Individualized scheme of immunoadsorption for the recurrence of idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the graft: a single center experience

Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) plays a significant role in various aspects of renal transplantation. It has been a necessary preconditioning component in ABO incompatible kidney transplants and an important modality in the removal of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both in the context of desensitization protocols that have been developed to allow highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates to be successfully transplanted and as treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes post transplantation. In addition, TA has been used with various results for the management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence supporting the application of TA as an adjunctive therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents in protocols both before and after kidney transplantation.

Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) plays a significant role in various aspects of renal transplantation. It has been a necessary preconditioning component in ABO incompatible kidney transplants and an important modality in the removal of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both in the context of desensitization protocols that have been developed to allow highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates to be successfully transplanted and as treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes post transplantation. In addition, TA has been used with various results for the management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence supporting the application of TA as an adjunctive therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents in protocols both before and after kidney transplantation.

Therapeutic Approach for Recurrent Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after kidney transplantation (KTx) develops in 40% of patients, leading to graft loss in half of cases. Extracorporeal apheretic treatments, combined with immunosuppressive drugs, seem to be the most promising therapies, but at now limited reports are available, mainly in pediatric patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We aimed to assess the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) to treat recurrent FSGS in pediatric patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We report a case series of 4 pediatric patients (aged 4–12 years) followed at our institution for early recurrent FSGS after KTx. FSGS recurrence was treated with early and intensive apheretic treatments IA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> After IA initiation, a partial remission (PR) of proteinuria at 24-month follow-up was achieved only in 1 patient. The others showed a mild reduction of nephrotic proteinuria, without PR, but gained a significant improvement in clinical signs of nephrotic syndrome (reduction of edema, increased serum albumin, and total protein levels). After a median follow-up of 38 (22–48) months, renal function was almost stable over time in all patients, except one who returned to hemodialysis after 22 months. No severe IA-related complications occurred. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> According to our clinical experience, IA revealed as a safe and effective therapy to treat patients with recurrent FSGS after KTx and it could maintain stable renal function in 75% of patients.

Kidney Transplantation for Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Can We Prevent Its Recurrence? Personal Experience and Literature Review

Background: Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is associated with a high risk of recurrence after kidney transplantation with a major risk of graft loss despite preventive or curative treatments. Aim: to assess graft survival in FSGS kidney-transplant recipients and to compare those that had a relapse with those that had no relapse. Patients/Methods: we included 17 FSGS kidney-transplant recipients between January 2000 and January 2020, separated retrospectively into two groups (recurrences: n = 8 patients; no recurrences: n = 9 patients). FSGS recurrence was defined as having proteinuria of ≥3 g/g or urinary creatinine of ≥3 g/day. All patients received an induction therapy; maintenance immunosuppressive therapy at post-transplantation relied on tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids. In order to prevent or treat FSGS recurrence, patients received apheresis sessions plus rituximab. Results: FSGS recurrence rate was 47%. All patients that relapsed with a first graft also relapsed with subsequent grafts. Median time to recurrence was 3 (min: 1; max: 4745) days, despite rituximab/apheresis prophylaxis. Mean age was significantly lower in the relapsers (group 1) than in the non-relapsers (group 2); i.e., 47 ± 11 vs. 58 ± 9 years (p = 0.04). Time to progression to stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and young age at FSGS diagnosis were lower in group 1 compared to group 2; i.e., 5 (min: 1; max: 26) vs. 2 (min: 1; max: 26) years, and 16 (min: 4; max: 55) vs. 34 (min: 6; max 48) years, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of progression to CKD stage 5 on the native kidneys, averaging 7 years in both groups (p = 0.99). In group 1, seven patients received rituximab/apheresis prophylaxis, although this did not prevent the recurrence of FSGS. Conclusion: pretransplant prophylaxis with plasmapheresis/rituximab did not appear to reduce the risk of recurrence of primary FSGS on the graft, but could allow remission in the event of recurrence.

Management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) post renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

One of the common GN causing ESKD is focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Recurrence of FSGS post-transplantation can lead to graft loss. Data on management either prophylactically or once recurrence occurs are limited. This review article aims to assess the effective management of patients with FSGS recurrence post-transplantation, looking mainly at recurrence post prophylactic treatment and remission in case of treatment post recurrence.

METHODS

Twenty-three studies were included using the search MeSH terms "FSGS" "recurrence" "adults" "transplantation" "treatment". Search engines used were Pubmed, clinical key, Scopus and Cochrane library. Inclusion criteria were articles covered adult patients with recurrent FSGS post renal transplantation, treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis, and articles published from 2000 tt2021. Excluded articles were paediatric population, studies with no reported outcomes of the treatment of FSGS, and Patients who received stem cell transplantation or galactose therapy.

RESULTS

Prophylactic PP did not show a reduction in recurrence of FSGS in 2/3 studies. Prophylactic rituximab was shown to reduce recurrence of FSGS in one-study and case reports. Treatment of recurrent FSGS with PP showed responses ranging from 41% to 100%. Only one study did not show improvement with PP use as treatment having a 27% remission. Treatment with rituximab showed variable results, with reports showing remission ranging from 57% to 100%. Whereas other reports showing no response at all. PP prescription reporting was variable. One study suggested intensified PP regimen while in most other studies PP was guided by the response reflected by the reduction of proteinuria.

DISCUSSION

Reviewing the treatment of recurrent FSGS is crucial, as there no consensus on treating FSGS as the disease is not very common in the adult population. The evidence of different modalities is based on small cohort studies. This paper supports the use of PP and RTX as treatment of recurrent FSGS.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, PP and RTX are the main modalities to treat recurrent FSGS with varying response rates. Prophylactic PP does not play a role in preventing recurrent FSGS. Prophylactic rituximab might play a role in preventing FSGS post-transplantation. PP and RTX, when used as a treatment, show variable response rates. Larger RCTs are needed to have a strong level of evidence to base our clinical management on.

Recurrent Glomerular Disease after Kidney Transplantation: Diagnostic and Management Dilemmas

Recurrent glomerular disease after kidney transplant remains an important cause of allograft failure. Many of the different entities post-transplant still suffer from incomplete knowledge on pathophysiology, and therefore lack targeted and effective therapies. In this review, we focus on specific clinical dilemmas encountered by physicians in managing recurrent glomerular disease by highlighting new insights into the understanding and treatment of post-transplant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, C3 glomerulopathy, amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, and IgA nephropathy.

Recurrent Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis After Kidney Transplantation in African Americans: Review of the Current Evidence

OBJECTIVES

In many countries of sub-Saharan Africa, the most common causes of end-stage kidney disease are hypertension, chronic glomerulonephritis, and diabetes mellitus. So far, literature on recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in sub-Saharan African populations is limited. With the intention of providing guidance for best practices in sub-Saharan Africa, we reviewed available evidence for African Americans, a population with a similar genetic background. We chose this population as a pseudo-population to show how similar genetic backgrounds can predict disease occurrence in similar populations residing in different continents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our extended PubMed and Scopus literature search used these key words: "focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in African Americans" (search 1), "recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after kidney transplantation" (search 2), "risk factors for recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis" (search 3); and "APOL1 gene and kidney transplantation" (search 4).

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Search 1 yielded 4 articles, search 2 yielded 44 articles, search 3 yielded 6 articles, and search 4 yielded 8 articles. African Americans were shown to be disproportionately predisposed to endstage kidney disease, traceable to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (the most common cause of glomerulonephritis leading to end-stage kidney disease). Apolipoprotein L1 presence in 22% of African Americans explained the odds ratio of 17 in developing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and 8 times lifetime risk of end-stage kidney disease. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis recurred in 30% of kidney transplant recipients; risk factors included young age, rapid progression to end-stage kidney disease, and White race recipient. Circulating permeability factors played a central role in primary and recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. For recurrent cases, transplant biopsy has remained the gold standard for diagnosis, with treatment involving a multi-modal approach, often resulting in partial or complete remission of proteinuria; allograft loss can occur if treatment is not successful. More randomized clinical trials are needed to chart the way forward for prolonged allograft function.

Immune-mediated entities of (primary) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) represents a glomerular scar formation downstream of various different mechanisms leading to podocytopathy and podocyte loss. Recently, significant advances were made in understanding genetic factors, podocyte intrinsic mechanisms, and adaptive mechanisms causing FSGS. However, while most cases of nephrotic FSGS are being treated with immunosuppressants, the underlying immune dysregulation, involved immune cells, and soluble factors are only incompletely understood. Thus, we here summarize the current knowledge of proposed immune effector cells, secreted soluble factors, and podocyte response in immune-mediated (primary) FSGS.

Therapeutic Options for Recurrence of Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulonephritis (FSGS) in the Renal Allograft: Single-Center Experience

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) recurrence after kidney transplantation (KTx) is relatively frequent and is associated with poor graft survival. The aim of this study was to investigate which management strategies were associated with better outcomes in our cohort of KTx recipients with primary FSGS. We retrospectively collected data on patients with primary FSGS who received a KTx between 1993 and 2019. A history of biopsy proven FSGS in native kidneys and new onset of significant proteinuria early post-KTx led to the diagnosis of recurrence, which was confirmed by graft biopsy. From 1993 to 2019 we performed 46 KTxs in patients with primary FSGS. We identified 26 episodes of recurrence in 25 patients, 67% of them occurring in males. They were younger at the time of KTx (33.8 vs. 41.1 years old, p = 0.067) and had progressed to end stage renal disease (ESRD) faster after FSGS diagnosis (61.4 vs. 111.2 months, p = 0.038), while they were less likely to have received prophylactic plasmapheresis (61.5% vs. 90%, p = 0.029). 76.7% of recurrences were found early, after a median of 0.5 months (IQR 0.1-1) with a median proteinuria was 8.5 (IQR 4.9-11.9) g/day. All patients with recurrence were treated with plasmapheresis, while 8 (30.7%) additionally received rituximab, 1 (3.8%) abatacept, and 4 (15.4%) ACTH. 7 (27%) patients experienced complete and 11 (42.3%) partial remission after a mean time of 3 (±1.79) and 4.4 (±2.25) months, respectively. Prognosis was worse for patients who experienced a recurrence. Eleven (42.3%) patients lost their graft from FSGS in a median time of 33 (IQR 17.5-43.3) months. In this series of patients, primary FSGS recurred frequently after KTx. Prophylacic plasmapheresis was shown efficacious in avoiding FSGS recurrence, while timely diagnosis and plasmapheresis-based regimens induced remission in more than half of the patients.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Immunoadsorption in nephrotic syndrome: Where are we now and where are we going from here?

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is characterized by three different entities, namely minimal change disease (MCD), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and membranous nephropathy (MN). While there is an increasing understanding of primary MN with the discovery of antibodies directed against phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R Ab) and thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A, circulatory factors causative of inducing MCD and FSGS remain in part elusive. Extracorporeal treatment forms (mostly plasma exchange) have been reserved for patients with either a disease course refractory to commonly prescribed immunosuppressive drugs or to patients with recurrence after kidney transplantation. There is a paucity of data supporting the use of immunoadsorption (IAS) in the management of MCD and MN and evidence to perform LDL-apheresis in the former is limited to reports from Japan. Treatment with IAS in primary FSGS has shown mixed responses, possibly biased by including treatment-resistant cases in the absence of genetic testing. In those with recurrence of the disease following kidney transplantation, IAS has shown high remission rates with an acceptable safety profile. There is a need to compare IAS to plasma exchange (PLEX) in this indication and due to a higher amount of plasma processed during one session, IAS may have advantages over PLEX. Removal of PLA2R Ab by IAS is currently being tested in a phase II clinical trial. More clinical trials in a prospective and randomized fashion need to be designed to prove the concept that IAS may be a treatment option for INS. While PLEX is still the leading extracorporeal treatment form in these indications, this review aims to highlight the efficacy and safety of IAS in the management of INS.

Anti-CD20 Blocker Rituximab in Kidney Transplantation

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal protein used in various clinical scenarios in kidney transplant recipients. However, its evidence-based use there remains limited due to lack of controlled studies, limited sample size, short follow-up and poorly defined endpoints. Rituximab is indicated for CD20+ posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. It may be beneficial for treating recurrent membranous nephropathy and recurrent allograft antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis and possibly for recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Rituximab, in combination with IVIg/plasmapheresis, appears to decrease antibody level and increase the odds of transplantation in sensitized recipients. The role of Rituximab in ABOi transplant remains unclear, as similar outcomes are achieved without its use. Rituximab is not efficacious in antibody-mediated rejection/chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Strict randomized control trials are necessary to elucidate its true role in these settings.

Efficacy of the Combination of Immunoadsorption and Rituximab for Treatment in a Case of Severe Focal and Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Recurrence after Renal Transplantation

Background/Aims: We present a case of a male patient with severe recurrence of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after transplant. Methods: Before the transplant he was treated with plasma exchange. Massive proteinuria was detected post-transplantation and plasma exchanges were performed without response. We administered 5 doses of Rituximab (375 mg/m2) and partial remission was achieved. Proteinuria relapse occurred 1 year post-transplant, so Immunoadsorption (IA) was started instead of plasma exchange with reduction of proteinuria. Later, 2 new episodes of proteinuria relapse were detected and treated by increasing the number of IA sessions and administering new cycles of Rituximab. After achieving partial remission, IA was reduced to one session every 7–10 days as maintenance therapy. Results: Despite the fact of the severe recurrence, renal function and proteinuria remain stable over 8 years after the transplantation was performed. Conclusion: Combination of maintenance IA and cycles of Rituximab is an effective treatment for aggressive forms of FSGS recurrence after renal transplantation.

Multiple Targets for Novel Therapy of FSGS Associated with Circulating Permeability Factor

A plasma component is responsible for altered glomerular permeability in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Evidence includes recurrence after renal transplantation, remission after plasmapheresis, proteinuria in infants of affected mothers, transfer of proteinuria to experimental animals, and impaired glomerular permeability after exposure to patient plasma. Therapy may include decreasing synthesis of the injurious agent, removing or blocking its interaction with cells, or blocking signaling or enhancing cell defenses to restore the permeability barrier and prevent progression. Agents that may prevent the synthesis of the permeability factor include cytotoxic agents or aggressive chemotherapy. Extracorporeal therapies include plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption with protein A or anti-immunoglobulin, or lipopheresis. Oral or intravenous galactose also decreases P_alb activity. Studies of glomeruli have shown that several strategies prevent the action of FSGS sera. These include blocking receptor-ligand interactions, modulating cell reactions using indomethacin or eicosanoids 20-HETE or 8,9-EET, and enhancing cytoskeleton and protein interactions using calcineurin inhibitors, glucocorticoids, or rituximab. We have identified cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 (CLCF-1) as a candidate for the permeability factor. Therapies specific to CLCF-1 include potential use of cytokine receptor-like factor (CRLF-1) and inhibition of Janus kinase 2. Combined therapy using multiple modalities offers therapy to reverse proteinuria and prevent scarring.

Update on the treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in renal transplantation

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) represents one of the most severe glomerular diseases, with frequent progression to end-stage renal disease and a high rate of recurrence in renal allografts (30%-50%). Recurrent FSGS portends a negative outcome, with the hazard ratio of graft failure being two-fold higher then that of other glomerulonephritis. Two patterns of clinical presentations are observed: Early recurrence, which is characterized by massive proteinuria within hours to days after implantation of the renal graft, and late recurrence, which occurs several months or years after the transplantation. Many clinical conditions have been recognized as risk factors for recurrence, including younger age, rapid progression of the disease to end-stage renal disease on native kidneys, and loss of previous renal allografts due to recurrence. However, much less is known about the incidence and risk factors of the so-called “de novo” type of FSGS, for which sufferers are transplanted patients without disease on native kidneys; but, rapid development of allograft failure is frequently observed. Management of both forms is challenging, and none of the approaches proposed to date have been demonstrated as consistently beneficial or effective. In the present review we report an update on the available therapeutic strategies for FSGS in renal transplantation within the context of a critical overview of the current literature.

Plasma Exchange for the Recurrence of Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis

Background. Posttransplant recurrence of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) in the form of massive proteinuria is not uncommon and has detrimental consequences on renal allograft survival. A putative circulating permeability factor has been implicated in the pathogenesis leading to widespread use of plasma exchange (PLEX). We reviewed published studies to assess the role of PLEX on treatment of rFSGS in adults. Methods. Eligible manuscripts compared PLEX or variants with conventional care for inducing proteinuria remission (PR) in rFSGS and were identified through MEDLINE and reference lists. Data were abstracted in parallel by two reviewers. Results. We detected 6 nonrandomized studies with 117 cases enrolled. In a random effects model, the pooled risk ratio for the composite endpoint of partial or complete PR was 0,38 in favour of PLEX (95% CI: 0,23–0,61). No statistical heterogeneity was observed among included studies (I² = 0%, p = 0,42). On average, 9–26 PLEX sessions were performed to achieve PR. Renal allograft loss due to recurrence was lower (range: 0%–67%) in patients treated with PLEX. Conclusion. Notwithstanding the inherent limitations of small, observational trials, PLEX appears to be effective for PR in rFSGS. Additional research is needed to further elucidate its optimal use and impact on long-term allograft survival.