Secondary malignant neoplasms following radiotherapy for primary cancer in children and young adults

Variations in size-specific effective dose with patient stature and beam width for kV cone beam CT imaging in radiotherapy

The facilities now available on linear accelerators for external beam radiotherapy enable radiation fields to be conformed to the shapes of tumours with a high level of precision. However, in order for the treatment delivered to take advantage of this, the patient must be positioned on the couch with the same degree of accuracy. Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography systems are now incorporated into radiotherapy linear accelerators to allow imaging to be performed at the time of treatment, and image-guided radiation therapy is now standard in most radiotherapy departments throughout the world. However, because doses from imaging are much lower than therapy doses, less effort has been put into optimising radiological protection of imaging protocols. Standard imaging protocols supplied by the equipment vendor are often used with little adaptation to the stature of individual patients, and exposure factors and field sizes are frequently larger than necessary. In this study, the impact of using standard protocols for imaging anatomical phantoms of varying size from a library of 193 adult phantoms has been evaluated. Monte Carlo simulations were used to calculate doses for organs and tissues for each phantom, and results combined in terms of size-specific effective dose (SED). Values of SED from pelvic scans ranged from 11 mSv to 22 mSv for male phantoms and 8 mSv to 18 mSv for female phantoms, and for chest scans from 3.8 mSv to 7.6 mSv for male phantoms and 4.6 mSv to 9.5 mSv for female phantoms. Analysis of the results showed that if the same exposure parameters and field sizes are used, a person who is 5 cm shorter will receive a size SED that is 3%-10% greater, while a person who is 10 kg lighter will receive a dose that is 10%-14% greater compared with the average size.

Risk of secondary malignant neoplasms in children following proton therapy vs. photon therapy for primary CNS tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Central nervous system tumors are now the most common primary neoplasms seen in children, and radiation therapy is a key component in management. Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs) are rare, but dreaded complications. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially minimize the risk of SMNs compared to conventional photon radiation therapy (RT), and multiple recent studies with mature data have reported the risk of SMNs after PBT. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize and compare the incidence of SMNs after proton and photon-based radiation for pediatric CNS tumors.

Methods

A systematic search of literature on electronic (PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase) databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. We included studies reporting the incidence and nature of SMNs in pediatric patients with primary CNS tumors. The crude incidence of SMNs and all secondary neoplasms were separately extracted, and the random-effects model was used for pooled analysis and subgroup comparison was performed between studies using photons vs. protons.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included for analysis. A total of 418 SMNs were seen in 38,163 patients. The most common SMN were gliomas (40.6%) followed by meningiomas (38.7%), sarcomas (4.8%), and thyroid cancers (4.2%). The median follow-up was 8.8 years [3.3–23.2].The median latency to SMN for photons and protons were 11.9 years [5-23] and 5.9 years [5-6.7], respectively. The pooled incidence of SMNs was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.1%–2.6%, I² = 94%) with photons and 1.5% (95% CI: 0%–4.5%, I² = 81%) with protons. The pooled incidence of all SNs was not different [photons: 3.6% (95% CI: 2.5%–4.8%, I² = 96%) vs. protons: 1.5% (95% CI: 0–4.5%, I² = 80%); p = 0.21].

Conclusion

We observed similar rates of SMN with PBT at 1.5% compared to 1.8% with photon-based RT for pediatric CNS tumors. We observed a shorter latency to SMN with PBT compared to RT. With increasing use of pencil beam scanning PBT and VMAT, further studies are warranted to evaluate the risk of secondary cancers in patients treated with these newer modalities.

Out-of-field organ doses and associated risk of cancer development following radiation therapy with photons

Innovations in cancer treatment have contributed to the improved survival rate of these patients. Radiotherapy is one of the main options for cancer management nowadays. High doses of ionizing radiation are usually delivered to the tumor site with high energy photon beams. However, the therapeutic radiation exposure may lead to second cancer induction. Moreover, the introduction of intensity-modulated radiation therapy over the last decades has increased the radiation dose to out-of-field organs compared to that from conventional irradiation. The increased organ doses might result in elevated probabilities for developing secondary malignancies to critical organs outside the treatment volume. The organ-specific dosimetry is considered necessary for the theoretical second cancer risk assessment and the proper analysis of data derived from epidemiological reports. This study reviews the methods employed for the measurement and calculation of out-of-field organ doses from exposure to photons and/or neutrons. The strengths and weaknesses of these dosimetric approaches are described in detail. This is followed by a review of the epidemiological data associated with out-of-field cancer risks. Previously published theoretical cancer risk estimates for adult and pediatric patients undergoing radiotherapy with conventional and advanced techniques are presented. The methodology for the theoretical prediction of the probability of carcinogenesis to out-of-field sites and the limitations of this approach are discussed. The article also focuses on the factors affecting the magnitude of the probability for developing radiotherapy-induced malignancies. The restriction of out-of-field doses and risks through the use of different types of shielding equipment is presented.

Radiation-Induced Secondary Cancer Risk Assessment in Patients With Lung Cancer After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using the CyberKnife M6 System With Lung-Optimized Treatment

Background

To evaluate the lifetime secondary cancer risk (SCR) of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the CyberKnife (CK) M6 system with a lung-optimized treatment (LOT) module for lung cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 11 lung cancer patients curatively treated with SBRT using the CK M6 robotic radiosurgery system. The planning treatment volume (PTV) and common organs at risk (OARs) for SCR analysis included the spinal cord, total lung, and healthy normal lung tissue (total lung volume - PTV). Schneider’s full model was used to calculate SCR according to the concept of organ equivalent dose (OED).

Results

CK-LOT-SBRT delivers precisely targeted radiation doses to lung cancers and achieves good PTV coverage and conformal dose distribution, thus posing limited SCR to surrounding tissues. The three OARs had similar risk equivalent dose (RED) values among four different models. However, for the PTV, differences in RED values were observed among the models. The cumulative excess absolute risk (EAR) value for the normal lung, spinal cord, and PTV was 70.47 (per 10,000 person-years). Schneider’s Lnt model seemed to overestimate the EAR/lifetime attributable risk (LAR).

Conclusion

For lung cancer patients treated with CK-LOT optimized with the Monte Carlo algorithm, the SCR might be lower. Younger patients had a greater SCR, although the dose–response relationship seemed be non-linear for the investigated organs, especially with respect to the PTV. Despite the etiological association, the SCR after CK-LOT-SBRT for carcinoma and sarcoma, is low, but not equal to zero. Further research is required to understand and to show the lung SBRT SCR comparisons and differences across different modalities with motion management strategies.

Radiation-induced secondary malignancies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a pilot study of patients treated via IMRT or VMAT

Background

Patients treated with radiotherapy are at risk of developing a second cancer during their lifetime, which can directly impact treatment decision-making and patient management. The aim of this study was to qualify and compare the secondary cancer risk (SCR) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

Patients and methods

We analyzed the treatment plans of a cohort of 10 NPC patients originally treated with IMRT or VMAT. Dose distributions in these plans were used to calculate the organ equivalent dose (OED) with Schneider’s full model. Analyses were applied to the brain stem, spinal cord, oral cavity, pharynx, parotid glands, lung, mandible, healthy tissue, and planning target volume.

Results

We observed that the OED-based risks of SCR were slightly higher for the oral cavity and mandible when VMAT was used. No significant difference was found in terms of the doses to other organs, including the brain stem, parotids, pharynx, submandibular gland, lung, spinal cord, and healthy tissue. In the NPC cohort, the lungs were the organs that were most sensitive to radiation-induced cancer.

Conclusion

VMAT afforded superior results in terms of organ-at-risk-sparing compared with IMRT. Most OED-based second cancer risks for various organs were similar when VMAT and IMRT were employed, but the risks for the oral cavity and mandible were slightly higher when VMAT was used.

DNA methylation as a potential mediator of environmental risks in the development of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

5-year survival rate for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has risen to approximately 90%, yet the causal disease pathway is still poorly understood. Evidence suggests multiple 'hits' are required for disease progression; an initial genetic abnormality followed by additional secondary 'hits'. It is plausible that environmental influences may trigger these secondary hits, and with the peak incidence of diagnosis between 2 and 5 years of age, early life exposures are likely to be key. DNA methylation can be modified by many environmental exposures and is dramatically altered in cancers, including childhood ALL. Here we explore the potential that DNA methylation may be involved in the causal pathway toward disease by acting as a mediator between established environmental factors and childhood ALL development.