Evaluation of the immunotoxicity of benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD-MA) in mice

Photosensitizers Used in the Photodynamic Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) has become one of the most promising treatment against autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as in the treatment of different types of cancer, since it is a non-invasive method and easy to carry out. The three main ingredients of PDT are light irradiation, oxygen, and a photosensitizer (PS). Light irradiation depends on the type of molecule or compound to be used as a PS. The concentration of O2 fluctuates according to the medium where the target tissue is located and over time, although it is known that it is possible to provide oxygenated species to the treated area through the PS itself. Finally, each PS has its own characteristics, the efficacy of which depends on multiple factors, such as solubility, administration technique, retention time, stability, excitation wavelength, biocompatibility, and clearance, among others. Therefore, it is essential to have a thorough knowledge of the disease to select the best PS for a specific target, such as RA. In this review we will present the PSs used in the last three decades to treat RA under PDT protocol, as well as insights on the relevant strategies.

Immunological aspects of photodynamic therapy of liver tumors in a rat model for colorectal cancer

We have investigated tumor immunological effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) of liver metastases. Livers of Wag/Rij rats were inoculated with three tumors of a syngeneic rat colon carcinoma cell line, CC531. One tumor in each rat was illuminated, with or without previous administration of the photosensitizer metatetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC). PDT was effective in causing necrosis of tumors, but it did not affect the growth rate of nearby, nonilluminated tumors in the liver. Immunological staining of tumors showed natural killer (NK) cells to be significantly lower in PDT-treated tumors than in control tumors (P < 0.05). T cells in PDT-treated tumors and in their margins were lower than in tumors that received only sensitizer or only illumination (P = 0.015) at day 2 after treatment but reappeared at the tumor margins from day 7 after treatment. For macrophages, a similar pattern was found. NK cells, T cells or macrophages in nonilluminated tumors in mTHPC-treated rats did not increase significantly when compared with tumors in rats without mTHPC treatment. These findings indicated that no antitumor effect of a systemic immune response was present, as measured by the effect of PDT on growth of distant tumors and the number of T lymphocytes, NK cells and macrophages in these tumors.