1
|
van der Woude LHV, Houdijk HJP, Janssen TWJ, Seves B, Schelhaas R, Plaggenmarsch C, Mouton NLJ, Dekker R, van Keeken H, de Groot S, Vegter RJK. Rehabilitation: mobility, exercise & sports; a critical position stand on current and future research perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 43:3476-3491. [PMID: 32805152 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1806365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human movement, rehabilitation, and allied sciences have embraced their ambitions within the cycle of "RehabMove" congresses over the past 30 years. This combination of disciplines and collaborations in the Netherlands has tried to provide answers to questions in the fields of rehabilitation and adapted sports, while simultaneously generating new questions and challenges. These research questions help us to further deepen our understanding of (impaired) human movement and functioning, with and without supportive technologies, and stress the importance of continued multidisciplinary (inter)national collaboration. METHODS This position stand provides answers that were conceived by the authors in a creative process underlining the preparation of the 6th RehabMove Congress. RESULTS The take-home message of the RehabMove2018 Congress is a plea for continued multidisciplinary research in the fields of rehabilitation and adapted sports. This should be aimed at more individualized notions of human functioning, practice, and training, but also of performance, improved supportive technology, and appropriate "human and technology asset management" at both individual and organization levels and over the lifespan. CONCLUSIONS With this, we anticipate to support the development of rehabilitation sciences and technology and to stimulate the use of rehabilitation notions in general health care. We also hope to help ensure a stronger embodiment of preventive and lifestyle medicine in rehabilitation practice. Indeed, general health care and rehabilitation practice require a healthy and active lifestyle management and research agenda in the context of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONContinued multidisciplinary (international) collaboration will stimulate the development of rehabilitation and human movement sciences.Notions from "human and technology asset management and ergonomics" are fundamental to rehabilitation practice and research.The rehabilitation concept will further merge into general health care and the quality there-off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas H V van der Woude
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Han J P Houdijk
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Research & Development, Heliomare Rehabilitation Center, Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas W J Janssen
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bregje Seves
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Reslin Schelhaas
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Corien Plaggenmarsch
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Noor L J Mouton
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rienk Dekker
- Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Helco van Keeken
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja de Groot
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Riemer J K Vegter
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krops LA, Geertzen JHB, Horemans HLD, Bussmann JBJ, Dijkstra PU, Dekker R. Feasibility and short-term effects of Activity Coach+: a physical activity intervention in hard-to-reach people with a physical disability. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 43:2769-2778. [PMID: 31999496 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1717650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Existing physical activity interventions do not reach a considerable proportion of physically disabled people. This study assessed feasibility and short-term effects of Activity Coach+, a community-based intervention especially targeting this hard-to-reach population. METHODS Feasibility was determined by reach, dropouts, and compliance with the protocol. Physical activity was measured with the Activ8 accelerometer and the adapted SQUASH questionnaire. Health outcomes were assessed by body composition, blood pressure, hand grip force, 10-metre walk test, 6-minute walk test, and the Berg Balance Scale. The RAND-36, Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, and IMPACT-S were administered. Measurements were performed at baseline and after 2 and 4 months. Changes over time were analysed by Friedman tests. RESULTS Twenty-nine participants enrolled during the first 4 months, of whom two dropped out. Intervention components were employed in 86-100% of the participants. Physical activity did not change after the implementation of Activity Coach+. Body mass index (p = 0.006), diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.032), walking ability (p = 0.002), exercise capacity (p = 0.013), balance (p = 0.014), and vitality (p = 0.049) changed over time. CONCLUSIONS Activity Coach + is feasible in a community setting. Indications for effectivity of Activity Coach + in hard-to-reach people with a physical disability were found.Implications for rehabilitationActivity Coach + was able to reach physically disabled people living in community, a population that is assumed hard-to-reach.Activity Coach + was feasible in a population of persons with a physical disability that was heterogeneous with respect to age and (severity of) disability.The current study provides the first indications for the beneficial health effects of Activity Coach + in hard-to-reach people with a physical disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Krops
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J H B Geertzen
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H L D Horemans
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J B J Bussmann
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P U Dijkstra
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Dekker
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoekstra F, van Offenbeek MAG, Dekker R, Hettinga FJ, Hoekstra T, van der Woude LHV, van der Schans CP. Implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings: managing tensions in rehabilitation care. Implement Sci 2017; 12:143. [PMID: 29191230 PMCID: PMC5709964 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0667-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity is acknowledged, little is known about heterogeneity in fidelity over time. This study aims to generate insight into the heterogeneity in implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings and the relationship with changes in patients' health behavior. METHODS This study used longitudinal data from the nationwide implementation of an evidence-informed physical activity promotion program in Dutch rehabilitation care. Fidelity scores were calculated based on annual surveys filled in by involved professionals (n = ± 70). Higher fidelity scores indicate a more complete implementation of the program's core components. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on the implementation fidelity scores of 17 organizations at three different time points. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to explore organizational and professional differences between identified trajectories. Regression analyses were conducted to determine differences in patient outcomes. RESULTS Three trajectories were identified as the following: 'stable high fidelity' (n = 9), 'moderate and improving fidelity' (n = 6), and 'unstable fidelity' (n = 2). The stable high fidelity organizations were generally smaller, started earlier, and implemented the program in a more structured way compared to moderate and improving fidelity organizations. At the implementation period's start and end, support from physicians and physiotherapists, professionals' appreciation, and program compatibility were rated more positively by professionals working in stable high fidelity organizations as compared to the moderate and improving fidelity organizations (p < .05). Qualitative data showed that the stable high fidelity organizations had often an explicit vision and strategy about the implementation of the program. Intriguingly, the trajectories were not associated with patients' self-reported physical activity outcomes (adjusted model β = - 651.6, t(613) = - 1032, p = .303). CONCLUSIONS Differences in organizational-level implementation fidelity trajectories did not result in outcome differences at patient-level. This suggests that an effective implementation fidelity trajectory is contingent on the local organization's conditions. More specifically, achieving stable high implementation fidelity required the management of tensions: realizing a localized change vision, while safeguarding the program's standardized core components and engaging the scarce physicians throughout the process. When scaling up evidence-informed health promotion programs, we propose to tailor the management of implementation tensions to local organizations' starting position, size, and circumstances. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3961 . Registered 18 April 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke Hoekstra
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rienk Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Center for Sports Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Florentina J. Hettinga
- School of Biological Sciences, Center of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Trynke Hoekstra
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas H. V. van der Woude
- Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees P. van der Schans
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Houdijk H, Janssen TWJ. Disability and rehabilitation on the move: mobility, exercise and sports for people with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 39:113-114. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1217079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Han Houdijk
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behaviour and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Heliomare Research and Development, Wijk Aan Zee, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas W. J. Janssen
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behaviour and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|