High dose dexamethasone therapy shows better responses in acute immune thrombocytopenia than in chronic immune thrombocytopenia

Thrombopoietin receptor agonist and rituximab combination therapy in patients with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of this therapy in patients with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia. It is crucial to develop alternative treatment methods for this patient group in order to achieve better response. This combination therapy combines two different mechanisms of action, which is promising in terms of targeting pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia. We conducted a retrospective study, which included all patients who were diagnosed with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia and received TPO-RA and rituximab at the General Hematology Department, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Poland. We assessed the response, time to response and treatment-free remission (TFR). After 1 month of treatment, the complete response (CR1, PLT >100 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients, and response (R1, PLT >30 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients. The median PLT was 175 × 10 9 /l. Within 1 month of treatment, 87.5% of patients achieved TFR. Adequately, after 6 months, CR6 and R6 was 62.5 and 75%. The median PLT was 182 × 10 9 /l. Treatment-free remission 6 months after completion was in 50% of patients. The study group achieved response to treatment, which suggests that combination of TPO-RA and rituximab is effective and relatively well tolerated. Prospective study on larger group of patients is needed to better evaluate the efficiency and safety of this treatment.

Understanding Immune Thrombocytopenia: Looking Out of the Box

The pathogenesis of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is increasingly being elucidated, and its etiology is becoming more frequently identified, leading to a diagnostic shift from primary to secondary ITP. The overlap between autoimmunity, immunodeficiency, and cancer is evident, implying more interdisciplinarity in daily care. This mini-review is based on an expert meeting on ITP organized by the Intercontinental Cooperative ITP Study Group and presents the challenges of hematologists in understanding and investigating "out of the box" concepts associated with ITP.

Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia

Over the last decade, there have been numerous developments and changes in treatment practices for the management of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This article is an update of the International Consensus Report published in 2010. A critical review was performed to identify all relevant articles published between 2009 and 2018. An expert panel screened, reviewed, and graded the studies and formulated the updated consensus recommendations based on the new data. The final document provides consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and management of ITP in adults, during pregnancy, and in children, as well as quality-of-life considerations.

Rituximab and three dexamethasone cycles provide responses similar to splenectomy in women and those with immune thrombocytopenia of less than two years duration

Adults with newly diagnosed or persistent immunothrombocytopenia frequently relapse upon tapering steroids; adults and children with chronic disease have an even lower likelihood of lasting response. In adults with newly-diagnosed immunothrombocytopenia, two studies showed that dexamethasone 40 mg/day × four days and 4 rituximab infusions were superior to dexamethasone alone. Studies have also shown three cycles of dexamethasone are better than one and patients with persistent/chronic immunothrombocytopenia respond less well to either dexamethasone or rituximab. Therefore, 375 mg/m(2) × 4 rituximab was combined with three 4-day cycles of 28 mg/m(2) (max. 40 mg) dexamethasone at 2-week intervals and explored in 67 ITP patients. Best long-term response was assessed as complete (platelet count ≥ 100 × 10(9)/L) or partial (50-99 × 10(9)/L). Only 5 patients had not been previously treated. Fifty achieved complete (n=43, 64%) or partial (n=7, 10%) responses. Thirty-five of 50 responders maintained treatment-free platelet counts over 50 × 10(9)/L at a median 17 months (range 4-67) projecting 44% event-free survival. Duration of immunothrombocytopenia less than 24 months, achieving complete responses, and being female were associated with better long-term response (P<0.01). Adverse events were generally mild-moderate, but 3 patients developed serum sickness and 2 colitis; there were no sequelae. Dexamethasone could be difficult to tolerate. Fourteen patients became hypogammaglobulinemic and half had increased frequency of minor infections; 9 of 12 evaluable patients recovered their IgG levels. Rituximab combined with three cycles of dexamethasone provides apparently better results to reported findings with rituximab alone, dexamethasone alone, or the combination with one cycle of dexamethasone. The results suggest medical cure may be achievable in immunothrombocytopenia, especially in women and in patients within two years of diagnosis. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier:02050581).

Comparison between pulsed high-dose dexamethasone and daily corticosteroid therapy for adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Recently, pulsed high-dose dexamethasone (HD-Dexa) therapy was proposed as a possible alteration for the classical prednisolone (PSL) therapy for primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients, however it remains to be confirmed which of these remedies is superior. So the objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and the sustainability of these options.

METHODS

The first-line therapy at our institute for untreated adult ITP cases was accordingly changed as follows, and we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes: 1) daily administration of 0.5-1 mg/kg PSL for 2-4 weeks and subsequently stepwise reduction, 2) one course of HD-Dexa (40 mg/day for four consecutive days, 1xHD-Dexa), 3) three courses of the same dose of HD-Dexa (3xHD-Dexa) repeated biweekly. This study was approved by the ethical committee of the University of Tokyo.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled consecutively. A good initial response was attained through all the regimens. Meanwhile, time to next treatment for lack of response or relapse was significantly longer in the PSL group than in the other groups (log-rank test, PSL vs. 1xHD-Dexa p<0.001, PSL vs. 3xHD-Dexa p=0.0053, respectively). Additionally, PSL regimen conferred a significantly longer duration time of response (PSL vs. 1xHD-Dexa p=0.0024, PSL vs. 3xHD-Dexa p=0.028, respectively) and CR (PSL vs. 1xHD-Dexa p=0.012, PSL vs. 3xHD-Dexa p=0.0090, respectively). No patient discontinued the treatment due to side effects in this study.

CONCLUSION

PSL regimen was considered to be superior to pulsed HD-Dexa regimens in the sustainability of response.