Antiinfective prophylaxis with ceftazidime and teicoplanin in children undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation

Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute childhood leukemia: What is known so far?

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has evolved in recent decades, reaching an overall survival rate close to 90%. Currently, approximately 4% of patients with ALL die from secondary complications of chemotherapy. Among these complications, the most frequent is febrile neutropenia (FN). The treatment of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) is even more aggressive, being consequently related to a considerable amount of treatment-related toxicity with a high risk of severe infection and death.

METHOD

In order to reduce the infection-related risks in these groups of patients, systemic antibacterial prophylaxis has emerged as a possible approach.

RESULTS

Antibiotic prophylaxis during neutropenia periods in those undergoing chemotherapy have .already been proven in adults with acute leukemias (ALs). Among the possible available therapeutic options for bacterial prophylaxis in children with cancer, fluoroquinolones emerged with the most amount of evidence. Within this class, levofloxacin became the best choice.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, the use of levofloxacin seems to be indicated in very specific situations: in children who are known to be neutropenic for a long time, secondary to intensive chemotherapy; in children with AL undergoing chemotherapy to induce remission; or in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This article aims to describe recent evidence focusing on antibiotic prophylaxis in children with ALs.

Guideline for Antibacterial Prophylaxis Administration in Pediatric Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background

Bacteremia and other invasive bacterial infections are common among children with cancer receiving intensive chemotherapy and in pediatric recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Systemic antibacterial prophylaxis is one approach that can be used to reduce the risk of these infections. Our purpose was to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for systemic antibacterial prophylaxis administration in pediatric patients with cancer and those undergoing HSCT.

Methods

An international and multidisciplinary panel was convened with representation from pediatric hematology/oncology and HSCT, pediatric infectious diseases (including antibiotic stewardship), nursing, pharmacy, a patient advocate, and a CPG methodologist. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to generate recommendations based on the results of a systematic review of the literature.

Results

The systematic review identified 114 eligible randomized trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. The panel made a weak recommendation for systemic antibacterial prophylaxis for children receiving intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia and relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Weak recommendations against the routine use of systemic antibacterial prophylaxis were made for children undergoing induction chemotherapy for ALL, autologous HSCT and allogeneic HSCT. A strong recommendation against its routine use was made for children whose therapy is not expected to result in prolonged severe neutropenia. If used, prophylaxis with levofloxacin was recommended during severe neutropenia.

Conclusions

We present a CPG for systemic antibacterial prophylaxis administration in pediatric cancer and HSCT patients. Future research should evaluate the long-term effectiveness and adverse effects of prophylaxis.

Ciprofloxacin vs. levofloxacin for prophylaxis in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Infection is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing myleosuppressive therapy with the risk of infection being heightened during the neutropenic phase. Fluoroquinolones are most often utilized as prophylaxis, specifically levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin; however, there is increasing resistance among these agents. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin when used prophylactically in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.

Study design

A retrospective cohort study conducted at a 443-bed tertiary teaching county hospital from 1 January 2005 to 31 September 2016.

Methods

Patients aged 18–89 who were admitted and received levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were evaluated.

Results

The patient population (N = 151) was predominantly male (93 vs. 58) and the median (IQR) age was 57 (20.1) years. There were 108 patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared to 43 undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significantly fewer patients who received levofloxacin (11/43, 25.6%) developed neutropenic fever compared to patients who received ciprofloxacin (61/108, 56.5%, p = 0.0006). Also there were significantly more positive blood cultures in the ciprofloxacin group (36/108, 33.3%) compared to the levofloxacin group (4/43, 9.3%); the majority of which were Gram-positive organisms (p = 0.0025).

Conclusion

Prophylaxis with levofloxacin was associated with a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia and bacteremia when compared to ciprofloxacin in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is frequently utilized in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) patients, its impact on morbidity and mortality is uncertain. This study investigates the role of quinolone prophylaxis after AHSCT in recent years.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 291 consecutive adult patients who underwent AHSCT for malignant disorders, between June 2013 and January 2015. Outcomes were compared between patients who received norfloxacin prophylaxis and those who did not. The endpoints were mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days after transplant, frequency of ICU admissions, and incidence and type of bacteremia.

RESULTS

Of 291 patients, 252 patients received norfloxacin prophylaxis and 39 patients did not. The mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days as well as the median number of days of hospitalization following AHSCT did not differ between the two groups. No differences were noted in the frequency of ICU admission, incidence of septic shock, and duration of ICU stay. Patients who did not receive prophylaxis had a significantly higher rate of neutropenic fever (97%) than patients who received prophylaxis (77%) (p = 0.005). The patients with prophylaxis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of gram-positive bacteremia as compared to those without prophylaxis (p = 0.002). Frequency of Clostridium difficile infection was similar during and post-prophylaxis. More antibiotic use was noted among patients without prophylaxis [97%; median 9 (range, 5-24) days] compared to patients with prophylaxis [79%; median 7 (range, 3-36) days, p = 0.04].

CONCLUSION

Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever and antibiotic use in AHSCT, it did not alter mortality or morbidity.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

METHODS

We collected reports from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, along with references cited therein. We included prospective, randomized studies on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in HSCT recipients.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials with 1453 autologous and allogeneic HSCT recipients were included. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis was compared with placebo or no prophylaxis in 10 trials and with non-absorbable antibiotics in two trials. Systemic antibiotics other than fluoroquinolones were evaluated in five of these 12 trials. Four trials evaluated the effect of the addition of antibiotics for gram-positive bacteria to fluoroquinolones. One trial compared two different systemic antibiotic regimens: fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. As a result, systemic antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the incidence of febrile episodes (OR 0.16; 95%CI 0.09-0.30), clinically or microbiologically documented infection (OR 0.38; 95%CI 0.22-0.63) and bacteremia (OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.16-0.59) without significantly affecting all-cause mortality or infection-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis successfully reduced the incidence of infection. However, there was no significant impact on mortality. The clinical benefits of prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones were inconclusive because of the small number of clinical trials evaluated.

The use of intravenous antibiotics at the onset of neutropenia in patients receiving outpatient-based hematopoietic stem cell transplants

Empirical antibiotics at the onset of febrile neutropenia are one of several strategies for management of bacterial infections in patients undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) (empiric strategy). Our HSCT program aims to perform HSCT in an outpatient setting, where an empiric antibiotic strategy was employed. HSCT recipients began receiving intravenous antibiotics at the onset of neutropenia in the absence of fever as part of our institutional policy from 01 Jan 2009; intravenous Prophylactic strategy. A prospective study was conducted to compare two consecutive cohorts [Year 2008 (Empiric strategy) vs. Year 2009 (Prophylactic strategy)] of patients receiving HSCT. There were 238 HSCTs performed between 01 Jan 2008 and 31 Dec 2009 with 127 and 111 in the earlier and later cohorts respectively. Infection-related mortality pre- engraftment was similar with a prophylactic compared to an empiric strategy (3.6% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.24), but reduced among recipients of autologous HSCT (0% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.03). Microbiologically documented, blood stream infections and clinically documented infections pre-engraftment were reduced in those receiving a prophylactic compared to an empiric strategy, (11.7% vs. 28.3%; p = 0.001), (9.9% vs. 24.4%; p = 0.003) and (18.2% vs. 33.9% p = 0.007) respectively. The prophylactic use of intravenous once-daily ceftriaxone in patients receiving outpatient based HSCT is safe and may be particularly effective in patients receiving autologous HSCT. Further studies are warranted to study the impact of this Prophylactic strategy in an outpatient based HSCT program.

A randomized comparison of empiric or pre-emptive antibiotic therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We performed a randomized comparison of pre-emptive and empiric antibiotic therapy for adult patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation. One hundred and fifty-three patients were randomized to receive cefepime either pre-emptively on the day that neutropenia (ANC<1.0 x 10(9) cells/l) developed irrespective of the presence of fever, or at onset of fever and neutropenia (empiric). Although there was no difference between the two arms in the proportion of patients developing fever or in the median number of days of fever, the time to onset of fever was a mean of 1 day longer in each patient on the pre-emptive arm (log rank P<0.001). The number of patients with bloodstream infections was significantly reduced in those receiving pre-emptive therapy (16/75) compared to the empiric arm (31/76) (P<0.01) but this did not translate into an appreciable clinical benefit as measured by days of hospitalization, time to engraftment, use of additional antimicrobial agents or mortality at 30 days. This study does not support the use of pre-emptive intravenous antibiotic therapy in adult stem cell transplant recipients.

High-dose busulfan and thiotepa followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in previously irradiated medulloblastoma patients: high toxicity and lack of efficacy

We previously demonstrated that Busulfan-Thiotepa (Bu-Thio) and ASCT effectively treated patients with locally relapsed medulloblastoma after surgery and conventional chemotherapy. We thus evaluated the administration of Bu-Thio in patients relapsing after conventional CNS irradiation. Patients were scheduled to receive Busulfan (600 mg/m(2)) and Thiotepa (900 mg/m(2)) and ASCT. Resection of residual tumour and additional irradiation were performed if necessary and feasible after Bu-Thio. Toxicity was compared to that observed in 35 patients treated without previous CNS irradiation. From 5/88 to 3/02, 15 patients were treated according to this strategy. Toxicity was significantly higher than that observed in unirradiated patients: thrombocytopenia <50,000/mm(3) lasting 56 days (13-732) (P=0.02) and 30 days (4-124), respectively, HVOD (10/15 and 12/35 patients, respectively) (P=0.06), neurological toxicity (8/15 vs 3/35 patients) (P=0.01). Tumour response was assessable in seven patients and consisted in two CR, three PR and two NR. Currently, two of 15 patients are alive with no evidence of disease. In conclusion, the toxicity of Bu-Thio was significantly more severe in previously irradiated patients. In spite of a high response rate, this strategy failed to improve the prognosis of previously irradiated patients with a relapse from a medulloblastoma.

Prophylaxis of early bacterial infections after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT): a matched-pair study comparing oral fluoroquinolones and intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam

The safety and efficacy of early bacterial prophylaxis with piperacillin-tazobactam were prospectively evaluated in 51 autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) recipients. The results were compared with those obtained in 51 control patients receiving oral fluoroquinolones in a retrospective matched-pair control study. Overall, 76% of the study group and 98% of the control group developed at least one febrile episode during neutropenia (P=0.002). Time from neutropenia to the first febrile episode (FFE) was significantly longer in the study group than in the control group (P=0.04). Once a febrile episode appeared, the duration of fever was significantly longer in cases than in controls (median of 5 and 2 days respectively, P<0.001), and led to a more frequent use of empirical amphotericin B (AmB), not statistically significant (P=0.13). However, the total time of antibiotic administration was significantly greater in the control than in the study group (P=0.05). The duration of AmB treatment shows a trend toward a longer duration in the control than in study group (P=0.2). Overall, 86% of the Gram-positive bacteremia and 85% of the Gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to the tested antibiotics. Our study suggests that a subgroup of patients could benefit from prophylaxis with piperacillin-tazobactam without increasing toxicity or bacterial resistance.

Less frequent catheter dressing changes decrease local cutaneous toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy in children, without increasing the rate of catheter-related infections: results of a randomised trial

Cutaneous lesions caused by catheter dressing changes can be serious and generate local pain in children undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation. One hundred and thirteen children entered a randomised trial to compare two catheter dressing change frequencies (15 days vs 4 days). Skin toxicity was classified according to the following scale: grade 0: healthy skin, to grade 4: severe skin toxicity. A qualitative culture of the skin at the catheter entry site was taken whenever the dressing was changed. Of the 112 evaluable children (56 in each group) 32 developed grade > or = 2 local skin toxicity (eight in the 15-day group and 24 in the 4-day group; P = 0.001). Although higher in the 4-day group, the proportions of children experiencing pain during and between dressing changes were not statistically different between the two groups. The proportion of patients with one or more positive skin culture(s) at the catheter entry site during hospitalisation were similar in the two groups (27% in the 15-day group and 23% in the 4-day group) as were the proportions of documented nosocomial bloodstream infections (11% and 13%; NS). Whereas the planned frequency was maintained in the 4-day group (mean = 4 days, s.d. = 1), it was usually shortened in the 15-day group (mean = 8 days, s.d. = 4), mainly because dressings had loosened. Decreasing the catheter dressing change frequency proved efficient in reducing cutaneous toxicity without increasing the risk of local and systemic infection. In our unit, catheter dressings are changed every 8 days since this analysis.

High-dose thiotepa and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric malignant mesenchymal tumors: a phase II study

The prognosis of metastatic malignant mesenchymal tumors (MMT) remains poor. Given the chemosensitivity of these neoplasms, a phase II study of high-dose thiotepa (HDT) was performed to evaluate the efficacy of this drug in this particular subset of pediatric tumors. Between 1986 and 1998, 18 patients, previously treated with conventional therapy for metastatic or refractory MMT, entered the study. Thiotepa was administered at a daily dose of 300 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days. Hematopoietic stem cell rescue, consisting of bone marrow transplantation or peripheral stem cell transplantation, was performed 2 days after completion of HDT. A response exceeding 50% was observed in 6/18 patients (response rate 33%). Toxicity was severe but never led to death. HDT used at a dose of 900 mg/m2 yields measurable anti-tumor activity in previously treated patients. The next step in these particularly poor prognosis metastatic MMT will be to investigate HDT combined with other drugs, known to be efficient at high doses.

Consolidation with a busulfan-containing regimen followed by stem cell transplantation in infants with poor prognosis stage 4 neuroblastoma

Although infants with stage 4 neuroblastoma (NB) usually have a good prognosis, metastatic relapses after 1 year of age and amplification of the N-myc oncogene are established poor prognostic factors. In order to improve the survival of patients with such high-risk factors, we performed consolidation with a busulfan (600 mg/m2)-melphalan (140 mg/m2)-containing regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). From 1986 to 1998, 12 patients were treated according to this strategy. Their median age at diagnosis was 9 months (1-11). Consolidation was performed after a metastatic relapse in five children, because of persistent bone metastases in one and as first-line consolidation in six patients whose tumor exhibited N-myc amplification. The 5-year EFS rate is 64. 5% (36-85%) with a median follow-up of 92 months (20-126). One toxicity-related death occurred in a very heavily pretreated patient. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease was the major side-effect that occurred in nine of 12 children. This busulfan-melphalan combination appears to dramatically improve the prognosis of these high-risk infants with metastatic NB. Given its high toxicity, indications for this consolidation must be restricted to high-risk infants and a lower dose of busulfan (480 mg/m2) is recommended in children weighing less than 10 kg. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 937-942.

A survey of the use of teicoplanin in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours

A significant number of open and comparative studies have now addressed the use of teicoplanin in the treatment of documented or presumed infection in patients with haematological and non-haematological malignancy. Available evidence suggests that teicoplanin is an effective agent against such infections, with an excellent safety profile. The use of teicoplanin and vancomycin may be justified as part of the initial management of clinically infected right atrial catheters in patients with malignancy. The first-line use of glycopeptides may also be appropriate in units where streptococcal and methicillin resistant staphylococcal infections are prevalent. However, such a policy should be reviewed regularly. Except in the above situations, a delay in the introduction of either teicoplanin or vancomycin in cancer patients does not appear to produce any excess mortality, but there may be some additional morbidity in terms of fever and malaise. The introduction of glycopeptides as second-line agents is indicated for sensitive, microbiologically documented infections and for patients who have not responded to empirical, first-line therapy. Non-inpatient treatment with teicoplanin is an area of ongoing interest and may be justified on both humanitarian and pharmacoeconomic grounds. The use of glycopeptides in the prophylactic setting remains controversial and should be avoided while the emergence of resistance, particularly in enterococci, should be monitored closely.

A review of the use of teicoplanin in haematological malignancy

Factors determining the change in patterns of antibiotic use in patients with haematological malignancies include the growing numbers of infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens, the increasing reliance on indwelling catheters, and strategic movement away from inpatient therapy towards day-case and non-inpatient therapy. The suitability of teicoplanin in this context is examined. The indications for teicoplanin use are now established as: early use in clinically infected patients; as a second-line agent for sensitive pathogens; and in primary antibiotic failures. Teicoplanin should not be used as empirical therapy in fevers of unknown origin; neither should teicoplanin be used as prophylaxis (the situations of infection in chemotherapy patients or for Hickman catheter insertion in particular are discussed). Comparative studies versus vancomycin have shown teicoplanin to be equally effective and to be well tolerated. Teicoplanin's good safety profile and ease of use make it particularly useful for non-inpatient therapy. Problems are posed for both glycopeptides by specific resistant pathogens, although these pathogens are currently not common. Haematologists must be aware of, and guard against, abuse of the glycopeptides in their own and other fields, including oral gut decontamination, the treatment of Clostridium difficile and veterinary use.

Stage IV neuroblastoma in patients over 1 year of age at diagnosis: consolidation of poor responders with combined busulfan, cyclophosphamide and melphalan followed by in vitro mafosfamide-purged autologous bone marrow transplantation

In an attempt to improve the poor prognosis of poor responders with stage IV neuroblastoma, a new combined high-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimen was tested. Event-free and overall survival, as well as the incidence of complications, were analysed. Twenty-five children aged 12-146 months at diagnosis entered this study. All were in complete remission (CR) at the time of high-dose chemotherapy. Two or three different protocols had been necessary for them to achieve a CR. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of a combination of busulfan (600 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (4400 mg/m2) and melphalan (140 mg/m2). It was followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). The bone marrow graft was purged in vitro with mafosfamide. The probability of event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years post-ABMT was 34%, compared to < 8% in a historical series. Toxicity was severe but manageable and 2 complication-related deaths were observed. Veno-occlusive disease was the most frequent extrahaematopoietic complication encountered, but its outcome was always favourable. By using a very intensive conditioning regimen consisting of a combination of three alkylating agents, the EFS of poor responders with metastatic neuroblastoma was improved and similar to that of good responders. When compared with a previously published similar series of patients, the improvement in survival appears probably related to intensification of the conditioning regimen.