1
|
Shahgheibi S, Seyedoshohadaei F, Khezri D, Ghasemi S. Endometrial and follicular development following stair-step and traditional protocols in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: An RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed 2021; 19:537-544. [PMID: 34401648 PMCID: PMC8350856 DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i6.9375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Various strategies have been proposed for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) treatment. Objective To investigate and compare the number and size of ovarian follicles, endometrial thickness, and ovulation rate by traditional protocol (TP) and stair-step protocol (SSP). Materials and Methods Sixty infertile PCOS women were allocated into two groups (SSP = 30 and control TP = 30) between May and October 2019 in the Besat Hospital, Sanandaj, Iran. In the SSP group, the infertile women were treated with 50 mg/daily clomiphene citrate (CC) for five days, while the nonresponsive women were prescribed 100 mg daily CC for five days in the same cycle. The maximum dose (150 mg) was administered until ovulation occurred. In the control group, in non-ovulatory cases, the dose was increased in the next cycle. Ultrasound was used to detect ovulation. Results Endometrial thickness changes with various doses of CC were significantly different in the TP. The comparison of both protocols showed a significant difference in endometrial thickness only at 50 mg CC. The number of follicles in the left ovary was significantly different in both protocols at 150-mg CC. The size of ovarian follicles in the left ovary was significantly different between the two protocols at 100-mg CC. The ovulation rate was significantly different in the SSP at 100- and 150-mg doses of CC. Moreover, 86% of ovulation occurred at 100-mg CC in the SSP, while this rate was 73% in the TP. Conclusion The most appropriate dose for ovulation in patients with PCOS is 100 mg CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sholeh Shahgheibi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Fariba Seyedoshohadaei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Danial Khezri
- Student Research Committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Solmaz Ghasemi
- Besat Hospital, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Costello MF, Misso ML, Balen A, Boyle J, Devoto L, Garad RM, Hart R, Johnson L, Jordan C, Legro RS, Norman RJ, Mocanu E, Qiao J, Rodgers RJ, Rombauts L, Tassone EC, Thangaratinam S, Vanky E, Teede HJ. Evidence summaries and recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: assessment and treatment of infertility. Hum Reprod Open 2019; 2019:hoy021. [PMID: 31486807 PMCID: PMC6396642 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoy021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the recommended assessment and management of infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), based on the best available evidence, clinical expertize and consumer preference? SUMMARY ANSWER International evidence-based guidelines, including 44 recommendations and practice points, addressed prioritized questions to promote consistent, evidence-based care and improve the experience and health outcomes of infertile women with PCOS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Previous guidelines on PCOS lacked rigorous evidence-based processes, failed to engage consumer and multidisciplinary perspectives or were outdated. The assessment and management of infertile women with PCOS are inconsistent. The needs of women with PCOS are not being adequately met and evidence practice gaps persist. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Governance included a six continent international advisory and a project board, a multidisciplinary international guideline development group (GDG), consumer and translation committees. Extensive health professional and consumer engagement informed the guideline scope and priorities. The engaged international society-nominated panel included endocrinology, gynaecology, reproductive endocrinology, obstetrics, public health and other experts, alongside consumers, project management, evidence synthesis and translation experts. Thirty-seven societies and organizations covering 71 countries engaged in the process. Extensive online communication and two face-to-face meetings over 15 months addressed 19 prioritized clinical questions involving nine evidence-based reviews and 10 narrative reviews. Evidence-based recommendations (EBRs) were formulated prior to consensus voting within the guideline panel. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION International evidence-based guideline development engaged professional societies and consumer organizations with multidisciplinary experts and women with PCOS directly involved at all stages. A (AGREE) II-compliant processes were followed, with extensive evidence synthesis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was applied across evidence quality, desirable and undesirable consequences, feasibility, acceptability, cost, implementation and ultimately recommendation strength. The guideline was peer-reviewed by special interest groups across our partner and collaborating societies and consumer organizations, was independently assessed against AGREE II criteria and underwent methodological review. This guideline was approved by all members of the GDG and has been approved by the NHMRC. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The quality of evidence (QOE) for the EBRs in the assessment and management of infertility in PCOS included very low (n = 1), low (n = 9) and moderate (n = 4) quality with no EBRs based on high-quality evidence. The guideline provides 14 EBRs, 10 clinical consensus recommendations (CCRs) and 20 clinical practice points on the assessment and management of infertility in PCOS. Key changes in this guideline include emphasizing evidence-based fertility therapy, including cheaper and safer fertility management. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Overall evidence is generally of low to moderate quality, requiring significantly greater research in this neglected, yet common condition. Regional health systems vary and a process for adaptation of this guideline is provided. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The international guideline for the assessment and management of infertility in PCOS provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice based on the best available evidence, expert multidisciplinary input and consumer preferences. Research recommendations have been generated and a comprehensive multifaceted dissemination and translation program supports the guideline with an integrated evaluation program. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The guideline was primarily funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) supported by a partnership with ESHRE and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). GDG members did not receive payment. Travel expenses were covered by the sponsoring organizations. Disclosures of conflicts of interest were declared at the outset and updated throughout the guideline process, aligned with NHMRC guideline processes. Dr Costello has declared shares in Virtus Health and past sponsorship from Merck Serono for conference presentations. Prof. Norman has declared a minor shareholder interest in the IVF unit Fertility SA, travel support from Merck and grants from Ferring. Prof. Norman also has scientific advisory board duties for Ferring. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This article was not externally peer-reviewed by Human Reproduction Open.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M F Costello
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, High St, Kensington, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M L Misso
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Balen
- Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | - J Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L Devoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - R M Garad
- Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.,National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in PCOS, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - R Hart
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - L Johnson
- Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Victoria, Australia
| | - C Jordan
- Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Victoria, Australia.,Genea Hollywood Fertility, 190 Cambridge St, Wembley WA, Australia
| | - R S Legro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State University College of Medicine, USA
| | - R J Norman
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in PCOS, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - E Mocanu
- Royal College of Surgeons, Rotunda Hospital, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Qiao
- Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian Qu, Beijing Shi, China
| | - R J Rodgers
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Fertility SA, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - L Rombauts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia
| | - E C Tassone
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Thangaratinam
- Barts Research Centre for Women's Health (BARC), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - E Vanky
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - H J Teede
- Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.,National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in PCOS, Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gadalla MA, Huang S, Wang R, Norman RJ, Abdullah SA, El Saman AM, Ismail AM, van Wely M, Mol BWJ. Effect of clomiphene citrate on endometrial thickness, ovulation, pregnancy and live birth in anovulatory women: systematic review and meta-analysis. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2018; 51:64-76. [PMID: 29055102 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the impact of clomiphene citrate (CC) vs other drug regimens on mid-cycle endometrial thickness (EMT), ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates in women with World Health Organization (WHO) group II ovulatory disorders. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) and the non-MEDLINE subset of PubMed from inception to December 2016 and cross-checked references of relevant articles. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CC used alone vs other drug regimens for ovulation induction in women with WHO group II anovulation. Outcomes were mid-cycle EMT, ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates. We pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous variables (EMT) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI for binary variables (ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates). RESULTS We retrieved 1718 articles of which 33 RCTs (4349 women, 7210 ovulation induction cycles) were included. In 15 RCTs that compared CC with letrozole, EMT was lower in the CC group (1957 women, 3892 cycles; WMD, -1.39; 95% CI, -2.27 to -0.51; I2 = 100%), ovulation rates after CC and letrozole were comparable (1710 women, 3217 cycles; RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04; I2 = 47%), while CC led to a lower pregnancy rate (1957 women, 3892 cycles; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; I2 = 43%) and a lower live birth rate (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98; I2 = 35%). In two RCTs that compared CC with CC plus metformin, EMT, ovulation and pregnancy rates were comparable (101 women, 140 cycles; WMD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.92 to 0.45; I2 = 78%; RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67-1.06; I2 = 0%; and RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.33-1.87; I2 = 0%). In three studies that compared CC with CC plus N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), EMT was lower in the CC group (340 women, 300 cycles; WMD, -1.51; 95% CI, -1.98 to -1.04; I2 = 45%). In two studies that compared CC with CC + nitric oxide (NO) donor, EMT was lower in the CC group (120 women, 304 cycles; WMD, -1.75; 95% CI, -2.08 to -1.41; I2 = 0%). Compared with CC plus NO donor or NAC, CC showed statistically significant lower ovulation and pregnancy rates. Compared with tamoxifen in three studies, CC showed a tendency towards lower EMT (571 women, 844 cycles; WMD, -1.34; 95% CI, -2.70 to 0.01; I2 = 96%) with comparable ovulation and pregnancy rates. CONCLUSIONS In women with WHO group II ovulatory disorders, ovulation induction with CC might result in lower EMT than other ovulation induction regimens. Whether the lower EMT caused the lower pregnancy and live birth rates remains to be elucidated. Letrozole seems to be beneficial for these women. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution as the quality of evidence was very low. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Gadalla
- Women's Health Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - S Huang
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Reproductive Medicine Centre, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - R Wang
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - R J Norman
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - S A Abdullah
- Women's Health Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - A M El Saman
- Women's Health Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - A M Ismail
- Women's Health Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - M van Wely
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B W J Mol
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|