What does coping mean to the worker with pain-related disability? A qualitative study

Defining pain-validation: The importance of validation in reducing the stresses of chronic pain

Purpose

To validate an individual's feelings or behaviour is to sanction their thoughts or actions as worthy of social acceptance and support. In contrast, rejection of the individual's communicated experience indicates a denial of social acceptance, representing a potential survival threat. Pain-invalidation, though ill-defined, appears to be a fundamental component of psychosocial stress for people with chronic pain. As such, the aim of this paper was to define pain-validation and outline its importance for those with chronic pain.

Methods

The pain-validation construct was defined using themes inherent in the narratives of those with chronic pain, as identified in a previously published systematic search and thematic analysis, together with examination of additional literature on pain-validation in the clinical context.

Results

We present a construct definition, proposing that pain-validation must necessarily include: (i) belief that the pain experience is true for the individual, (ii) acceptability of the individual's expressions of pain, and (iii) communication of belief and acceptability to the individual experiencing pain. Further, we outline the importance of pain-validation as a protective factor and means of reducing many of the psychosocial stresses of chronic pain; for example, by indicating social support for pain-coping, buffering negative emotions, and re-enforcing unity and shared identity.

Implications

The role of pain-validation in the current era of pain management intervention is discussed. Adhering to interventions that involve cognitive and behavioural change is often difficult. Acknowledging and validating the acceptability of the patient's pain experience in the early stages of pain management may, therefore, be a key component of intervention that encourages compliance to the treatment plan and achieving therapeutic goals.

The Pain-Invalidation Scale: Measuring Patient Perceptions of Invalidation Toward Chronic Pain

Increasing evidence reveals the damaging impact of having one's chronic pain symptoms invalidated through disbelief, discrediting, and critical judgement. In other instances, a caregiver's over-attentiveness to the daily tasks of individuals with pain can be problematic, potentially undermining rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to measure different aspects of invalidation perceived by people with chronic pain. Item generation was informed through literature review and a thematic analysis of narratives from 431 peer-reviewed articles. The crowdsourcing platform Prolific was used to distribute survey items to participants. In Study 1A, Principal Component Analysis was performed on data from 302 respondents, giving rise to 4 subscales, including: Invalidation by the Self, Invalidation by Immediate Others, Invalidation by Healthcare Professionals, and Invalidation by Over-attentive Others. Confirmatory Factor Analysis of data collected from aonther 308 individuals in Study 1B supported the 4-factor model of the Pain-Invalidation Scale (Pain-IS) and identified a best-fit model with 24 items. The Pain-IS was further validated in another 300 individuals in Study 2. The Pain-IS demonstrates sound psychometric properties and may serve as a valuable tool for use by clinicians in the detection of pain-invalidation issues, as a first step in patient pain management. Perspective. Links between pain-invalidation and pain levels, as well as functional detriment, highlight the importance of having one's chronic pain experience heard, believed and accepted. The Pain-Invalidation Scale is designed to identify domains where invalidation of the patient's pain should be addressed to promote emotional processing, treatment adherence and improved outcomes.

Biopsychosocial barriers affecting recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A qualitative study from Victoria

Objective

The aim of the study was to understand the recovery phenomena and to explore participants' perspectives on the biopsychosocial facilitators and barriers affecting their recovery after a minor transport injury.

Methods

A qualitative method was used involving semi‐structured interviews with 23 participants who sustained a minor transport injury. Interviews and analysis were guided by the biopsychosocial model (BPS) of health. The outcomes were themes capturing biopsychosocial barriers to, and personal experiences of, recovery using a previously defined framework.

Results

The themes indicate that recovery is a multifaceted phenomenon affected by comorbidities such as chronic pain, depression and anxiety. A range of subsequent complexities such as the inability to self‐care and undertaking daily domestic duties, and incapacity to participate in recreational activities were major barriers to recovery. These barriers were found to be an on‐going source of frustration, dissatisfaction and a perceived cause of depressive symptomatology in many participants. Most participants reported mixed feelings of the care received. Other common issues raised included a lack of understanding of the assessment time, regular follow‐up, guidance and on‐going support.

Conclusion

This study revealed that recovery after a minor transport‐related injury was a challenging, complex, demanding and a long‐term process for the individuals in this study. Findings from this limited cohort suggested that, for participants to return to their pre‐accident health status, a more coordinated approach to information and care delivery may be required.

Psychiatric and psychological perspectives on chronic pain

Chronic pain patients often have psychiatric disorders that negatively influence their responses to treatment. Also, many of them have dysfunctional beliefs and coping strategies, even if they do not meet DSM-5 criteria for a psychiatric disorder. Physiatrists should have a low threshold for referring both groups of patients for mental health services. This article describes psychiatric disorders that are highly prevalent among pain patients and also describes psychological processes that contribute to poor coping by the patients. Finally, it discusses factors that a physiatrist should consider in deciding whether to refer patients to psychiatrists versus psychologists.

A sense of increased living space after participating in multimodal rehabilitation

PURPOSE

The aim was to explore and describe experiences of change related to multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) in participants suffering from persistent musculoskeletal-related pain, in order to increase knowledge about the impact of the rehabilitation.

METHODS

Participants in MMR from an outpatient rehabilitation unit in primary care in Sweden were recruited for interviews about any kind of change they experienced that they thought were related to their participation in the MMR. Systematic text condensation according to Malterud was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 14 participants were interviewed. The interview analysis resulted in four categories in which the participants described their experience of change related to the MMR: a new desire for participation, increased embodied knowledge, a stronger sense of feeling empowered and regained hope. The categories interacted and from these categories, one theme emerged: a sense of increased living space.

CONCLUSION

According to these results, it is important to have various entrances to enhance change and to be aware of how these changes interact and can reinforce each other in order to facilitate the participants' empowerment processes toward a sense of increased living space. Implications for rehabilitation The efforts in MMR should be coordinated to be mutually reinforcing as changes in one area could facilitate in others and thus facilitate the participants' empowerment processes. Participants experience change after MMR in areas that standardized assessment questionnaires do not capture and consequently it would be useful to let the participants answer an open question about perceived changes together with standardized questionnaires.

Exploring how pain leads to productivity loss in primary care consulters for osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study

Objective

Osteoarthritis pain has become a leading cause of decreased productivity and work disability in older workers, a major concern in primary care. How osteoarthritis pain leads to decreased productivity at work is unclear; the aim of this study was to elucidate causal mechanisms and thus identify potential opportunities for intervention.

Methods

Population-based prospective cohort study of primary care consulters with osteoarthritis. Path analysis was used to test proposed mechanisms by examining the association between pain at baseline, and onset of work productivity loss at three years for mediation by physical limitation, depression, poor sleep and poor coping mechanisms.

Results

High pain intensity was associated with onset of work productivity loss (Adjusted Odds Ratio 2.5; 95%CI 1.3, 4.8). About half of the effect of pain on work productivity was a direct effect, and half was mediated by the impact of pain on physical function. Depression, poor sleep quality and poor coping did not mediate the association between high pain intensity and onset of work productivity loss.

Conclusions

As pain is a major cause of work productivity loss, results suggest that decreasing pain should be a major focus. However, successfully improving function may have an indirect effect by decreasing the impact of pain on work productivity, especially important as significant pain reduction is often difficult to achieve. Although depression, sleep problems, and coping strategies may be directly related to work productivity loss, addressing these issues may not have much effect on the significant impact of pain on work productivity.

Neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury from the perspective of support providers: a phenomenological study

OBJECTIVE

To gain greater insight into the experience of support providers who assist and support individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) for the performance of bowel care.

DESIGN

Qualitative (phenomenological) interviews and analysis.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten support providers of individuals with SCI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Themes related to supporting bowel care for individuals with SCI.

RESULTS

Support providers identified concerns and challenges as well as sources of satisfaction related to the provision of bowel care to individuals with SCI. Traits and characteristics of effective support providers also emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with SCI often require emotional, logistical, and/or physical assistance to complete bowel care. Exploration of neurogenic bowel care from the perspective of support providers identified concerns and challenges, sources of satisfaction, and important traits and characteristics of support providers. This information can facilitate the identification of effective support providers and the provision of enhanced training and support. Interventions of this nature can improve the experience for individuals with SCI and their supports.