Low platelet disaggregation predicts poor response to 150 mg clopidogrel in patients with elevated platelet reactivity

Comparison of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel non-responsiveness assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and PFA-100® in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures

Objectives

Dual platelet inhibition is commonly used for prevention of cardiovascular events in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. Non-responsiveness to platelet inhibitors may be associated with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the platelet function analyzer PFA-100® in comparison to light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) for monitoring clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) non-responsiveness in a cohort of patients treated for intracranial aneurysm or cranial artery stenosis.

Methods

Non-responsiveness to clopidogrel and ASA was assessed by LTA using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid and by PFA-100® with the ADP/prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and collagen/epinephrine cartridges, respectively.

Results

A total of 203 patients (145 females; median age, 57 years) were analyzed. Agreement between the two tests was poor for clopidogrel non-responsiveness (ƙ=0.19) and not better than chance for ASA non-responsiveness (ƙ=0.01). Clopidogrel non-responsiveness by LTA and PFA-100® was associated with higher von Willebrand factor antigen and activity levels. ADP-induced platelet disaggregation was lower in patients with clopidogrel non-responsiveness as assessed by PFA-100®. Clopidogrel non-responsiveness by LTA was associated with a higher prevalence of diabetes and a higher body mass index (BMI). Adverse outcomes (death, thromboembolism, or in-stent thrombosis) occurred in 13% (n=26) of all patients independently of ASA and clopidogrel non-responsiveness as assessed by both devices.

Conclusions

Our results show that LTA and PFA-100® are not interchangeable in the assessment of ASA and clopidogrel non-responsiveness in patients undergoing neuroendovascular interventions.

Impaired thrombolytic status predicts adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Antithrombotic medications reduce thrombosis but increase bleeding. Identification of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients at risk of recurrent thrombosis could allow targeted treatment with potent antithrombotic medications, with less potent agents in others, to reduce bleeding. Conventional platelet function tests assess platelet reactivity only, yet there is increasing evidence that endogenous thrombolytic potential determines outcome following thrombus initiation. We investigated whether assessing both platelet reactivity and endogenous thrombolysis, could identify STEMI patients at high-risk of recurrent thrombotic events. Thrombotic status was assessed in STEMI patients, before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), at discharge and at 30 days; with 12 months’ followup. The time to form an occlusive thrombus under high shear (occlusion time, OT), and time to restore flow by endogenous thrombolysis (lysis time, LT) was measured using the point-of-care Global Thrombosis Test (GTT) in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Impaired endogenous thrombolysis (prolonged LT ≥ 3000 s), seen in 13 % patients pre-PPCI, was related to major adverse cardiac events, MACE (HR: 3.31, 95 %CI: 1.02–10.78, p = 0.045), driven by cardiovascular death (HR: 4.17, 95 %CI: 0.99–17.51, p = 0.05). Enhanced (rapid) endogenous thrombolysis (LT < 1000 s) was associated with spontaneous reperfusion, ST-segment resolution and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow pre-PPCI. Baseline OT was shorter in those with MACE (especially recurrent myocardial infarction and stroke) than those without (253 ± 150 s vs 354 ± 134 s, p=0.017). Endogenous thrombolysis, when impaired, is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, and when enhanced, with spontaneous reperfusion. Endogenous thrombolysis may be a novel target for pharmacological intervention, and allow targeting of potent antithrombotic medications to high-risk patients.

Prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel

The existence of poor biological response to clopidogrel has been shown in some patients. Despite the increasing number of studies, this phenomenon remains difficult to quantify. We performed a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel and investigate the factors known to modulate this. An exhaustive search was performed. Altogether 171 publications were identified, providing data for a total of 45,664 subjects. The estimated prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel ranged from 15.9% to 49.5% according to the platelet function assay employed. The assays most frequently used were light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay and the Verify -now® assay. For all these assays, higher cut-off values were associated with a lower prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel. However, when choosing a fixed cut-off point for each assay, the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel was highly variable suggesting that other factors could modulate poor biological response to clopidogrel. Finally, none of the studied factors could apparently explain the variability of poor biological response to clopidogrel. This meta-analysis shows that the prevalence of poor biological response depends on the assay employed, the cut-off value and on various unidentified additional factors.

Disaggregation Following Agonist-Induced Platelet Activation in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Disaggregation as the difference between maximal and final platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry indicates the stability of platelet aggregates. We evaluated the extent of disaggregation after platelet stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), collagen, epinephrine, and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-6 in 323 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with daily aspirin and clopidogrel (group 1), prasugrel (group 2), or ticagrelor (group 3) therapy. All patients in group 1 underwent elective angioplasty and stenting, whereas all patients included in groups 2 and 3 suffered from acute coronary syndromes (STEMI or NSTEMI) and underwent urgent PCI. Significant differences between maximal and final platelet aggregation were observed with all agonists throughout the groups (all p<0.001). Disaggregation was highest using AA (clopidogrel 36.5%; prasugrel/ticagrelor 100%) and ADP (clopidogrel 21.7%; prasugrel/ticagrelor 100%). In contrast, low disaggregation was observed after platelet stimulation with collagen and TRAP-6 in clopidogrel-treated patients, and after platelet stimulation with collagen and epinephrine in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, pathways of platelet activation that are not inhibited by standard antiplatelet therapy allow persisting platelet aggregation and may at least in part be responsible for adverse ischemic events.

Combination of high on-treatment platelet aggregation and low deaggregation better predicts long-term cardiovascular events in PCI patients under dual antiplatelet therapy

High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with short-term major cardiovascular (CV) events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Maximum and final aggregation assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) have both been used to predict short-term outcome after PCI, however their long-term prognostic impact remains controversial. There is currently no information regarding the prognostic role of deaggregation and its added value in combination with established aggregation parameters. About 1279 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI were enrolled in this monocentric study. On-treatment platelet aggregation under clopidogrel maintenance therapy, as well as deaggregation was determined by maximum and final aggregation (5 min after adding of the agonist). Deaggregation was defined as slope of the tangent between Aggmax +0.5 min. Primary endpoints were the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and CV death or stent thrombosis according to the ARC criteria. Low deaggregation, defined as values in the lowest tertile (<1.5), was more frequent in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) compared to patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP), ACS: 29.6% vs. SAP: 22.0%, p = 0.001. The combination of high on-treatment platelet reactivity, defined by the upper tertile of Aggmax and low deaggregation, was associated with significantly increased risk for combined long-term CV events. The combination of low deaggregation and high on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with higher risk for recurrent events in patients with CAD undergoing PCI. Thus, deaggregation might be a more sensitive parameter providing added value in terms of risk prediction for long-term recurrent CV events in relation with established aggregation parameters.

Justification of 150 mg clopidogrel in patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity

BACKGROUND

The GRAVITAS trial showed that 150 mg clopidogrel did not improve outcome in patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) screened by the VerifyNow assay. We aimed to determine the impact of 150 mg clopidogrel in stable angina patients with HPR identified with conventional aggregometry (LTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clopidogrel-naive stable angina patients before ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention were recruited into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT00638326). Twelve to 24 h after the 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel, ADP(5μM)-stimulated maximal (AGGmax), late platelet aggregation (AGGlate) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-PRI) were evaluated. Patients with HPR (AGGmax ≥ 34%) were randomly allocated to 75 or 150 mg clopidogrel after 4 weeks. After control platelet function measurements at day 28, 75 mg clopidogrel was administered to all patients until 1 year.

RESULTS

The study was prematurely terminated at the stage of 200 enroled patients. Administration of 150 mg clopidogrel significantly reduced platelet aggregation (AGGmax: 45·0 ± 6·8 vs. 33·8 ± 15·1, P < 0·01; AGGlate: 27·1 ± 14·7 vs. 13·8 ± 18·0, P < 0·01) and VASP-PRI (57·5 ± 15·2 vs. 37·2 ± 17·1; P < 0·01), while platelet reactivity remained unchanged in patients with HPR receiving 75 mg clopidogrel. The higher maintenance dose of clopidogrel was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular (CV) death and myocardial infarction (MI) (0% vs. 11·4%, P = 0·04) and in CV death, MI or target vessel revascularization (24·6% vs. 3·1%; P = 0·01) during 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

One-month administration of 150 mg maintenance dose of clopidogrel reduces platelet reactivity and might decrease the risk of thrombo-ischaemic complications in stable angina patients with HPR identified by LTA.

Platelet function monitoring in patients on clopidogrel

Clopidogrel is essential to prevent recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, platelet reactivity after clopidogrel treatment is not uniform, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) persists in approximately one third of patients receiving clopidogrel. As recent observational studies suggest that HTPR is associated with higher risk of ischemic events, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, it seems rational to monitor post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity for risk assessment and to tailor anti-platelet therapy for patients with HTPR. However, routine platelet function monitoring is not recommended by current clinical guidelines. The article aims to review the available evidence on the clinical relevance of platelet function monitoring, highlighting possible reasons for the conflict between guidelines and observational studies.