The use of an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest before office operative hysteroscopy: a feasibility study

Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of a long-term estradiol-releasing stent in rat uterine

Purpose

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA), often leading to gynecological complications including amenorrhea, abdominal pain and infertility, is frequently induced by injuries to the endometrium. Hence it would be of great benefit to take efforts to prevent adhesion after intrauterine operations. Orally administration of 17β-estradiol (E2) is commonly used to promote endometrium regeneration, but is limited by low concentrations at the injured sites. We aim at preparing an E2-releasing uterine stent, which could improve the efficiency of E2 therapy and be utilized for IUA prevention.

Methods

We designed a silicone rubber stent, which could be implanted in the uterine cavity and continuously release E2 in long term. Stents were placed in rodent uterine, and removed at different time points. Remaining E2 in stent was measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and organ E2 concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA). Endometrium morphology was examined by histological staining of paraffin sections.

Results

Our stent showed a controlled release of E2 in rodent uterine for over 60 days, and significantly increased E2 concentration in serum and in situ uterine. After the stent was removed from uterine, E2 rapidly reverted to a normal level. Also, the stent did not induce pathological changes in endometrium.

Conclusions

The uterine stent provided abundant local E2 in uterine cavity with satisfactory safety. The silicone rubber based E2-releasing uterine stent could be further advanced by adjusting its shape and E2 load for its clinical application, and might promisingly help lowering the incidence of IUA.

•

The silicone rubber uterine stent continuously released E2 in long term.

•

The E2-releasing uterine stent revealed more efficient E2 delivery capacity than orally administrated E2.

•

The E2-releasing uterine stent is safe for endometrium and remote organs.

Oral Desogestrel as Endometrial Preparation before Operative Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review

The pharmacologic preparation of the endometrium before hysteroscopy may be achieved with the use of various drugs. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding the use of desogestrel for endometrial preparation before hysteroscopic procedures. A literature search for suitable articles published in English language from inception of the database until August 2019 was performed using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. All original articles concerning desogestrel-only pretreatment before hysteroscopic surgery were considered eligible. Reviews, case reports/series, conference papers, studies including the use of combined hormonal preparation, and articles in languages other than English were excluded from the analysis. The literature search retrieved 3 studies that met all the inclusion criteria. The data demonstrated that desogestrel may be considered as a hormonal pretreatment drug before hysteroscopic procedures. The drug was distinctly effective and assessed as helpful by the operating surgeon in numerous patients who were administered the pretreatment of 75 μg daily. Oral desogestrel is a cheap, easily available, safe, and quite efficient alternative for endometrial preparation before hysteroscopic procedures.

Dienogest suppresses cellular proliferation status of endometrial polyps and acts differently depending on the morphological type

Administration of Dienogest prior to hysteroscopic polypectomy is empirically performed, but the physiological effects of Dienogest on endometrial polyps are unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of Dienogest on the proliferation and inflammation of endometrial polyps. We conducted a retrospective case study on 40 menstruating women who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy at our hospital. We collected clinical data, and the polyps were divided by morphological appearance. The specimens obtained were immunostained for Ki67 as a marker of cellar proliferation and CD138 as a marker of plasmacytes, which are a hallmark of chronic endometritis. Dienogest significantly suppressed the proliferation status of EPs because Dienogest treatment prior to the operation significantly reduced the Ki67 index (41.25 ± 16.85 vs 7.18 ± 9.82, p < 0.01). We found that sessile-type polyps showed a significantly lower Ki67 index than the pedunculated type (12.28 ± 11.12 vs 2.09 ± 2.73, p = 0.026). The presence of CD138-positive cells was more pronounced in sessile-type polyps than in pedunculated polyps (p = 0.018). However, Dienogest treatment showed no apparent effect on inflammation status, as detected by CD138-positive cells. We revealed that Dienogest suppressed cellular proliferation, and morphological classification of endometrial polyps could be used to predict the responsiveness to Dienogest. However, Dienogest might not affect cellular inflammation.

Use of pre-operative imaging for symptomatic uterine myomas during pregnancy: a case report and a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Uterine fibroids (UFs) occur in 10% of pregnancies and may lead to severe maternal-fetal complications, mainly depending on UFs characteristics and the distance to the uterine cavity (UC). When symptomatic, UFs are managed medically. Nevertheless, in about 2% of cases, surgery becomes necessary. Entry into the UC should be avoided during myomectomy. Consequentially, pre-operative assessment of this risk could be beneficial. Ultrasonography (US) represents the gold standard for UFs assessment; however, scarce evidence has been produced to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of the present study was to summarize current evidence about the pre-operative use of imaging techniques for UFs during pregnancy.

METHODS

A systematic research of the literature was conducted in Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library, including case reports and case series. A case report was also discussed. We collected data regarding patients, imaging assessment, UFs characteristics, surgical information, timing and modality of delivery.

RESULTS

According to our search strategy, 66 articles were selected and 210 patients were included. US assessment was reported in 36 (17%) cases. MRI was reported in 10 (4.7%) cases. Only in one case, MRI was used to measure the distance between UFs and UC.

CONCLUSION

US allows an adequate pre-operative evaluation of anterior, submucosal or pedunculated symptomatic UFs in pregnancy. However, compared to US, MRI may provide a more accurate evaluation of multiple, large, intramural or posterior UFs and could measure the distance between UFs and UC more accurately.

Effectiveness of estrogen treatment before transcervical resection of adhesions on moderate and severe uterine adhesion patients

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA), also known as Asherman's syndrome, is a common disease for among women. The extent of adhesion and pre-surgery hormone therapy greatly affects the function of uterine cavity. This current study investigates the association of different doses of estrogen before transcervical resection of adhesions (TCRA) surgery and clinical outcome in serious IUA. About 120 newly diagnostic serious IUA patients who underwent TCRA were randomly divided into three study groups: Estradiol valerate (progynova) 3 or 9 mg per diet before surgery and the control group. Follow-up hysteroscopy checkups were taken in 1- and 3-month post-operation. The effective power of 9 mg group was significantly higher than other groups. The 9 mg group achieved the best menstrual recovery rate in all study groups compared with the other two groups in 6 months post-operatively (p < 0.05). Our results confirmed estradiol valerateas an alternative effective drug for the prevention of IUAs before and after hysteroscopic surgery.

Dienogest as preoperative treatment of submucous myomas for hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study

The aim of this single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study was to compare Dienogest and Danazol as endometrial preparation in patients who have to undergo hysteroscopic surgery for submucous myomas. We enrolled 80 consecutive eligible patients, in reproductive age, affected by submucous myomas. Pre- and posttreatment characterization of endometrium was performed by hysteroscopic visual observation and histologic confirmation. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 40 were treated with 2 mg of Dienogest/die, 40 with 100 mg of Danazol/die, both orally for 5 weeks, starting on day 1 of menstruation. Posttreatment comparison of endometrial patterns showed a significant more marked effect of Dienogest, respect to Danazol, in atrophying endometrium ("normotrophic non-responders" versus "hypotrophic"-"atrophic", p = 0.028). Intraoperative data showed no significant difference between the two groups for cervical dilatation time (p = 0.326), while in the Dienogest group, we found a significant reduction of operative time (p = 0.001), infusion volume (p = 0.001), and severity of bleeding (p = 0.042). Moreover, Dienogest caused less side effects (p = 0.008). According to our data analysis, Dienogest, respect to Danazol, is more effective for the preparation of the endometrium in patients who have to undergo hysteroscopic surgery for submucous myomas, and causes less side effects.

Noncontraceptive benefits of the estradiol valerate/dienogest combined oral contraceptive: a review of the literature

Combined oral contraceptives formulated to include estradiol (E2) have recently become available for the indication of pregnancy prevention. A combined estradiol valerate and dienogest pill (E2V/DNG), designed to be administered using an estrogen step-down and a progestin step-up regimen over 26 days of active treatment followed by 2 days of placebo (26/2-day regimen), has also undergone research to assess the potential for additional noncontraceptive benefits. Randomized, placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that E2V/DNG is an effective treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding - a reduction in median menstrual blood loss approaching 90% occurs after 6 months of treatment. To date, E2V/DNG is the only oral contraceptive approved for this indication. Comparator studies have also demonstrated a reduction in hormone withdrawal-associated symptoms in users of E2V/DNG compared with a conventional 21/7-day regimen of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel. Other potential noncontraceptive benefits associated with E2V/DNG, like improvement in dysmenorrhea, sexual function, and quality of life, are comparable with those associated with other combined oral contraceptives and are discussed further in this review.

Hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians

The objective of this study was to provide guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning hysteroscopy. Vaginoscopy should be the standard technique for diagnostic hysteroscopy (Grade A) using a miniature (≤3.5mm sheath) (Grade A) rigid hysteroscope (Grade C), using normal saline solution distension medium (Grade C), without any anaesthesia (conscious sedation should not be routinely used), without cervical preparation (Grade B), without vaginal disinfection and without antibiotic prophylaxy (Grade B). Misoprostol (Grade A), vaginal oestrogens (Grade C), or GnRH agonist routine administration is not recommended before operative hysteroscopy. Before performing hysteroscopy, it is important to purge the air out of the system (Grade A). The uterine cavity distention pressure should be maintained below the mean arterial pressure and below 120mm Hg. The maximum fluid deficit of 2000ml is suggested when using normal saline solution and 1000ml is suggested when using hypotonic solution. When uterine perforation is recognized during operative hysteroscopy using monopolar or bipolar loop, the procedure should be stopped and a laparoscopy should be performed in order to eliminate a bowel injury. Diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy is allowed when an endometrial cancer is suspected (Grade B). Implementation of this guideline should decrease the prevalence of complications related to hysteroscopy.

Experience and results of office hysteroscopy at a primary hospital

Our aim was to analyse, retrospectively, the perioperative outcomes of 3,488 office hysteroscopies. Age, menopausal status, parity, medical indications, use or not of anaesthesia, incidents, presence of pathology in the cavity, endometrial pathology, type of surgery and pain assessment details were collected. The mean age of patients was 52.1 years. The most common medical indication was suspicious ultrasound for endometrial disease, and the most frequent symptom was metrorrhagia. We did not use any type of anaesthesia in 89.5% of patients and we could access the uterine cavity in 99.4% of cases. The complication rate was very low though 12% of patients reported severe pain while performing the test. Although office hysteroscopy in outpatients is fully established and is usually well tolerated, there is a group of patients who could benefit from analgesic treatment prior to the test, to improve their tolerance.

[Prevention of the complications related to hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice]

OBJECTIVE

To provide clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning the adverse events related to hysteroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Review of literature using following Keywords: hysteroscopy; vaginoscopy; infection; perforation; intrauterine adhesions

RESULTS

Vaginoscopy should be the standard technique for outpatient hysteroscopy (grade A) using a miniature (≤ 3.5mm sheath) (grade A) rigid hysteroscope (grade C), using normal saline solution distension medium (grade C), without any anesthesia (conscious sedation should not be routinely used), without cervical preparation (grade B), without vaginal disinfection and without antibiotic prophylaxy (grade B). Misoprostol (grade A), vaginal estrogens (grade C), or GnRH agonist routine administration is not recommended before operative hysteroscopy. Before performing hysteroscopy, it is important to purge the air out of the system (grade A). The uterine cavity distention pressure should be maintained below the mean arterial pressure and below 120 mmHg. The maximum fluid deficit of 2000 mL is suggested when using normal saline solution and 1000 mL is suggested when using hypotonic solution. When uterine perforation is recognized during operative hysteroscopy using monopolar or bipolar loop, the procedure should be stopped and a laparoscopy should be performed in order to eliminate a bowel injury. Diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy is allowed when an endometrial cancer is suspected (grade B).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of this guideline should decrease the prevalence of complications related to office and operative hysteroscopy.