1
|
Scott HC, Robinson LS, Brown T. Scar massage as an intervention for post-surgical scars: A practice survey of Australian hand therapists. HAND THERAPY 2024; 29:21-29. [PMID: 38434186 PMCID: PMC10901164 DOI: 10.1177/17589983231205666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Scar massage is a commonly used treatment in hand therapy. The current empirical evidence that supports it is disparate and of variable quality, with no established effective dosage and method proposed. This study aimed to identify the current practice among Australian hand therapists using massage as an intervention for scarring following surgery to the hand and upper limb. Methods A purposely designed self-report online survey was emailed to current members of the Australian Hand Therapy Association (n = 958). Data collected included demographics, intervention techniques, conditions treated and protocols, scar assessment and knowledge and training about scar massage as a clinical intervention. Results A total of 116 completed questionnaires were received (a response rate of 12.1%). All respondents used scar massage as part of their clinical practice with 98% to improve soft tissue glide (n = 114), 92% for hypersensitivity (n = 107), and 84% to increase hand function (n = 97). Only 18% (n = 21) of respondents used standardised outcome measures, and most therapists had learned scar massage from a colleague (81%). Conclusions Commonalities in how respondents implemented scar massage were found. Participants reported relying primarily on clinical experience to inform their practice. Whilst scar massage was widely used, few respondents had received formal skills training or completed outcome measures regularly to formally evaluate its clinical efficacy or impact. Replication of this study with a larger international sample of participants is warranted to determine if these findings reflect general practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen C Scott
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Luke S Robinson
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Ted Brown
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johansson A, Torgé CJ, Fristedt S, Bravell ME. Relationships and gender differences within and between assessments used in Swedish home rehabilitation - a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:807. [PMID: 35729529 PMCID: PMC9215038 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08177-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Home rehabilitation programmes are increasingly implemented in many countries to promote independent living. Home rehabilitation should include a comprehensive assessment of functioning, but the scientific knowledge about the assessment instruments used in this context is limited. The aim of this study was to explore relationships between standardised tests and a self-reported questionnaire used in a home rehabilitation programme. We specifically studied whether there were gender differences within and between assessments. Method De-identified data from 302 community-dwelling citizens that participated in a municipal home rehabilitation project in Sweden was analysed. A Mann Whitney test and an independent t-test were used to analyse differences within the following assessment instruments: the Sunnaas Activity of Daily Living Index, the General Motor Function assessment scale and the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale. Spearman’s bivariate correlation test was used to analyse relationships between the instruments, and a Fischer’s Z test was performed to compare the strengths of the correlation coefficients. Result Gender differences were found both within and between the assessment instruments. Women were more independent in instrumental activities of daily living than men. The ability to reach down and touch one’s toes while performing personal activities of daily living was stronger for men. There was a difference between men’s self-reported performance of usual activities that included instrumental activities of daily living and the standardised assessment in performing instrumental activities of daily living. The result also showed an overall difference between the self-reported assessment and the standardised test of motor function for the total group. Conclusion The results indicate that a comprehensive assessment with the combination of standardised tests, questionnaires and patient-specific instruments should be considered in a home rehabilitation context in order to capture different dimensions of functioning. Assessment instruments that facilitate a person-centred home rehabilitation supporting personally meaningful activities for both men and women should be applied in daily practice. Further research about gender-biased instruments is needed to facilitate agreement on which specific instruments to use at both individual and organisation levels to promote gender-neutral practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08177-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anette Johansson
- Health Care Administration, Jönköping Municipality, Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, SE 551 11, Jönköping, Sweden.
| | | | - Sofi Fristedt
- Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moore JL, Bø E, Erichsen A, Rosseland I, Halvorsen J, Bratlie H, Hornby TG, Nordvik JE. Development and Results of an Implementation Plan for High-Intensity Gait Training. J Neurol Phys Ther 2021; 45:282-291. [PMID: 34369450 PMCID: PMC8423140 DOI: 10.1097/npt.0000000000000364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE High-intensity gait training is recommended in stroke rehabilitation to improve gait speed, walking distance, and balance. However, identifying effective and efficient implementation methods is a challenge for rehabilitation providers. This article describes the development of an implementation plan, presents findings of each implementation phase, and identifies the project's impact on clinicians and the health system. METHODS Two inpatient rehabilitation facilities, including 9 physical therapists, collaborated with a knowledge translation center to implement this program. We developed an implementation plan using the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and select implementation strategies. Using mix-methods research, including surveys and informal discussions, we evaluated current practice, barriers, outcomes, and the sustainability of high-intensity gait training in practice. RESULTS A multicomponent implementation plan that targeted barriers was developed. Before implementation, clinicians reported providing several balance, strength training, and gait interventions to improve walking. Barriers to using high-intensity gait training included knowledge, beliefs, adaptability of high-intensity gait training, resources, culture, and others. Twenty-six implementation strategies were selected to target the barriers. Surveys and informal discussions identified significant changes in perceived practice, adoption of high-intensity gait training, and positive impacts on the health system. The 2-year follow-up survey indicated that the new practice was sustained. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Using a multicomponent implementation plan that targeted barriers, we successfully implemented high-intensity gait training in clinical practice. Contributors to successful implementation may include the implementation methods, usual care interventions, and clinicians' readiness for this change.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A352.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Moore
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| | - Elisabeth Bø
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| | - Anne Erichsen
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| | - Ingvild Rosseland
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| | - Joakim Halvorsen
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| | - Hanne Bratlie
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| | - T. George Hornby
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| | - Jan Egil Nordvik
- First Oslo team members are as follows: Tonje Barkenæs, Miriam Byhring, Magnus Hågå, Chris Henderson, Mari Klokkerud, Julia Mbalilaki, Stein-Arne Rimehaug, Thomas Tomren, and Karen Vergoossen
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McQuaid L, Thomson K, Bannigan K. Exploring the contribution of case study research to the evidence base for occupational therapy practice: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 19:2040-2047. [PMID: 34400600 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This scoping review will explore the range and characteristics of case study research within the occupational therapy evidence base. It will examine how case study research is defined, the methodologies adopted, and the context in which it is applied. Most importantly, it will consider the viability of case study research for contributing to the evidence base for occupation and health. INTRODUCTION Occupational therapists report barriers to conducting research due to the complexities of clinical practice, and lack of knowledge, time, and resources. Case study research is generating interest as a potentially manageable and practical solution to increase research engagement. However, it is not clear how this is being utilized by occupational therapists or how feasible it is to contribute to the evidence base. INCLUSION CRITERIA Opinion, text, and empirical studies that explicitly use or discuss case study research methodology within an occupational therapy context will be included. Studies will be excluded where the occupational therapy context cannot be clearly defined, for example, where they are multi-disciplinary focused or where a case study research design is not explicit (eg, a descriptive case report without data collection). All countries and practice settings will be included. METHODS A three-step search following JBI methodology will be conducted across databases and websites for English-language, published peer-reviewed and gray literature from 1990. Study selection will be completed by two independent reviewers. A data extraction table developed and piloted by the authors will be used and data charted to align with the research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leona McQuaid
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Katie Thomson
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Katrina Bannigan
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.,The University of Plymouth Centre for Innovations in Health and Social Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Occupational therapists are generally positive towards use of measuring tools. However, such use may be problematic. PURPOSE. To illuminate hidden and adverse effects of using measuring tools in occupational therapy. METHOD. A Foucauldian inspired thematic analysis of the use of measuring tools in 13 reports of practice development projects in Denmark. FINDINGS. Three themes were constructed: "Categorisation of loss", "Conduct of conduct: Self-tracking and competition", and "Conforming to expected forms of everyday living". Measuring tools tended to produce generalised truths about older adults and were used to predict outcome of or access to reablement programs. The measurements guided both older people and professionals, and measurements created both motivation and resistance. The tools served as an extension of the healthcare professionals' authority. IMPLICATIONS. When appropriately situated, measuring tools have the potential to empower and enhance older adults' lives and should be the focus of greater clinical attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stinne Glasdam
- Stinne Glasdam, Integrative Health Research, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Margaretavägen 1 B, S- 222 41 Lund, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moore JL, Virva R, Henderson C, Lenca L, Butzer JF, Lovell L, Roth E, Graham ID, Hornby TG. Applying the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to Implement Gait and Balance Assessments in Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 103:S230-S245. [PMID: 33253695 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The overall objectives of this project were to implement and sustain use of a gait assessment battery (GAB) that included the Berg Balance Scale, 10-meter walk test, and 6-minute walk test during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. The study objective was to assess the effect of the study intervention on clinician adherence to the recommendations and its effect on clinician perceptions and the organization. DESIGN Pre- and post-training intervention study. SETTING Subacute inpatient rehabilitation facility. PARTICIPANTS Physical therapists (N=6) and physical therapist assistants (N=2). INTERVENTION The intervention comprised a bundle of activities, including codeveloping and executing the plan with clinicians and leaders. The multicomponent implementation plan was based on the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and included implementation facilitation, implementation leadership, and a bundle of knowledge translation interventions that targeted barriers. Implementation was an iterative process in which results from one implementation phase informed planning of the next phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinician administration adherence, surveys of perceptions, and organizational outcomes. RESULTS Initial adherence to the GAB was 46% and increased to more than 85% after 6 months. These adherence levels remained consistent 48 months after implementation. Clinician perceptions of measure use were initially high (>63%), with significant improvements in knowledge and use of one measure after implementation. CONCLUSIONS We successfully implemented the assessment battery with high levels of adherence to recommendations, likely because of using the bundle of knowledge translation activities, facilitation, and use of a framework to codevelop the plan. These changes in practice were sustainable, as determined by a 4-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Moore
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN; South Eastern Norway Regional Center of Knowledge Translation in Rehabilitation, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Roberta Virva
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Chris Henderson
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Lauren Lenca
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - John F Butzer
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI
| | | | - Elliot Roth
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - T George Hornby
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Romli MH, Wan Yunus F, Mackenzie L. Overview of reviews of standardised occupation-based instruments for use in occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J 2019; 66:428-445. [PMID: 30821362 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Using standardised instruments is one approach to support evidence-based practice. Referring to systematic reviews is an option to identify suitable instruments. However, with an abundance of systematic reviews available, therapists are challenged to identify an appropriate instrument to use. Therefore, this overview of reviews aimed to summarise relevant systematic review findings about standardised occupation-based instruments relevant for occupational therapy practice. METHODS An overview of reviews was conducted. A systematic search was performed on four databases up to March 2018. Included systematic reviews were analysed for quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). RESULTS A total of 2187 articles were identified after removing duplicates. Ultimately, 58 systematic reviews were identified that yielded 641 instruments. From those, 45 instruments were selected for appraisal as they met the inclusion criteria of being developed mainly by occupational therapists and were recommended in the summarised findings from the systematic reviews. The instruments were classified according to the following occupation domains: (i) multidimensional, (ii) activities of daily living, (iii) productivity, (iv) social, (v) sleep/rest, (vi) sexuality and (vii) spirituality. No systematic review was identified that specifically focussed on occupations related to school/education, leisure and play. DISCUSSION Certain occupation domains such as activities of daily living, social and sleep/rest received high attention amongst researchers. There is a need for systematic reviews of instruments to measure education/school, play and leisure. Limited numbers of instruments were developed by occupational therapists outside the occupation domain of activities of daily living, and in areas of practice other than children and older people. Nevertheless, this overview can give some guidance for occupational therapists in selecting a suitable occupational therapy instrument for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Hibatullah Romli
- Department of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.,Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeing), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Farahiyah Wan Yunus
- Occupational Therapy Programme, Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Rehabilitation and Special Needs, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Lynette Mackenzie
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cumberland Campus, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kristensen HK, Ytterberg C, Jones DL, Lund H. Research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation: an investigation of its implementation by physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38:2564-74. [PMID: 26984455 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1138550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stroke rehabilitation is a multidimensional process that is designed to facilitate restoration of and/or adaptation to loss of functioning. The use of research-based evidence in informed decision-making is insufficient. Occupational therapy and physiotherapy constitute important contributions to rehabilitation. The study aim was to investigate characteristics of the implementation of research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation by occupational therapists and physiotherapists, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a conceptual framework. METHOD A prospective cohort study, including all service levels within stroke rehabilitation. Consecutive patients with stroke admitted to a university hospital between May and December 2012 were enrolled by 13 therapists. Documentation of daily practice was collected from medical records. Analysis compared the therapists' documentation with the national clinical guidelines for physiotherapy and occupational therapy in the rehabilitation of adults with brain injury. RESULTS The study included 131 patients. The therapists' praxis was seen to be in agreement with the majority of the national clinical guidelines. However, joint goal-setting and evaluation using standardized measures were seldom documented. CONCLUSIONS Although the therapists recognize evidence-based practice as a framework for achieving quality in rehabilitation, findings suggest that they do not employ research-based evidence to the fullest extent. Implications for Rehabilitation In order to individualize the rehabilitation offered, more attention and focus on involving and giving words to patients' expectations, perceptions, experiences, and perspectives is needed. With the intention of enabling meaningful participation the health professionals need to pay more attention to the importance of environmental factors. Both guidelines and clinical practice should consider all components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health when formulating, and implementing, recommendations in rehabilitation praxis in order to aim for rehabilitation that is based both on evidence and a holistic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Kaae Kristensen
- a Health Sciences Research Center, University College Lillebaelt , Odense , Denmark ;,b Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
| | - Charlotte Ytterberg
- b Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark ;,c Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society , Karolinska Institutet Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Dorrie Lee Jones
- d The Department of Rehabilitation , Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - Hans Lund
- e SEARCH - Research Group for Synthesis of Evidence and Research, Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy (FoF) , Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark ;,f Centre for Evidence Based Practice, Bergen University College , Bergen , Norway
| |
Collapse
|