be a potentially modifiable cause of hypoalbuminemia in some patients. A group of newer dialyzers for maintenance HD-sometimes termed protein-leaking or medium cut-off membranes-aim to improve clearance of middle molecules (vs high flux dialyzers) but are associated with increased albumin losses. In this article, we will examine the impact of dialyzer selection on albumin losses during conventional HD, including the clinical relevance of such losses on serum albumin levels. Data on the clinical relevance of albumin losses during dialysis and current gaps in the evidence base are also discussed.

Levels of cystatin C in low- and high-flux hemodialysis in children with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Cystatin-C (CyC) is a middle molecule that is freely filtered at the glomerulus and almost completely reabsorbed by the proximal tubules. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum CyC and its reduction ratio as a biomarker for assessing the adequacy of the hemodialysis (HD) sessions in children with end-stage renal disease on maintenance HD. We also compared levels of CyC in patients on low-flux HD (LFH) and high-flux HD (HFH).

METHODS

Forty patients were included in the study and divided into two groups, with one group (16 patients) receiving HFH and the other group receiving LFH (24 patients) (high-flux and low-flux polysulfone filters, respectively). Before and after each dialysis session serum CyC and beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) levels were measured using an ELISA technique, and routine laboratory tests were performed for each patient.

RESULTS

Pre-dialytic levels of CyC were significantly lower in the patients receiving HFH than in those receiving LFH (7.33 ± 1.35 vs. 9.73 ± 0.93, respectively; p < 0.0001). In the HFH group, post-dialytic levels of serum CyC were significantly lower than pre-dialytic levels (4.49 ± 0.71 vs. 7.33 ± 1.35, respectively; p < 0.0001). The reduction ratio (RR) of CyC was significantly higher in the HFH group than in the LFH group (38.2 ± 3.91 vs. -6.49 ± 5.05, respectively; p < 0.0001). Serum CyC level significantly correlated with B2M, urea and creatinine levels in both the LFH and HFH groups, whereas its RR significantly correlated with the RRs of urea, creatinine, and B2M in the HFH group.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study emphasize the role of CyC as a good marker for assessing the adequacy of HD sessions in children on HFH and show that the CyC RR may be used as an index of middle-molecule toxin clearance following HFH sessions.

The effect of two different high-flux dialysis membranes on insulin resistance in non-diabetic end-stage renal disease patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two different types of high-flux dialysis membranes on insulin resistance among patients who are receiving hemodialysis (HD) due to end-stage renal failure (ESRF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-six (21 female, 25 male) patients were included in the study, who were on HD treatment due to stage-5 chronic renal failure. Prior to the study, fasting insulin resistance via Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and fractioned urea clearance (Kt/V) values were calculated using the urokinetic model. The polysulfone (PS) dialysis membrane of all patients included in the study was replaced with "polyarylethersulfone, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyamide (PPP)" high-flux membrane that has the same surface area over 12 weeks. At the end of the 12-week period, HOMA and Kt/V values were recalculated.

RESULTS

At the end of the 12-week period, Kt/V values rose statistically significant from 1.575 to 1.752 (p = 0.002). HOMA-IR values declined, though not statistically significant, from 3.268 to 2.926 (p = 0.085). PPP high-flux membrane increased the Kt/V values significantly compared to the PS membrane, while it decreased the insulin resistance and increased insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The two different types of high-flux dialysis membranes used for HD have different effects on insulin sensitivity. Compared to the PS membrane, PPP high-flux membrane decreased insulin resistance by increasing insulin sensitivity among non-diabetic ESRF patients.