Evaluating the effectiveness of an integrated community continuum of care program for individuals with serious mental illness

Current insights of community mental healthcare for people with severe mental illness: A scoping review

Background

For the last four decades, there has been a shift in mental healthcare toward more rehabilitation and following a more humanistic and comprehensive vision on recovery for persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Consequently, many community-based mental healthcare programs and services have been developed internationally. Currently, community mental healthcare is still under development, with a focus on further inclusion of persons with enduring mental health problems. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of existing and upcoming community mental healthcare approaches to discover the current vision on the ingredients of community mental healthcare.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review by systematically searching four databases, supplemented with the results of Research Rabbit, a hand-search in reference lists and 10 volumes of two leading journals. We included studies on adults with SMI focusing on stimulating independent living, integrated care, recovery, and social inclusion published in English between January 2011 and December 2022 in peer-reviewed journals.

Results

The search resulted in 56 papers that met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis revealed ingredients in 12 areas: multidisciplinary teams; collaboration within and outside the organization; attention to several aspects of health; supporting full citizenship; attention to the recovery of daily life; collaboration with the social network; tailored support; well-trained staff; using digital technologies; housing and living environment; sustainable policies and funding; and reciprocity in relationships.

Conclusion

We found 12 areas of ingredients, including some innovative topics about reciprocity and sustainable policies and funding. There is much attention to individual ingredients for good community-based mental healthcare, but very little is known about their integration and implementation in contemporary, fragmented mental healthcare services. For future studies, we recommend more empirical research on community mental healthcare, as well as further investigation(s) from the social service perspective, and solid research on general terminology about SMI and outpatient support.

Intensive Outpatient Treatment (IOP) of Behavioral Health (BH) Problems: Engagement Factors Predicting Subsequent Service Utilization

The purpose of the study is to 1) better understand patterns of utilization of Intensive Outpatient Treatment (IOP) Programs and Services in the State of Connecticut by adult Medicaid recipients experiencing a serious mental illness, substance use disorder, or co-occurring disorders; and 2) to determine the relationship between the duration of an IOP episode and connection to care rates for higher (i.e., rehospitalization) or lower levels of care following discharge. We hypothesized that the duration of an IOP episode would impact positively in reducing the use of higher levels of care while increasing the use of lower levels of care. In order to examine the frequency and duration of use of Intensive Outpatient (IOP) services by the CT Medicaid population, a two-year timeframe was selected: July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2014. A survival analysis was conducted to assess the risk of readmission to an IOP within 180 days based on demographic and utilization factors including, Age (in years on date of discharge), Race and Ethnicity, Gender, Homeless Status (at least one day in CY 2013), and Engagement Group (Intent to Treat, Early Termination, Minimally Adequate Dosage, & Target or More). To better understand the patterns of utilization associated with Adult IOP services, the average length of stay, number of treatment days, and average number of treatment days per week were explored. The number of unique individuals who were part of this analysis is 11,473, of which 2050 were mental health IOP utilizers (18%), 4598 were co-occurring IOP utilizers (40%), and 4825 (42%) were substance use IOP utilizers. For the total population, the average length of stay (ALOS) in days was 42 and the average number of treatment days attended per week was 2.5, for an average of 15 treatment days per episode of care. Among the IOP Cohorts, the Mental Health Cohort had the longest ALOS at 44.15 days, an average of 2.34 days of service per week, for an average of 14.76 days of IOP service per episode of care. The Substance Use Cohort had the shortest ALOS at 41.33 days, but had the highest intensity of services per week at 2.71 for an average of 16 days of service per episode of care. The Co-Occurring Cohort presented an ALOS of 41.74 days, an average of 2.32 services per week and an average of 13.83 sessions per episode. Overall there is evidence supporting an association between the number of days of care and protection from hospitalization, up to a certain number of days of care or number of days in IOP. Above the Minimally Adequate Dosage, the IOP protection factor seems to reach a plateau. This means that after 16 days of care, the chances of hospitalization remain the same regardless of the additional days provided.